UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )


Filed by the Registrant    x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    o

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 



(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 


 

 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 


 

 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 


 

 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 


 

 5) Total fee paid:

 


 

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 1) Amount Previously Paid:

 


 

 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 


 

 3) Filing Party:

 


 

 4) Date Filed:

 





 

 

(MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC. LOGO)

(COMPANY LOGO)

 


 

 

1200 West Century Avenue

Terry D. HildestadDavid L. Goodin

 

President and

 

Chief Executive Officer

Mailing Address:

 

P.O. Box 5650

 

Bismarck, ND 58506-5650

 

(701) 530-1000

 


 

 

 

March 9, 201213, 2013


 

 

 

To Our Stockholders:

 

 

 

Please join us for the 20122013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 24, 2012,23, 2013, at 11:00 a.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, at 909 Airport Road, Bismarck, North Dakota.

 

 

 

The formal matters are described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. We also will have a brief report on current matters of interest. Lunch will be served following the meeting.

 

 

 

We were pleased with the stockholder response for the 20112012 Annual Meeting at which 88.0789.72 percent of the common stock was represented in person or by proxy. We hope for an even greater representation at the 20122013 meeting.

 

 

 

You may vote your shares by telephone, by the Internet, or by returning the enclosed proxy card. Representation of your shares at the meeting is very important. We urge you to submit your proxy promptly.

 

 

 

Brokers may not vote your shares on two of the three matters to be presented if you have not given your broker specific instructions as to how to vote. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions to your broker so that your vote can be counted.

 

 

 

All stockholders who find it convenient to do so are cordially invited and urged to attend the meeting in person. Registered stockholders will receive a request for admission ticket(s) with their proxy card that can be completed and returned to us postage-free. Stockholders whose shares are held in the name of a bank or broker will not receive a request for admission ticket(s). They should, instead, (1) call (701) 530-1000 to request an admission ticket(s), (2) bring a statement from their bank or broker showing proof of stock ownership as of February 24, 2012,25, 2013, to the annual meeting, and (3) present their admission ticket(s) and photo identification, such as a driver’s license. Directions to the meeting will be included with your admission ticket.

 

 

 

I hope you will find it possible to attend the meeting.


 

Sincerely yours,

 

-s- Terry D. Hildestad

Terry D. Hildestad


 

 

 

 

Sincerely yours,

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement-s- David L. Goodin

 

David L. Goodin



Proxy Statement

 

 


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement



MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.


Proxy Statement


MDU Resources Group, Inc.

1200 West Century Avenue

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 5650
Bismarck, North Dakota 58506-5650
(701) 530-1000

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD APRIL 24, 201223, 2013

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on April 24, 201223, 2013

The 20122013 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and 20112012 Annual Report
to Stockholders are available at www.mdu.com/proxymaterials.

March 9, 2012

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MDU Resources Group, Inc. will be held at 909 Airport Road, Bismarck, North Dakota, on Tuesday, April 24, 2012,

March 13, 2013

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MDU Resources Group, Inc. will be held at 909 Airport Road, Bismarck, North Dakota, on Tuesday, April 23, 2013, at 11:00 a.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, for the following purposes:

 

 

(1)

Election of ten directors nominated by the board of directors for one-year terms;

 

 

(2)

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the company’s independent auditors for 2012;2013;

 

 

(3)

Advisory vote to approveApproval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the company’s named executive officers; and

 

 

(4)

Transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournmentsadjournment(s) thereof.

The board of directors has set the close of business on February 25, 2013, as the record date for the determination of common stockholders who will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment(s) thereof.

The board of directors has set the close of business on February 24, 2012, as the record date for the determination of common stockholders who will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

All stockholders who find it convenient to do so are cordially invited and urged to attend the meeting in person. Registered stockholders will receive a request for admission ticket(s) with their proxy card that can be completed and returned to us postage-free. Stockholders whose shares are held in the name of a bank or broker will not receive a request for admission ticket(s). They should, instead, (1) call (701) 530-1000 to request an admission ticket(s), (2) bring a statement from their bank or broker showing proof of stock ownership as of February 24, 2012,25, 2013, to the annual meeting, and (3) present their admission ticket(s)ticket(s ) and photo identification, such as a driver’s license. Directions to the meeting will be included with your admission ticket. We look forward to seeing you.

 

 

 

By order of the Board of Directors,

 

-s- Paul K. Sandness-s- Paul K. Sandness

 

Paul K. Sandness

 

Secretary


 

 


 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

 




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

Page

 

 

Page

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

Proxy Statement

 

1

 

 

 

Voting Information

 

1

 

 

 

Item 1. Election of Directors

 

3

 

 

 

Director Nominees

 

3

 

 

 

Item 2. Ratification of Independent Auditors

 

10

 

 

 

Accounting and Auditing Matters

 

10

 

 

 

Item 3. Approval, on a Non-Binding Advisory Vote to ApproveBasis, of the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers

 

11

 

 

 

Executive Compensation

 

12

 

 

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

12

 

 

 

Compensation Committee Report

 

3329

 

 

 

Summary Compensation Table for 20112012

 

3430

 

 

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20112012

 

3631

 

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 20112012

 

4034

 

 

 

Pension Benefits for 2011Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2012

 

4135

 

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred CompensationPension Benefits for 20112012

 

4435

 

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2012

38

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

 

4539

 

 

 

Director Compensation for 20112012

 

5346

 

 

 

Information Concerning Executive Officers

 

5649

 

 

 

Security Ownership

 

5750

 

 

 

Related Person Transaction Disclosure

 

5852

 

 

 

Corporate Governance

 

5852

 

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

6458

 

 

 

Other BusinessConduct of Meeting; Adjournment

 

6458

 

 

 

Other Business

59

Shared Address Stockholders

 

6459

 

 

 

20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

6559

 

 

 

Exhibit A – Companies that Participated in the Compensation Surveys used by Towers Perrin (Towers Watson)MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s Human Resources Department

 

A-1

 

 

 

Exhibit B – Companies Surveyed using Equilar, Inc. – MDU Resources Group, Inc. – Chieffor Named Executive Officer Competitive Analysis Measuring Long-Term Incentive Compensation and Supplemental Income Security Plan Benefits

B-1

Exhibit CPositions Companies Surveyed using Equilar, Inc. – Fidelity Exploration & Production Company – Chief Executive Officer Competitive Analysis Measuring Base Salary, Target Annual Cash Compensation, and Target Total Direct Compensation

 

C-1B-1


 

 


MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

PROXY STATEMENT

The board of directors of MDU Resources Group, Inc. is furnishing this proxy statement beginning March 9, 2012,13, 2013, to solicit your proxy for use at our annual meeting of stockholders on April 24, 2012.

23, 2013, and any adjournment(s) thereof. We are soliciting proxies principally by mail, but directors, officers, and employees of MDU Resources Group, Inc. or its subsidiaries may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, or by electronic media, without compensation other than their regular compensation. Okapi Partners LLC additionally will solicit proxies for approximately $7,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses. We will pay the cost of soliciting your proxy and reimburse brokers and others for forwarding proxy material to you. Okapi Partners LLC additionally will solicit proxies for approximately $7,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s e-proxy rules allow companies to post their proxy materials on the Internet and provide only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders as an alternative to mailing full sets of proxy materials except upon request. For 2012,2013, we have elected to use the Securities and Exchange Commission’s full set delivery option, which means that while we are posting our proxy materials online, we are also mailing a full set of our proxy materials to our stockholders. We believe that mailing a full set of proxy materials will help ensure that a majority of outstanding shares of our common stock are present in person or represented by proxy at our meeting. We also hope to help maximize stockholder participation. Therefore, even if you previously consented to receiving your proxy materials electronically, you will receive a full set of proxy materials in the mail for this year’s annual meeting. However, we will continue to evaluate the option of providing only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to some or all of our stockholders in the future.

VOTING INFORMATION

Who may vote?You may vote if you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on February 24, 2012.25, 2013. You may vote each share that you owned on that date on each matter presented at the meeting.meeting and any adjournment(s) thereof. As of February 24, 2012,25, 2013, we had 188,830,529 shares of common stock outstanding entitled to one vote per share.

What am I voting on?You are voting on:

 

 

election of ten directors nominated by the board of directors for one-year terms

 

 

ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the company’s independent auditors for 20122013

 

 

approval, on a non-binding advisory vote to approvebasis, of the compensation of the company’s named executive officers and

 

 

any other business that is properly brought before the meeting.meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof.

What vote is required to pass an item of business?A majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote must be present in person or represented by proxy to hold the meeting.

If you hold shares through an account with a bank or broker, the bank or broker may vote your shares on some matters even if you do not provide voting instructions. Brokerage firms have the authority under the New York Stock Exchange rules to vote shares on certain matters when their customers do not provide voting instructions. However, on other matters, when the brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from its customers, the brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that matter and a “broker non-vote” occurs.This means that brokers may not vote your shares on items 1 and 3 if you have not given your broker specific instructions as to how to vote. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions to your broker so that your vote can be counted.

 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

1




 

Proxy Statement


Item 1 – Election of Directors
A majority of votes cast is required to elect a director in an uncontested election. A majority of votes cast means the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the director’s election. “Abstentions” and “broker non-votes” do not count as votes cast “for” or “against” the director’s election. In a contested election, which is an election in which the number of nominees for director exceeds the number of directors to be elected, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. If a nominee becomes unavailable for any reason or if a vacancy should occur before the election, which we do not anticipate, the proxies will vote your shares in their discretion for another person nominated by the board.

Our policy on majority voting for directors contained in our corporate governance guidelines requires any proposed nominee for re-election as a director to tender to the board, prior to nomination, his or her irrevocable resignation from the board that will be effective, in an uncontested election of directors only, upon:

 

 

receipt of a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” election at our annual meeting of stockholders and

 

 

acceptance of such resignation by the board of directors.

Following certification of the stockholder vote, the nominating and governance committee will promptly recommend to the board whether or not to accept the tendered resignation. The board will act on the nominating and governance committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days following the date of the annual meeting.

Item 2 – Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s Independent Auditors for 20122013
Approval of Item 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will count as votes “against” the proposal.

Item 3 – Approval, on a Non-Binding Advisory Vote to ApproveBasis, of the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers
Approval of Item 3 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the item. Abstentions will count as votes “against” the item. Broker non-votes are not counted as voting power present and, therefore, are not counted in the vote.

Unless you specify otherwise when you submit your proxy, the proxies will vote your shares of common stock “for” all directors nominated by the board of directors and “for” items 2 and 3.

How do I vote?There are three ways to vote by proxy:

 

 

by calling the toll free telephone number on the enclosed proxy card

 

 

by using the Internet as described on the enclosed proxy card or

 

 

by returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided.

You may be able to vote by telephone or the Internet if your shares are held in the name of a bank or broker. Follow their instructions.

You may also vote in person at the meeting. However, if you are the beneficial owner of the shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from the holder of record of the shares, usually your bank or broker, and present it at the meeting. A legal proxy identifies you, states the number of shares you own, and gives you the right to vote those shares. Without a legal proxy we cannot identify you as the beneficial owner of the shares or know how many shares you have to vote.

Can I revoke my proxy?Yes. You

If you are a stockholder of record, you can revoke your proxy by:

 

 

filing written revocation with the corporate secretary before the meeting

 

 

filing a proxy bearing a later date with the corporate secretary before the meeting or

 

 

revoking your proxy at the meeting and voting in person.


 

 

 

 


2


MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement


ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

All nominees for director are nominated to serve one-year terms, until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2013

ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The board expresses its thanks to Terry D. Hildestad, who retired on January 3, 2013. He had served as president and chief executive officer of the company and as a director since August 17, 2006. He had served as president and chief operating officer from May 1, 2005 until August 17, 2006. He began his career with the company in 1974 at Knife River Corporation, where he served in several operating positions before becoming its chief executive officer in 1993 through April 2005.

The board also expresses its thanks to Richard H. Lewis for his service on the board, the audit committee, and the nominating and governance committee. Mr. Lewis also served on the compensation committee during his tenure. Mr. Lewis is not standing for reelection as a director after serving on the board since 2005.

All nominees for director are nominated to serve one-year terms until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2014 and until their respective successors are elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation, removal from office, or death.

We have provided information below about our nominees, all of whom are incumbent directors, including their ages, years of service as directors, business experience, and service on other boards of directors, including any other directorships held during the past five years. We have also included information about each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led the board to conclude that he or she should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc. at the time we file our proxy statement, in light of our business and structure. Unless we specifically note below, no corporation or organization referred to below is a subsidiary or other affiliate of MDU Resources Group, Inc.

We have provided information below about our nominees, all of whom are incumbent directors, including their ages, years of service as directors, business experience, and service on other boards of directors, including any other directorships held during the past five years. We have also included information about each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led the board to conclude that he or she should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc. at the time we file our proxy statement, in light of our business and structure. Unless we specifically note below, no corporation or organization referred to below is a subsidiary or other affiliate of ours.

Director Nominees


 

 

 

 

(PHOTO OF THOMAS EVERIST)(Photo of Thomas Everist)

 

Thomas Everist

Director Since 1995

 

Age 6263

Compensation Committee

 

 

 

Mr. Everist has served as president and chairman of The Everist Company, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, an aggregate, concrete, and asphalt production company, since April 15, 2002. He has been a managing member of South Maryland Creek Ranch, LLC, a land development company, since June 2006, and president of SMCR, Inc., an investment company, since June 2006. He was previously president and chairman of L.G. Everist, Inc., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, an aggregate production company, from 1987 to April 15, 2002. He held a number of positions in the aggregate and construction industries prior to assuming his current position with The Everist Company. He is a director of Showplace Wood Products, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, a custom cabinets manufacturer, and has been a director of Raven Industries, Inc., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, a general manufacturer of electronics, flow controls, and engineered films since 1996, and its chairman of the board since April 1, 2009. Mr. Everist has beenserved as a director and chairman of the board of Everist Genomics, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, which provides solutions for personalized medicines since May 2002,2002. He served as Everist Genomics’ chief executive officer from August 2012 to December 2012. He was a director of Angiologix Inc., Mountain View, California, a medical diagnostic device company, from July 2010 through October 2011 when it was acquired by Everist Genomics, Inc., and He has been a director of Bell, Inc., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, a manufacturer of folding cartons and packages, since April 2011.

 

 

 

Mr. Everist attended Stanford University where he received a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and a master’s degree in construction management. He is active in the Sioux Falls community and currently serves as a director on the Sanford Health Foundation, a non-profit charitable health services organization.organization, and as a member of the Council of Advisors for Searching for Solutions Institute, a non-profit public foundation that provides leaders with resources to address critical social issues. From July 2001 to June 2006, he served on the South Dakota Investment Council, the state agency responsible for prudently investing state funds.

 

 

 

The board concluded that Mr. Everist should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. A significant portion of MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s earnings is derived from its construction services and aggregate mining businesses. Mr. Everist has considerable business experience in this area, with more than 3839 years in the aggregate and construction materials industry. He has also demonstrated success in his business and leadership skills, serving as president and chairman of his companies for over 2425 years. We value other public company board service. Mr. Everist has experience serving as a director and now chairman of another public company, which enhances his contributions to our board. His leadership skills and experience with his own companies and on other boards enable him to be an effective board member and compensation committee chairman. Mr. Everist is our longest serving board member, providing 1718 years of board experience as well as extensive knowledge of our business.


 

 


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement


3




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

(PHOTO OF KAREN B. FAGG)(Photo of Karen B. Fagg)

 

Karen B. Fagg

Director Since 2005

 

Age 5859

Nominating and Governance Committee

 

 

Compensation Committee

 

 

 

 

Ms. Fagg served as vice president of DOWL LLC, d/b/a DOWL HKM, an engineering and design firm, from April 2008 until her retirement on December 31, 2011. Ms. Fagg was president from April 1, 1995 through March 2008, and chairman and majority owner from June 2000 through March 2008 of HKM Engineering, Inc., Billings, Montana, an engineering and physical science services firm. HKM Engineering, Inc. merged with DOWL LLC on April 1, 2008. Ms. Fagg was employed with MSE, Inc., Butte, Montana, an energy research and development company, from 1976 through 1988, and from 1993 to April 1995. She1995 she served as vice president of operations and corporate development director. From 1989 through 1992, Ms. Fagg served a four-year term as director of the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Helena, Montana, the state agency charged with promoting stewardship of Montana’s water, soil, energy, and rangeland resources; regulating oil and gas exploration and production; and administering several grant and loan programs.

 

 

 

Ms. Fagg has a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Carroll College in Helena, Montana. She served on the board for St. Vincent’s Healthcare from October 2003 until October 2009, including a term as board chair, on the board of Deaconess Billings Clinic Health System from 1994 to 2002, as a member of the Board of Trustees of Carroll College from 2005 through 2010, and on the board of advisors of the Charles M. Bair Family Trust from 2008 to July 2011, including a term as board chair. She has been a member of the board of directors of the Billings Chamber of Commerce since July 2009 and a member of the Billings Catholic School Board since December 2011. She is alsoFrom 2007 until December 31, 2011, she was a member of the Montana State University Engineering Advisory Council, whose responsibilities include evaluating the mission and goals of the College of Engineering and assisting in the development and implementation of the college’s strategic plan. From 2002 through 2006, she served on the Montana Board of Investments, the state agency responsible for prudently investing state funds. From 2001 to 2005, she served on the board of Montana State University’s Advanced Technology Park. From 1998 to 2007, she served on the ZooMontana Board and as vice chair from 2005 to 2006.

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Fagg submitted a letter of resignation to the board of directors when she retired from DOWL LLC in accordance with our Director Resignation upon Change of Job Responsibility policy. The board decidedconcluded that Ms. Fagg should continue to serve as a director and be renominated to serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. Construction and engineering, energy, and the responsible development of natural resources are all important aspects of our business. Ms. Fagg has business experience in all these areas, including 17 years of construction and engineering experience at DOWL HKM and its predecessor, HKM Engineering, Inc., where she served as vice president, president, and chairman. Ms. Fagg has also had 14 years of experience in energy research and development at MSE, Inc., where she served as vice president of operations and corporate development director, and four years focusing on stewardship of natural resources as director of the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation. In addition to her industry experience, Ms. Fagg brings to our board 13 years of business leadership and management experience as president and chairman of her own company, as well as knowledge and experience acquired through her service on a number of Montana state and community boards.


 

 

 

(PHOTO OF TERRY D. HILDESTAD)(Photo of David L. Goodin)

 

Terry D. HildestadDavid L. Goodin

Director Since 2006January 4, 2013

 

Age 6251

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Mr. HildestadGoodin was elected president and chief executive officer and a director of the company effective August 17, 2006. He had served as president and chief operating officer from May 1, 2005 until August 17, 2006.January 4, 2013. Prior to that, he served as chief executive officer and president andof Intermountain Gas Company effective October 2008, chief executive officer of our subsidiary, Knife RiverCascade Natural Gas Corporation, from 1993 until May 1, 2005.Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., and Great Plains Natural Gas Co. effective June 2008, president of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Great Plains Natural Gas Co. effective March 2008, and president of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation effective July 2007. He began his career with the company in 19741983 at Knife River Corporation,Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., where he served in several operating positions before becoming its president.as a division electrical engineer effective May 1983, division electric superintendent effective February 1989, electric systems supervisor effective August 1993, electric systems manager effective April 1999, vice president-operations effective January 2000, and executive vice president-operations and acquisitions effective January 2007. He additionally serves as an executive officer and as chairman of the company’s principal subsidiaries and of the managing committees of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Great Plains Natural Gas Co.

 

Mr. HildestadGoodin has a bachelor’sbachelor of science degree in electrical and electronics engineering from DickinsonNorth Dakota State University, a masters in business administration from the University of North Dakota, and has completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard School of Business. Mr. HildestadGoodin is a registered professional engineer in North Dakota. He is a member of the U.S. Bancorp Western North Dakota Advisory BoardBoard. Mr. Goodin is involved in numerous civic organizations, including serving on the board of Directors.directors of Sanford Bismarck, the Missouri Valley YMCA, and as trustee for the Bismarck State College Foundation. He is a past board member of several industry associations, including the American Gas Association, the Edison Electric Institute, the North Central Electric Association, the Midwest ENERGY Association, and the North Dakota Lignite Council. Mr. Goodin received the University of Mary Entrepreneurship Award in 2009.

 


4


MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


The board concluded that Mr. HildestadGoodin should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. As chief executive officer of MDU Resources Group, Inc., Mr. HildestadGoodin is theone of only officertwo officers of the company to sit on our board, consistent with our past practice.board. With over 3729 years of significant, hands-on experience at our company, Mr. Hildestad has aGoodin’s long history and deep knowledge and understanding of MDU Resources Group, Inc., its operating



4


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


companies, and its lines of business.business will bring continuity to the board. Mr. HildestadGoodin has demonstrated his leadership abilities and his commitment to our company since he was electedthrough his long service to the company and more recently as chief executive officer and president of the four utility companies. He demonstrated strong leadership skills in integrating Cascade Natural Gas Corporation and Intermountain Gas Company while meeting and exceeding profitability goals. The board’s unanimous election of Mr. Goodin to succeed Mr. Hildestad as our president and chief executive officer was a result of our comprehensive succession planning process led by the board of directors during which the board had the opportunity to interact with and a director in 2006evaluate our executive officers. The board selected Mr. Goodin because it became clear to the board through this process that he had the strategic vision, operational experience, passion, and priorvalues to that time through his long service as chief operating officerlead the future growth of the company and as president and chief executive officer at Knife River Corporation, our construction materials and contracting subsidiary.company. The board also believes that Mr. Hildestad’s leadership abilities, integrity, values, and good judgmentthese characteristics make him well-suited to serve on our board, particularly in this challenging economic environment.

 

 

 

(PHOTO OF A. BART HOLADAY)(Photo of A. Bart Holaday)

 

A. Bart Holaday

Director Since 2008

 

Age 6970

Audit Committee

 

 

Nominating and Governance Committee

 

 

 

 

Mr. Holaday headed the Private Markets Group of UBS Asset Management and its predecessor entities for 15 years prior to his retirement in 2001, during which time he managed more than $19 billion in investments. Prior to that he was vice president and principal of the InnoVen Venture Capital Group, a venture capital investment firm. He was founder and president of Tenax Oil and Gas Corporation, an onshore Gulf Coast exploration and production company, from 1980 through 1982. He has four years of senior management experience with Gulf Oil Corporation, a global energy and petrochemical company, and eight years of senior management experience with the federal government, including the Department of Defense, Department of the Interior, and the Federal Energy Administration. He is currently the president and owner of Dakota Renewable Energy Fund, LLC, which invests in small companies in North Dakota. He is a member of the investment advisory board of Commons Capital LLC, a venture capital firm; is a director of Hull Investments, LLC, a private entity that combines nonprofit activities and investments; is a member of the board of directors of Adams Street Partners, LLC, a private equity investment firm, Alerus Financial, a financial services company, Jamestown College, the United States Air Force Academy Endowment (chairman)(former chairman), the Falcon Foundation (director and former vice president), which provides scholarships to Air Force Academy applicants, the Center for Innovation Foundation at the University of North Dakota (chairman(trustee and trustee)former chairman) and the University of North Dakota Foundation; and is chairman and chief executive officer of the Dakota Foundation, a nonprofit foundation that fosters social entrepreneurship.entrepreneurship; and is a member of the board of trustees for The Colorado Springs Child Nursery Centers Foundation, a non-profit organization that supports the operations of Early Connections Learning Centers, a non-profit child care organization in Colorado, and Discover Goodwill of southern and western Colorado, a non-profit organization providing job training, placement, and retention programs for people transitioning from welfare to work. He is a past member of the board of directors of the National Venture Capital Association, Walden University, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission advisory committee on the regulation of capital markets.

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Holaday has a bachelor’s degree in engineering sciences from the U.S. Air Force Academy. He was a Rhodes Scholar, earning a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in politics, philosophy, and economics from Oxford University. He also earned a law degree from George Washington Law School and is a Chartered Financial Analyst. In 2005, he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Letters from the University of North Dakota.

 

 

 

 

 

The board concluded that Mr. Holaday should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. MDU Resources Group, Inc. has significant operations in the natural gas and oil industry where Mr. Holaday has knowledge and experience. He founded and served as president of Tenax Oil and Gas Corporation. He has four years experience in senior management with Gulf Oil Corporation and 16 years of experience managing private equity investments, including investments in oil and gas, as the head of the Private Markets Group of UBS Asset Management and its predecessor organizations. This business experience demonstrates his leadership skills and success in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Holaday brings to the board his extensive finance and investment experience, as well as his business development skills acquired through his work at UBS Asset Management, Tenax Oil and Gas Corporation, Gulf Oil Corporation, and several private equity investment firms. This will enhance the knowledge of the board and provide useful insights and guidance to management in connection not only with our natural gas and oil business, but with all of our businesses.



MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement


5




Proxy Statement


 

 

 

(PHOTO OF DENNIS W. JOHNSON)(Photo of Dennis W. Johnson)

 

Dennis W. Johnson

Director Since 2001

 

Age 6263

Audit Committee

 

 

 

 

Mr. Johnson is chairman, chief executive officer, and president of TMI Corporation, and chairman and chief executive officer of TMI Systems Design Corporation, TMI Transport Corporation, and TMI Storage Systems Corporation, all of Dickinson, North Dakota, manufacturers of casework and architectural woodwork. He has been employed at TMI since 1974 serving as president or chief executive officer since 1982. Mr. Johnson is serving his twelfththirteenth year as president of the Dickinson City Commission. He served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis from 1993 to 1998. He is a past member and chairman of the Theodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation.



MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement


5




Proxy Statement


Mr. Johnson has a bachelor of science degree in electrical and electronics engineering, as well as a master of science degree in industrial engineering from North Dakota State University. He has served on numerous industry, state, and community boards, including the North Dakota Workforce Development Council (chairperson), the Decorative Laminate Products Association, the North Dakota Technology Corporation, St. Joseph Hospital Life Care Foundation, St. John Evangelical Lutheran Church, Dickinson State University Foundation, the executive operations committee of the University of Mary Harold Schafer Leadership Center, the Dickinson United Way, and the business advisory council of the Steffes Corporation, a metal manufacturing and engineering firm. He also served on North Dakota Governor Sinner’s Education Action Commission, the North Dakota Job Service Advisory Council, the North Dakota State University President’s Advisory Council, North Dakota Governor Schafer’s Transition Team, and chaired North Dakota Governor Hoeven’s Transition Team. He has received numerous awards including the 1991 Regional Small Business Person of the Year Award and the Greater North Dakotan Award.

 

 

 

 

 

The board concluded that Mr. Johnson should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. Mr. Johnson has over 3738 years of experience in business management, manufacturing, and finance, and has demonstrated his success in these areas, holding positions as chairman, president, and chief executive officer of TMI for 2931 years, as well as through his prior service as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. His finance experience and leadership skills enable him to make valuable contributions to our audit committee, which he has chaired for eightnine years. As a result of his service on a number of state and local organizations in North Dakota, Mr. Johnson has significant knowledge of local, state, and regional issues involving North Dakota, a state where we have significant operations and assets.


 

 

 

 

(PHOTO OF THOMAS C. KNUDSON)(PHOTO OF Thomas C. Knudson)

 

Thomas C. Knudson

Director Since 2008

 

Age 6566

Compensation Committee

 

 

 

 

Mr. Knudson has been president of Tom Knudson Interests since its formation on January 14, 2004. Tom Knudson Interests provides consulting services in energy, sustainable development, and leadership. Mr. Knudson began employment with Conoco Oil Company (Conoco) in May 1975 and retired in 2004 from Conoco’s successor, ConocoPhillips, as senior vice president of human resources and government affairs and communications. Mr. Knudson served as a member of ConocoPhillips’ management committee. His diverse career at Conoco and ConocoPhillips included engineering, operations, business development, and commercial assignments. He was the founding chairman of the Business Council for Sustainable Development in both the United States and the United Kingdom. He has been a director of Bristow Group Inc. since June 2004 and its chairman of the board of directors since August 2006, and was a director of Natco Group Inc. from April 2005 to November 2009 and Williams Partners LP from November 2005 to September 2007. Bristow Group Inc. is a leading provider of helicopter services to the offshore oil industry. Natco Group Inc. is a leading manufacturer of oil and gas processing equipment. Williams Partners LP owns natural gas gathering, transportation, processing, and treating assets, and also has natural gas liquids fractionating and storage assets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Knudson has a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy and a master’s degree in aerospace engineering from the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School. He served as a naval aviator, flying combat missions in Vietnam, and was a lieutenant commander in 1974 when he was honorably discharged. He has served as an adjunct professor at the Jones Graduate School of Management at Rice University. Mr. Knudson has served on the boards of a number of petroleum industry associations, Covenant House Texas, and The Houston Museum of Natural Science, and Alpha USA/Houston.Science. He has served on the National Council of Methodist Neurological Institute since October 2011, and as a Trustee of the Episcopal Seminary of the Southwest, Austin, Texas, since JanuaryFebruary 2012, and as a board member of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), Texas Tri-Cities Chapter, since December 2012. He holds the designation of Board Leadership Fellow from the NACD.



6


MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

 

 

 

 

 


The board concluded that Mr. Knudson should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. A significant portion of our earnings is derived from natural gas and oil production and the transportation, storage, and gathering of natural gas. Mr. Knudson has extensive knowledge and experience in this industry as a result of his prior employment with Conoco and ConocoPhillips, as well as through his service on the boards of Natco Group Inc. and Williams Partners LP. Mr. Knudson has a broad background in engineering, operations, and business development, as well as service on the management committee at Conoco and ConocoPhillips, which bring additional experience and perspective to our board. His service as senior vice president of human resources at ConocoPhillips makes him an excellent fit for our compensation committee. Sustainable business development is also an important aspect of our business, and Mr. Knudson, as the founding chairman of the Business Council for Sustainable Development, brings to our board significant experience and knowledge in this area. Mr. Knudson also has significant knowledge of local, state, and regional issues involving Texas, a state where we have important operations and assets.



6


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


 

 

 

(PHOTO OF RICHARD LEWIES)

Richard H. Lewis

Director Since 2005

Age 62

Audit Committee

Nominating and Governance Committee

Mr. Lewis has been the managing general partner of Brakemaka LLLP, a private investment partnership for managing family investments, and president of the Lewis Family Foundation since August 2004. Mr. Lewis serves as chairman of the board of Entre Pure Industries, Inc., a privately held company involved in the purified water and ice business. He also serves as a director of Colorado State Bank and Trust and on the senior advisory board of TPH Partners, L.P., a private equity fund with an energy only focus. Mr. Lewis founded Prima Energy Corporation, a natural gas and oil exploration and production company, in 1980 and served as chairman and chief executive officer of the company until its sale in July 2004. During his tenure, Prima Energy was named to Forbes Magazine’s 200 Best Small Companies in America list seven times and was ranked the No. 1 Colorado public company for the decade of the 1990s in terms of market return. Mr. Lewis represented natural gas producers on a panel that studied electric restructuring in Colorado and has testified before Congressional committees on industry matters. He worked in private practice as a certified public accountant for eight years, now on inactive status, prior to founding Prima Energy.

Mr. Lewis has a bachelor’s degree in finance and accounting from the University of Colorado. He served as a board member on the Colorado Oil and Gas Association from November 1999 to November 2009, including a term as its president. In 2000, Mr. Lewis was inducted into the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Hall of Fame and in 2004 was inducted into the Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Hall of Fame. Mr. Lewis serves as a board director and as the chairman of the development board of Colorado Uplift, a non-profit organization whose mission is to build long-term, life-changing relationships with urban youth. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of Alliance for Choice in Education, which provides scholarships to inner city youth. He has also served on the Board of Trustees of the Metro Denver YMCA, the Advisory Council to the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado, and as a director for the Partnership for the West.

The board concluded that Mr. Lewis should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. MDU Resources Group, Inc. derives a significant portion of its earnings from natural gas and oil production, one of our business segments. Mr. Lewis has extensive business experience, recognized excellence, and demonstrated success in this industry through almost 25 years at his company, Prima Energy Corporation, and ten years on the board of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association. In addition to his industry experience, he brings investment experience to our board through his service on the senior advisory board of TPH Partners, L.P., an energy-only private equity fund. As a certified public accountant and a director of Colorado State Bank and Trust, Mr. Lewis also contributes significant finance and accounting knowledge to our board and audit committee. Mr. Lewis also brings to the board his knowledge of local, state, and regional issues involving Colorado and the Rocky Mountain region, where we have important operations.

(PHOTO OF PATRICIA MOSS)(Photo of Patricia L. Moss)

 

Patricia L. Moss

Director Since 2003

 

Age 5859

Compensation Committee

 

 

Nominating and Governance Committee

 

 

 

 

Ms. Moss served as the president and chief executive officer of Cascade Bancorp, a financial holding company in Bend, Oregon, from 1998 to January 3, 2012. She served as the chief executive officer of Cascade Bancorp’s principal subsidiary, Bank of the Cascades, from 1993 to January 3, 2012, serving also as president from 1993 to 2003. From 1987 to 1998, Ms. Moss served as chief operating officer, chief financial officer, and corporate secretary of Cascade Bancorp. Ms. Moss has been a director of Cascade Bancorp since 1993 and a director of Bank of the Cascades since 1998 and was elected vice chairman of both boards effective January 3, 2012. Ms. Moss also serves as a director of the Oregon Investment Fund Advisory Council, a state-sponsored program to encourage the growth of small businesses within Oregon.Oregon, co-chairs the Oregon Growth Board, a state agency created to provide recommendations to connect businesses to sources of capital, and serves on the City of Bend’s Juniper Ridge management advisory board.

 

 

 

 

Ms. Moss graduated magna cum laude with a bachelor of science degree in business administration from Linfield College in Oregon and did master’s studies at Portland State University. She received commercial banking school certification at the ABA Commercial Banking School at the University of Oklahoma. She served as a director of the Oregon Business Council, whose mission is to mobilize business leaders to contribute to Oregon’s quality of life and economic prosperity; the Cascades Campus Advisory Board of the Oregon State University; the North Pacific Group, Inc., a wholesale distributor of building materials, industrial and hardwood products, and other specialty products; the Aquila Tax Free Trust of Oregon, a mutual fund created especially for the benefit of Oregon residents; Clear Choice Health Plans Inc., a multi-state insurance company; and as a director and chair of the St. Charles Medical Center.


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

7




Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

 

In August 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Oregon Division of Finance and Corporate Securities entered into a consent agreement with Bank of the Cascades that requires the bank to develop and adopt a plan to maintain the capital necessary for it to be “well-capitalized,” to improve its lending policies and its allowance for loan losses, to increase its liquidity, to retain qualified management, and to increase the participation of its board of directors in the affairs of the bank. In October 2009, the bank’s parent, Cascade Bancorp, entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Oregon Division relating largely to improving the financial condition of Cascade Bancorp and the Bank of the Cascades. Cascade Bancorp completed a sale of common stockreported in Januaryits third quarter 2012 Form 10-Q that at December 31, 2011, to private investors that raised sufficient capital toCascade Bancorp and the Bank did not meet the agreement requirements.written agreement’s leverage ratio requirement and as a result they had filed a required update to their capital plan, which was accepted by their regulators. On September 30, 2012, Bancorp and the Bank had met this requirement. The order remains in place until lifted by the regulators.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Moss submitted a letter of resignation to the board of directors in connection with her retirement from Cascade Bancorp and Bank of the Cascades in accordance with our Director Resignation upon Change of Job Responsibility policy. The board decidedconcluded that Ms. Moss should continue to serve as a director and be renominated to serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. A significant portion of MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s utility, construction services, and contracting operations are located in the Pacific Northwest. Ms. Moss has first-hand business experience and knowledge of the Pacific Northwest economy and local, state, and regional issues through her executive positions at Cascade Bancorp and Bank of the Cascades, where she gained over 30 years of experience. Ms. Moss provides to our board her experience in finance and banking, as well as her experience in business development through her work at Cascade Bancorp and on the Oregon Investment Advisory Council, the Oregon Business Council, and the Oregon Business Council.Growth Board. This business experience demonstrates her leadership abilities and success in the finance and banking industry. Ms. Moss is also certified as a Senior Professional in Human Resources, which makes her well-suited for our compensation committee. In deciding that Ms. Moss should be renominated as a director, the board was mindful of the consent agreement with Bank of the Cascades, but concluded that Ms. Moss brought the many skills and experiences discussed above to our board and had proved herself to be a dedicated and hard-working director.



MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement


7




Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

(PHOTO OF HARRY PEARCE)(Photo of Harry J. Pearce)

 

Harry J. Pearce

Director Since 1997

 

Age 6970

Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

 

Mr. Pearce was elected chairman of the board of the company on August 17, 2006. Prior to that, he served as lead director effective February 15, 2001, and was vice chairman of the board from November 16, 2000 until February 15, 2001. Mr. Pearce has been a director of Marriott International, Inc., a major hotel chain, since 1995. He was a director of Nortel Networks Corporation, a global telecommunications company, from January 11, 2005 to August 10, 2009, serving as chairman of the board from June 29, 2005. He retired on December 19, 2003, as chairman of Hughes Electronics Corporation, a General Motors Corporation subsidiary and provider of digital television entertainment, broadband satellite network, and global video and data broadcasting. He had served as chairman since June 1, 2001. Mr. Pearce was vice chairman and a director of General Motors Corporation, one of the world’s largest automakers, from January 1, 1996 to May 31, 2001, and was general counsel from 1987 to 1994. He served on the President’s Council on Sustainable Development and co-chaired the President’s Commission on the United States Postal Service. Prior to joining General Motors, he was a senior partner in the Pearce & Durick law firm in Bismarck, North Dakota. Mr. Pearce is a director of the United States Air Force Academy Endowment and a member of the Advisory Board of the University of Michigan Cancer Center. He is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers and a member of the International Society of Barristers. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University. He has served as a chairman or director on the boards of numerous nonprofit organizations, including as chairman of the board of Visitors of the U.S. Air Force Academy, chairman of the National Defense University Foundation, and chairman of the Marrow Foundation. He currently serves as a director of the National Bone Marrow Transplant Link and New York Marrow Foundation. Mr. Pearce received a bachelor’s degree in engineering sciences from the U.S. Air Force Academy and his lawa juris doctor degree from Northwestern University’s School of Law.

 

 

 

 

 

The board concluded that Mr. Pearce should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. MDU Resources Group, Inc. values public company leadership and the experience directors gain through such leadership. Mr. Pearce is recognized nationally, as well as in the State of North Dakota, as a business leader and for his business acumen. He has multinational business management experience and proven leadership skills through his position as vice chairman at General Motors Corporation, as well as through his extensive service on the boards of large public companies, including Marriott International, Inc.; Hughes Electronics Corporation, where he was chairman; and Nortel Networks Corporation, where he also was chairman. He also brings to our board his long experience as a practicing attorney. In addition, Mr. Pearce is focused on corporate governance issues and is the founding chair of the Chairmen’s Forum, an organization comprised of non-executive chairmen of publicly-traded companies. Participants in the Chairmen’s Forum discuss ways to enhance the accountability of corporations to owners and promote a deeper understanding of independent board leadership and effective practices of board chairmanship. The board also believes that Mr. Pearce’s values and commitment to excellence make him well-suited to serve as chairman of our board.


 

 

 

 

(Photo of J. Kent Wells)

J. Kent Wells

Director Since January 4, 2013

Age 56

Vice Chairman of the Corporation

President and Chief Executive Officer

of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

Mr. Wells was elected vice chairman of the company and a director effective January 4, 2013, and continues to serve as president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, our natural gas and oil production business, the position for which he was hired effective May 2, 2011. Prior to that he was senior vice president of exploration and production for BP America, Inc. (BP) from June 2007 until October 2010, when he was named BP’s group senior vice president for global deepwater response until March 31, 2011. He also served as general manager of Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations from February 2005 until June 2007; vice president, Gulf of Mexico shelf, for BP from 2002 to 2005; vice president, Rockies, for BP from 2000 to 2002; general manager of Crescendo Resources LP from 1997 to 2000; manager, Hugoton, for Amoco Production Company, Inc. (Amoco) from 1993 to 1996; manager, operations, for Amoco in 1993; resource manager for Amoco from 1988 to 1993; executive assistant for Amoco from 1987 to 1988; engineering supervisor for Amoco Canada Petroleum Company (Amoco Canada) from 1983 to 1987; and petroleum engineer for Amoco Canada from 1979 to 1983. Mr. Wells received a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada in 1979.

The board concluded that Mr. Wells should serve as director of MDU Resources Group, Inc. in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. A significant portion of our earnings is derived from natural gas and oil production. One of the company’s strategic objectives is to achieve product diversity in the midstream segment of the oil and gas industry. Mr. Wells brings to our board significant experience and knowledge of the oil and gas business, including the midstream segment. He has



8


MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 

 

(PHOTO OF JOHN WILSON)

more than 33 years of natural gas and oil experience, including several years in senior leadership positions at BP, the world’s third largest integrated oil company, and a publicly traded company. He was senior vice president of exploration and production for BP’s U.S. natural gas operations from 2007 until October 2010 with responsibility for BP’s onshore natural gas business throughout the United States, encompassing both exploration and production, and midstream business. His strong track record in natural gas and oil production includes experience in shale formations similar to the company’s current development focus. He has firsthand experience in the Rockies and Texas, where a large portion of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s reserves are concentrated. Mr. Wells’ combination of expertise and experience, along with his success in leadership roles with a large publicly traded company, will complement the skills of the current board members.

(Photo of John K. Wilson)

 

John K. Wilson

Director Since 2003

 

Age 5758

Audit Committee

 

 

 

 

Mr. Wilson was president of Durham Resources, LLC, a privately held financial management company, in Omaha, Nebraska, from 1994 to December 31, 2008. He previously was president of Great Plains Energy Corp., a public utility holding company and an affiliate of Durham Resources, LLC, from 1994 to July 1, 2000. He was vice president of Great Plains Natural Gas Co., an affiliate company of Durham Resources, LLC, until July 1, 2000. The company bought Great Plains Energy Corp. and Great Plains Natural Gas Co. on July 1, 2000. Mr. Wilson also served as president of the Durham Foundation and was a director of Bridges Investment Fund, a mutual fund, and the Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce. He is presently a director of HDR, Inc., an international architecture and engineering firm, Tetrad Corporation, a privately held investment company, both based in Omaha, and serves on the advisory board of Duncan Aviation, an aircraft service provider, headquartered in Lincoln, Nebraska. He currently serves as deputy executive director of the Robert B. Daugherty Charitable Foundation, Omaha, Nebraska, and formerly served on the advisory board of USU.S. Bank NA Omaha.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Wilson is a certified public accountant, on inactive status. He received his bachelor’s degree in business administration, cum laude, from the University of Nebraska – Omaha. During his career, he was an audit manager at Peat, Marwick, Mitchell (now known as KPMG), controller for Great Plains Natural Gas Co., and chief financial officer and treasurer for all Durham Resources entities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The board concluded that Mr. Wilson should serve as a director of MDU Resources Group, Inc., in light of our business and structure, at the time we file our proxy statement for the following reasons. Mr. Wilson has an extensive background in finance and accounting, as well as extensive experience with mergers and acquisitions, through his education and work experience at a major accounting firm and his later positions as controller and vice president of Great Plains Natural Gas Co., president of Great Plains Energy Corp., and president, chief financial officer, and treasurer for Durham Resources, LLC and all Durham Resources entities. The electric and natural gas utility business was our core business when our company was founded in 1924. That business now operates through four utilities: Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, and Intermountain Gas Company. Mr. Wilson is our only non-employee director with direct experience in this area through his prior positions at Great Plains Natural Gas Co. and Great Plains Energy Corp. In addition, Mr. Wilson’s extensive finance and accounting experience make him well-suited for our audit committee.

The board of directors recommends a vote “for” each nominee.

A majority of votes cast is required to elect a director in an uncontested election. A majority of votes cast means the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the director’s election. “Abstentions” and “broker non-votes” do not count as votes cast “for” or “against” the director’s election. In a contested election, which is an election in which the number of nominees for director exceeds the number of directors to be elected and which we do not anticipate, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast.

Unless you specify otherwise when you submit your proxy, the proxies will vote your shares of common stock “for” all directors nominated by the board of directors. If a nominee becomes unavailable for any reason or if a vacancy should occur before the election, which we do not anticipate, the proxies will vote your shares in their discretion for another person nominated by the board.

Our policy on majority voting for directors andcontained in our corporate governance guidelines requirerequires any proposed nominee for re-election as a director to tender to the board, prior to nomination, his or her irrevocable resignation from the board that will be effective, in an uncontested election of directors only, upon:

 

 

receipt of a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” election at our annual meeting of stockholders and

 

 

acceptance of such resignation by the board of directors.



MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement


9



Proxy Statement

Following certification of the stockholder vote, the nominating and governance committee will promptly recommend to the board whether or not to accept the tendered resignation. The board will act on the nominating and governance committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days following the date of the annual meeting.

Brokers may not vote your shares on the election of directors if you have not given your broker specific instructions as to how to vote. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions to your broker so that your vote can be counted.

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

9




Proxy Statement

ITEM 2. RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The audit committee at its February 20122013 meeting appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2012.2013. The board of directors concurred with the audit committee’s decision. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as our independent auditors since fiscal year 2002.

Although your ratification vote will not affect the appointment or retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP for 2012,2013, the audit committee will consider your vote in determining its appointment of our independent auditors for the next fiscal year. The audit committee, in appointing our independent auditors, reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to change an appointment at any time during a fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests.

A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the annual meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. We do not anticipate that the representative will make a prepared statement at the meeting; however, he or she will be free to do so if he or she chooses.

The board of directors recommends a vote “for” the ratification of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2012.2013.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 20122013 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will count as votes against this proposal.

ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING MATTERS

Fees
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees that our independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, billed or are expected to bill us for professional services rendered for 20112012 and 2010:2011:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

*

 

2012

 

2011

*

 

Audit Fees(a)

 

$

2,425,700

 

$

2,250,579

 

Audit Fees (a)

Audit Fees (a)

 

$

2,400,000

 

$

2,456,046

 

Audit-Related Fees(b)

Audit-Related Fees(b)

 

216,410

 

26,400

 

Audit-Related Fees(b)

 

63,110

 

216,410

 

Tax Fees(c)

Tax Fees(c)

 

0

 

9,800

 

Tax Fees(c)

 

23,566

 

0

 

All Other Fees(d)

All Other Fees(d)

 

0

 

17,943

 

All Other Fees(d)

 

0

 

0

 

Total Fees(e)

Total Fees(e)

 

$

2,642,110

 

$

2,304,722

 

Total Fees(e)

 

$

2,486,676

 

$

2,672,456

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratio of Tax and All Other Fees to Audit and Audit-Related Fees

Ratio of Tax and All Other Fees to Audit and Audit-Related Fees

 

0.0

%

 

1.2

%

Ratio of Tax and All Other Fees to Audit and Audit-Related Fees

 

0.96

%

 

0.00

%

 

*

The 2011 amounts were adjusted from amounts shown in the 2012 proxy statement to reflect actual amounts.

(a)

 

 

Audit fees for 2012 and 2011 consisted of services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, reviews of quarterly financial statements, statutory and regulatory audits, compliance with loan covenants, reviews of financial statements for MDU Construction Services Group, Inc. and subsidiaries, agreed upon procedures associated with the annual submission of financial assurance to the North Dakota Department of Health, filing Form S-3 registration statements (2011 only), and work related to responding to a comment letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission (2011 only).

*

The 2010 amounts were adjusted from amounts shown in the 2011 proxy statement to reflect actual amounts.

 

(b)

Audit-related fees for 2012 and 2011 are associated with accounting research assistance, workpaper review requested by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (2012 only), the compliance audit for the U.S. Department of Energy (2012 only), and accounting consultation in connection with due diligence (2011 only).

(a)(c)

Audit fees for 2010 and 2011 consisted of services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, reviews of quarterly financial statements, statutory and regulatory audits, compliance with loan covenants, reviews of financial statements for MDU Construction Services Group and subsidiaries, agreed upon procedures associated with the annual submission of financial assurance to the North Dakota Department of Health, filing Form S-3 registration statements (2011 only), and work related to responding to a comment letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission (2011 only).

 

Tax fees for 2012 relate to the review of permanent tax benefits associated with Medicare Part D subsidies. There were no tax fees for 2011.

(b)(d)

Audit-related fees for 2011 and 2010 are associated with the audit of the Intermountain Gas Company’s benefit plans (2010 only), accounting research assistance, and accounting consultation in connection with due diligence (2011 only).

 

There were no all other fees for 2012 and 2011.

(c)(e)

Tax fees for 2010 include services associated with Section 199 tax credits. There were no tax fees for 2011.

 

Total fees reported above include out-of-pocket expenses related to the services provided of $332,210 for 2012 and $305,346 for 2011.

(d)

All other fees for 2010 consist of training provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP on the topic of utility taxes. There were no all other fees for 2011.

 

 

(e)

Total fees reported above include out-of-pocket expenses related to the services provided of $275,000 for 2011 and $274,329 for 2010.

 

 

 


10

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


Pre-Approval Policy
The audit committee pre-approved all services Deloitte & Touche LLP performed in 20112012 in accordance with the pre-approval policy and procedures the audit committee adopted at its August 12, 2003 meeting. This policy is designed to achieve the continued independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP and to assist in our compliance with Sections 201 and 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The policy defines the permitted services in each of the audit, audit-related, tax, and all other services categories, as well as prohibited services. The pre-approval policy requires management to submit annually for approval to the audit committee a service plan describing the scope of work and anticipated cost associated with each category of service. At each regular audit committee meeting, management

10

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

reports on services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP and the fees paid or accrued through the end of the quarter preceding the meeting. Management may submit requests for additional permitted services before the next scheduled audit committee meeting to the designated member of the audit committee, Dennis W. Johnson, for approval. The designated member updates the audit committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting regarding any services that he approved during the interim period. At each regular audit committee meeting, management may submit to the audit committee for approval a supplement to the service plan containing any request for additional permitted services.

In addition, prior to approving any request for audit-related, tax, or all other services of more than $50,000, Deloitte & Touche LLP will provide a statement setting forth the reasons why rendering of the proposed services does not compromise Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence. This description and statement by Deloitte & Touche LLP may be incorporated into the service plan or as an exhibit thereto or may be delivered in a separate written statement.

ITEM 3. APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVEBASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14a-21(a), we are asking our stockholders to approve, in a separate advisory vote, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K. As discussed in the compensation discussion and analysis, our compensation committee and board of directors believe that our current executive compensation program directly links compensation of our named executive officers to our financial performance and aligns the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. Our compensation committee and board of directors also believe that our executive compensation program provides our named executive officers with a balanced compensation package that includes an appropriate base salary along with competitive annual and long-term incentive compensation targets. These incentive programs are designed to reward our named executive officers on both an annual and long-term basis if they attain specified goals.

Our overall compensation program and philosophy is built on a foundation of these guiding principles:

 

 

we pay for performance, with over 50% of our 2012 total target direct compensation in the form of incentive compensation

 

 

we determineassess the relationship between our named executive officers’ pay and performance based on key financial criteria that are important to stockholder valuemetricsearnings per share,revenue, profit, return on invested capital, and total stockholder return relative– in comparison to our peers andperformance graph peer group

 

 

we review competitive compensation data for eachour named executive officer positionofficers, to the extent available, and incorporate internal equity in the final determination of target compensation levels.levels

we determine annual performance incentives based on financial criteria that are important to stockholder value, including earnings per share and return on invested capital and

we determine long-term performance incentives based on total stockholder return relative to our performance graph peer group.

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their approval of our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the compensation discussion and analysis, the executive compensation tables, and narrative discussion. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers for 2011.2012. Accordingly, the following resolution is submitted for stockholder vote at the 20122013 annual meeting:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

11




Proxy Statement

As this is an advisory vote, the results will not be binding on the company, the board of directors, or the compensation committee and will not require us to take any action. The final decision on the compensation of our named executive officers remains with our compensation committee and our board of directors, although our board and compensation committee will consider the outcome of this vote when making future compensation decisions. As the board of directors determined at its meeting in May 2011, we will provide our stockholders with the opportunity to vote on our named executive officer compensation at every annual meeting until the next required vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on named executive officer compensation. The next required vote on frequency will occur at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.

The board of directors recommends a vote “for” the approval, on ana non-binding advisory basis, of
the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement.

Approval of the compensation of our named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will count as votes against this proposal. Broker non-votes are not counted as voting power present and, therefore, are not counted in the vote.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

11




Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following compensation discussion and analysis may contain statements regarding corporate performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.

2011 Named Executive Officers
For 2011, our named executive officers were Terry D. Hildestad, Doran N. Schwartz, J. Kent Wells, John G. Harp, and William E. Schneider. Mr. Hildestad is our president and chief executive officer, and Mr. Schwartz is our vice president and chief financial officer. Mr. Wells, president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings, Inc., was hired in May 2011 and is a named executive officer for the first time. Mr. Harp was president and chief executive officer of MDU Construction Services Group, Inc. during 2011 and, effective January 1, 2012, became chief executive officer of Knife River Corporation as well as MDU Construction Services Group, Inc. Mr. Schneider was president and chief executive officer of Knife River Corporation during 2011 and, effective January 1, 2012, became MDU Resources Group, Inc. executive vice president of Bakken development.

Summary of Company Performance and Named Executive Officer Compensation Paid –2011– 2012 Compared to 2010

MDU Resources Group, Inc. was comprised of the following business segments in 2011:
2011
Our named executive officers for 2012 were:

 

Terry D. Hildestad, our president and chief executive officer, who retired January 3, 2013

Doran N. Schwartz, our vice president and chief financial officer

William E. Schneider, our executive vice president of Bakken development, a role he assumed on January 1, 2012

J. Kent Wells, who led our exploration and production segment as president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings, Inc., and

Steven L. Bietz, who led our pipeline and energy services segment as president and chief executive officer of WBI Holdings, Inc., which is the parent company of WBI Energy, Inc. and WBI Energy Services, Inc.

In addition to the business segments above, we have the following business segments:

 

electric and natural gas distribution1under the leadership of David L. Goodin, who was during 2012 the president and chief executive officer of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, and Intermountain Gas Company,

pipeline and energy services under the leadership of Steven L. Bietz, thewho was promoted, effective January 4, 2013, to be president and chief executive officer of WBI Holdings,MDU Resources Group, Inc., which is the parent company of WBI Pipeline & Storage Group, Inc. and WBI Energy Services, Inc.

exploration and production under the leadership of J. Kent Wells, the president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, a subsidiary of WBI Holdings, Inc.

construction materials and contracting under the leadership of William E. Schneider, the president and chief executive officer of Knife River Corporation and

 

 

construction services segment and construction materials and contracting segment under the leadership of John G. Harp, who is the president and chief executive officer of MDU Construction Services Group, Inc. and Knife River Corporation.

Our consolidated financial results for 2011 and 2010 were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item

 

2011 Result

 

2010 Result

 

Consolidated Earnings on Common Stock

 

$212.3 million

 

$240.0 million

 

Earnings per Share (diluted)

 

$1.12

 

$1.27

 

Return on Invested Capital

 

 

6.3%

 

7.0%

Total Stockholder Return

 

 

9.1%

 

 

(11.3)%

Our business segment results were as follows:


electric and natural gas distribution earnings increased from $65.9 million in 2010 to $67.7 million in 2011

pipeline and energy services earnings decreased from $23.2 million in 2010 to $23.1 million in 2011

exploration and production earnings decreased from $85.6 million in 2010 to $80.3 million in 2011

construction materials and contracting earnings decreased from $29.6 million in 2010 to $26.4 million in 2011 and

construction services earnings increased from $18.0 million in 2010 to $21.6 million in 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

1

Natural gas distribution is a separate business segment, although we are showing it combined in this discussion.


 

 

 

 

 

 

12

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

WhileFinancial Results for 2012 and 2011 performance in our electric
Our consolidated financial results for 2012 was a loss of $1.4 million compared to 2011 earnings of $212.3 million. Adjusted earnings were $216.8 million for 2012, compared to 2011 adjusted earnings of $225.2 million. The following table compares 2012 results to 2011 results on a business segment basis. Adjusted earnings and natural gas and construction services segments was strong, performanceinformation in the pipelinetable below contain non-GAAP numbers. Please refer to the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and energy services, explorationReconciliation of GAAP to Adjusted Earnings sections below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business Segment

 

2012 Earnings
($) (millions)

 

2011 Earnings
($) (millions)

 

Electric and Natural Gas Distribution

 

 

60.0

 

 

67.6

 

Pipeline and Energy Services

 

 

11.6

 

 

23.1

 

Exploration and Production

 

 

69.6

 

 

80.3

 

Construction Materials and Services

 

 

70.8

 

 

48.0

 

Other

 

 

4.8

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Before Discontinued Operations, Noncash Write-Downs of Oil and Natural Gas Properties, and Net Benefit Related to Natural Gas Gathering Operations Litigation

 

 

216.8

 

 

225.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax*

 

 

13.6

 

 

(12.9

)

Effects of Noncash Write-Downs of Oil and Natural Gas Properties

 

 

(246.8

)

 

 

Net Benefit Related to Natural Gas Gathering Operations Litigation

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

Earnings (Loss) on Common Stock

 

 

(1.4

)

 

212.3

 

*

Reflects a 2012 reversal of a 2011 arbitration charge of $13.0 million after tax related to a guarantee of a construction contract

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
As noted above, the company, in addition to presenting its earnings information in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), has provided non-GAAP earnings data that reflects an adjustment to exclude a fourth quarter 2012 $145.9 million after-tax noncash ceiling test write-down, a third quarter 2012 $100.9 million after-tax noncash ceiling test write-down, as well as an adjustment to exclude a second quarter 2012 reversal of an arbitration charge of $15.0 million after-tax. The company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors because the items excluded are not indicative of the company’s continuing operating results. Also, the company’s management uses these non-GAAP financial measures as indicators for planning and production,forecasting future periods. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered a substitute for financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Reconciliation of GAAP to Adjusted Earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012
Earnings
($) (millions)

 

2011
Earnings
($) (millions)

 

2012
Earnings
Per Share

 

2011
Earnings
Per Share

 

Earnings (Loss) on Common Stock

 

 

(1.4

)

 

212.3

 

 

(0.01

)

 

1.12

 

Discontinued Operations

 

 

(13.6

)

 

12.9

 

 

(0.07

)

 

0.07

 

Noncash Write-Downs of Oil and Natural Gas Properties

 

 

246.8

 

 

 

 

1.31

 

 

 

Net Benefit Related to Natural Gas Gathering Operations Litigation

 

 

(15.0

)

 

 

 

(0.08

)

 

 

Adjusted Earnings

 

 

216.8

 

 

225.2

 

 

1.15

 

 

1.19

 

Total Realized Pay in 2012 and construction materials segments2011
The compensation committee believes considering total realized pay is equally as important as considering total compensation as presented in the summary compensation table. Total compensation as presented in the summary compensation table contains estimated values of grants of performance shares based on multiple assumptions that may or may not come to fruition. Also, the summary compensation table shows an increase in change in pension value and above-market earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation. The pension plan was frozen as of December 31, 2009, and none of the named executives’ benefit levels in the Supplemental Income Security Plan, our non-qualified retirement program, increased for 2012. The primary reason for increases in the change in pension value is due to a lower than in 2010. We believe thatdiscount rate used to calculate the values.

Total realized pay, on the other hand, reflects the compensation actually earned, including the value of incentive awards if the goals are met and excluding the value of incentive awards if the goals are not met. Because we have not met certain performance measures in the last several years, our named executive officers for 2011 reflects these results.

In termsofficers’ total realized pay excludes the value of remuneration, this overview focuses on theincentive awards that were not earned. We define total compensation paid to our named executives. Total compensation paid isrealized pay as the sum of base salary, annual incentive award paid, and the value realized upon the vesting of long-term incentive awards of performance shares, and restricted stock. While the compensation committee believes that totalall other compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table is important, it does not show the actual value in thesummary compensation paid to our named executive officers, which the compensation committee believes is important to show stockholders. The three major differences are that the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table shows:table.

 

 

the change in pension value, which increased in 2011 due to lower discount rates used to calculate the values. Because the defined benefit pension plans were frozen as of January 1, 2010, and none of our named executives received benefit level increases in our Supplemental Income Security Plan for 2011, their retirement benefits under these programs did not increase.

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

a grant date fair value assigned to performance share awards, which are potential payments based on multiple assumptions. Performance shares are paid, if at all, three years after grant, based upon our total stockholder return in comparison to our peer group and13




 

Proxy Statement

all other compensation for the named executives officers, which we excluded from total compensation paid because the dollar amount did not change from 2010 to 2011, except for a very small amount for Mr. Harp.

The following table compares total compensation paidrealized pay for our named executives in 2012 to Messrs. Hildestad, Schwartz, Harp, and Schneider, the four 2011 named executive officers who were also employed by the company in 2010. Three of the four named executive officer’s total compensation paid decreased in 2011 and, as a group, their total compensation paid decreased $821,353, or 17.3% when compared to 2010.2011.

Total Compensation Paid in 2011 and 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named
Executive
Officer

 

Year

 

Base Salary
($)

 

Annual
Incentive
Awards
Paid
($)

 

Value
Realized
upon
Vesting of
Performance
Shares
($)

 

Value
Realized
upon
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock
($)(3)

 

Total
Compensation
Paid
($)(4)

 

 

Year

 

Base Salary
($)

 

Annual
Incentive
Awards
and
Bonus
Paid
($)

 

Value
Realized
upon
Vesting of
Performance
Shares
($)

 

All
Other
Compensation
($)

 

Total
Realized
Pay
($)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

2011

 

750,000

 

954,750

 

0

(1)

 

 

1,704,750

 

 

2012

 

750,000

 

518,250

 

0(1)

 

38,224

 

1,306,474

 

 

2010

 

750,000

 

762,750

 

720,474

(2)

 

73,498

 

2,306,722

 

 

2011

 

750,000

 

954,750

 

0(2)

 

37,499

 

1,742,249

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

2011

 

273,000

 

173,765

 

0

(1)

 

 

446,765

 

 

2012

 

300,000

 

103,650

 

0(1)

 

34,224

 

437,874

 

��

 

2010

 

252,454

 

127,053

 

75,398

(2)

 

 

454,905

 

 

2011

 

273,000

 

173,765

 

0(2)

 

33,549

 

480,314

 

John G. Harp

 

2011

 

450,000

 

438,750

 

0

(1)

 

 

888,750

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

2012

 

360,500

 

347,973

 

0(1)

 

37,884

 

746,357

 

 

2011

 

360,500

 

229,198

 

0(2)

 

37,159

 

626,857

 

J. Kent Wells

 

2012

 

550,000

 

934,042

(3)

 

N/A

 

96,470

 

1,580,512

 

 

2010

 

450,000

 

438,750

 

221,666

(2)

 

 

1,110,416

 

 

2011

 

367,671

 

1,923,991

(4)

 

N/A

 

84,580

 

2,376,242

 

William E. Schneider

 

2011

 

447,400

 

436,215

 

0

(1)

 

 

883,615

 

 

2012

 

447,400

 

200,950

 

0(1)

 

38,224

 

686,574

 

 

2010

 

447,400

 

37,805

 

329,179

(2)

 

58,806

 

873,190

 

 

2011

 

447,400

 

436,215

 

0(2)

 

37,499

 

921,114

 

 

 

 

 

2011 Total

 

3,923,880

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Total

 

4,745,233

 

 

 

(1)

Performance shares and dividend equivalents granted for the 2009-2011 performance period that did not vest and were forfeited because performance was below threshold.

(2)

Performance shares and dividend equivalents granted for the 2008-2010 performance period that did not vest and were forfeited because performance was below threshold.

(2)(3)

PerformanceReflects the value of the portion of Mr. Wells’ additional 2011 annual incentive award that was paid in shares paid for the 2007-2009 performance period. The value realized isof our common stock based on our closing stock price of $19.99 on February 11, 2010, and includes the dividend equivalents paid$21.67 on the vested shares.

(3)

Reflects the value of restricted shares granted in 2001 that vested automatically and were paid onvesting date, February 15, 2010, based on our closing stock price of $19.80 on February 12, 2010, as February 15, 2010, was a holiday.16, 2012.

(4)

Total compensation paid is the sumMr. Wells was hired as president and chief executive officer of base salary,Fidelity Exploration & Production Company effective May 2, 2011. Includes a cash recruitment payment of $550,000, annual incentive award paid,payment of $448,981, and the value realized upon vestingadditional annual incentive payment of long-term incentive awards of performance shares and restricted stock.$925,010.

TheOur named executive officers forfeited all performance shares and dividend equivalents for the 2009-2011 performance period because our total stockholder return in comparison to our peer group was at the 25th percentile. With respect to the annual incentive awards, our 2012 results in the construction services segment, construction materials and contracting segment, and the pipeline and energy services segment were above their performance targets, and, conversely, 2012 results for the exploration and production segment and the electric and gas distribution segments were below their threshold performance goals, with 2012 consolidated earnings per share results also below threshold. Since the corporate named executives’ annual incentives depend on achievement of the foregoing performance goals, Messrs. Hildestad’s, Schwartz’s, and Schneider’s 2012 annual incentives were paid below the target amount.

With respect to our chief executive officer, the following table further demonstrates our pay for performance policy specifically for our chief executive officerapproach by comparing:

 

 

 

his total compensation paid,realized pay, which is the sum of base salary, annual incentive awards paid, all other compensation, and the value realized upon the

 

 

 

o

vesting of restricted stock during 2010

 

 

 

 

o

vesting of performance shares during 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 (none vested in 2011) and

o

exercise of stock options in 20072011 or 2012)

 

 

 

his total compensation as reported in the summary compensation table and

 

 

 

one-year total stockholder returns for 2007 to 2011.2008 through 2012.


 

 

 

 

14

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

13




 

Proxy Statement

5 Year CEO Compensation and Total Stockholder Return

(BAR CHART)(BAR CHART)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

(GRAPHIC)

Total Compensation Paid

 

$3,248,707

 

$1,680,323

 

$2,647,426

 

$2,306,722

 

$1,704,750

 

(GRAPHIC)

Total Compensation
from Summary
Compensation Table

 

$4,023,732

 

$3,119,702

 

$4,203,004

 

$2,860,918

 

$3,566,327

 

(GRAPHIC)

1 Year TSR

 

 

9.9%

 

 

(20.1)%

 

 

12.9%

 

 

(11.3)%

 

 

9.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Compensation Paid = Base Salary + Annual Bonus Paid + Performance Shares that Vested + Restricted Stock that Vested + 2007 Stock Option Exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

(GRAPHIC)

Total Realized Pay

 

 

$1,689,799

 

 

$2,657,250

 

 

$2,344,221

 

 

$1,742,249

 

 

$1,306,474

 

(GRAPHIC)

Total Compensation
from Summary
Compensation Table

 

 

$3,119,702

 

 

$4,203,004

 

 

$2,860,918

 

 

$3,566,327

 

 

$2,558,778

 

(GRAPHIC)

1 Year Total
Stockholder Return

 

 

-20.1%

 

 

12.9%

 

 

-11.3%

 

 

9.1%

 

 

2.1%

 

Comparing Mr. Hildestad’sThe yearly changes in total compensation paid and total compensation as reported infrom the summary compensation table against annualand total realized pay align very closely with the yearly changes in total stockholder return shows:return.

Overview of 2012 Compensation for our Named Executive Officers
In 2012, we continued our approach of referencing market data to establish competitive pay levels for base salary, total annual cash, which is base salary plus target annual incentive, and total direct compensation, which is the sum of total annual cash plus the expected value of target long-term incentives. We discuss this competitive assessment in the Role of Management section below. To ensure compensation awarded to named executive officers was commensurate with competitive performance levels, we continued to compare:

 

 

In 2007, annual total stockholder return was 9.9%results to the results of our performance graph peer group to determine payouts under our performance share program and Mr. Hildestad’s total compensation paid increased by 65% and his total compensation as reported in the summary compensation table increased by 30%.

 

 

In 2008, annual total stockholderon a historical basis, our targeted and actual results on return was (20.1)% and Mr. Hildestad’s total compensation paid decreased by 48% and his total compensation as reported inon invested capital to the summary compensation table decreased by 23%.

In 2009, annual total stockholder return was 12.9% and Mr. Hildestad’s total compensation paid increased by 58% and his total compensation as reported in the summary compensation table increased by 35%.

In 2010, annual total stockholder return was (11.3)% and Mr. Hildestad’s total compensation paid decreased by 13% and his total compensation as reported in the summary compensation table decreased by 32%.

In 2011, annual total stockholder return was 9.1% and Mr. Hildestad’s total compensation paid decreased by 26% and his total compensation as reported in the summary compensation table increased by 25%.


Overview of 2011 Compensation for our Named Executive Officers

Our 2011 compensation program for our named executive officers was designed to link their compensation to our financial performance and align their interests with thoseresults of our stockholders. Mr. Wells’performance graph peer group when the compensation wascommittee established to induce him to join the company while, at the same time, basing his incentive payments on the attainment of financial results. We discuss Mr. Wells’ compensation in a separate section below, and the following discussionperformance targets for annual incentives of our named executive officers’ compensation excludes Mr. Wells.business segment leaders.

 

Our overall compensation program and philosophy is built on a foundation of these guiding principles:


 

 

we pay for performance, with 55.6% to 71.4%76.5% of our named executive officers’ 20112012 total target direct compensation in the form of incentives

 

 

we determine annual performance incentives based on financial criteria that are important to stockholder value, including earnings per share and return on invested capital and

we determine long-term performance incentives based on total stockholder return relative to our peersperformance graph peer group

 

 

we review competitive compensation data for eachour named executive officerofficers, to the extent available, and incorporate internal equity in the final determination of target compensation levels and

 

 

through our PEER Analysis, we compare our pay-for-performance results with the pay-for-performance results ofon key financial metrics – revenue, profit, return on invested capital, and stockholder return – in comparison to our peers over five-year periods.performance graph peer group.


14

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The compensation committee took the following actions with respect to 2011 compensation for our named executive officers:

 

 

froze 2011 base salaries at their 2009 and 2010 levelsThe compensation committee took the following actions with respect to 2012 compensation for Messrs. Hildestad, Harp, and Schneider and provided a 5% salary increase only to Mr. Schwartzour named executive officers:

 

 

maintainedgranted a salary increase to Mr. Hildestad to recognize his effective leadership during an extended period of economic softness. Mr. Hildestad subsequently rejected the same percentagessalary increase because he felt accepting the increase would be out of place since five of the thirteen Section 16 officers did not receive an increase for 2012

granted a salary increase to Mr. Schwartz to bring his salary closer to his salary grade midpoint


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

15




Proxy Statement


tied 25% of our business segment leaders’ 2012 annual incentive targets to the company’s 2012 earnings per share results in order to more closely align amounts paid to these executives with total company results

increased Mr. Wells’ annual incentive target from 100% to 125% of base salary used to establish target incentive awardsmitigate the impact of the added company earnings per share goal and to reflect his impact on overall company results

 

 

continued to link our corporate executives’ – i.e., Messrs. Hildestad, Schwartz, and SchwartzSchneider20112012 annual incentive awards to the achievement of our business units’segments’ performance goals

 

 

maintained the limitation on the maximum payment with respect to the return on invested capital portion of the 2011 annual incentive awards at MDU Construction Services Group, Inc., Knife River Corporation, Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, and WBI Holdings, Inc. at 100% of the target incentive award, unless return on invested capital equaled or exceeded the business unit’s weighted average cost of capital

provided for mandatory reductions in any performance shares earned pursuant to awards granted in 2011 if our total stockholder return for the 2011-2013 performance period is negative

in 2011 the compensation committee did not approve payment of any performance shares or dividend equivalents granted in 20082009 for the 2008-20102009-2011 performance period due to our negative total stockholder return for the 2008-20102009-2011 performance period placing us in the 33rd25th percentile compared to our performance graph peer group

imposed mandatory stock holding requirements on a portion of shares earned pursuant to long-term incentive awards granted in 2011 or thereafter and

 

 

granted no increases under our SISP,Supplemental Income Security Plan, which is a nonqualified retirement plan that provides benefits to our key managers and four of our named executive officers.


J. Kent Wells

We hired Mr. Wells as the president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, effective May 2, 2011. Mr. Hildestad, with assistance from our vice president-human resources, negotiated Mr. Wells’ compensation in connection with his hiring; his compensation is set forth in a letter agreement, which was approved by the compensation committee and the board of directors at their regular February 2011 meetings. The compensation committee approved Mr. Wells’ compensation after considering his extensive experience in leading the oil and gas industry and his demonstrated track record of substantially increasing reserves and production while reducing finding costs.

Mr. Wells’ letter agreement provides for the following:


a base salary of $550,000, prorated for his eight months of employment during 2011. We discuss how Mr. Wells’ base salary was determined in the Base Salaries of the Named Executive Officers for 2011 section below.

a cash recruitment payment of $550,000 to induce Mr. Wells to join the company and to offset the forfeiture of restricted stock granted by his former employer that would otherwise have vested in 2012 and 2013

a target annual incentive award opportunity of 100% of base salary prorated to reflect his eight months of employment during 2011. Mr. Wells would receive a guaranteed minimum payment equal to the 2011 prorated target amount and could earn up to 200% of target if:

o

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and WBI Holdings, Inc.’s 2011 earnings per share were at or above 115% of the performance targets approved by the compensation committee

o

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and WBI Holdings, Inc.’s 2011 returns on invested capital were both at least equal to their respective weighted average costs of capital

o

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company achieved its production goal and

o

WBI Holdings, Inc. achieved its five safety goals.

We discuss this incentive award in the 2011 Annual Incentives section below.

to offset other compensation Mr. Wells would have received if he had stayed with his former employer, an additional 2011 incentive award opportunity to earn $1.85 million, payable one-half in cash and one-half in our common stock, if Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s 2011 cash flow from operations exceeded $132.0 million. We discuss this incentive award in the 2011 Annual Incentives section below.

commencing in 2012, a target long-term incentive opportunity of 200% of base salary and

relocation benefits consisting of:

o

reasonable expenses for two home finding trips for Mr. Wells and his spouse

o

monthly reimbursements of up to $3,000 for 6 months for temporary living expenses


 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

15




Proxy Statement


o

reasonable expenses incurred during the actual move from the Houston area to Denver

o

reimbursementIn addition, our Section 16 officers who had change of actual and reasonable costs of moving household goods and personal effects

o

a relocation allowance equal to one month’s salary

o

reimbursement of the following home sale expenses:

reasonable attorney’s fees

federal, state and local transfer taxes

search fees and title insurance

brokerage commission of a licensed real estate broker

mortgage prepayment penalties

recording fees

any other fees or expenses approved in advance in writing by the company

o

a bonus of 3% of the sales price of Mr. Wells’ Houston area home up to a maximum of $15,000

o

reimbursement of the following costs to acquire a new home if Mr. Wells purchases a new home within 18 months from his hire date:

title search and title insurance

mortgage service charges and mortgage taxes

bank applications and processing and appraisal fees

recording and notary fees

state and local transfer taxes

termite inspection

land survey

attorney’s fees up to a maximum of 1% of the new mortgage amount

origination fees or points up to a maximum of 2% of the new mortgage amount and

any other fees or expenses approved in writing by the company and

o

spousal career assistance.

Mr. Wells received $66,031 in relocation benefits for 2011 consisting of $18,000 in temporary living expenses, $2,198 in actual move and related expenses, and $45,833 in relocation allowance. We anticipate Mr. Wells completing his relocationcontrol employment agreements agreed to the Denver area duringearly termination of their agreements, effective November 1, 2012.

Mr. Wells must repay the relocation benefits he received if he resigns from the company within one year from when his household goods and personal effects are moved to the Denver area.

 

Objectives of our Compensation Program

We structure our compensation program to help retain and reward the executive officers who we believe are critical to our long-term success. We have a written executive compensation policy for our Section 16 officers, including all our named executive officers. Our policy has the followingpolicy’s stated objectives:objectives are to:

 

recruit, motivate, reward, and retain the high performing executive talent required to create superior long-term total stockholder return in comparison to our peer group

 

 

reward executives for short-term performance, as well as the growth in enterprise value over the long-term

 

 

provide a competitive package relative to industry-specific and general industry comparisons and internal equity, as appropriate

 

 

ensure effective utilization and development of talent by working in concert with other management processes – for example, performance appraisal, succession planning, and management development and

 

 

help ensure that compensation programs do not encourage or reward excessive or imprudent risk taking.


 

 

16

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


Elements of our Compensation Program

We pay/grant:

 

base salaries in order to provide executive officers with sufficient, regularly-paid income and attract, recruit, and retain executives with the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to successfully execute their job duties and responsibilities

 

 

opportunities to earn annual incentive compensation in order to be competitive from a total remuneration standpoint and ensure focus on annual financial and operating results and

 

 

opportunities to earn long-term incentive compensation in order to be competitive from a total remuneration standpoint and ensure focus on stockholder return.

 

 

If earned, incentive compensation, which consists of annual cash incentive awards and three-year performance share awards under our Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, makes up the greatest portion of our named executive officers’ total compensation. The compensation committee believes incentive compensation that comprised approximately 55.6% to 71.4%76.5% of total target compensation for the named executive officers except for Mr. Wells, for 2011 is appropriate because:

 

our named executive officers are in positions to drive, and therefore bear high levels of responsibility for, our corporate performance

 

 

incentive compensation is more variable than base salary and dependent upon our performance

 

 

variable compensation helps ensure focus on the goals that are aligned with our overall strategy and

 

 

the interests of our named executive officers will be aligned with those of our stockholders by making a majority of the named executive officers’ target compensation contingent upon results that are beneficial to stockholders.


16

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The following table shows the allocation of total target compensation for 20112012 among the individual components of base salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentive:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            

 

% of Total
Target
Compensation
Allocated to
Base Salary (%)

 

% of Total Target Compensation
Allocated to Incentives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual +
Long-Term (%)

 

Name % of Total
Target
Compensation
Allocated to
Base Salary (%)
 % of Total Target Compensation
Allocated to Incentives
 

 

% of Total
Target
Compensation
Allocated to
Base Salary (%)

 

Annual (%)

 

Long-Term (%)

 

Annual +
Long-Term (%)

 

Annual (%) Long-Term (%) Annual +
Long-Term(%)
 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

28.6

 

42.8

 

 28.6 28.6 42.8 71.4 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

22.2

 

33.4

 

55.6

 

 44.4 22.2 33.4 55.6 
Steven L. Bietz 39.2 25.5 35.3 60.8 

J. Kent Wells (1)

 

81.4

 

0.0

 

81.4

 

 23.5 29.4 47.1 76.5 

John G. Harp

 

39.2

 

25.5

 

35.3

 

60.8

 

William E. Schneider

 

39.2

 

25.5

 

35.3

 

60.8

 

 39.2 25.5 35.3 60.8 

(1) Mr. Wells received two annual incentive awards in 2011, but no long-term incentive award in 2011.

 

In order to reward long-term growth, as well as short-term results, the compensation committee establishes incentive targets that emphasize long-term compensation as much as or more than short-term compensation for our named executive officers. Except for Mr. Wells, the annual incentive targets for 2011 range from 50% to 100% of base salary and the long-term incentive targets range from 75% to 150% of base salary, depending on the named executive officer’s salary grade. In Mr. Wells’ case for 2011, his incentives are made up of a target annual incentive opportunity of 100% of base salary plus an additional incentive opportunity of $1.85 million. After 2011 and pursuant to his letter agreement, Mr. Wells’ target annual incentive opportunity will remain at 100% of base salary and his long-term incentive target will be 200% of base salary. Generally, our approach is to allocategenerally allocates a higher percentage of total target compensation to the long-term incentive than to the short-term incentive for our higher level executives, since they are in a better position to influence our long-term performance.

Additionally, the long-term incentive, if earned, is paid in company common stock. These awards, combined with our stock retention requirements and stock ownership policy, promote ownership of our stock by the named executive officers. The compensation committee believes that, as stockholders, the named executive officers will be motivated to consistently deliver financial results that build wealth for all stockholders over the long-term.

 

Role of Compensation ConsultantsManagement

Our executive compensation policy providescalls for an assessment of the competitive pay levels for base salary and incentive compensation for each Section 16 officer position to be conducted at least every two years by an independent consulting firm. InTowers Watson conducted the study in 2010 for purposes of 2011 compensation,use by the compensation committee retained Towers Watson, a nationally recognized consulting firm, to perform this assessment and to assistdetermine 2011 compensation levels. In 2011, the compensation committee requested the competitive assessment be completed internally. They directed the vice president-human resources and the human resources department to prepare the competitive assessment in August 2011 on Section 16 officers for their use in establishing competitive compensation targets for our Section 16 officers.


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

17




Proxy Statement

2012 compensation.

The assessment included identifying any material changes to the positions analyzed, and their scopes of responsibility, summarizing current incumbent compensation information, updating competitive compensation information, gathering and analyzing relevant general and industry-specific survey data, validating position matches and survey data with our management, assessing pay relationships for our chief executive officer as compared to our chief financial officer and the business unit presidents and chief executive officers, and updating the base salary structure. Towers WatsonThe human resources department assessed competitive pay levels for base salary, total annual cash, which is base salary plus target annual incentives, and total direct compensation, which is the sum of total annual cash and the expected value of target long-term incentives. TheyThe competitive assessment compared our positions to like positions contained in general industry compensation surveys and industry-specific compensation surveys and, for our chief executive officer, tosurveys. The human resources department aged the chief executive officers in our performance graph peer group. Towers Watson also aged thesurvey data from the date of the surveyssurvey by 2.5% on an annualized basis to estimate 2011the 2012 competitive targets.

The compensation surveys and databases used by Towers Watson were:are listed on the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Survey*

 

Number of
Companies
Participating
(#)

 

Median
Number of
Employees
(#)(1)

 

Publicly-
Traded
Companies
(#)

 

Number of
Median
Revenue
(000s)
($)

 

Towers Perrin 2009 Compensation Databank General Industry Executive Database

 

428

 

19,083

 

310

 

6,199,000

 

Towers Perrin 2009 Compensation Databank Energy Services Executive Database

 

98

 

3,290

 

62

 

3,371,000

 

2009 Effective Compensation, Inc. Oil & Gas Exploration Compensation Survey

 

119

 

451

 

49

 

Not reported

 

Mercer’s 2009 Total Compensation Survey for the Energy Sector

 

276

 

Not reported

 

205

 

1,057,000

 

Watson Wyatt 2009/2010 Report on Top Management Compensation

 

2,275

 

(2)

(2)

(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Survey*

 

Number of
Companies
Participating
(#)

 

Median
Number of
Employees
(#)(1)

 

Number of
Publicly-
Traded
Companies
(#)

 

Median
Revenue
(000s)
($)

 

Towers Watson 2010 General Industry Executive Database

 

 

430

 

 

16,400

 

 

312

 

 

5,112,000

 

Towers Watson 2010 U.S. CDB Energy Services Executive Database

 

 

102

 

 

3,012

 

 

67

 

 

2,818,000

 

2010 Effective Compensation, Inc. Oil & Gas Exploration Compensation Survey

 

 

121

 

 

439

 

 

48

 

 

Not Reported

 

Mercer’s 2010 Total Compensation Survey for the Energy Sector

 

 

297

 

 

Not Reported

 

 

201

 

 

823,000

 

Towers Watson 2010/2011 Report on Top Management Compensation

 

 

3,422

 

 

(2)

 

(2)

 

(2)

 

 

(1)

For the 20092010 Effective Compensation, Inc. Oil & Gas Exploration Compensation Survey, the number reported as the Median Number of Employees is the average number of employees.

(2)

The 2,2753,422 organizations participating in Watson Wyatt’s 2009/2010Towers Watson’s 2010/2011 Top Management Compensation Survey included 350394 organizations with 2,000 to 4,999 employees; 327308 organizations with 5,000 to 9,999 employees; 264205 organizations with 10,000 to 19,999 employees; and 33087 organizations with 20,000 or more employees. Towers Watson Wyatt did not provide a revenue breakdown or the number of publicly-traded companies participating in its survey.

*

The information in the table is based solely upon information provided by the publishers of the surveys and is not deemed filed or a part of this compensation discussion and analysis for certification purposes. For a list of companies that participated in the compensation surveys and databases, see Exhibit A.

In billions of dollars our revenues for 2009, 2010, 2011, and 20112012 were approximately $4.2, $3.9, $4.0, and $4.0,$4.1, respectively.

Since there were no specific data sources dedicated to the construction services or construction material industries, Towers Watson considered data from a subset of companies in the Towers Perrin 2009 Compensation Databank General Industry Executive Database and five public companies. The companies from the general industry survey, along with key financial data, were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company Name*

 

Market Capitalization
Fiscal Year-End
($) (millions)

 

Revenue
($) (millions)

 

Total Assets
($) (millions)

 

Hovnanian Enterprises

 

302.8

 

1,596.3

 

2,024.6

 

KB Home

 

1,193.4

 

1,824.9

 

3,436.0

 

Owens Corning

 

3,276.1

 

4,803.0

 

7,167.0

 

PulteGroup

 

3,822.7

 

4,084.4

 

10,051.2

 

Carpenter Technology

 

916.2

 

1,362.3

 

1,497.4

 

Century Aluminum

 

1,498.2

 

899.3

 

1,861.8

 

Crown Holdings

 

4,129.5

 

7,938.0

 

6,532.0

 

Kennametal

 

1,559.2

 

1,999.9

 

2,347.0

 

Martin Marietta Materials

 

4,052.6

 

1,702.6

 

3,239.3

 

Newmont Mining

 

23,338.6

 

7,705.0

 

22,299.0

 

Vulcan Materials

 

6,654.0

 

2,690.5

 

8,533.0

 

*

The information in the table is based solely upon information provided by the publisher of the general industry survey and is not deemed filed or a part of this compensation discussion and analysis for certification purposes.


18

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The five public companies Towers Watson referenced, along with key financial data, were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company Name*

 

Market Capitalization
Fiscal Year-End
($) (millions)

 

Revenue
($) (millions)

 

Total Assets
($) (millions)

 

Dycom Industries

 

 

496.5

 

 

1,106.9

 

 

693.5

 

Quanta Services

 

 

4,363.8

 

 

3,318.1

 

 

4,117.0

 

EMCOR Group

 

 

1,781.1

 

 

5,547.9

 

 

2,981.9

 

U.S. Concrete

 

 

34.1

 

 

534.5

 

 

389.2

 

Granite Construction

 

 

1,300.3

 

 

1,963.5

 

 

1,709.6

 

*

The information in the table is based solely upon information provided by Towers Watson and is not deemed filed or a part of this compensation discussion and analysis for certification purposes.

Revenues for 2009, 2010, and 2011 were approximately $819.0 million, $789.1 million and $854.0 million, respectively, for our construction services segment and were approximately $1.5 billion each year for our construction materials segment.

Role of Management

To verify the comparability of Mr. Hildestad’s target long-term incentive compensation and his Supplemental Income Security Plan benefits, the compensation committee directed the human resources department to prepare a report comparing the combined value of long-term incentive compensation and nonqualified defined benefit plan benefits of other chief executive officers. The report was prepared by compiling data from Equilar, Inc. and presented at the compensation committee’s November 2010 meeting. The report compared Mr. Hildestad’s target long-term incentive compensation and the Supplemental Income Security Plan benefits to those of the chief executive officers in our performance graph peer group as of February 2010 and companies with revenues ranging from $2.5 billion to $6.5 billion in the construction, energy, and utility industries. We discuss the results of this review in the 2011 Long-Term Incentives section below.

The following companies were in our performance graph peer group as presented at the November 2010 compensation committee meeting:

Alliant Energy Corporation

OGE Energy Corp.

Berry Petroleum Company

ONEOK, Inc.

Black Hills Corporation

Quanta Services, Inc.

Comstock Resources, Inc.

Questar Corporation

Dycom Industries, Inc.

SCANA Corporation

EMCOR Group, Inc.

Southwest Gas Corporation

Encore Acquisition Company

St. Mary Land & Exploration Company

EQT Corporation

Swift Energy Company

Granite Construction Inc.

U.S. Concrete, Inc.

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Vectren Corporation

National Fuel Gas Co.

Vulcan Materials Company

Northwest Natural Gas Company

Whiting Petroleum Corporation

NSTAR

The other companies reviewed for this assessment are listed in Exhibit B.

At the request of Mr. Hildestad, the human resources department conducted a competitive assessment in January 2011 to determine the compensation level necessary to recruit a qualified individual to lead Fidelity Exploration & Production Company. Mr. Hildestad, with the assistance of our vice president–human resources, negotiated Mr. Wells’ compensation in connection with his hiring. The January 2011 competitive assessment is discussed in the Base Salaries of the Named Executive Officers for 2011 section below.

The chief executive officer played an important role in recommending 2011 compensation to the committee for the other named executive officers. The chief executive officer assessed the performance of the named executive officers and reviewed the relative value of the named executive officers’ positions and their salary grade classifications. He then reviewed the competitive assessment prepared by Towers Watson and worked with the compensation consultants and the human resources department to prepare 2011 compensation recommendations for the compensation committee, other than for himself. The chief executive officer attended compensation committee meetings; however, he was not present during discussions regarding his compensation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

1917




 

Proxy Statement

 


The human resources department also augmented the competitive analysis by using Equilar to provide information on what was reported by companies in our performance graph peer group and by other public companies in relevant industries, as selected by the human resources department and as determined by SIC codes and as disclosed in their SEC filings. The companies referenced via Equilar and the positions for which they were used are found in Exhibit B.

For our president and chief executive officer, the Equilar companies included all companies in our performance graph peer group and data on 68 additional chief executive officers from public companies in the energy, construction, and utility industries with revenues ranging from $1 billion to $8 billion.

For our vice president and chief financial officer, the Equilar companies included all companies in our performance graph peer group and data on 55 additional chief financial officers from public companies in the energy, construction, and utility industries with revenues ranging from $1 billion to $8 billion.

For the president and chief executive officer of our exploration and production segment, the Equilar companies included the exploration and production companies in our performance graph peer group and data on 27 additional chief executive officers from public companies in the oil and gas exploration and production industries with revenues ranging from $250 million to $850 million.

For the president and chief executive officer of the pipeline and energy services segment, the Equilar companies included the pipeline and energy services companies in our performance graph peer group and data on 13 chief executive officers from public companies in the pipeline and energy services industry with revenues of $1 billion or less.

The chief executive officer played an important role in recommending 2012 compensation to the committee for the other named executive officers. The chief executive officer assessed the performance of the named executive officers and considered the relative value of the named executive officers’ positions and their salary grade classifications. He then reviewed the competitive assessment prepared by the human resources department to formulate 2012 compensation recommendations for the compensation committee, other than for himself. The chief executive officer attended compensation committee meetings; however, he was not present during discussions regarding his compensation.

 

Timing of Compensation Decisions for 20112012

The compensation committee, in conjunction with the board of directors, determined all compensation for each named executive officer for 20112012 and set overall and individual compensation targets for the three components of compensation – base salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentive. The compensation committee made recommendations to the board of directors regarding compensation of all Section 16 officers, and the board of directors then approved the recommendations.

The compensation committee reviewed the competitive assessment and established 20112012 salary grades at its August 20102011 meeting. At the November 20102011 meeting, it established individual base salaries, target annual incentive award levels, and target long-term incentive award levels for 2011.2012. At their February 2011and March 2012 meetings, the compensation committee and the board of directors increased the target annual incentive award level for Mr. Wells and determined annual and long-term incentive awards, along with the payouts based on performance from the recently completed performance period for prior annual and long-term awards. The February 2011and March 2012 meetings occurred after the release of earnings for the prior year.

Our stockholders had their first advisory vote on our named executive officers’ compensation at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and approximately 94% of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter approved the named executive officers’ compensation. The compensation committee and the board of directors considered the results of the vote at their November 2011 meetings and did not change our executive compensation program as a result of the vote.

 

Salary Grades for 2011Stockholder Advisory Vote (“Say on Pay”)

Our stockholders had their second advisory vote on our named executive officers’ compensation at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Approximately 92% of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter approved the named executive officers’ compensation. The 92% approval is consistent with the results of our say on pay vote at the 2011 Annual Meeting. The compensation committee and the board of directors considered the results of the votes at their November 2011 and November 2012 meetings and did not change our executive compensation program as a result of the votes.

Salary Grades for 2012

The compensation committee determines the named executive officers’ base salaries and annual and long-term incentive targets by reference to salary grades. Each salary grade has a minimum, midpoint, and maximum annual salary level with the midpoint targeted at approximately the 50th percentile of the competitive assessment data for positions in the salary grade. The compensation committee may adjust the salary grades away from the 50th percentile in order to balance the external market data with internal equity. The salary grades also have annual and long-term incentive target levels, which are expressed as a percentage of the individual’s actual base salary. We generally place named executive officers into a salary grade based on historical classification of their positions; however, the compensation committee reviews each classification and may place a position into a different salary grade if it determines that the targeted competitive compensation for the position changes significantly or the executive’s responsibilities and/or performance warrants a different salary grade. The committee also considers, upon recommendation from the chief executive officer, a position’s relative value.

Our named executive officers’ salary grade classifications are listed below along with the 2011 base salary ranges associated with each classification:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 Base Salary (000s)

 

Position

 

Grade

 

Name

 

Minimum
($)

 

Midpoint
($)

 

Maximum
($)

 

President and CEO

 

K

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

620

 

775

 

930

 

Vice President and CFO

 

I

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

260

 

325

 

390

 

President and CEO, Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

 

J

 

J. Kent Wells

 

312

 

390

 

468

 

President and CEO, MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.

 

J

 

John G. Harp

 

312

 

390

 

468

 

President and CEO, Knife River Corporation

 

J

 

William E. Schneider

 

312

 

390

 

468

 

The presidents and chief executive officers of MDU Construction Services Group, Inc. and Knife River Corporation were assigned to salary grade “J” and were unchanged for 2011. In connection with his hiring, the president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company was assigned to salary grade “J” in recognition of the importance of this business segment to the company and the elevation of this position to be a direct report to our president and chief executive officer. The committee believes that from an internal equity standpoint, these positions should carry the same salary grade. The vice president and CFO position remained in salary grade “I” for 2011 to maintain a one-step difference in salary grade level when compared to the president and chief executive officer positions at our business units and to reflect the separate treasurer position created in 2010. After reviewing the competitive analysis, the compensation committee made no changes in the base salary ranges associated with each named executive officer’s salary grade classification.

At its August 2010 meeting, the compensation committee reviewed Towers Watson’s assessment of internal equity between our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, and the presidents and chief executive officers of our business units. The assessment showed that our chief executive officer’s 2010 pay as a multiple of the 2010 pay of our business units’ presidents and chief executive officers is generally consistent with the chief executive officer pay multiples of our performance graph peer group. Additionally, our chief executive officer’s 2010 pay as a multiple of our chief financial officer’s 2010 pay is higher than the chief executive officer pay multiple of our performance graph peer group due to our chief financial officer’s recent promotion to the position. The table below shows pay multiples for base salary, target annual cash, which is base salary plus target annual incentives, and total target direct compensation, which is the sum of target annual cash and the expected value of target long-term incentives.


 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

 

Internal Equity Assessment*compensation for the position changes significantly or the executive’s responsibilities and/or performance warrants a different salary grade. Individual executives may be paid below, equal to, or above the salary grade midpoint. Mr. Wells’ 2011 compensation was determined pursuant to his letter agreement in connection with his hiring effective May 2, 2011, and served as a basis for his 2012 compensation, rather than the business segment leaders’ salary grade.

2010 CEO Pay Multiple for
MDU Resources Group, Inc.

CEO Pay Multiple of
Performance Graph Peer Group (1)

Title

Company or Business Unit

Base
Salary

Target
Annual
Cash

Total
Target Direct
Compensation

Base
Salary

Target
Annual
Cash

Total
Target Direct
Compensation

President & CEO

MDU Resources Group, Inc.

Vice President & CFO

MDU Resources Group, Inc.

2.9x

3.8x

4.5x

2.0x

2.2x

2.4x

President & CEO / 2nd Highest Paid

MDU Construction Services

Group, Inc.

1.7x

2.0x

2.3x

1.6x

1.7x

1.8x

President & CEO / 3rd Highest Paid

Knife River Corporation

1.7x

2.0x

2.3x

1.9x

2.2x

2.4x

President & CEO / 4th Highest Paid

WBI Holdings, Inc.

2.1x

2.6x

2.9x

2.2x

2.4x

3.0x

President & CEO / 5th Highest Paid

Combined Utility Group (2)

2.3x

2.8x

3.2x

2.4x

3.1x

4.1x

(1)

Performance graph peer group compensation data compiled by Towers Watson from most recent proxy statements as of July 2010.

(2)

Combined Utility Group consists of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, and Intermountain Gas Company

   *

The information in the table is based solely upon information provided by Towers Watson and is not deemed filed or a part of this compensation discussion and analysis for certification purposes

The salary grades give the compensation committee determines where, relativeflexibility to the midpoint of eachassign different salaries to individual executives within a salary grade an individual’s base salary should be based onto reflect one or more of the following:

 

 

executive’s performance on financial goals and on non-financial goals, including the results of the performance assessment program

 

 

executive’s experience, tenure, and future potential

 

 

position’s relative value compared to other positions within the company

 

 

relationship of the salary to the competitive salary market value

 

 

internal equity with other executives and

 

 

economic environment of the corporation or executive’s business unit.segment.

No changes were made in the salary grade classifications of the named executive officers for 2012, and after reviewing the competitive analysis, the compensation committee made no changes in the base salary ranges associated with each named executive officer’s salary grade classification.

Our named executive officers’ salary grade classifications for 2012 are listed below, along with the base salary ranges associated with each classification:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 Base Salary (000s)

Position

 

Grade

 

Name

 

Minimum
($)

 

Midpoint
($)

 

Maximum
($)

President and CEO

 

K

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

620

 

775

 

930

Vice President and CFO

 

I

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

260

 

325

 

390

President and CEO, WBI Holdings, Inc.

 

J

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

312

 

390

 

468

President and CEO, Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

 

J

 

J. Kent Wells

 

312

 

390

 

468

Executive Vice President – Bakken Development

 

J

 

William E. Schneider

 

312

 

390

 

468


Performance Assessment Program

Our performance assessment program rates performance of our executive officers, except for our chief executive officer, in the following areas, which help determine actual salaries within the range of salaries associated with the executive’s salary grade:


 

 

 

 

visionary leadership

leadership

strategic thinking

mentoring

leading with integrity

relationship building

managing customer focus

conflict resolution

financial responsibility

organizational savvy

achievement focus

safety

judgment

Great Place to Work ®risk management

planning and organization

 

 

An executive’s overall performance in our performance assessment program is rated on a scale of one to five, with five as the highest rating denoting distinguished performance. An overall performance above 3.75 is considered commendable performance.

The chief executive officer assessed each other named executive officer’s performance under the performance assessment program, and the compensation committee, as well as the full board of directors, assessed the chief executive officer’s performance.

The board of directors rates our chief executive officer’s performance in the following areas:

leadership

succession planning

integrity and values

human resources

strategic planning

external relations

financial results

board relations

communications


 

 

 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

2119




 

Proxy Statement

 

The board of directors rates our chief executive officer’s performance in the following areas:

leadership

succession planning

integrity and values

human resources

strategic planning

external relations

financial results

board relations

communications

risk management

Our chief executive officer’s performance was rated on a scale of one to five, with five as the highest rating denoting performance well above expectations.

Base Salaries of the Named Executive Officers for 2012

 

Base Salaries of the Named Executive Officers for 2011Terry D. Hildestad

In recognition ofThe compensation committee recommended a 6.67% salary increase for Mr. Hildestad for 2012, which would have raised his salary from $750,000 to $800,000 ($775,000 being the continued challengingmarket median). The compensation committee’s rationale for the increase was


his high performance evaluation

his high integrity, excellent business know how, and ability to work effectively with the management team and the board

his effectiveness in navigating the company through a difficult economic environment and our efforts to control costs, the compensation committee determined that, except for Mr. Schwartz, there would be no base

his salary increases for 2011. The compensation committee had alsobeen frozen 2010 base salaries at their 2009 levels for our named executive officers, except for Mr. Schwartz who received an increase in connection with his promotion to chief financial officer in 2010. Determination of Mr. Wells’ base salary is discussed below.since January 1, 2009.

Mr. Hildestad, however, did not accept his base salary increase for 2012 in order to be treated the same as other Section 16 officers who did not receive a salary increase for 2012.

 

Doran N. Schwartz

Mr. Schwartz was elected vice president and chief financial officer effective February 17, 2010. For 20112012, the compensation committee awarded Mr. Schwartz a 5.0%9.9% increase, raising his 20102012 salary from $260,000$273,000 to $273,000.$300,000, or 92% of the midpoint of salary grade I for 2012. The compensation committee’s rationale for the increase was in recognition of:


 

 

���

Mr. Schwartz’s commendable job in transitioning into his new position of chief financial officer in 2010

his salary equaling the minimum of his salary grade

his leadership in helping reduce our 2011 corporate overhead expense budget by approximately $700,000 and

his assistance in the company achieving a return on invested capital of 7.5%6.9% for the twelve months ending June 20102011 as compared to the median return on invested capital of 6.4%6.0% for companies in our performance graph peer group over the same time period.period

 

his success at building good working relationships with shareholders, rating agencies, and the financial community and

moving his salary closer to the midpoint of salary grade I.


Steven L. Bietz

Mr. Bietz received no salary increase for 2012 because the compensation committee wanted to limit salary cost increases.

 

J. Kent Wells

WhenMr. Wells received no salary increase for 2012 because he had just started his employment with the board initiatedcompany in May 2011 with a searchsalary above the maximum for a president and chief executive officer of Fidelity & Exploration Company, Mr. Hildestad directed the human resources department to conduct a competitive assessment to determine the remuneration necessary to recruit a qualified individual. The competitive assessment was done in January 2011. Using information collected from most recent public company proxy statements by Equilar, Inc., an independent data collection firm, the human resources department’s analysis looked at 2009 compensation data for chief executive officer positions at companies in the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes:his salary grade.

 

1311 – Crude Petroleum and Natural GasWilliam E. Schneider

1321 – Natural Gas Liquids

1381 – Drilling OilMr. Schneider received no salary increase for 2012 because his salary was 115% of the market value for his position and Gas Wells and

1382 – Oil and Gas Field Exploration Services.the compensation committee wanted to limit salary cost increases.

Revenue ranged from $250 million to $850 million with median revenue of $591 million at the 36 companies surveyed. These companies are listed on Exhibit C.

The competitive assessment measured base salary, target annual cash compensation, which was base salary plus annual discretionary bonus plus target annual non-equity incentive plan compensation, and target total direct compensation, which was target annual cash compensation plus the target value of long term incentives plus the change in pension and non-qualified deferred compensation plus all other compensation as reported in a company’s proxy statement. The results of the competitive analysis were:

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation Item

 

 

CEO Data

 

Base Salary (median)

 

$

559,961

 

Target Annual Cash Compensation (median)

 

$

1,050,000

 

Target Total Direct Compensation (median)

 

$

2,337,003

 

Mr. Wells’ base salary of $550,000 approximated the median base salary of $559,961 paid to chief executive officers in the competitive assessment. We determined that Mr. Wells’ base salary should be close to the median paid to chief executive officers and above the maximum for his salary grade level because we determined that level was necessary to recruit Mr. Wells for this position.


 

 

 

 

 

2220

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

 

The following table shows each named executive officer’s base salary for 2010 and 2011 and the percentage change:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Base Salary
for 2010
(000s)
($)

 

Base Salary
for 2011
(000s)
($)

 

% Change
(%)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

750.0

 

 

750.0

 

 

0.0

 

Doran N. Schwartz (1)

 

 

260.0

 

 

273.0

 

 

5.0

 

J. Kent Wells (2)

 

 

n/a

 

 

550.0

 

 

n/a

 

John G. Harp

 

 

450.0

 

 

450.0

 

 

0.0

 

William E. Schneider

 

 

447.4

 

 

447.4

 

 

0.0

 

(1)

Elected vice president and chief financial officer effective February 17, 2010. Salary shown is not prorated.

(2)

Hired May 2, 2011, as president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company. Salary shown is not prorated.

20112012 Annual Incentives

What the Performance Measures Are and Why We Chose Them


The compensation committee develops and reviews financial and other corporate performance measures to help ensure that compensation to the executives reflects the success of their respective business unitsegment and/or the corporation, as well as the value provided to our stockholders. For all business segment chief executive officers, including Messrs. Wells, Harp,Wells and Schneider,Bietz, the performance measures for annual incentive awards are their respective business unit’s annual return on invested capital results compared to target and their respective business unit’s

their respective business segment’s annual return on invested capital results compared to target

their respective business segment’s allocated earnings per share results compared to target and

the company’s consolidated earnings per share compared to a target of $1.19.

The compensation committee added the third performance measure, consolidated earnings per share, results compared to target, with Mr. Wells’ 2011 annual incentivefor the first time in 2012. The compensation committee weighted the 2012 performance measures for Messrs. Wells and Bietz at 75% for Fidelity Exploration & Production Companytheir business segment performance measures (weighted evenly) and 25% for WBI Holdings, Inc.

the company’s earnings per share measure to more closely tie their annual incentive amounts to total company results.

For the named executive officers working at MDU Resources Group, Inc. in 2011,2012, who were Messrs. Hildestad, Schwartz, and Schwartz,Schneider, the compensation committee based 20112012 annual incentives on the weighted averageachievement of performance goals at the incentive payments made tobusiness segments: (i) the chief executive officers of MDU Construction Services Group, Inc., Knife River Corporation, WBI Holdings, Inc.,construction materials and contracting and construction services segments, (ii) the Combined Utility Group, which consists of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., Cascade Natural Gas Corporation,pipeline and Intermountain Gas Company.energy services segment, (iii) the exploration and production segment, and (iv) the electric and natural gas distribution segments. The compensation committee’s rationale for this approach was to provide greater alignment between the MDU Resources Group, Inc. executives and the business unit executives’ annual incentive payments andsegment performance. This methodology requires that all business unit executives receive a maximum annual incentive payment before the MDU Resources Group, Inc. executives receive a maximum annual incentive payment.

The compensation committee believes earnings per share and return on invested capital are very good measurements in assessing a business unit’ssegment’s performance and the company’s performance from a financial standpoint.perspective. Earnings per share is a generally accepted accounting principle measurement and is a key driver of stockholder return over the long-term. Return on invested capital measures howmeasure show efficiently and effectively management deploys capital. Sustained returns on invested capital in excess of a business unit’ssegment’s cost of capital create value for our stockholders.

Allocated earnings per share for a business unitsegment is calculated by dividing that business unit’ssegment’s earnings by the business unit’ssegment’s portion of the total company weighted average shares outstanding. Return on invested capital for a business unitsegment is calculated by dividing the business unit’ssegment’s earnings, without regard to after tax interest expense and preferred stock dividends, by the business unit’ssegment’s average capitalization for the calendar year.

The compensation committee determines the weighting of the performance measures each year based upon recommendations from the chief executive officer. The compensation committee maintained the 2011 performance measure weightings at 50% each because the compensation committee believes both measures are equally important in driving stockholder value in the short term and long term.

We establish our incentive plan performance targets in connection with our annual financial planning process, where we assess the economic environment, competitive outlook, industry trends, and company specific conditions to set projections of results. The compensation committee evaluates the projected results and uses this evaluation to establish the incentive plan performance targets based upon recommendation of the chief executive officer. The compensation committee also considers annual change inIn determining where to set the return on invested capital measure in establishing targets to help ensure that return on invested capital will equal or exceedtarget, the compensation committee considers the business segment’s weighted average cost of capital over time.capital. The weighted average cost of capital is a composite cost of the individual sources of funds including equity and debt used to finance a company’s assets. It is calculated by averaging the cost of debt plus the cost of equity by the proportion each represents in our, or the business segment’s, capital structure. For 2011,2012, the compensation committee chose to use the return on invested capital target for each business segment as approved by

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

23




Proxy Statement

the board in the 20112012 business plan. Furthermore,plan, except for the construction services segment, which had a target higher than the 2012 business plan to incentivize efforts for that segment to achieve its weighted average cost of capital within five years. The compensation committee continued its 2010 practice and imposed an additional requirement for the 20112012 return on invested capital portion of the annual incentives except for the Combined Utility Group. Results aboveconstruction materials and contracting segment, the 2011 return on invested capital target would not generateconstruction services segment, and the exploration and production segment. The additional annual incentive compensation forrequirement was the business unit executives, unless 2011 return on invested capital results met or exceeded a business unit’ssegment needed to achieve its weighted average cost of capital. In that case, the business unit chief executive officer could earncapital in order to achieve 200% of the annual incentive target attributable to the return on invested capital portion of the annual incentive. However, payments with respect to 2012 return on invested capital results above the 2012 target but below the weighted average cost of capital would be interpolated, in order to motivate these executives to achieve performance levels between the return on invested capital performance targets and the weighted average cost of capital for their respective business segments.

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

21



Proxy Statement

What the Named Executive Officers’ 2012 Incentive Targets Are and Why We Chose Them

Targets


The compensation committee established the named executive officers’ annual incentive targets as a percentage of each officer’s actual 20112012 base salary.

Messrs. Hildestad’s, Harp’s,Schwartz‘s, and Schneider’s 20112012 target annual incentiveincentives were 100%, 65%50%, and 65% of base salary, respectively. The compensation committee determined the 20112012 annual incentive targets would remain unchanged from 2010. The compensation committee’s rationale2011 for this decision wasthese named executives based on the competitive assessments. Specifically, the annual incentive target of 100% of base salary for Mr. Hildestad was within the 82% to 135% range of incentives for chief executive officer positions. The annual incentive targets of 65% for Messrs. Harp and Schneider were within the 43% to 71% range of incentives for business unit president and chief executive officer positions. The compensation committee believed, based on internal equity, that there should be a uniform annual incentive target for these two business unit president and chief executive officer positions. Mr. Schwartz’s annual incentive target was 50% of base salary and also remained unchanged from 2010. Mr. Schwartz’s annual incentive target was below the 55% target identified by Towers Watson in its competitive assessment. The committee’s rationale for the slightly lower annual incentive target was to reflect Mr. Schwartz’s recent promotion to vice president and chief financial officer. Mr. Wells’ annual incentive target is discussed below.following reasons:

Terry D. Hildestad and Doran N. Schwartz
As discussed above, Messrs. Hildestad and Schwartz were awarded 2011 incentives based on the weighted average of the payments made to the business unit chief executive officers, with each payment weighted by the business unit’s average invested capital for 2011. The award opportunities and results for the four business units are discussed below.

As a result of the awards earned by the chief executive officers of the business units, Messrs. Hildestad and Schwartz earned 127.3% of their target awards, resulting in a payment of $954,750 for Mr. Hildestad and $173,765 for Mr. Schwartz.

John G. Harp – MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.
The 2011 award opportunity available to Mr. Harp ranged from no payment if the results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

 

 

For Mr. Hildestad, the annual incentive target of 100% of base salary was slightly above the 86% of base salary paid to chief executive officer positions based on salary survey data from the competitive assessment. The committee believed this difference was too small to warrant a change in Mr. Hildestad’s 2012 incentive target.

For Mr. Schwartz, the annual incentive target of 50% of base salary was slightly below 57% of base salary paid to chief financial officers based on salary survey data from the competitive assessment. The committee believed this difference was too small to warrant a change in Mr. Schwartz’s 2012 incentive target.

For Mr. Schneider, the compensation committee determined his 2012 incentive target should remain the same from 2011 because of the importance the company placed on his new role of leveraging opportunities in the Bakken that would cut across all of the company’s business segments. There was no competitive data compiled on his position.

Mr. Bietz’s 2012 target annual incentive was 65% of base salary. The compensation committee determined the 2012 annual incentive target would remain unchanged from 2011 for Mr. Bietz because the annual incentive based on salary survey data from the competitive assessment was 62% of base salary. The committee believed this difference was too small to warrant a change in Mr. Bietz’s 2012 target annual incentive.

Mr. Wells’ 2012 incentive target was 125% of bases salary, which was increased from 100% of base salary. The committee raised Mr. Wells’ annual incentive target to mitigate the impact of the added company earnings per share goal and to reflect his business segment’s impact on overall company results. The committee recognized the significant investment that his business segment will make and the desire to incentivize and motivate Mr. Wells to generate earnings that can greatly impact overall company earnings.

Named Executive Officers’ 2012 Incentive Payments

Terry D. Hildestad, Doran N. Schwartz, and William E. Schneider
As discussed above, Messrs. Hildestad, Schwartz, and Schneider were awarded 2012 incentives based on achievement of performance goals at the business segments. The award opportunities and results for the business segments are discussed below.

As a result of the performance goals achieved at the business segments, Messrs. Hildestad, Schwartz, and Schneider earned 69.1% of their target awards, resulting in a payment of $518,250 for Mr. Hildestad, $103,650 for Mr. Schwartz, and $200,950 for Mr. Schneider.

Pipeline and Energy Services Segment
For the pipeline and energy services segment, the 2012 award opportunity was comprised of three components:

The pipeline and energy services segment component represented 75% of the target award, and payout could range from no payment if the results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

o

the 2012 allocated earnings per share for MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.the segment were at or above the 115% level and

 

 

o

the 20112012 return on invested capital was at least equal to MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.’s 2011 weighted average cost of capital.or above the 115% level.

We set Mr. Harp’s 2011 allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital target levels below his 2010 target level and below the 2010 actual level. Both 2011 target levels reflected significant uncertainty in the overall construction market and anticipated lower margins due to more competitive bids on construction projects. MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.’s 2011 earnings per share and return on invested capital were 186.6% and 160.0% of their respective 2011 targets. Mr. Harp’s payment with respect to the return on invested capital component was limited to the target amount of $146,250 because MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.’s return on invested capital was less than its weighted average cost of capital, resulting in an overall payment of $438,750, or 150% of Mr. Harp’s 2011 target annual incentive.

William E. Schneider – Knife River Corporation
The 2011 award opportunity for Mr. Schneider ranged from no payment if the results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

 

 

the 2011 allocatedThe MDU Resources Group, Inc. earnings per share for Knife River Corporationcomponent represented 25% of the award and payout could range from no payment if the results were atbelow the $1.19 to a 200% payout if the results were $1.37 or above the 115% level andhigher.

 

 

the 2011 return on invested capitalThe pipeline and energy services segment also had five individual goals relating to safety results with each goal that was at least equal to Knife River Corporation’s 2011 weighted average cost of capital.


24

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

We setnot met reducing the 2011 allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital target levels below the 2010 target levels and the 2010 actual results. The 2011 target levels reflected a greater share of business coming from public sector projects, which generally carry lower profit margins. Also, 2011 target levels were lower than 2010 target levels due in part to the absence of earnings gains on the sales of property and equipment. Knife River Corporation’s 2011 results for allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital were 115.0% and 109.4% of their respective targets. Mr. Schneider’s payment with respect to the return on invested capital component was limited to the target amount of $145,405 because Knife River Corporation’s return on invested capital was less than its weighted average cost of capital, resulting in an overall payment of $436,215, or 150% of Mr. Schneider’s 2011 target annual incentive.

WBI Holdings, Inc.
For WBI Holdings, Inc., the 2011 award opportunity for its president and chief executive officer ranged from no payment if the results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

the 2011 allocated earnings per share for WBI Holdings, Inc. were at or above the 115% level

the 2011 return on invested capital was at least equal to WBI Holdings, Inc.’s 2011 weighted average cost of capital and

the five safety goals were met.

We set the 2011 allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital target levels slightly below the 2010 target levels and below the 2010 actual results. The 2011 target levels were based on lower natural gas prices and higher depletion, depreciation, and amortization amounts. WBI Holdings, Inc.’s 2011 results for allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital were 99.5% and 100.0% of their respective targets, resulting in a potential payment of 98.8% of the president and chief executive officer of WBI Holdings, Inc.’s 2011 target annual incentive.

The president and chief executive officer of WBI Holdings, Inc. also had five individual goals relating to WBI Holdings, Inc.’s safety results with each goal that was not met reducing his annual incentive award by 1%. The five individual goals were:

 

 

o

each established local safety committee will conduct 8eight meetings per year

 

 

o

each established local safety committee must conduct 4four site assessments per year

 

 

o

report vehicle accidents and personal injuries by the end of the next business day

 

 

o

achieve the targeted vehicle accident incident rate of 2.52.25 or less and

 

 

o

achieve the targeted personal injury incident rate of 2.0 or less.

One of the five safety goals was not met because WBI Holdings, Inc.’s personal injury incident rate was 3.13. Therefore, the incentive payment was reduced from 98.8% to 97.8% of the 2011 target annual incentive.

Combined Utility Group
For the Combined Utility Group, the 2011 award opportunity for its president and chief executive officer ranged from no payment if the allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if results were at or above the 115% level.

We set the 2011 targets for allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital targets higher than the 2010 targets but lower than 2010 actual results to reflect a deferred income tax credit in 2010 that did not recur in 2011. For 2011, the Combined Utility Group’s 2011 earnings per share and return on invested capital exceeded their respective 2011 targets. As a result, the president and chief executive officer of the Combined Utility Group was paid 136.7% of the 2011 target annual incentive.

J. Kent Wells
In connection with his hire, the compensation committee granted Mr. Wells an annual incentive opportunity pursuant to the WBI Holdings, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. Mr. Wells’ annual incentive target was set at 100% of his base salary. The committee’s rationale was the 100% annual incentive target would drive a target annual cash compensation of $1.1 million, which approximated the target annual cash compensation paid to chief executive officers listed in the competitive assessment. For 2011, the committee guaranteed a minimum payment of 100% of target, prorated to reflect his May 2, 2011 hire date.

 

 

 

 

22

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement



Proxy Statement

The committee set the pipeline and energy services segment’s 2012 allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital below the 2011 target levels and below the 2011 actual results. The 2012 target levels were based on lower natural gas prices and, as a result, lower storage and gas transmission activity.

The committee set the MDU Resources Group, Inc. earnings per share target at $1.19 because it was equal to the 2011 result, and the committee believed tying 25% of the incentive award to delivering at least $1.19 in 2012 was appropriate.

The pipeline and energy services segment’s 2012 earnings per share and return on invested capital were 179.8% and 143.1% of their respective 2012 targets, equating to 200% of the target amount attributable to that component. Also, MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s 2012 earnings per share results were $(.01), equating to 0% of the target amount attributable to that component.

Results at the pipeline and energy services segment (before adjustment for the five safety goals) were 150% of the 2012 target annual incentive. One of the five safety goals was not met because WBI Energy’s personal injury incident rate was 2.67. Therefore, the incentive results were reduced from 150% to 148.5% of the 2012 target annual incentive.

Exploration and Production Segment
For the exploration and production segment, the 2012 award opportunity was comprised of two components:

The exploration and production business segment component represented 75% of the target award, and payout could range from no payment if the results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

o

the 2012 allocated earnings per share for the segment were at or above the 115% level and

o

the 2012 return on invested capital was at least equal to the segment’s 2012 weighted average cost of capital.

The MDU Resources Group, Inc. earnings per share component represented 25% of the award and payout could range from no payment if the results were below the $1.19 target to a 200% payout if the results were $1.37 or higher.

The committee set the exploration and production segment’s 2012 allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital target levels below the 2011 actual results. The 2012 allocated earnings per share target level was above the 2011 target level, and the 2012 return on invested capital target level was below the 2011 target level. The 2012 target levels were based on lower natural gas prices and higher depletion, depreciation, and amortization amounts. The committee set the MDU Resources Group, Inc. earnings per share target at $1.19 because it was equal to the 2011 result, and the committee believed tying 25% of the incentive award to delivering at least $1.19 in 2012 was appropriate.

This segment’s 2012 earnings per share and return on invested capital were negative equating to no payment on either component. Also, MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s 2012 earnings per share results were $(.01), equating to 0% of the target amount attributable to that component.

Overall results for 2012 were 0%.

Construction Services and Construction Materials and Contracting Segments
For purposes of determining the annual incentive awards of the MDU Resources Group, Inc. executives and the chief executive officer of these segments, these segments were combined. The 2012 award opportunity was comprised of three components:

The construction services segment component represented 37.5% of the target award, and payout could range from no payment if the results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

o

the 2012 allocated earnings per share for the segment were at or above the 115% level and

o

the 2012 return on invested capital was at least equal to the segment’s 2012 weighted average cost of capital.

The construction materials and contracting segment component represented 37.5% of the award, and payment could range from no payment if the results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

o

the 2012 allocated earnings per share for the segment were at or above the 115% level and

o

the 2012 return on invested capital was at least equal to the segment’s 2012 weighted average cost of capital.

The MDU Resources Group, Inc. earnings per share component represented 25% of the award and payout could range from no payment if the results were below the $1.19 target to a 200% payout if the results were $1.37 or higher.


 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

23




Proxy Statement

The committee set the construction services business segment’s 2012 allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital target levels above the 2011 target levels and below the 2011 actual results. The construction materials and contracting business segment’s 2012 allocated earnings per share target level was set below the 2011 target level and 2011 actual results, and the 2012 return on invested capital target level was set above the 2011 target level and equal to the 2011 actual results. The 2012 target levels reflected significant uncertainty in the overall construction market, including an absence of a federal highway bill and continued low margins due to competitive bids on construction projects. The committee set the MDU Resources Group, Inc. earnings per share target at $1.19 because it was equal to the 2011 result, and the committee believed tying 25% of the incentive award to delivering at least $1.19 in 2012 was appropriate.

The construction services segment’s 2012 earnings per share and return on invested capital were 226.6% and 205.4% of their respective 2012 targets, equating to 200% of the target amount attributable to that component. The construction materials and contracting segment’s 2012 earnings per share and return on invested capital were 158.1% and 117.1% of their respective 2012 targets, equating to 155.9% of the target amount attributable to that component. MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s 2012 earnings per share results were $(.01), equating to 0% of the target amount attributable to that component.

Overall results for 2012 were 133.5% of the 2012 target annual incentive award.

Electric and Natural Gas Distribution Segments
For the electric and natural gas distribution segments, the 2012 award opportunity was comprised of two components:

the electric and natural gas distribution business segments component represented 75% of the target award, and payout could range from no payment if the allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital results were below the 85% level to a 200% payout if:

o

the 2012 allocated earnings per share for the segment were at or above the 115% level and

o

the 2012 return on invested capital was at or above the 115% level.

The MDU Resources Group, Inc. earnings per share component represented 25% of the award and payout could range from no payment if the results were below the $1.19 target to a 200% payout if the results were $1.37 or higher.

The committee set the 2012 target for allocated earnings per share higher than the 2011 targets but lower than 2011 actual results to reflect a one-time income tax benefit in 2011. The committee set the 2012 return on invested capital target at the 2011 target level, which was below 2011 actual results to reflect a one-time income tax benefit in 2011. For 2012, the electric and natural gas distribution segments’ 2012 earnings per share and return on invested capital were 93.1% and 93.6% of their respective targets, equating to 66.7% of the target amount attributable to that component. MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s 2012 earnings per share results were $(.01), equating to 0% of the target amount attributable to that component.

Overall results for these segments were 50% of the 2012 target annual incentive award.

The following table shows the changes in our performance targets and achievements for both 2011 and 2012:

  2011
Incentive Plan
Performance
Targets
 2011
Incentive
Plan Results
 2012
Incentive Plan
Performance
Targets
 2012
Incentive
Plan Results
                EPS   EPS
          EPS   EPS Business   MDU
          Business   MDU Segment ROIC Resources
  EPS ROIC EPS ROIC Segment ROIC Resources ($) / (% of (%) / (% of ($) / (% of
Name ($) (%) ($) (%) ($) (%) ($) Target) Target) Target)
Pipeline and Energy Services 1.97 7.9 1.96 7.9 0.99 5.8 1.19 1.78 / 200 8.3 / 200 (.01) / 0
Exploration and Production 1.99 7.1 2.20 7.9 2.10 6.9 1.19 (4.81) / 0 (13.9) / 0 (.01) / 0
Construction Services 2.39 6.0 4.46 9.6 3.61 7.4 1.19 8.18 / 200 15.2 / 200 (.01) / 0
Construction Materials and Contracting 0.35 3.2 0.40 3.5 0.31 3.5 1.19 0.49 / 200 4.1 / 111.8 (.01) / 0
Electric and Natural Gas Distribution 1.14 6.2 1.21 6.5 1.16 6.2 1.19 1.08 / 65.5 5.8 / 67.8 (.01) / 0

2524

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

 

The 2011 incentive award opportunity was based on the financial goals for both Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and WBI Holdings, Inc., weighted 75% for the results of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and 25% for the results of WBI Holdings, Inc. The incentive award could be reduced by up to 10% if Fidelity Exploration & Production Company did not meet its production goal and by up to 5% if WBI Holdings, Inc. did not satisfy its safety goals. Mr. Wells could achieve a maximum of 200% of the annual incentive target if:

the 2011 allocated earnings per share for Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and the 2011 allocated earnings per share for WBI Holdings, Inc., were at or above 115% of the performance target

the 2011 return on invested capital for Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and the 2011 return on invested capital for WBI Holdings, Inc. were both at least equal to their respective weighted average costs of capital

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company achieved production of at least 69.3 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe), and

the five safety goals for WBI Holdings, Inc. were met.

Financial Goals and Results
We set the 2011 earnings per share and return on invested capital targets for Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and WBI Holdings, Inc. lower than 2010 target levels and lower than 2010 actual results based on lower natural gas prices and higher depletion, depreciation, and amortization expense.

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s earnings per share and return on invested capital exceeded their respective targets, but Mr. Wells’ payment with respect to the return on invested capital component was limited to the target amount because its return on invested capital was less than its weighted average cost of capital. WBI Holdings, Inc.’s 2011 results are discussed earlier under 2011 Annual Incentives – WBI Holdings, Inc. The weighted financial results for Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and WBI Holdings, Inc. resulted in an achievement of 126.1% of the incentive target. This resulted in a potential payment to Mr. Wells of $462,390, which was subject to reduction if Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s production goal was not met and/or WBI Holdings, Inc. failed to achieve one or more of its five 2011 safety goals.

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company Production and WBI Holdings, Inc. Safety Goals and Results

 

 

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

 

2011 Production in Bcfe

Goal Achievement Percentage

Less than 62.4

0%

62.4

50%

Higher than 62.4 up to and including 69.3

Prorated from 50% to 100%

Higher than 69.3

100%

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s 2011 actual production was 66.6 Bcfe, which equates to an achievement percentage of 80.5%.

The five WBI Holdings, Inc. safety goals were:

each established local safety committee will conduct 8 meetings per year

each established local safety committee must conduct 4 site assessments per year

report vehicle accidents and personal injuries by the end of the next business day

achieve the targeted vehicle accident incident rate of 2.5 or less and

achieve the targeted personal injury incident rate of 2.0 or less.

Even though Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s personal injury rate was 0.0, WBI Holdings, Inc. did not meet one of its safety goals due to a 2011 personal injury incident rate above 2.0. Achieving four of the five safety goals equates to an achievement percentage of 80.0%.

The production and safety goal results reduced Mr. Wells’ potential award of $462,390 by 2.9% to $448,981. Of the $448,981 payment, $366,685 is the target amount guaranteed in Mr. Wells’ letter agreement and is reported in the Bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table; the additional $82,296 was reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

26

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The following table shows the changes in our performance targets and achievements for both 2010 and 2011:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010
Incentive Plan
Performance
Targets

 

2010
Incentive
Plan Results

 

2011
Incentive Plan
Performance
Targets

 

2011
Incentive
Plan Results

 

Name

 

EPS
($)

 

ROIC
(%)

 

EPS
($)

 

ROIC
(%)

 

EPS
($)

 

ROIC
(%)

 

EPS
($)

 

ROIC
(%)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

J. Kent Wells

FEP: 2.08

 

 

7.8

FEP: 2.41

 

 

8.8

FEP: 1.99

 

 

7.1

FEP: 2.20

 

 

7.9

 

 

WBI: 2.02

 

 

8.4

WBI: 2.08

 

 

8.6

WBI: 1.97

 

 

7.9

WBI: 1.96

 

 

7.9

 

John G. Harp (1)

 

 

2.22

 

 

6.7

 

 

3.46

 

 

9.0

 

 

2.39

 

 

6.0

 

 

4.46

 

 

9.6

 

William E. Schneider (2)

 

 

0.54

 

 

4.6

 

 

0.44

 

 

3.9

 

 

0.35

 

 

3.2

 

 

0.40

 

 

3.5

 

WBI Holdings, Inc.
President & CEO

 

 

2.02

 

 

8.4

 

 

2.08

 

 

8.6

 

 

1.97

 

 

7.9

 

 

1.96

 

 

7.9

 

Combined Utility Group
President & CEO

 

 

1.07

 

 

6.1

 

 

1.17

 

 

6.5

 

 

1.14

 

 

6.2

 

 

1.21

 

 

6.5

 

(1)

Based on allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital for MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.

(2)

Based on allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital for Knife River Corporation.

The table below lists each named executive officer’s 20112012 base salary, annual incentive target percentage, incentive plan performance targets, incentive plan results, and the annual incentive earned.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011
Base
Salary

 

 

2011
Annual
Incentive

 

2011
Incentive Plan
Performance
Targets

 

2011
Incentive
Plan Results

 

 

2011
Annual Incentive
Earned
(% of Target)

 

 

2011
Annual
Incentive
Earned

 

Name

 

 

(000s)
($)

 

 

Target
(%)

 

 

EPS
($)

 

 

ROIC
(%)

 

 

EPS
($)

 

 

ROIC
(%)

 

 

EPS
(%)

 

 

ROIC
(%)

 

 

(000s)
($)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

750.0

 

 

100

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

 

954.8

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

273.0

 

 

50

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

See table below

 

 

173.8

 

J. Kent Wells (1)

 

 

550.0

 

 

100

FEP: 1.99

 

 

7.1

FEP: 2.20

 

 

7.9

FEP: 170.3

 

 

100

 

 

FEP: 353.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WBI: 1.97

 

 

7.9

WBI: 1.96

 

 

7.9

WBI:   97.5

 

 

100

 

 

WBI:   95.5

 

John G. Harp (2)

 

 

450.0

 

 

65

 

 

2.39

 

 

6.0

 

 

4.46

 

 

9.6

 

 

200.0

 

 

100

 

 

438.8

 

William E. Schneider (3)

 

 

447.4

 

 

65

 

 

0.35

 

 

3.2

 

 

0.40

 

 

3.5

 

 

200.0

 

 

100

 

 

436.2

 

(1)

Based on allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital for Fidelity Exploration & Production Company (weighted 75%) and WBI Holdings, Inc. (weighted 25%). Mr. Wells’ 2011 annual incentive earned reflects a reduction of 2.9% due to Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s 2011 results on production and WBI Holdings, Inc.’s results on safety.

(2)

Based on allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital for MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.

(3)

Based on allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital for Knife River Corporation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

2012
Base
Salary
(000s)
($)

 

2012
Annual
Incentive
Target
(%)

 

2012
Annual
Incentive
Earned
(% of Target)

 

2012
Annual
Incentive
Earned
(000s)
($)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

750.0

 

100

 

69.1

 

518.3

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

300.0

 

50

 

69.1

 

103.7

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

360.5

 

65

 

148.5

 

348.0

 

J. Kent Wells

 

550.0

 

125

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

William E. Schneider

 

447.4

 

65

 

69.1

 

201.0

 

Messrs. Hildestad’s, Schwartz’s, and Schwartz’s 2011Schneider’s 2012 annual incentives were paid at 127.3%69.1% of target based on the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer of:

 

 

Column A
2011 Payment as a
Percentage of Annual
Incentive Target

 

Column B
Percentage of
Average Invested
Capital

Column A x Column B

 

MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.

 

 

150.0

%

 

6.1

%

 

9.2

%

Knife River Corporation

 

 

150.0

%

 

24.4

%

 

36.6

%

WBI Holdings, Inc.

 

 

97.8

%

 

34.6

%

 

33.8

%

Combined Utility Group

 

 

136.7

%

 

34.9

%

 

47.7

%

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

127.3

%

 

J. Kent Wells’ Additional 2011 Annual Incentive
We granted Mr. Wells a second 2011 annual incentive award pursuant to the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, based on Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s cash flow from operations. Specifically, we granted Mr. Wells an all-or-nothing award opportunity of $1.85 million, payable one-half in cash and one-half in our common stock, if Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s 2011 cash flow from operations exceeded $132.0 million and he did not resign from the company prior to January 2, 2012. If Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s 2011 cash flow from operations exceeded $132.0 million and Mr. Wells’ employment was terminated prior to January 2, 2012, due to a change in control of the company, Mr. Wells would have been entitled to full payment of this incentive award. The compensation committee chose cash flow from operations as the performance measure due to the significance of consistent

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

27




Proxy Statement

reinvestment in exploration and production assets. Cash flow from operations is necessary to sustain and grow a business in this industry. The compensation committee set the incentive performance level at $132.0 million, which was below the 2011 operating plan, to provide an allowance for depressed commodity prices and to yield a reasonable probability of payment, as the $1.85 million was in part to offset other compensation Mr. Wells would have received if he had stayed with his former employer.

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s actual 2011 cash flow from operations was $276.4 million, resulting in a payment of $1.85 million to Mr. Wells. The cash portion paid to Mr. Wells is reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan column in the Summary Compensation Table, and the grant date fair value of the stock portion of the award is reported in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Column A
Percentage of
Annual Incentive
Target Achieved

 

Column B
Percentage of
Average Invested
Capital

 

Column A x Column B

 

Construction Services Segment and Construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Materials and Contracting Segment

 

133.5%

29.2%

39.0%

Exploration and Production Segment

 

0.0%

28.1%

0.0%

Pipeline and Energy Services Segment

 

148.5%

8.8%

13.1%

Electric and Natural Gas Distribution Segments

 

50.0%

 

33.9%

 

17.0%

Total (Payout Percentage)

 

 

 

 

 

69.1%

Deferral of Annual Incentive Compensation

We provide executives the opportunity to defer receipt of earned annual incentives. If an executive chooses to defer his or her annual incentive, we will credit the deferral with interest at a rate determined by the compensation committee. For 2011,2012, the committee chose to use the average of (i) the number that results from adding the daily Moody’s U.S. Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for “A” rated companies as of the last day of each month for the 12-month period ending October 31 and dividing by 12 and (ii) the number that results from adding the daily Moody’s U.S. Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for “BBB” rated companies as of the last day of each month for the 12-month period ending October 31 and dividing by 12. This resulted in an interest rate of 5.46%. The compensation committee’s reasons for using this approach recognized:

 

 

incentive deferrals are a low-cost source of capital for the company and

 

 

incentive deferrals are unsecured obligations and, therefore, carry a higher risk to the executives.

20112012 Long-Term Incentives

Awards Granted in 20112012 under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Named Executives
We use the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, which has been approved by our stockholders, for long-term incentive compensation. We use performance shares as the primary form of long-term incentive compensation. We have not granted stock options since 2001, and in 2011 we amended the plan to no longer permit the grant of stock options or stock appreciation rights. We use performance shares as the primary form of long-term incentive compensation, andrights; no stock options, stock appreciation rights, or restricted shares are outstanding.

For the named executives, other than Mr. Wells who did not receive any long-term incentive award in 2011, theThe compensation committee used the performance graph peer group as the comparator group to determine relative stockholder return and potential payments underfor the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan for its 2011-20132012 performance share awards. In February 2011, the compensation committee approved changes to ourThe performance graph peer group to:

remove OGE Energy Corp. because it is an electric only utility

remove NSTAR because it was expected to be acquired by Northeast Utilities in 2011

add Atmos Energy Corporation, a natural gas distribution business with pipeline, gas storage, and energy marketing businesses

remove ONEOK because its asset size has grown to $13 billion

add Southern Union Company, which has natural gas transportation and storage, gathering and processing, and gas distribution businesses

add Texas Industries, Inc. and Sterling Construction Company and

replace Dycom Industries, Inc., which has more emphasis on telecommunications, with Pike Electric, which is a good fit with our construction services business to balance out the business mix of our peer group.


28

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

Theconsisted of the following companies comprising ourwhen the committee granted performance graph peer groupshares in February 2011 were:2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alliant Energy Corporation

 

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

 

Southwest Gas Corporation

Atmos Energy

 

National Fuel Gas Company

 

Sterling Construction Company

Berry Petroleum Company

 

Northwest Natural Gas Company

 

SM Energy Company

Black Hills Corporation

 

Pike Electric Corporation

 

Swift Energy Company

Comstock Resources, Inc.

 

Quanta Services, Inc.

 

Texas Industries

EMCOR Group, Inc.

 

Questar Corporation

 

Vectren Corporation

EQT Corporation

 

SCANA Corporation

 

Vulcan Materials Company

Granite Construction Incorporated

 

Southern Union Company

 

Whiting Petroleum Corporation


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

25




Proxy Statement

The performance measure is our total stockholder return over a three-year measurement period as compared to the total stockholder returns of the companies in our performance graph peer group over the same three-year period. The compensation committee selected the relative stockholder return performance measure because it believes executive pay under a long-term, capital accumulation program such as this should mirror our long-term performance in stockholder return as compared to other public companies in our industries. Payments are made in company stock; dividend equivalents are paid in cash. No dividend equivalents are paid on unvested performance shares.

Total stockholder return is the percentage change in the value of an investment in the common stock of a company, from the closing price on the last trading day in the calendar year preceding the beginning of the performance period, through the last trading day in the final year of the performance period. It is assumed that dividends are reinvested in additional shares of common stock at the frequency paid.

As with the annual incentive target, we determined the long-term incentive target for a given position by reference to the salary grade. We derived these incentive targets in part from the competitive assessment and in part by the compensation committee’s judgment on the impact each position has on our total stockholder return. The compensationFrom an internal equity standpoint, the committee also believed consistency across positions in the same salary grades andgrade should have the same long-term incentive target level. From an internal equity standpoint, the committee believed in keeping the chief executive officer’s long-term incentive target below a level indicated byfrom the competitive assessment were important from an internal equity standpoint. The 2011 long-term incentive targets as a percentageassessment. Mr. Hildestad’s target was 150% of base salary, below the salary survey median of 231% of base salary for each namedchief executive were unchanged from 2010 because the targets were in line with the competitive assessment’s targets.

officers. The compensation committee has historically set Mr. Hildestad’s target long-term incentive compensation below the level indicated by the competitive assessment to offset his benefit under the Supplemental Income Security Plan, our nonqualified defined benefit plan, which prior assessments have shown to be higher than competitive levels. To verify whether Mr. Hildestad’s targetThe 2012 long-term incentive compensation remains lowertargets as a percentage of base salary for Messrs. Schwartz, Bietz, and Schneider were unchanged from 2011 because the targets were in line with the competitive assessment’s targets. Mr. Wells’ long-term incentive target is 200% of base salary, which is higher than competitive levelsthe 90% long-term incentive target for other executives in salary grade J. The higher target for Mr. Wells was pursuant to his letter agreement and whetherreflects the committee’s judgment of offsetting Mr. Hildestad’sWells’ non-participation in our Supplemental Income Security Plan benefit remains higher than competitive levels, our human resources department conducted the review discussed in the Role of Management section above. The report showed that the combined value of Mr. Hildestad’s target long-term incentive compensation and nonqualified defined benefit plan benefits had a percentile rank of 58.4% when compared to the performance graph peer companies and a percentile rank of 43.7% when compared to companies with revenues ranging from $2.5 billion to $6.5 billion in the construction, energy, and utility industries.Plan.

On February 17, 2011,16, 2012, the board of directors, upon recommendation of the compensation committee, made performance share grants to the named executive officers. The compensation committee determined the target number of performance shares granted to each named executive officer by multiplying the named executive officer’s 20112012 base salary by his or her long-term incentive target and then dividing this product by the average of the closing prices of our stock from January 1, 20112012 through January 22, 2011,2012, as shown in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

2011
Base
Salary to
Determine
Target
($)

 

2011
Long-Term
Incentive
Target at
Time of
Grant
(%)

 

2011
Long-Term
Incentive
Target at
Time of
Grant
($)

 

Average
Closing Price
of Our Stock
From January 1
Through
January 22
($)

 

Resulting
Number of
Performance
Shares
Granted on
February 17
(#)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

750,000

 

 

150

 

 

1,125,000

 

 

20.74

 

 

54,243

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

273,000

 

 

75

 

 

204,750

 

 

20.74

 

 

9,872

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

John G. Harp

 

 

450,000

 

 

90

 

 

405,000

 

 

20.74

 

 

19,527

 

William E. Schneider

 

 

447,400

 

 

90

 

 

402,660

 

 

20.74

 

 

19,414

 


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

29




Proxy Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

2012
Base
Salary to
Determine
Target
($)

 

2012
Long-Term
Incentive
Target at
Time of
Grant
(%)

 

2012
Long-Term
Incentive
Target at
Time of
Grant
($)

 

Average
Closing Price
of Our Stock
From January 1
Through
January 22
($)

 

Resulting
Number of
Performance
Shares
Granted on
February 16
(#)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

750,000

 

150

 

1,125,000

 

21.54

 

52,228

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

300,000

 

75

 

225,000

 

21.54

 

10,445

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

360,500

 

90

 

324,450

 

21.54

 

15,062

 

J. Kent Wells

 

550,000

 

200

 

1,100,000

 

21.54

 

51,067

 

William E. Schneider

 

447,400

 

90

 

402,660

 

21.54

 

18,693

 

Assuming our three-year (2011–2013)(2012 to 2014) total stockholder return is positive, from 0% to 200% of the target grant will be paid out in February 20142015 depending on our total stockholder return compared to the total three-year stockholder returns of companies in our performance graph peer group. The payout percentage will be a function of our rank against our performance graph peer group as follows:

Long-Term Incentive Payout Percentages

 

 

 

 

 

The Company’s
Percentile Rank

 

Payout Percentage of
February 17, 201116, 2012 Grant

 

90th or higher

 

200

%

 

70th

 

150

%

 

50th

 

100

%

 

40th

 

10

%

 

Less than 40th

 

0

%

 


26

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

Payouts for percentile ranks falling between the intervals will be interpolated. We also will pay dividend equivalents in cash on the number of shares actually earned for the performance period. The dividend equivalents will be paid in 20142015 at the same time as the performance awards are paid.

If our total stockholder return is negative, the shares and dividend equivalents otherwise earned, if any, will be reduced in accordance with the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

TSR

 

Reduction in Award

 

0% through -5%

 

50

%

 

-5.01% through -10%

 

60

%

 

-10.01% thoughthrough -15%

 

70

%

 

-15.01% through -20%

 

80

%

 

-20.01% through -25%

 

90

%

 

-25.01% or below

 

100

%

 

The named executive officers must retain 50% of the net after-tax shares that are earned pursuant to this long-term incentive award until the earlier of (i) the end of the two-year period commencing on the date any shares earned under the award are issued and (ii) the executive’s termination of employment.

No Payment in February 2011 for 2008

No Payment in February 2012 for 2009 Grants under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan
We granted performance shares to our named executive officers under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan on February 12, 2009 for the 2009 through 2011 performance period. Our total stockholder return for the 2009 through 2011 performance period was 9.25%, which corresponded to a percentile rank of 25% against our performance graph peer group and resulted in no shares or dividend equivalents being paid to the named executive officers.

PEER Analysis: Comparison of Pay for Performance Ratios
Each year we compare our named executive officers’ pay for performance ratios to the pay for performance ratios of the named executive officers in the performance graph peer group. This analysis compares the relationship between our compensation levels and our average annual total stockholder return to the peer group over a five-year period. All data used in the analysis, including the valuation of long-term incentives and calculation of stockholder return, were compiled by Equilar, Inc., an independent service provider, which is based on each company’s annual filings for its data collection.

We granted performance shares to our named executive officers under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan on February 14, 2008, for the 2008 through 2010 performance period. Our total stockholder return for the 2008 through 2010 performance period was (19.98)%, which corresponded to a percentile rank of 33% against our performance graph peer group and resulted in no shares or dividend equivalents being paid to the named executive officers.

PEER Analysis: Comparison of Pay for Performance Ratios

Each year we compare our named executive officers’ pay for performance ratios to the pay for performance ratios of the named executive officers in the performance graph peer group. This analysis compares the relationship between our compensation levels and our average annual total stockholder return to the peer group over a five-year period. All data used in the analysis, including the valuation of long-term incentives and calculation of stockholder return, were compiled by Equilar, Inc., an independent service provider, which is based on each company’s annual filings for its data collection.

This analysis consisted of dividing what we paid our named executive officers for the years 2006 through 2010 by our average annual total stockholder return for the same five-year period to yield our pay ratio. Our pay ratio was then compared to the pay ratio of the companies in the performance graph peer group, which was calculated by dividing total direct compensation for all the proxy group executives by the sum of each company’s average annual total stockholder return for the same five-year period. The results are shown in the following chart:

5 Year Total Compensation to 5 Year Total Stockholder Return

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MDU Resources
Group, Inc.
($000s)

 

Performance
Graph
Peer Group
($000s)

*

Dollars of Total Direct Compensation (1) per Point of Total Stockholder Return

 

 

50,369

 

 

12,261

 

(1)

Total direct compensation consists of the values reported in the total column of the summary compensation table.

   *

Based solely on information provided by Equilar, Inc. and is not deemed filed or a part of this compensation discussion and analysis for certification purposes.


30

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The results of the analysis showed that we paid our named executive officers more than whatfor the years 2007 through 2011 by our average annual total stockholder return for the same five-year period to yield our pay ratio. Our pay ratio was then compared to the pay ratio of the companies in the performance graph peer group, companies paid their named executive officerswhich was calculated by dividing total direct compensation for comparable levelsall the proxy group executives by the sum of each company’s average annual total stockholder return overfor the same five-year period.

For the five-year period. We have prepared this analysis each year since 2004, commencing withperiod of 2007 through 2011, our average annual stockholder return was minus .88%. Therefore, our pay ratio is not a meaningful statistic and a comparison to the 2000-2004 period, andpay ratio of the companies in most years, the analysis showed that we paid our named executive officers less than, or approximately the same as, our performance graph peer group. However, for the 2006-2010 five-year period, our negative total stockholder return in both 2008 and 2010 resulted in a five-year average total stockholder return of 0.98%. This low average caused the ratio to spike, despite decreased total direct compensation, as calculated, for our named executive officers for the period.group could not be made. The compensation committee believes that the analysis continues to serve a useful purpose in its annual review of compensation despite the effect of the negative total stockholder return on the ratio for the 2006-20102007 through 2011 period.

Post-Termination Compensation and Benefits
Pension Plans

Effective in 2006, we no longer offer defined benefit pension plans to new non-bargaining unit employees. The defined benefit plans available to employees hired before 2006 were amended to cease benefit accruals as of December 31, 2009. The frozen benefit provided through our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined by years of service and base salary. Effective 2010, for those employees who were participants in defined benefit pension plans and for executives and other non-bargaining unit employees hired after 2006, the company offers increased company contributions to our 401(k) plan. For non-bargaining unit employees hired after 2006, the retirement contribution is 5% of plan eligible compensation. For participants hired prior to 2006, retirement contributions are based on the participant’s age as of December 31, 2009. The retirement contribution is 11.5% for each of the named executive officers, except Mr. Schwartz who is eligible for 10.5% and Mr. Wells who is eligible for 5%.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

27




Proxy Statement

Supplemental Income Security Plan

Benefits Offered

We offer certain key managers and executives, including all of our named executive officers, except Mr. Wells, benefits under our nonqualified retirement plan, which we refer to as the Supplemental Income Security Plan or SISP. The SISP has a ten-year vesting schedule and was amended to add an additional vesting requirement for benefit level increases occurring on or after January 1, 2010. The SISP provides participants with additional retirement income and death benefits.

We believe the SISP is critical in retaining the talent necessary to drive long-term stockholder value. In addition, we believe that the ten-year vesting provision of the SISP, augmented by an additional three years of vesting for benefit level increases occurring on or after January 1, 2010, helps promote retention of key executive officers.

Benefit Levels

The chief executive officer recommends benefit level increases to the compensation committee for participants except himself. The chief executive officer considers, among other things, the participant’s salary in relation to the salary ranges that correspond with the SISP benefit levels, the participant’s performance, the performance of the applicable business unitsegment or the company, and the cost associated with the benefit level increase.

The chief executive officer did not recommend a 20112012 SISP benefit level increase for any of the named executive officers, and the committee chose not to grant a 20112012 SISP benefit level increase to the chief executive officer. The primary reasons for no benefit level increases were cost containment and the absence of salary increases for our named executive officers, except for Mr. Schwartz whose salary increase did not correspond to a new SISP benefit level. The following table reflects our named executive officers’ SISP levels as of December 31, 2011:2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2011
Annual SISP Benefits

 

Name

 

Survivor
($)

 

Retirement
($)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

1,025,040

 

 

512,520

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

175,200

 

 

87,600

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

John G. Harp

 

 

548,400

 

 

274,200

 

William E. Schneider

 

 

548,400

 

 

274,200

 


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

31




Proxy Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2012
Annual SISP Benefits

 

Name

 

Survivor
($)

 

Retirement
($)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

1,025,040

 

512,520

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

175,200

 

87,600

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

386,640

 

193,320

 

J. Kent Wells

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

William E. Schneider

 

548,400

 

274,200

 

Clawback
In November 2005, we implemented a guideline for repayment of incentives due to accounting restatements, commonly referred to as a clawback policy, whereby the compensation committee may seek repayment of annual and long-term incentives paid to executives if accounting restatements occur within three years after the payment of incentives under the annual and long-term plans. Under our clawback policy, the compensation committee may require executives to forfeit awards and may rescind vesting, or the acceleration of vesting, of an award.

Impact of Tax and Accounting Treatment
The compensation committee may consider the impact of tax and/or accounting treatment in determining compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation paid to certain officers that we may deduct as a business expense in any tax year unless, among other things, the compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation, as that term is used in Section 162(m). Generally, long-term incentive compensation and annual incentive awards for our chief executive officer and those executive officers whose overall compensation is likely to exceed $1 million are structured to be deductible for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, but we may pay compensation to an executive officer that is not deductible. All annual or long-term incentive compensation paid to our named executive officers for 2011in 2012 satisfied the requirements for deductibility.deductibility, except for $48,129 paid to Mr. Wells.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code imposes additional income taxes on executive officers for certain types of deferred compensation if the deferral does not comply with Section 409A. We have amended our compensation plans and arrangements affected by Section 409A with the objective of not triggering any additional income taxes under Section 409A.

Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes an excise tax on payments to executives and others of amounts that are considered to be related to a change of control if they exceed levels specified in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. The potential impactTo the extent a change in control triggers liability for an excise tax, payment of the Section 4999 excise tax is addressed withwill be made by the modified tax payment provisions inindividual. The company will not pay the change of control employment agreements, which are described later in the proxy statement under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”excise tax. We do not consider the potential impact of Section 4999 or 280G when designing our compensation programs.

28

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The compensation committee also considers the accounting and cash flow implications of various forms of executive compensation. In our financial statements, we record salaries and annual incentive compensation as expenses in the amount paid, or to be paid, to the named executive officers. For our equity awards, accounting rules also require that we record an expense in our financial statements. We calculate the accounting expense of equity awards to employees in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board generally accepted accounting principles for stock-based compensation.

Stock Ownership Requirements
We instituted stock ownership guidelines on May 5, 1993, which we revised in November 2010 to provide that executives who participate in our Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan are required within five years to own our common stock equal to a multiple of their base salaries. Stock owned through our 401(k) plan or by a spouse is considered in ownership calculations. Unvested performance shares and other unvested equity awards are not considered in ownership calculations. The level of stock ownership compared to the requirements is determined based on the closing sale price of the stock on the last trading day of the year and base salary at December 31 of each year. Each February, the compensation committee receives a report on the status of stock holdings by executives. The committee may, in its sole discretion, grant an extension of time to meet the ownership requirements or take such other action as it deems appropriate to enable the executive to achieve compliance with the policy. The table shows the named executive officers’ holdings as of December 31, 2011:2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Assigned
Guideline
Multiple of
Base Salary

 

Actual
Holdings as a
Multiple of
Base Salary

 

Number of
Years at
Guideline
Multiple
(#)

 

 

Assigned
Guideline
Multiple of
Base Salary

 

Actual
Holdings as a
Multiple of
Base Salary

 

Number of
Years at
Guideline
Multiple
(#)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

4X

 

6.13

 

6.67

 

 

4X

 

6.06

 

7.67

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

3X

 

1.47

 

1.87

(1)

 

3X

 

1.75

 

2.87

(1)

Steven L. Bietz

 

3X

 

4.09

 

10.33

 

J. Kent Wells

 

3X

 

0.00

 

0.67

(2)

 

3X

 

1.07

 

1.67

(2)

John G. Harp

 

3X

 

4.09

 

7.25

 

William E. Schneider

 

3X

 

5.57

 

10.00

 

 

3X

 

4.96

 

11.00

 

 

 

(1)

Participant must meet ownership requirement by January 1, 2015.

(2)

As of February 22, 2012, Mr. Wells owns 25,743 shares of our common stock. Participant must meet ownership requirement by May 1, 2016.


32

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The compensation committee may consider the policy and the executive’s stock ownership in determining compensation. The committee, however, did not do so with respect to 20112012 compensation.

Policy Regarding Hedging Stock Ownership
Our executive compensation policy prohibits Section 16 officers from hedging their ownership of company common stock. Executives may not enter into transactions that allow the executive to benefit from devaluation of our stock or otherwise own stock technically but without the full benefits and risks of such ownership. See the Security Ownership section of the proxy statement for our policy on margin accounts and pledging of our stock.

Compensation Committee Report

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Reg.Regulation S-K, Item 402(b), with management. Based on the review and discussions referred to in the preceding sentence, the compensation committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our proxy statement on Schedule 14A.

Thomas Everist, Chairman
Karen B. Fagg
Thomas C. Knudson
Patricia L. Moss

 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

3329




Proxy Statement

 

 

Summary Compensation Table for 20112012


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and
Principal Position
(a)

 

Year
(b)

 

Salary
($)
(c)

 

Bonus
($)
(d)

 

Stock
Awards
($)
(e)(1)

 

Option
Awards
($)
(f)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(g)

 

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(h)(2)

 

All Other
Compensation
($)
(i)

 

Total
($)
(j)

 

Name and
Principal Position
(a)

Year
(b)

 

Salary
($)
(c)

 

Bonus
($)
(d)

 

Stock
Awards
($)
(e)(1)

 

Option
Awards
($)
(f)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(g)

 

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(h)(2)

 

All Other
Compensation
($)
(i)

 

Total
($)
(j)

Terry D. Hildestad

 

2011

 

750,000

 

 

1,084,318

 

 

954,750

 

739,760

 

37,499

 (3)

 

3,566,327

 

 

2012

 

750,000

 

 

897,277

 

 

518,250

 

355,027

 

38,224

(3)

2,558,778

 

President and CEO

 

2010

 

750,000

 

 

830,137

 

 

762,750

 

480,532

 

37,499

 

2,860,918

 

 

2011

 

750,000

 

 

1,084,318

 

 

954,750

 

739,760

 

37,499

 

3,566,327

 

 

2009

 

750,000

 

 

1,117,861

 

 

1,500,000

 

825,319

 

9,824

 

4,203,004

 

 

2010

 

750,000

 

 

830,137

 

 

762,750

 

480,532

 

37,499

 

2,860,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

2011

 

273,000

 

 

197,341

 

 

173,765

 

147,789

 

33,549

 (3)

 

825,444

 

 

2012

 

300,000

 

 

179,445

 

 

103,650

 

100,935

 

34,224

(3)

718,254

 

Vice President and CFO

 

2010

 

252,454

 

 

143,881

 

 

127,053

 

71,302

 

33,549

 

628,239

 

 

2011

 

273,000

 

 

197,341

 

 

173,765

 

147,789

 

33,549

 

825,444

 

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

252,454

 

 

143,881

 

 

127,053

 

71,302

 

33,549

 

628,239

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John G. Harp

 

2011

 

450,000

 

 

390,345

 

 

438,750

 

481,331

 (4)

 

51,445

 (3)

 

1,811,871

 

President and CEO of

 

2010

 

450,000

 

 

298,845

 

 

438,750

 

307,935

 

48,545

 (5)

 

1,544,075

 

MDU Construction

 

2009

 

450,000

 

 

402,417

 

 

392,500

 (6)

 

761,670

 

 

23,272

 (5)

 

2,029,859

 

Services Group, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

2012

 

360,500

 

 

258,765

 

 

347,973

 

329,969

 

37,884

(3)

1,335,091

 

President and CEO

 

2011

 

360,500

 

 

312,704

 

 

229,198

 

545,066

 

37,159

 

1,484,627

 

of WBI Holdings, Inc.

 

2010

 

350,000

 

 

232,429

 

 

245,245

 

302,863

 

36,218

 

1,166,755

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J. Kent Wells

 

2011

 

367,671

 

916,685

 (7)

 

925,000

 (8)

 

 

1,007,306

 (9)

 

 

89,505

 (3)

 

3,306,167

 

 

2012

 

550,000

 

 

877,331

 

 

 

 

96,470

(3)

1,523,801

 

President and CEO of

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

367,671

 

916,685

(4)

925,000

(5)

 

1,007,306

(6)

 

84,580

(7)

3,301,242

 

Fidelity Exploration &

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William E. Schneider

 

2011

 

447,400

 

 

388,086

 

 

436,215

 

412,085

 

37,499

 (3)

 

1,721,285

 

 

2012

 

447,400

 

 

321,146

 

 

200,950

 

240,068

 

38,224

(3)

1,247,788

 

President and CEO of

 

2010

 

447,400

 

 

297,122

 

 

37,805

 

306,909

 

37,499

 

1,126,735

 

Knife River Corporation

 

2009

 

447,400

 

 

400,093

 

 

581,620

 

726,646

 

9,324

 

2,165,083

 

Executive Vice President -

 

2011

 

447,400

 

 

388,086

 

 

436,215

 

412,085

 

37,499

 

1,721,285

 

Bakken Development

 

2010

 

447,400

 

 

297,122

 

 

37,805

 

306,909

 

37,499

 

1,126,735

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the performance share awards calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board generally accepted accounting principles for stock-based compensation in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. This column was prepared assuming none of the awards will be forfeited. The amounts were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation, as described in Note 13 of our audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.2012.

 

(2)

Amounts shown represent the change in the actuarial present value for years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 20112012 for the named executive officers’ accumulated benefits under the pension plan, excess SISP, and SISP, and, for Mr. Harp, the additional retirement benefit, collectively referred to as the “accumulated pension change,” plus above market earnings on deferred annual incentives, if any. The amounts shown are based on accumulated pension change and above market earnings as of December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2011,2012, as follows:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated
Pension Change

 

Above Market
Earnings

 

 

Accumulated
Pension Change

 

Above Market
Earnings

 

Name

 

12/31/2009
($)

 

12/31/2010
($)

 

12/31/2011
($)

 

12/31/2009
($)

 

12/31/2010
($)

 

12/31/2011
($)

 

 

12/31/2010
($)

 

12/31/2011
($)

 

12/31/2012
($)

 

12/31/2010
($)

 

12/31/2011
($)

 

12/31/2012
($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

806,554

 

462,186

 

728,587

 

18,765

 

18,346

 

11,173

 

 

462,186

 

728,587

 

331,845

 

18,346

 

11,173

 

23,182

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

71,302

 

147,789

 

 

 

 

 

71,302

 

147,789

 

100,935

 

 

 

 

John G. Harp

 

743,334

 

294,023

 

459,963

 

 

 

 

Additional Retirement (4)

 

18,336

 

13,912

 

21,368

 

 

 

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

302,863

 

545,066

 

329,969

 

 

 

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William E. Schneider

 

696,572

 

277,507

 

393,768

 

30,074

 

29,402

 

18,317

 

 

277,507

 

393,768

 

201,944

 

29,402

 

18,317

 

38,124

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

3430

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

401(k)
($)(a)

 

 

Life
Insurance
Premium
($)

 

 

Matching
Charitable
Contribution
($)

 

 

Office and
Automobile
Allowance
($)

 

 

Additional
LTD
Premium
($)

 

 

Relocation
($)(b)

 

 

Parking
($)

 

 

Payment
In Lieu
of
Medical
Coverage
($)

 

 

Spousal
Travel
($)

 

 

Wellness
Fitness
($)

 

 

Total
($)

 

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

35,525

 

 

174

 

 

1,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,499

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

33,075

 

 

174

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,549

 

John G. Harp

 

 

35,525

 

 

174

 

 

1,800

 

 

13,200

 

 

746

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,445

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

19,600

 

 

116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,031

 

 

2,400

 

 

700

 

 

508

 

 

150

 

 

89,505

 

William E. Schneider

 

 

35,525

 

 

174

 

 

1,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,499

 


(3)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

401(k)
($)(a)

 

Life
Insurance
Premium
($)

 

Matching
Charitable
Contribution
($)

 

Additional
LTD
Premium
($)

 

Relocation
($)

 

Parking
($)

 

Payment
In Lieu
of
Medical
Coverage
($)

 

Spousal
Travel
($)

 

Total
($)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

36,250

 

174

 

1,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,224

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

33,750

 

174

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,224

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

36,250

 

174

 

1,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,884

 

J. Kent Wells

 

20,000

 

174

 

 

435

 

69,695

 

3,600

 

1,200

 

1,366

 

96,470

 

William E. Schneider

 

36,250

 

174

 

1,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,224

 

(a)

Represents company contributions to 401(k) plan, which include matching contributions and except for Mr. Wells, contributions made in lieu of pension plan accruals after pension plans were frozen at December 31, 2009.

(b)

Mr. Wells’ 2011 relocation benefits were:

 

 

 

Temporary

Actual Move and

Relocation

Living

Related Expense

Allowance

($)

($)

($)

18,000

2,198

45,833


 

 

(4)

In addition to the change in the actuarial present value of Mr. Harp’s accumulated benefit under the pension plan, excess SISP, and SISP, this amount also includes the following amounts attributable to Mr. Harp’s additional retirement benefit:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

 

2010

 

 

2011

 

 

Change in present value of additional years of service for pension plan

 

$

13,077

 

$

12,240

 

$

19,407

 

Change in present value of additional years of service for excess SISP

 

 

5,259

 

 

1,672

 

 

1,961

 

Change in present value of additional years of service for SISP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Harp’s additional retirement benefit is described in the narrative that follows the Pension Benefits for 2011 table. The additional retirement benefit provides Mr. Harp with additional retirement benefits equal to the additional benefit he would earn under the pension plan, excess SISP, and the SISP if he had three additional years of service. The pension and excess SISP were frozen as of December 31, 2009. The amounts in the table above reflect the change in present value of this additional benefit in 2009, 2010, and 2011. The additional retirement benefit was determined by calculating the actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits under the pension plan, excess SISP, and SISP, with and without the three additional years of service, using the same assumptions used to determine the amounts disclosed in the Pension Benefits for 2011 table. Because Mr. Harp would be fully vested in his SISP benefit if he retired at age 65, the assumed retirement age of these calculations, the additional years of service provided by the additional retirement agreement would not increase that benefit. If Mr. Harp retires before becoming 100% vested in his SISP benefit, his SISP benefit would be less than the amount shown in the Pension Benefits for 2011 table, but the payments he would receive under the additional retirement benefit arrangement would increase, as would the amounts reflected in the table above and in the Summary Compensation Table.

(5)

Includes company contributions to Mr. Harp’s 401(k) of a company match and retirement contribution, a matching contribution to a charity, payment of a life insurance premium, an additional premium for Mr. Harp’s long-term disability insurance, and Mr. Harp’s office and automobile allowance.

(6)

Includes one-time incentive payment of $100,000 in addition to his annual incentive compensation.

(7)

Includes a cash recruitment payment of $550,000 and guaranteed target annual incentive payment of $366,685.

(8)

(5)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the portion of Mr. Wells’ additional 2011 annual incentive award that was to be paid in shares of our common stock calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board generally accepted accounting principles for stock-based compensation in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718.

(9)

(6)

Includes $82,296, the value of Mr. Wells’ annual incentive earned above the guaranteed target amount and the $925,010 cash portion of Mr. Wells’ additional 2011 annual incentive.


 

 

(7)

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

35




Proxy Statement

The 2011 amount for Mr. Wells’ all other compensation has been reduced to reflect the removal of $4,925, an excess 401(k) company match, that exceeded the limit when contributions from his prior company and current company were aggregated.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20112012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
(i)

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(j)

 

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(k)

 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)
(l)

 

 

 

All Other

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock

 

Option

 

 

 

Grant

 

 

 

 

Awards:

 

Awards:

 

Exercise

 

Date Fair

 

 Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 

 

 

Estimated Future

 

Estimated Future

 

Number of

 

Number of

 

or Base

 

Value of

 

Name
(a)

 

Grant Date
(b)

 

Board Approval
Date

 

Threshold
($)
(c)

 

Target
($)
(d)

 

Maximum
($)
(e)

 

Threshold
(#)
(f)

 

Target
(#)
(g)

 

Maximum
(#)
(h)

 

 

 

Payouts Under Non-Equity

 

Payouts Under Equity

 

Shares of

 

Securities

 

Price of

 

Stock and

 

 

 

Incentive Plan Awards

 

Incentive Plan Awards

 

Stock or

 

Underlying

 

Option

 

Option

 

 

Grant

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Units

 

Options

 

Awards

 

Awards

 

Name

 

Date

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

(#)

 

(#)

 

(#)

 

(#)

 

(#)

 

($/Sh)

 

($)

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

(d)

 

(e)

 

(f)

 

(g)

 

(h)

 

(i)

 

(j)

 

(k)

 

(l)

 

Terry D.

 

2/17/11(1

)

 

 

187,500

 

750,000

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2012(1

)

187,500

 

750,000

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hildestad

 

2/17/11(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

5,424

 

54,243

 

108,486

 

 

 

 

1,084,318

 

 

2/16/2012(2

)

 

 

 

5,223

 

52,228

 

104,456

 

 

 

 

897,277

 

Doran N.

 

2/17/11(1

)

 

 

34,125

 

136,500

 

273,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2012(1

)

37,500

 

150,000

 

300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schwartz

 

2/17/11(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

987

 

9,872

 

19,744

 

 

 

 

197,341

 

 

2/16/2012(2

)

 

 

 

1,045

 

10,445

 

20,890

 

 

 

 

179,445

 

John G.

 

2/17/11(1

)

 

 

73,125

 

292,500

 

585,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harp

 

2/17/11(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

1,953

 

19,527

 

39,054

 

 

 

 

390,345

 

Steven L.

 

3/1/2012(1

)

58,581

 

234,325

 

468,650

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bietz

 

2/16/2012(2

)

 

 

 

1,506

 

15,062

 

30,124

 

 

 

 

258,765

 

J. Kent Wells

 

2/17/11(3

)

 

 

 

366,685

 

733,370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2012(1

)

171,875

 

687,500

 

1,375,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/02/11(4

)

 

2/17/11

(4)

 

 

925,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/02/11(4

)

 

2/17/11

(4)

 

 

 

 

 

$925,000

(4)

 

 

 

 

 

925,000

 

 

2/16/2012(2

)

 

 

 

5,107

 

51,067

 

102,134

 

 

 

 

877,331

 

William E.

 

2/17/11(1

)

 

 

72,703

 

290,810

 

581,620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2012(1

)

72,703

 

290,810

 

581,620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schneider

 

2/17/11(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

1,941

 

19,414

 

38,828

 

 

 

 

388,086

 

 

2/16/2012(2

)

 

 

 

1,869

 

18,693

 

37,386

 

 

 

 

321,146

 


 

 

(1)

Annual incentive for 20112012 granted pursuant to the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, except for Mr. Schwartz whose award was granted pursuant to the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.

 

(2)

Performance shares for the 2011-20132012-2014 performance period granted pursuant to the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.

(3)

Annual incentive for 2011 granted pursuant to the WBI Holdings, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. Mr. Wells was guaranteed a minimum payment of 100% of target.

(4)

Additional 2011 annual incentive granted pursuant to the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, payable one-half in cash and one-half in our common stock. The award was approved on February 17, 2011, but the grant date for purposes of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 was May 2, 2011, Mr. Wells’ hire date. The $925,000 shown in column (g) represents the dollar value of the portion of Mr. Wells’ additional 2011 annual incentive award that was paid in shares of our common stock determined by dividing $925,000 by the stock price on January 2, 2012, according to the terms of Mr. Wells’ award.

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table
and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Incentive Awards

Annual Incentive

On February 15, 2011,March 1, 2012, the compensation committee recommended the 20112012 annual incentive award opportunities for our named executive officers and the board approved these opportunities at its meeting on February 17, 2011.March 1, 2012. These award opportunities are reflected in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table at grant on February 17, 2011,March 1, 2012, in columns (c), (d), and (e) and in the Summary Compensation Table as earned with respect to 20112012 in column (g). For Mr. Wells, the compensation committee guaranteed a minimum payment of 100% of target, prorated to reflect his May 2, 2011 hire date, which is reflected in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table at grant on February 17, 2011, in column (d) and in the Summary Compensation Table in column (d). Mr. Wells could achieve a maximum of 200% of target, which is reflected at grant on February 17, 2011, in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table in column (e), and the amount that he earned above target with respect to this award is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in column (g).

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

31



Other than the arrangements negotiated for Mr. Wells for 2011, executive


Proxy Statement

Executive officers may receive a payment of annual cash incentive awards based upon achievement of annual performance measures with a threshold, target, and maximum level. A target incentive award is established based on a percent of the executive’s base salary. Actual payment may range from 0% to 200% of the target based upon achievement of goals.

In order to be eligible to receive a payment of an annual incentive award under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, Messrs. Hildestad, Harp,Bietz, Wells, and Schneider must have remained employed by the company through December 31, 2011,2012, unless the compensation committee determines otherwise. The committee has full discretion to determine the extent to which goals have been achieved, the payment level, whether any final payment will be made, and whether to adjust awards downward based upon individual performance. Unless otherwise determined and established in writing by the compensation committee within 90 days of the beginning of the performance period, the performance goals may not be adjusted if the adjustment would increase the annual incentive award payment. The compensation committee may use negative discretion and adjust any annual incentive award payment downward, using

36

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

any subjective or objective measures as it shall determine, including but not limited to the 20% limitation described in the following sentence. The 20% limitation means that no more than 20% of after-tax earnings that are in excess of planned earnings at the business unitsegment level for operating company executives and at the MDU Resources Group level for corporate executives will be paid in annual incentives to executives. The application of this limitation or any other reduction, and the methodology used in determining any such reduction, is in the sole discretion of the compensation committee.

With respect to annual incentive awards granted pursuant to the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, which includes Mr. Schwartz, and the annual incentive awards granted pursuant to the WBI Holdings, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, which includes Mr. Wells, participants who retire at age 65 during the year remain eligible to receive an award. Subject to the compensation committee’s discretion, executives who terminate employment for other reasons are not eligible for an award. The compensation committee has full discretion to determine the extent to which goals have been achieved, the payment level, and whether any final payment will be made. Once performance goals are approved by the committee for executive incentive compensation plan awards, the committee generally does not modify the goals. However, if major unforeseen changes in economic and environmental conditions or other significant factors beyond the control of management substantially affected management’s ability to achieve the specified performance goals, the committee, in consultation with the chief executive officer, may modify the performance goals. Such goal modifications will only be considered in years of unusually adverse or favorable external conditions.

Messrs. Harp’s and Schneider’s performance goals for 2011 are budgeted earnings per share achieved and budgeted return on invested capital achieved, each weighted 50%. The goals are measured at the business unit level, as allocated, for Mr. Harp and Mr. Schneider.

For Messrs. Harp and Schneider, achievement of budgeted earnings per share and return on invested capital would result in payment of 100% of the target amount. Their 2011 award opportunities ranged from no payment if the allocated earnings per share and return on invested capital were below the 85% level to a 200% payout for achievement of 115% of budgeted earnings per share and a return on invested capital equal to or greater than the business unit’s weighted average cost of capital would result in payment of 200% of the target amount.

For Mr. Wells, the committee guaranteed a minimum payment of 100% of target, prorated to reflect his May 2, 2011 hire date. The 2011 incentive award opportunity was based on the financial goals for both Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and WBI Holdings, Inc., weighted 75% for the results of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and 25% for the results of WBI Holdings, Inc. The incentive award could be reduced by up to 10% if Fidelity Exploration & Production Company did not meet its production goal and by up to 5% if WBI Holdings, Inc. did not satisfy its safety goals. Mr. Wells could achieve a maximum of 200% of the annual incentive target if:

the 2011 allocated earnings per share for Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and the 2011 allocated earnings per share for WBI Holdings, Inc., were at or above 115% of the performance target

the 2011 return on invested capital for Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and the 2011 return on invested capital for WBI Holdings, Inc. were both at least equal to their respective weighted average costs of capital

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company achieved production of at least 69.3 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) and

the five safety goals for WBI Holdings, Inc. were met.



Annual incentive award payments for Messrs. Hildestad, Schwartz, and SchwartzSchneider were determined based on achievement of performance goals at the annual incentive award payments made to the presidentfollowing business segments – (i) construction services and chief executive officers of the four business units – MDU Construction Services Group, Inc., Knife River Corporation, WBI Holdings, Inc.,construction materials and Combined Utility Group –contracting, (ii) exploration and production, (iii) pipeline and energy services, and (iv) electric and natural gas distribution - and were calculated as follows: each business unit president and chief executive officer’s annual incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Column A
Percentage of
Annual Incentive
Target Achieved

 

Column B
Percentage of
Average Invested
Capital

 

Column A x Column B

 

Construction Services Segment and
Construction Materials and Contracting Segment

 

133.5

%

 

29.2

%

 

39.0

%

 

Exploration and Production Segment

 

0.0

%

 

28.1

%

 

0.0

%

 

Pipeline and Energy Services Segment

 

148.5

%

 

8.8

%

 

13.1

%

 

Electric and Natural Gas Distribution Segments

 

50.0

%

 

33.9

%

 

17.0

%

 

Total (Payout Percentage)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69.1

%

 

The award payment, expressed as a percentage of his annual target award, was multiplied by that business unit’s percentage share of average invested capital for 2011. These four products were added together, and the sum was multiplied by Messrs. Hildestad’s and Schwartz’s 2011 target incentive. Messrs. Hildestad’s and Schwartz’s 2011 annual incentives were paid at 127.3% of target based on the following:opportunity available to Mr. Bietz was:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

President and
Chief Executive Officer of:

 

Column A
2011 Payment as a
Percentage of Annual
Incentive Target

 

Column B
Percentage of
Average Invested
Capital

 

Column A x Column B

 

MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.

 

150.0

%

 

6.1

%

 

9.2

%

 

Knife River Corporation

 

150.0

%

 

24.4

%

 

36.6

%

 

WBI Holdings, Inc.

 

97.8

%

 

34.6

%

 

33.8

%

 

Combined Utility Group

 

136.7

%

 

34.9

%

 

47.7

%

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

127.3

%

 

            
Pipeline and Energy Services’ 2012
return on invested capital results
as a % (weighted 37.5%)
of 2012 target
 Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
return on invested capital
 Pipeline and Energy Services’ 2012
earnings per share results
as a % (weighted 37.5%)
of 2012 target
 Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
earnings per share
 
Less than 85%     0% Less than 85%     0% 
  85%   25%   85%   25% 
  90%   50%   90%   50% 
  95%   75%   95%   75% 
100% 100% 100% 100% 
103% 120% 103% 120% 
106% 140% 106% 140% 
109% 160% 109% 160% 
112% 180% 112% 180% 
115% 200% 115% 200% 

 

 

 

 

32

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

37




 

Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s
consolidated 2012 earnings per share
results (weighted 25%)

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
consolidated earnings per share results

 

Less than 100%

 

0

%

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

103

%

 

120

%

 

106

%

 

140

%

 

109

%

 

160

%

 

112

%

 

180

%

 

115

%

 

200

%

 

The award opportunities available to Messrs. Harp and Schneider were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 return on invested capital
results as a % of 2011 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
return on invested capital

 

2011 earnings per share
results as a % of 2011 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
earnings per share

Less than 85%

 

0%

 

Less than 85%

 

0%

85%

 

25%

 

85%

 

25%

90%

 

50%

 

90%

 

50%

95%

 

75%

 

95%

 

75%

100%

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

103%

 

100%

 

103%

 

120%

106%

 

100%

 

106%

 

140%

109%

 

100%

 

109%

 

160%

112%

 

100%

 

112%

 

180%

Up to weighted

 

 

 

115%

 

200%

average cost of capital

 

100%

 

 

 

 

Weighted average cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

of capital or higher

 

200%

 

 

 

 

The award opportunitiesopportunity available to Mr. Wells with respect to the financial results component of his award were:was:

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company – weighted 75%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 return on invested capital
results as a % of 2011 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
return on invested capital

 

2011 earnings per share
results as a % of 2011 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
earnings per share

Less than 85%

 

0%

 

Less than 85%

 

0%

85%

 

25%

 

85%

 

25%

90%

 

50%

 

90%

 

50%

95%

 

75%

 

95%

 

75%

100%

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

103%

 

100%

 

103%

 

120%

106%

 

100%

 

106%

 

140%

109%

 

100%

 

109%

 

160%

112%

 

100%

 

112%

 

180%

Up to weighted

 

 

 

115%

 

200%

average cost of capital

 

100%

 

 

 

 

Weighted average cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

of capital or higher

 

200%

 

 

 

 

WBI Holdings, Inc. – weighted 25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 return on invested capital
results as a % of 2011 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
return on invested capital

 

2011 earnings per share
results as a % of 2011 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
earnings per share

Less than 85%

 

0%

 

Less than 85%

 

0%

85%

 

25%

 

85%

 

25%

90%

 

50%

 

90%

 

50%

95%

 

75%

 

95%

 

75%

100%

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

103%

 

100%

 

103%

 

120%

106%

 

100%

 

106%

 

140%

109%

 

100%

 

109%

 

160%

112%

 

100%

 

112%

 

180%

Up to weighted

 

 

 

115%

 

200%

average cost of capital

 

100%

 

 

 

 

Weighted average cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

of capital or higher

 

200%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration and Production’s 2012
return on invested capital results
as a % (weighted 37.5%)
of 2012 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
return on invested capital

 

Exploration and Production’s 2012
earnings per share results
as a % (weighted 37.5%)
of 2012 target

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
earnings per share

 

Less than 85%

 

0

%

 

Less than 85%

 

0

%

 

85

%

 

25

%

 

85

%

 

25

%

 

90

%

 

50

%

 

90

%

 

50

%

 

95

%

 

75

%

 

95

%

 

75

%

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

108

%

 

120

%

 

103

%

 

120

%

 

116

%

 

140

%

 

106

%

 

140

%

 

124

%

 

160

%

 

109

%

 

160

%

 

132

%

 

180

%

 

112

%

 

180

%

 

140

%

 

200

%

 

115

%

 

200

%

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.’s
consolidated 2012 earnings per share
results (weighted 25%)

 

Corresponding payment of
annual incentive target based on
consolidated earnings per share results

 

Less than 100%

 

0

%

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

103

%

 

120

%

 

106

%

 

140

%

 

109

%

 

160

%

 

112

%

 

180

%

 

115

%

 

200

%

 

For discussion of the specific incentive plan performance targets and results, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

38

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

Long-Term Incentive



Proxy Statement


J. Kent Wells’ Additional 2011 Annual Incentive

On February 15, 2011, the compensation committee recommended the grant of a second 2011 annual incentive award opportunity to Mr. Wells pursuant to the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, based on Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s cash flow from operations. The board approved this opportunity at its meeting on February 17, 2011. Specifically, we granted Mr. Wells an all-or-nothing award opportunity of $1.85 million, payable one-half in cash and one-half in our common stock, if Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s 2011 cash flow from operations exceeded $132.0 million and he did not resign from the company prior to January 2, 2012. If Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s 2011 cash flow from operations exceeded $132.0 million and Mr. Wells’ employment was terminated prior to January 2, 2012, due to a change in control of the company, Mr. Wells would have been entitled to full payment of this incentive award.

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s actual 2011 cash flow from operations exceeded $132.0 million, resultingOn February 14, 2012, the compensation committee recommended long-term incentive grants to the named executive officers in a paymentthe form of $1.85 million to Mr. Wells. The cash portion paid to Mr. Wells is reportedperformance shares, and the board approved these grants at its meeting on February 16, 2012. These grants are reflected in columns (f), (g), (h), and (l) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and in column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table in column (g), and the grant date fair value of the stock portion of the award is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e).

J. Kent Wells’ Recruitment BonusTable.

We paid a cash recruitment bonus of $550,000 to induce Mr. Wells to join the company, which is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in column (d).


Long-Term Incentive

On February 15, 2011, the compensation committee recommended long-term incentive grants to the named executive officers in the form of performance shares, and the board approved these grants at its meeting on February 17, 2011. These grants are reflected in columns (f), (g), (h), and (i) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and in column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table.

If the company’s 2011-20132012-2014 total shareholder return is positive, from 0% to 200% of the target grant will be paid out in February 2014,2015, depending on our 2011-20132012-2014 total stockholder return compared to the total three-year stockholder returns of companies in our performance graph peer group. The payout percentage is determined as follows:

 

 

 

 

The Company’s Percentile Rank

 

Payout Percentage of
February 17, 201116, 2012 Grant

 

90th or higher

 

200

%

 

70th

 

150

%

 

50th

 

100

%

 

40th

 

10

%

 

Less than 40th

 

0

%

 

Payouts for percentile ranks falling between the intervals will be interpolated. We also will pay dividend equivalents in cash on the number of shares actually earned for the performance period. The dividend equivalents will be paid in 20142015 at the same time as the performance awards are paid.

If the common stock of a company in the peer group ceases to be traded at any time during the 2012-2014 performance period, the company will be deleted from the peer group. Percentile rank will be calculated without regard to the return of the deleted company. If MDU Resources Group, Inc. or a company in the peer group spins off a segment of its business, the shares of the spun-off entity will be treated as a cash dividend that is reinvested in MDU Resources Group, Inc. or the company in the peer group.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

33




Proxy Statement

If the company’s 2011-20132012-2014 total shareholder return is negative, the number of shares otherwise earned, if any, for the performance period will be reduced in accordance with the following table:

 

 

 

 

TSR

 

Reduction in Award

 

0% through -5%

 

50

%

 

-5.01% through -10%

 

60

%

 

-10.01% through -15%

 

70

%

 

-15.01% through -20%

 

80

%

 

-20.01% through -25%

 

90

%

 

-25.01% or below

 

100

%

 


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

39




Proxy Statement


Salary and Bonus in Proportion to Total Compensation

The following table shows the proportion of salary and bonus to total compensation.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Salary
($)

 

Bonus
($)

 

Total
Compensation
($)

 

Salary and Bonus
as a % of
Total Compensation

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

 

3,566,327

 

 

21.0

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

273,000

 

 

 

 

825,444

 

 

33.1

 

John G. Harp

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

 

1,811,871

 

 

24.8

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

367,671

 

 

916,685

 

 

3,306,167

 

 

38.8

 

William E. Schneider

 

 

447,400

 

 

 

 

1,721,285

 

 

26.0

 

Salary and Bonus in Proportion to Total Compensation
The following table shows the proportion of salary and bonus to total compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Salary
($)

 

Bonus
($)

 

Total
Compensation
($)

 

Salary and Bonus
as a % of
Total Compensation

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

 

2,558,778

 

 

29.3

%

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

 

718,254

 

 

41.8

%

Steven L. Bietz

 

 

360,500

 

 

 

 

1,335,091

 

 

27.0

%

J. Kent Wells

 

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

1,523,801

 

 

36.1

%

William E. Schneider

 

 

447,400

 

 

 

 

1,247,788

 

 

35.9

%

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 20112012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name
(a)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
(b)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
(c)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d)

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)

 

Option
Expiration
Date
(f)

 

Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(g)

 

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(h)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
(i)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
(j)(1)

 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
(b)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
(c)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d)

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)

 

Option
Expiration
Date
(f)

 

Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(g)

 

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(h)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
(i)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
(j)(1)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118,739(2

)

 

2,548,139

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

111,242(2

)

 

2,362,780

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,062(2

)

 

451,991

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,144(2

)

 

449,099

 

John G. Harp

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,746(2

)

 

917,329

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,041(2

)

 

680,551

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,103(3

)

 

925,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,067(2

)

 

1,084,663

 

William E. Schneider

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,498(2

)

 

912,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,815(2

)

 

845,671

 


 

 

(1)

Value based on the number of performance shares reflected in column (i) multiplied by $21.46,$21.24, the year-end closing price for 2011.2012.

 

 

(2)

Below is a breakdown by year of the plan awards:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer

 

Award

 

Shares

 

End of
Performance
Period

 

Award

 

Shares

 

End of
Performance
Period

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

2009

 

5,482

 

12/31/11

Terry D. Hildestad

 

2010

 

4,771

 

12/31/12

 

 

2010

 

4,771

 

12/31/12

 

2011

 

54,243

 

12/31/13

 

 

2011

 

108,486

 

12/31/13

 

2012

 

52,228

 

12/31/14

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

2009

 

491

 

12/31/11

 

2010

 

827

 

12/31/12

 

 

2010

 

827

 

12/31/12

 

2011

 

9,872

 

12/31/13

 

 

2011

 

19,744

 

12/31/13

 

2012

 

10,445

 

12/31/14

 

John G. Harp

 

2009

 

1,974

 

12/31/11

Steven L. Bietz

 

2010

 

1,336

 

12/31/12

 

 

2011

 

15,643

 

12/31/13

 

 

2012

 

15,062

 

12/31/14

 

J. Kent Wells

 

2010

 

 

12/31/12

 

 

2010

 

1,718

 

12/31/12

 

2011

 

 

12/31/13

 

 

2011

 

39,054

 

12/31/13

 

2012

 

51,067

 

12/31/14

 

William E. Schneider

 

2009

 

1,962

 

12/31/11

 

2010

 

1,708

 

12/31/12

 

 

2010

 

1,708

 

12/31/12

 

2011

 

19,414

 

12/31/13

 

 

2011

 

38,828

 

12/31/13

 

2012

 

18,693

 

12/31/14

 


 

 

Shares for the 2009 award are shown at the threshold level (10%) based on results for the 2009-2011 performance cycle below threshold.

 

Shares for the 2010 award are shown at the threshold level (10%) based on results for the first two years of the 2010-2012 performance cycle below threshold.

Shares for the 2011 award are shown at the maximumtarget level (200%(100%) based on results for the first two years of the 2011-2013 performance cycle below target.

Shares for the 2012 award are shown at the target level (100%) based on results for the first year of the 2011-20132012-2014 performance cycle abovebelow target.

(3)

The number of shares for the additional 2011 annual incentive equity award of $925,000 was determined by using the year-end closing price for 2011 of $21.46. These shares vested February 16, 2012.


 

 

 

 

4034

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name
(a)

 

Number of Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
(b)

 

Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
(c)

 

Number of Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
(d)(1)

 

Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(e)(2)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,103

 

 

934,042

 

William E. Schneider

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



(1)

Reflects the portion of Mr. Wells’ additional 2011 annual incentive award that vested on February 16, 2012 and was paid in shares of our common stock determined by dividing $925,000 by the stock price on December 30, 2011, according to the terms of Mr. Wells’ award.

(2)

Reflects the value of the portion of Mr. Wells’ additional 2011 annual incentive award that was paid in shares of our common stock based on our closing stock price of $21.67 on February 16, 2012.

Pension Benefits for 20112012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name
(a)

 

Plan Name
(b)

 

Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#)
(c)

 

Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(d)

 

Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
(e)

 

 

Plan Name
(b)

 

Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#)
(c)

 

Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(d)

 

Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
(e)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

MDU Pension Plan

 

35

 

1,619,835

 

 

 

MDU Pension Plan

 

35

 

1,662,318

 

 

 

SISP I(1)(3)

 

10

 

1,951,968

 

 

 

SISP I(1)(3)

 

10

 

2,126,747

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

10

 

3,222,988

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

10

 

3,511,576

 

 

 

SISP Excess(4)

 

35

 

552,948

 

 

 

SISP Excess(4)

 

35

 

378,943

 

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

MDU Pension Plan

 

4

 

78,419

 

 

 

MDU Pension Plan

 

4

 

94,002

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

4

 

403,676

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

5

 

489,028

 

 

John G. Harp

 

MDU Pension Plan

 

5

 

242,675

 

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

WBI Pension Plan

 

28

 

1,154,443

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

6

 

2,461,293

 

 

 

SISP I(1)(3)

 

10

 

799,197

 

 

 

SISP Excess(4)

 

5

 

40,291

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

10

 

768,065

 

 

 

Harp Additional Retirement Benefit

 

3

 

155,416

 

 

 

SISP Excess(4)

 

28

 

103,162

 

 

J. Kent Wells(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William E. Schneider

 

KR Pension Plan

 

16

 

786,231

 

 

 

KR Pension Plan

 

16

 

800,720

 

 

 

SISP I(1)(3)

 

10

 

1,372,770

 

 

 

SISP I(1)(3)

 

10

 

1,479,910

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

10

 

1,621,769

 

 

 

SISP II(2)(3)

 

10

 

1,748,343

 

 

 

SISP Excess(4)

 

16

 

46,259

 

 


 

 

(1)

Grandfathered under Section 409A.

(2)

Not grandfathered under Section 409A.

(3)

Years of credited service only affects vesting under SISP I and SISP II. The number of years of credited service in the table reflects the years of vesting service completed in SISP I and SISP II as of December 31, 2011,2012, rather than total years of service with the company. Ten years of vesting service is required to obtain the full benefit under these plans. The present value of accumulated benefits was calculated by assuming the named executive officer would have ten years of vesting service on the assumed benefit commencement date; therefore, no reduction was made to reflect actual vesting levels.

(4)

The number of years of credited service under the SISP excess reflects the years of credited benefit service in the appropriate pension plan as of December 31, 2009, when the pension plans were frozen, rather than the years of participation in the SISP excess. We reflect years of credited benefit service in the appropriate pension plan because the SISP excess provides a benefit that is based on benefits that would have been payable under the pension plans absent Internal Revenue Code limitations.

(5)

Mr. Wells is not eligible to participate in our pension plan and does not participate in the SISP.

The amounts shown for the pension plan and SISP excess represent the actuarial present values of the executives’ accumulated benefits accrued as of December 31, 2011,2012, calculated using a 4.00%3.45%, 4.11%3.59%, 3.76%, and 4.07%3.58% discount rate for the SISP excess, MDU pension plan, WBI pension plan, and KR pension plan, respectively, the 20122013 IRS Static Mortality Table for post-retirement mortality, and no recognition of future salary increases or pre-retirement mortality. The assumed retirement ages for these benefits was age 60 for Messrs. Schwartz and Harp.Bietz. This is the earliest age at which the executives could begin receiving unreduced benefits. Retirement on December 31, 2011,2012, was assumed for Messrs. Hildestad and Schneider, who were age 6263 and 63,64, respectively, on that date. The amounts shown for the SISP I and SISP II were determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate and assume benefits commenced at age 65. The assumptions used to calculate Mr. Harp’s additional retirement benefit are described below.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

35




Proxy Statement


 

Pension Plans

Messrs. Hildestad Schwartz, and HarpSchwartz participate in the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Pension Plan for Non-Bargaining Unit Employees, which we refer to as the MDU pension plan. Mr. Bietz participates in the Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company Pension Plan, which we refer to as the WBI pension plan. Mr. Schneider participates in the Knife River Corporation Salaried Employees’ Pension Plan, which we refer to as the KR pension plan. Pension benefits under the pension plans are based on the participant’s average annual salary over the 60 consecutive month period in which the participant received the highest annual salary during the participant’s final 10 years of service. For this purpose, only a participant’s salary is considered; incentives and other forms of compensation are not included. Benefits are determined by multiplying (1) the participant’s years of credited service by (2) the sum of (a) the average annual salary up to the social security integration level times 1.1% and (b) the average annual salary over the social security integration level times 1.45%. The KR pension plan uses the same formula except that 1.2% and 1.6% are used instead of 1.1% and 1.45%. The maximum years of service recognized when determining benefits under the pension plans is 35. Pension plan benefits are not reduced for social security benefits.

Each of the pension plans was amended to cease benefit accruals as of December 31, 2009, meaning the normal retirement benefit will not change. The years of credited service in the table reflect the named executive officers’ years of credited service as of December 31, 2009.

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

41




Proxy Statement

To receive unreduced retirement benefits under the MDU pension plan and the WBI pension plan, participants must either remain employed until age 60 or elect to defer commencement of benefits until age 60. Under the KR pension plan, participants must remain employed until age 62 or elect to defer commencement of benefits until age 62 to receive unreduced benefits. Messrs.Mr. Hildestad and Schneider werewas eligible for unreduced retirement benefits under the MDU pension plan, and Mr. Schneider was eligible for unreduced retirement benefits under the KR pension plan respectively, on December 31, 2011.2012. Participants whose employment terminates between the ages of 55 and 60, with 5 years of service under the MDU pension plan and the WBI pension plan are eligible for early retirement benefits. Early retirement benefits are determined by reducing the normal retirement benefit by 0.25% per month for each month before age 60 in the MDU pension plan and the WBI pension plan. If a participant’s employment terminates before age 55, the same reduction applies for each month the termination occurs before age 62, with the reduction capped at 21%. Mr. Harp is currently eligible for early retirement benefits.

Benefits for single participants under the pension plans are paid as straight life annuities and benefits for married participants are paid as actuarially reduced annuities with a survivor benefit for spouses, unless participants choose otherwise. Participants hired before January 1, 2004, who terminate employment before age 55 may elect to receive their benefits in a lump sum. Mr. Bietz would have been eligible for a lump sum if he had retired on December 31, 2012.

The Internal Revenue Code limits the amounts that may be paid under the pension plans and the amount of compensation that may be recognized when determining benefits. In 2009 when the pension plans were frozen, the maximum annual benefit payable under the pension plans was $195,000 and the maximum amount of compensation that could be recognized when determining benefits was $245,000.

Supplemental Income Security Plan
We also offer key managers and executives, including our named executive officers, except Mr. Wells, benefits under our nonqualified retirement plan, which we refer to as the Supplemental Income Security Plan or SISP. Benefits under the SISP consist of:

We also offer key managers and executives, including our named executive officers, except Mr. Wells, benefits under our nonqualified retirement plan, which we refer to as the Supplemental Income Security Plan or SISP. Benefits under the SISP consist of:


 

 

a supplemental retirement benefit intended to augment the retirement income provided under the pension plans – we refer to this benefit as the regular SISP benefit

 

 

an excess retirement benefit relating to Internal Revenue Code limitations on retirement benefits provided under the pension plans –we– we refer to this benefit as the SISP excess benefit, and

 

 

death benefits – we refer to these benefits as the SISP death benefit.

SISP benefits are forfeited if the participant’s employment is terminated for cause.

Regular SISP Benefits and Death Benefits
Regular SISP benefits and death benefits are determined by reference to one of two schedules attached to the SISP – the original schedule or the amended schedule. Our compensation committee, after receiving recommendations from our chief executive officer, determines the level at which participants are placed in the schedules. A participant’s placement is generally, but not always, determined by reference to the participant’s annual base salary. Benefit levels in the amended schedule, which became effective on January 1, 2010, are 20% lower than the benefit levels in the original schedule. The amended schedule applies to new participants and participants who receive a benefit level increase on or after January 1, 2010. None of the named executive officers have received a benefit level increase since the amended schedule became effective.

36

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

Participants can elect to receive (1) the regular SISP benefit only, (2) the SISP death benefit only, or (3) a combination of both. Regardless of the participant’s election, if the participant dies before the regular SISP benefit would commence, only the SISP death benefit is provided. If the participant elects to receive both a regular SISP benefit and a SISP death benefit, each of the benefits is reduced proportionately.

The regular SISP benefits reflected in the table above are based on the assumption that the participant elects to receive only the regular SISP benefit. The present values of the SISP death benefits that would be provided if the named executive officers had died on December 31, 2011,2012, prior to the commencement of regular SISP benefits, are reflected in the table that appears in the section entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Regular SISP benefits that were vested as of December 31, 2004, and were thereby grandfathered under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code remain subject to SISP provisions then in effect, which we refer to as SISP I benefits. Regular SISP benefits that are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which we refer to as SISP II benefits, are governed by amended provisions intended to comply with Section 409A. Participants generally have more discretion with respect to the distributions of their SISP I benefits.

42

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The time and manner in which the regular SISP benefits are paid depend on a variety of factors, including the time and form of benefit elected by the participant and whether the benefits are SISP I or SISP II benefits. Unless the participant elects otherwise, the SISP I benefits are paid over 180 months, with benefits commencing when the participant attains age 65 or, if later, when the participant retires. The SISP II benefits commence when the participant attains age 65 or, if later, when the participant retires, subject to a six-month delay if the participant is subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code that require delayed commencement of these types of retirement benefits. The SISP II benefits are paid over 180 months or, if commencement of payments is delayed for six months, 173 months. If the commencement of benefits is delayed for six months, the first payment includes the payments that would have been paid during the six-month period plus interest equal to one-half of the annual prime interest rate on the participant’s last date of employment. If the participant dies after the regular SISP benefits have begun but before receipt of all of the regular SISP benefits, the remaining payments are made to the participant’s designated beneficiary.

Rather than receiving their regular SISP I benefits in equal monthly installments over 15 years commencing at age 65, participants can elect a different form and time of commencement of their SISP I benefits. Participants can elect to defer commencement of the regular SISP I benefits. If this is elected, the participant retains the right to receive a monthly SISP death benefit if death occurs prior to the commencement of the regular SISP I benefit.

Participants also can elect to receive their SISP I benefits in one of three actuarially equivalent forms – a life annuity, 100% joint and survivor annuity, or a joint and two-thirds joint and survivor annuity, provided that the cost of providing these actuarial equivalent forms of benefits does not exceed the cost of providing the normal form of benefit. Neither the election to receive an actuarialactuarially equivalent benefit nor the administrator’s right to pay the regular SISP benefit in the form of an actuarially equivalent lump sum are available with respect to SISP II benefits.

To promote retention, the regular SISP benefits are subject to the following 10-year vesting schedule:

 

 

0% vesting for less than 3 years of participation

 

 

20% vesting for 3 years of participation

 

 

40% vesting for 4 years of participation and

 

 

an additional 10% vesting for each additional year of participation up to 100% vesting for 10 years of participation.

There is an additional vesting requirement on benefit level increases for the regular SISP benefit granted on or after January 1, 2010. The requirement applies only to the increased benefit level. The increased benefit vests after the later of three additional years of participation in the SISP or the end of the regular vesting schedule described above. The additional three-year vesting requirement for benefit level increases is pro-rated for participants who are officers, attain age 65, and, pursuant to the company’s bylaws, are required to retire prior to the end of the additional vesting period as follows:

 

 

33% of the increase vests for participants required to retire at least one year but less than two years after the increase is granted and

 

 

66% of the increase vests for participants required to retire at least two years but less than three years after the increase is granted.


 1

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

37




Proxy Statement

The benefit level increases of participants who attain age 65 and are required to retire pursuant to the company’s bylaws will be further reduced to the extent the participants are not fully vested in their regular SISP benefit under the 10-year vesting schedule described above. The additional vesting period associated with a benefit level increase may be waived by the compensation committee.

SISP death benefits become fully vested if the participant dies while actively employed. Otherwise, the SISP death benefits are subject to the same vesting schedules as the regular SISP benefits.

The SISP also provides that if a participant becomes totally disabled, the participant will continue to receive credit for up to two additional years under the SISP as long as the participant is totally disabled during such time. Since the named executive officers other than Messrs.Mr. Schwartz and Harp are fully vested in their SISP benefits, this would not result in any incremental benefit for the named executive officers other than Messrs. Schwartz and Harp.Mr. Schwartz. The present value of these two additional years of service for Messrs.Mr. Schwartz and Harp areis reflected in the table in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

SISP Excess Benefits
SISP excess benefits are equal to the difference between (1) the monthly retirement benefits that would have been payable to the participant under the pension plans absent the limitations under the Internal Revenue Code and (2) the actual benefits payable to the participant under the pension plans. Participants are only eligible for the SISP excess benefits if (1) the participant is fully vested under the

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

43




 

Proxy Statement

SISP Excess Benefits

SISP excess benefits are equal to the difference between (1) the monthly retirement benefits that would have been payable to the participant under the pension plans absent the limitations under the Internal Revenue Code and (2) the actual benefits payable to the participant under the pension plans. Participants are only eligible for the SISP excess benefits if (1) the participant is fully vested under the pension plan, (2) the participant’s employment terminates prior to age 65, and (3) benefits under the pension plan are reduced due to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code on plan compensation. Effective January 1, 2005, participants who were not then vested in the SISP excess benefits were also required to remain actively employed by the company until age 60. In 2009, the plan was amended to limit eligibility for the SISP excess benefit to current SISP participants (1) who were already vested in the SISP excess benefit or (2) who would become vested in the SISP excess benefits if they remain employed with the company until age 60. The plan was further amended to freeze the SISP excess benefits to a maximum of the benefit level payable based on the participant’s years of service and compensation level as of December 31, 2009. Messrs. Hildestad, Bietz, and Schneider would be entitled to the SISP excess benefit if they were to terminate employment prior to age 65. Mr. Harp must remain employed until age 60 to become entitled to his SISP excess benefit. Messrs. Schwartz and Wells are not eligible for this benefit.

Benefits generally commence six months after the participant’s employment terminates and continue to age 65 or until the death of the participant, if prior to age 65. If a participant who dies prior to age 65 elected a joint and survivor benefit, the survivor’s SISP excess benefit is paid until the date the participant would have attained age 65.

Mr. Harp’s Additional Retirement Benefit
To encourage Mr. Harp to remain with the company, on November 16, 2006, upon recommendation of our chief executive officer and the compensation committee, our board of directors approved an additional retirement benefit for Mr. Harp. The benefit provides for Mr. Harp to receive payments that represent the equivalent of an additional three years of service under the pension plan, SISP excess, and SISP II. The additional three years of service recognize Mr. Harp’s previous employment with a subsidiary of the company. To calculate payments Mr. Harp could receive due to his additional retirement benefit, we applied the additional years of service to each of the retirement arrangements and assumed he remained employed until age 60, for purposes of calculating the additional benefit under the pension plan and SISP excess, and age 65, for purposes of calculating the additional benefit under the SISP II. Since the pension plan and SISP excess were frozen as of December 31, 2009, no additional accruals will be recognized. Because we calculate the amounts shown in the table based on an assumption that the named executive officers are 100% vested in their SISP benefits, the additional years of service provided by the agreement would not increase his SISP II benefit reflected in the table. Consequently, the additional retirement benefit amount shown in the table does not include any additional benefit attributable to the SISP II. If Mr. Harp were to retire before achieving 10 years of service and becoming fully vested in his SISP II benefit, the additional years of service provided by the additional retirement benefit would increase his vesting percentage under the SISP II and, therefore, would increase his benefits under the SISP II. For a description of the payments that could be provided under the additional retirement benefit if Mr. Harp’s employment were to be terminated on December 31, 2011, refer to the table and related notes in “Potential Payment upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 20112012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive

 

Registrant

 

Earnings in

 

Aggregate

 

Aggregate

 

 

Contributions in

 

Contributions in

 

Aggregate

 

Withdrawals/

 

Balance at

 

 

Last FY

 

Last FY

 

Last FY

 

Distributions

 

Last FYE

 

Name

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

(d)

 

(e)

 

(f)

 

Name
(a)

 

Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
(b)

 

Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
(c)

 

Earnings in
Aggregate
Last FY
($)
(d)

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e)

 

Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
(f)

 

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

 

52,968

 

 

948,527

 

 

 

 

53,105

 

 

1,001,633

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John G. Harp

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

 

 

 

 

 

J. Kent Wells

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William E. Schneider

 

37,805

 

 

86,836

 

 

1,559,891(1

)

 

 

 

87,334

 

 

1,647,225

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes $392,000 which was reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2006 in column (g) and $37,805 which is reported for 2010 in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement.

Participants in the executive incentive compensation plans may elect to defer up to 100% of their annual incentive awards. Deferred amounts accrue interest at a rate determined annually by the compensation committee. The interest rate in effect for 20112012 was 5.76%5.46% or the “Moody’s Rate,” which is the average of (i) the number that results from adding the daily Moody’s U.S. Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for “A” rated companies as of the last day of each month for the 12-month period ending October 31 and dividing by 12 and (ii) the number that results from adding the daily Moody’s U.S. Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for “BBB” rated companies as of the last day of each month for the 12-month period ending October 31 and dividing by 12. The deferred amount will be paid in accordance with the participant’s election, following termination of employment or beginning in the fifth year following the year the award was granted. The amounts will be paid in accordance with the participant’s election in a lump sum or in monthly installments not to exceed 120 months. In the event of a change of control, all amounts become immediately payable.

 

 

 

4438

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

A change of control is defined as:

 

 

an acquisition during a 12-month period of 30% or more of the total voting power of our stock

 

 

an acquisition of our stock that, together with stock already held by the acquirer, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of our stock

 

 

replacement of a majority of the members of our board of directors during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of our board of directors or

 

 

acquisition of our assets having a gross fair market value at least equal to 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of our assets.


Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
The following tables show the payments and benefits our named executive officers would receive in connection with a variety of employment termination scenarios and upon a change of control. For the named executive officers, the information assumes the terminations and the change of control occurred on December 31, 2011.2012. All of the payments and benefits described below would be provided by the company or its subsidiaries.

The tables exclude compensation and benefits provided under plans or arrangements that do not discriminate in favor of the named executive officers and that are generally available to all salaried employees, such as benefits under our qualified defined benefit pension plan (for employees hired before 2006), accrued vacation pay, continuation of health care benefits, and life insurance benefits. The tables also do not include the named executive officers’ benefits under our nonqualified deferred compensation plans, which are reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 20112012 table. See the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table and the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 20112012 table, and accompanying narratives, for a description of the named executive officers’ accumulated benefits under our qualified defined benefit pension plans and our nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

The calculation of the present value of excess SISP benefits our named executive officers would be entitled to upon termination of employment under the SISP was computed based on calculations assuming an age rounded to the nearest whole year of age. Actual payments may differ. The terms of the excess SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2012 table.

We provide disability benefits to some of our salaried employees equal to 60% of their base salary, subject to a cap on the amount of base salary taken into account when calculating benefits. For officers, the limit on base salary is $200,000. For other salaried employees, the limit is $100,000. For all salaried employees, disability payments continue until age 65 if disability occurs at or before age 60 and for 5 years if disability occurs between the ages of 60 and 65. Disability benefits are reduced for amounts paid as retirement benefits. The amounts in the tables reflect the present value of the disability benefits attributable to the additional $100,000 of base salary recognized for executives under our disability program, subject to the 60% limitation, after reduction for amounts that would be paid as retirement benefits. As the tables reflect, with the exception of Messrs. Schwartz and Harp, the reduction for amounts paid as retirement benefits would eliminate disability benefits assuming a termination of employment on December 31, 2011. The table2012 for Mr. Wells does not reflect a disability benefit as he had not exhausted the eligibility waiting period of one year as of December 31, 2011.

According to the terms of Mr. Wells’ letter agreement, we agreed to pay Mr. Wells a guaranteed minimum payment of 100% of target of his annual incentive award under the WBI Holdings, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, prorated to reflect his May 2, 2011 hire date. In addition, if Mr. Wells’ employment had ended before January 2, 2012, due to a change of control, as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we agreed to pay Mr. Wells’ additional annual incentive of $1.85 million in full if the performance goal was met.Messrs. Hildestad, Bietz, and Schneider.

Upon a change of control, share-based awards granted under our Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan vest and non-share-based awards are paid in cash. All performance share awards for Messrs. Hildestad, Schwartz, Harp,Bietz, Wells, and Schneider and the annual incentives for Messrs. Hildestad, Harp,Bietz, Wells, and Schneider, which were awarded under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan, would vest at their target levels. For this purpose, the term “change of control” is defined as:

 

 

the acquisition by an individual, entity, or group of 20% or more of our outstanding common stock

 

 

a change in a majority of our board of directors since April 22, 1997, without the approval of a majority of the board members as of April 22, 1997, or whose election was approved by such board members

 

 

consummation of a merger or similar transaction or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, unless our stockholders immediately prior to the transaction beneficially own more than 60% of the outstanding common stock and voting power of the resulting corporation in substantially the same proportions as before the merger, no person owns 20% or more of the resulting corporation’s outstanding common stock or voting power except for any such ownership that existed before the merger and at least a majority of the board of the resulting corporation is comprised of our directors or

 

 

stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution.


 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

4539




 

Proxy Statement

Performance share awards will be forfeited if the participant’s employment terminates for any reason before the participant has reached age 55 and completed 10 years of service. Performance shares and related dividend equivalents for those participants whose employment is terminated other than for cause after the participant has reached age 55 and completed 10 years of service will be prorated as follows:

 

 

if the termination of employment occurs during the first year of the performance period, the shares are forfeited

 

 

if the termination of employment occurs during the second year of the performance period, the executive receives a prorated portion of any performance shares earned based on the number of months employed during the performance period and

 

 

if the termination of employment occurs during the third year of the performance period, the executive receives the full amount of any performance shares earned.

Of the named executive officers with performance share awards, only Mr.As of December 31, 2012, Messrs. Schwartz, Bietz, and Wells had not satisfied this requirement as of December 31, 2011.requirement. Accordingly, if a December 31, 20112012 termination other than for cause without a change of control is assumed, the named executive officers’ 2011-20132012-2014 performance share awards would be forfeited, any amounts earned under the 2011-2013 performance share awards for Messrs. Hildestad and Schneider would be reduced by one-third and such award for Messrs. Schwartz and Bietz would be forfeited, and any amounts earned under the 2010-2012 performance share awards for Messrs. Hildestad Harp, and Schneider would be reduced by one-third and such award for Mr. Schwartz would be forfeited, and any amounts earned under the 2009-2011 performance share awards for Messrs. Hildestad, Harp, and Schneider would not be reduced and the award for Mr.Messrs. Schwartz and Bietz would be forfeited. Mr. Wells had no 2011-2013 or 2010-2012 performance share awards. The number of performance shares earned following a termination depends on actual performance through the full performance period. As actual performance for the 2009-20112010-2012 performance share awards has been determined, the amounts for these awards in the event of a termination without a change of control were based on actual performance, which resulted in vesting of 0% of the target award. For the 2010-20122011-2013 performance share awards, because we do not know what actual performance through the entire performance period will be, we have assumed target performance will be achieved and, therefore, show two-thirds of the target award. No amounts are shown for the 2011-20132012-2014 performance share awards because such awards would be forfeited. Although vesting would only occur after completion of the performance period, the amounts shown in the tables were not reduced to reflect the present value of the performance shares that could vest. Dividend equivalents attributable to earned performance shares would also be paid. Dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2011,2012, are included in the amounts shown.

The value of the vesting of performance shares shown in the tables was determined by multiplying the number of performance shares that would vest due to termination or a change of control by the closing price of our stock on December 31, 2011.

Except for Messrs. Hildestad and Wells, we also have change of control employment agreements with our named executive officers and other executives, which provide certain protections to the executives in the event there is a change of control of the company. Mr. Hildestad requested that his change of control employment agreement be terminated in June 2010. The compensation committee notified other executives with change of control employment agreements that their agreements would not be extended beyond their current expiration dates.

For these purposes, we define “change of control” as:

the acquisition by an individual, entity, or group of 20% or more of our outstanding common stock

a change in a majority of our board of directors since the date of the agreement without the approval of a majority of the board members as of the date of the agreement or whose election was approved by such board members

consummation of a merger of similar transaction or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, unless our stockholders immediately prior to the transaction beneficially own more than 60% of the outstanding common stock and voting power of the resulting corporation in substantially the same proportions as before the merger, no person owns 20% or more of the resulting corporation’s outstanding common stock or voting power except for any such ownership that existed before the merger and at least a majority of the board of the resulting corporation is comprised of our directors or

stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution.

If a change of control occurs, the agreements provide for a three-year employment period from the date of the change of control, during which the named executive officer is entitled to receive:

a base salary of not less than twelve times the highest monthly salary paid within the preceding twelve months

annual incentive opportunity of not less than the highest annual incentive paid in any of the three years before the change of control

participation in our incentive, savings, retirement, and welfare benefit plans

reasonable vehicle allowance, home office allowance, and subsidized annual physical examinations and

office and support staff, vacation, and expense reimbursement consistent with such benefits as they were provided before the change of control.


46

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

Assuming a change of control occurred on December 31, 2011, the guaranteed minimum level of base salary provided over the three-year employment period would not result in an increase in any of the named executive officers’ base salaries. The minimum annual incentive opportunities Messrs. Schwartz, Harp, and Schneider would be eligible to earn over the three-year employment period would be $543,780, $1,316,250, and $1,744,860, respectively. The agreements also provide that severance payments and benefits will be provided:

if we terminate the named executive officer’s employment during the employment period, other than for cause or disability, or

the named executive officer resigns for good reason.

“Cause” means the named executive officer’s willful and continued failure to substantially perform his duties or willfully engaging in illegal conduct or gross misconduct materially injurious to the company. “Good reason” includes:

a material diminution of the named executive officer’s authority, duties, or responsibilities

a material change in the named executive officer’s work location and

our material breach of the agreement.

In such event, the named executive officer would receive:

accrued but unpaid base salary and accrued but unused vacation

a lump sum payment equal to three times his (a) annual salary using the higher of the then current annual salary or twelve times the highest monthly salary paid within the twelve months before the change of control and (b) annual incentive using the highest annual incentive paid in any of the three years before the change of control or, if higher, the annual incentive for the most recently completed fiscal year

a pro-rated annual incentive for the year of termination

an amount equal to the actuarial equivalent of the additional benefit the named executive officer would receive under the SISP and any other supplemental or excess retirement plan if employment continued for an additional three years

outplacement benefits and

a payment equal to any federal excise tax on excess parachute payments if the total parachute payments exceed 110% of the safe harbor amount for that tax. If this 110% threshold is not exceeded, the named executive officer’s payments and benefits would be reduced to avoid the tax. The named executive officers are not reimbursed for any taxes imposed on this tax reimbursement payment.

This description of severance payments and benefits reflects the terms of the agreements as in effect on December 31, 2011.2012.

The compensation committee may also consider providing severance benefits on a case-by-case basis for employment terminations not related to a change of control.terminations. The compensation committee adopted a checklist of factors in February 2005 to consider when determining whether any such severance benefits should be paid. The tables do not reflect any such severance benefits, as these benefits are made in the discretion of the committee on a case-by-case basis and it is not possible to estimate the severance benefits, if any, that would be paid.

 

 

 

 

40

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

47




 

Proxy Statement

Terry D. Hildestad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change of

 

Change of

 

Executive Benefits and

 

 

 

Not for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

 

Control

 

Payments Upon

 

Voluntary

 

Cause

 

For Cause

 

 

 

 

 

(With

 

(Without

 

Termination or

 

Termination

 

Termination

 

Termination

 

Death

 

Disability

 

Termination)

 

Termination)

 

Change of Control

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Change of
Control
(With
Termination)
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term Incentive(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

750,000

 

750,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

750,000

 

750,000

 

2009-2011 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,281,374

 

1,281,374

 

2010-2012 Performance Shares

 

723,587

 

723,587

 

 

 

723,587

 

723,587

 

1,085,380

 

1,085,380

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,107,087

 

1,107,087

 

2011-2013 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,199,584

 

1,199,584

 

 

816,176

 

816,176

 

 

816,176

 

816,176

 

1,224,265

 

1,224,265

 

2012-2014 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,144,577

 

1,144,577

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regular SISP(2)

 

5,242,870

 

5,242,870

 

 

 

 

 

5,242,870

 

5,242,870

 

 

 

 

5,709,419

 

5,709,419

 

 

 

5,709,419

 

5,709,419

 

 

 

Excess SISP(3)

 

552,948

 

552,948

 

 

 

 

 

552,948

 

552,948

 

 

 

 

378,944

 

378,944

 

 

 

378,944

 

378,944

 

 

 

SISP Death Benefits(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,586,607

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,024,426

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

6,519,405

 

6,519,405

 

 

 

12,310,194

 

6,519,405

 

10,112,156

 

4,316,338

 

 

6,904,539

 

6,904,539

 

 

12,840,602

 

6,904,539

 

10,314,292

 

4,225,929

 


 

 

(1)

Represents the target 20112012 annual incentive, which would be deemed earned upon change of control under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.

(2)

Represents the present value of Mr. Hildestad’s vested regular SISP benefit as of December 31, 2011,2012, which was $42,710 per month for 15 years, commencing at age 65. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the regular SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table.

(3)

Represents the present value of all excess SISP benefits Mr. Hildestad would be entitled to upon termination of employment under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the excess SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table.

(4)

Represents the present value of 180 monthly payments of $85,420 per month, which would be paid as a SISP death benefit under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the SISP death benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table.


 

 

48

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

41




 

Proxy Statement

 

Doran N. Schwartz

Doran N. Schwartz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Change of
Control
(With
Termination)
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010-2012 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,882

 

 

191,882

 

2011-2013 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

222,811

 

 

222,811

 

2012-2014 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

228,902

 

 

228,902

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regular SISP

 

 

244,273

(1)

 

244,273

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

341,982

(2)

 

244,273

(1)

 

 

 

SISP Death Benefits(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,055,217

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disability Benefits(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

855,522

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

244,273

 

 

244,273

 

 

 

2,055,217

 

 

1,197,504

 

 

887,868

 

 

643,595

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

 

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Not for
Cause
or Good
Reason
Termination
Following
Change of
Control
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

819,000

 

 

Short-term Incentive(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

725,040

 

 

2009-2011 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

114,689

 

114,689

2010-2012 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

188,120

 

188,120

2011-2013 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218,319

 

218,319

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regular SISP

 

160,738

(2)

160,738

(2)

 

 

 

 

241,107

(3)

281,292

(4)

 

SISP Death Benefits(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,980,385

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disability Benefits(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

842,408

 

 

 

 

Outplacement Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,000

 

 

280G Tax(7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

417,848

 

 

Total

 

160,738

 

160,738

 

 

 

1,980,385

 

1,083,515

 

2,814,308

 

521,128

 

 

(1)

Includes the prorated annual incentive for the year of termination, which is the full annual incentive since we assume termination occurred on December 31, 2011, and the additional severance payment of three times the annual incentive. For each of these, we used the higher of (1) the annual incentive earned in 2011 or (2) the highest annual incentive paid in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

(2)

Represents the present value of Mr. Schwartz’s vested regular SISP benefit as of December 31, 2011,2012, which was $2,920$3,650 per month for 15 years, commencing at age 65. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the regular SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table.

(3)(2)

Represents the present value of Mr. Schwartz’s vested SISP benefit described in footnote 2,1, adjusted to reflect the increase in the present value of his regular SISP benefit that would result from an additional two years of vesting under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate.

(4)

Represents the payment that would be made under Mr. Schwartz’s change of control agreement based on the increase in the actuarial present value of his regular SISP benefit that would result if he continued employment for an additional three years.

(5)(3)

Represents the present value of 180 monthly payments of $14,600 per month, which would be paid as a SISP death benefit under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the SISP death benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table.

(6)(4)

Represents the present value of the disability benefit after reduction for amounts that would be paid as retirement benefits. Present value was determined using a 4.11%3.59% discount rate.

(7)

Determined applying the Internal Revenue Code Section 4999 excise tax of 20% only if 110% threshold is exceeded.


 

 

42

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

49




 

Proxy Statement

 

John G. Harp

Steven L. Bietz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Change of
Control
(With
Termination)
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term Incentive(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

234,325

 

 

234,325

 

2010-2012 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

309,972

 

 

309,972

 

2011-2013 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

353,063

 

 

353,063

 

2012-2014 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

330,084

 

 

330,084

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regular SISP(2)

 

 

1,556,929

 

 

1,556,929

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,556,929

 

 

1,556,929

 

 

 

 

Excess SISP(3)

 

 

180,597

 

 

180,597

 

 

 

 

 

 

180,597

 

 

180,597

 

 

 

 

SISP Death Benefits(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,535,554

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,737,526

 

 

1,737,526

 

 

 

4,535,554

 

 

1,737,526

 

 

2,964,970

 

 

1,227,444

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

 

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Not for
Cause
or Good
Reason
Termination
Following
Change of
Control
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,350,000

 

 

 

Short-term Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,755,000

(1)

292,500

(2)

2009-2011 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

461,280

 

461,280

 

2010-2012 Performance Shares

 

260,488

 

260,488

 

 

 

260,488

 

260,488

 

390,731

 

390,731

 

2011-2013 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

431,840

 

431,840

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incremental Pension(3)

 

136,432

 

136,432

 

 

 

 

 

136,432

 

136,432

 

 

 

Regular SISP

 

2,215,163

(4)

2,215,163

(4)

 

 

 

 

2,461,292

(5)

2,461,292

(6)

 

 

SISP Death Benefits(7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,198,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disability Benefits(8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

178,455

 

 

 

 

 

Outplacement Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

280G Tax(9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

718,845

 

 

 

Total

 

2,612,083

 

2,612,083

 

 

 

6,459,363

 

3,036,667

 

7,755,420

 

1,576,351

 

 

 

(1)

Includes the prorated annual incentive for the year of termination, which is the full annual incentive since we assume termination occurred on December 31, 2011, and the additional severance payment of three times the annual incentive. For each of these, we used the higher of (1) the annual incentive earned in 2011 or (2) the highest annual incentive paid in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

(2)

Represents the target 20112012 annual incentive, which would be deemed earned upon change of control under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.

(3)

Represents the equivalent of three additional years of service that would be provided under the Harp additional retirement benefit described following the Pension Benefits for 2011 table. Present value was determined using a 4.11% discount rate.

(4)(2)

Represents the present value of Mr. Harp’sBietz’s vested regular SISP benefit as of December 31, 2011,2012, which was $20,565$16,110 per month for 15 years, commencing at age 65. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the regular SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2011 table. Also includes the additional benefit attributable to three additional years of service that would be provided under the retirement benefit agreement described following the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table.

(5)(3)

Represents the present value of all excess SISP benefits Mr. Harp’s vested SISP benefit described in footnote 4, adjustedBietz would be entitled to reflect the increase in the present valueupon termination of his regular SISP benefit that would result from an additional two years of vestingemployment under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the excess SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2012 table.

(4)

Represents the present value of 180 monthly payments of $32,220 per month, which would be paid as a SISP death benefit under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 3.45% discount rate. The terms of the SISP death benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2012 table.


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

43




Proxy Statement

J. Kent Wells

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

 

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Change of
Control
(With
Termination)
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term Incentive(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

687,500

 

 

687,500

 

2012-2014 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,119,133

 

 

1,119,133

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disability Benefits (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

452,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

452,506

 

 

1,806,633

 

 

1,806,633

 

(1)

Represents the target 2012 annual incentive, which would be deemed earned upon change of control under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.

(2)

Represents the present value of the disability benefit. Present value was determined using a 3.76% discount rate.


(6)

44

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

William E. Schneider

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

 

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Change of
Control
(With
Termination)
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term Incentive(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

290,810

 

 

290,810

 

2010-2012 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

396,249

 

 

396,249

 

2011-2013 Performance Shares

 

 

292,124

 

 

292,124

 

 

 

 

 

292,124

 

 

292,124

 

 

438,174

 

 

438,174

 

2012-2014 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

409,657

 

 

409,657

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regular SISP(2)

 

 

3,161,624

 

 

3,161,624

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,161,624

 

 

3,161,624

 

 

 

 

SISP Death Benefits(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,433,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

3,453,748

 

 

3,453,748

 

 

 

 

 

6,725,234

 

 

3,453,748

 

 

4,696,514

 

 

1,534,890

 

(1)

Represents the target 2012 annual incentive, which would be deemed earned upon change of control under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.

(2)

Represents the present value of Mr. Harp’sSchneider’s vested SISP benefit described in footnote 4, adjusted to reflect the increase in the present value of his regular SISP benefit that would result if he continued employmentas of December 31, 2012, which was $22,850 per month for an additional three years.15 years, commencing at age 65. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the regular SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2012 table.

(7)

(3)

Represents the present value of 180 monthly payments of $45,700 per month, which would be paid as a SISP death benefit under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00%3.45% discount rate. The terms of the SISP death benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 20112012 table.

(8)

Represents the present value of the disability benefit after reduction for amounts that would be paid as retirement benefits. Present value was determined using a 4.11% discount rate.

(9)

Determined applying the Internal Revenue Code Section 4999 excise tax of 20% only if 110% threshold is exceeded.


 

 

 

 

50

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Inc. Proxy Statement

45




 

Proxy Statement

 

J. Kent Wells


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

 

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Change of
Control
(With
Termination)
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term Incentive(1)

 

366,685

 

366,685

 

366,685

 

366,685

 

366,685

 

366,685

 

366,685

 

Additional 2011 Annual Incentive

 

 

 

1,850,000

(2)

1,850,000

(2)

1,850,000

(2)

1,850,000

(2)

1,850,000

(3)

1,850,000

(4)

Total

 

366,685

 

2,216,685

 

2,216,685

 

2,216,685

 

2,216,685

 

2,216,685

 

2,216,685

 

(1)

Represents the guaranteed minimum annual incentive payment of 100% of target for 2011, prorated to reflect Mr. Wells’ May 2, 2011 hire date.

(2)

Mr. Wells was eligible to receive payment of his 2011 additional annual incentive if he did not resign from Fidelity Exploration & Production Company before January 2, 2012, and the goal was met.

(3)

Mr. Wells would receive payment of his 2011 additional annual incentive if Fidelity Exploration & Production Company’s cash flow from operations for 2011 exceeded $132.0 million and his employment ended for any reason before January 2, 2012, due to a change in control of MDU Resources Group, Inc.

(4)

Represents the 2011 additional annual incentive, which would be deemed earned upon a change of control under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

51



Director Compensation for 2012


Proxy Statement

William E. Schneider


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination or
Change of Control

 

Voluntary
Termination
($)

 

Not for
Cause
Termination
($)

 

For Cause
Termination
($)

 

Death
($)

 

Disability
($)

 

Not for
Cause
or Good
Reason
Termination
Following
Change of
Control
($)

 

Change of
Control
(Without
Termination)
($)

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,342,200

 

 

 

Short-term Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,326,480

(1)

290,810

(2)

2009-2011 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

458,615

 

458,615

 

2010-2012 Performance Shares

 

258,986

 

258,986

 

 

 

258,986

 

258,986

 

388,479

 

388,479

 

2011-2013 Performance Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

429,341

 

429,341

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regular SISP(3)

 

2,919,232

 

2,919,232

 

 

 

 

 

2,919,232

 

2,919,232

 

 

 

Excess SISP

 

46,259

(4)

46,259

(4)

 

 

 

 

46,259

(4)

46,259

(5)

 

 

SISP Death Benefits(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,198,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outplacement Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

280G Tax(7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

784,127

 

 

 

Total

 

3,224,477

 

3,224,477

 

 

 

6,457,861

 

3,224,477

 

8,744,733

 

1,567,245

 

(1)

Includes the prorated annual incentive for the year of termination, which is the full annual incentive since we assume termination occurred on December 31, 2011, and the additional severance payment of three times the annual incentive. For each of these, we used the higher of (1) the annual incentive earned in 2011 or (2) the highest annual incentive paid in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

(2)

Represents the target 2011 annual incentive, which would be deemed earned upon change of control under the Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan.

(3)

Represents the present value of Mr. Schneider’s vested regular SISP benefit as of December 31, 2011, which was $22,850 per month for 15 years, commencing at age 65. Present value was determined using a 4.00% discount rate. The terms of the regular SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2011 table. The three additional years of vesting credit assumed for purposes of calculating the additional SISP benefit under Mr. Schneider’s change of control agreement would not increase the actuarial present value of his SISP amount.

(4)

Represents the present value of all excess SISP benefits Mr. Schneider would be entitled to upon termination of employment under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00% discount rate. The terms of the excess SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2011 table.

(5)

Represents the present value of all excess SISP benefits Mr. Schneider would be entitled to, calculated with the assumption of three additional years of employment, as provided under Mr. Schneider’s change of control agreement. Present value was determined using a 4.00% discount rate. The terms of the excess SISP benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2011 table.

(6)

Represents the present value of 180 monthly payments of $45,700 per month, which would be paid as a SISP death benefit under the SISP. Present value was determined using a 4.00% discount rate. The terms of the SISP death benefit are described following the Pension Benefits for 2011 table.

(7)

Determined applying the Internal Revenue Code Section 4999 excise tax of 20% only if 110% threshold is exceeded.

52

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

Director Compensation for 2011


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name
(a)

 

Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
(b)

 

Stock
Awards
($)
(c)(1)

 

Option
Awards
($)
(d)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(e)

 

Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(f)

 

All Other
Compensation
($)
(g)(2)

 

Total
($)
(h)

 

Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
(b)

 

Stock
Awards
($)
(c)(1)

 

Option
Awards
($)
(d)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(e)

 

Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(f)

 

All Other
Compensation
($)
(g)(2)

 

Total
($)
(h)

 

Thomas Everist

 

62,917

 

110,000

 

(3)

 

 

174

 

173,091

 

65,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

175,174

 

Karen B. Fagg

 

62,917

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

173,091

 

65,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

175,174

 

A. Bart Holaday

 

55,000

(4)

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

55,000

(3)

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

Dennis W. Johnson

 

67,917

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

178,091

 

70,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

180,174

 

Thomas C. Knudson

 

55,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

674

 

165,674

 

55,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

674

 

165,674

 

Richard H. Lewis

 

55,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

55,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

Patricia L. Moss

 

55,000

(5)

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

55,000

(4)

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

Harry J. Pearce

 

130,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

240,174

 

130,000

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

240,174

 

John K. Wilson

 

55,000

(6)

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

55,000

(5)

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

174

 

165,174

 

 

 

(1)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of 5,4505,467 shares of MDU Resources Group, Inc. stock purchased for our non-employee directors measured in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board generally accepted accounting principles for stock based compensation in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The grant date fair value is based on the purchase price of our common stock on the grant date on November 21, 2011,19, 2012, which was $20.181.$20.118. The $14$14.89 in cash paid to each director for the fractional shares is included in the amounts reported in column (c) to this table.

(2)

Group life insurance premium of $174 and a matching charitable contribution of $500 for Mr. Knudson.

(3)

Mr. Everist had 6,750 stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

(4)

Includes $14,997$14,999 that Mr. Holaday received in our common stock in lieu of cash.

(5)(4)

Includes $54,983$27,481 that Ms. Moss received in our common stock in lieu of cash.

(6)(5)

Includes $54,983$54,982 that Mr. Wilson received in our common stock in lieu of cash.

Effective June 1, 2011, the board approved changes to the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Directors’ Compensation Policy. The following table shows the cash and stock retainers payable to our non-employee directors.

Base Retainer

$55,000

Additional Retainers:

Non-Executive Chairman

75,000

Lead Director, if any

33,000

Audit Committee Chairman

15,000

Compensation Committee Chairman

10,000

Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman

10,000

Annual Stock Grant(1)

110,000


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective
June 1, 2011

 

Prior to
June 1, 2011

 

Base Retainer

 

$55,000

 

$55,000

 

Additional Retainers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Executive Chairman

 

 

75,000

 

 

75,000

 

Lead Director, if any

 

 

33,000

 

 

33,000

 

Audit Committee Chairman

 

 

15,000

 

 

10,000

 

Compensation Committee Chairman

 

 

10,000

 

 

5,000

 

Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman

 

 

10,000

 

 

5,000

 

Annual Stock Grant(1)

 

 

110,000

 

 

4,050 shares

 

 

 

(1)

Effective for 2011, theThe annual stock grant was changed from a fixed number of shares tois a grant of shares equal in value to $110,000.

There are no meeting fees.

In addition to liability insurance, we maintain group life insurance in the amount of $100,000 on each non-employee director for the benefit of each director’s beneficiaries during the time each director serves on the board. The annual cost per director is $174.

Directors may defer all or any portion of the annual cash retainer and any other cash compensation paid for service as a director pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors. Deferred amounts are held as phantom stock with dividend accruals and are paid out in cash over a five-year period after the director leaves the board.

Directors are reimbursed for all reasonable travel expenses including spousal expenses in connection with attendance at meetings of the board and its committees. All amounts together with any other perquisites were below the disclosure threshold for 2011.2012.

Our post-retirement income plan for directors was terminated in May 2001 for current and future directors. The net present value of each director’s benefit was calculated and converted into phantom stock. Payment is deferred pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and will be made in cash over a five-year period after the director’s retirement from the board.

 

 

 

46

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

53




 

ProxyStatement

The board revised ourOur director stock ownership policy for directorscontained in November 2010. Eachour corporate governance guidelines requires each director is required, rather than expected, to own our common stock equal in value to five times the director’s annual cash base retainer. Shares acquired through purchases on the open market and participation in our director stock plans will be considered in ownership calculations as will ownership of our common stock by a spouse. A director is allowed five years commencing January 1 of the year following the year of that director’s initial election to the board to meet the requirements. The level of common stock ownership is monitored with an annual report made to the compensation committee of the board. For stock ownership, please see “Security Ownership.”

In our Director Compensation Policy, we prohibit our directors from hedging their ownership of company common stock. Directors may not enter into transactions that allow the director to benefit from devaluation of our stock or otherwise own stock technically but without the full benefits and risks of such ownership.

Narrative Disclosure of our Compensation Policies and Practices
as They Relate to Risk Management

Senior managementThe human resources department has conducted an assessment of the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees and concluded that none of these risks is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. Based on the human resources department’s assessment and taking into account information received from the risk identification process, senior management and our management policy committee concluded that risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. After review and discussion with senior management, the compensation committee concurred with this assessment.

As part of its assessment of the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees, senior managementthe human resources department identified the principal areas of risk faced by the company that may be affected by our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including any risks resulting from our operating businesses’ compensation policies and practices. In assessing the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, senior managementthe human resources department identified the following practices as factors that servedesigned to mitigate any risks arising from our compensation plans and programs:prevent excessive risk taking:

Business management and governance practices

 

 

hedging on oil and gas productionrisk management is a specific performance competency to reduce commodity price volatilityannual performance assessment of Section 16 officers

 

 

board of director oversight on capital expenditure and operating plans that promotes careful consideration of financial assumptions

 

 

limitation on business acquisitions without board of director approval

 

 

employee integrity training programs and anonymous reporting systems

 

 

quarterly risk assessment reports at audit committee meetings and

 

 

prohibitionprohibitions on holding company stock in an account that is subject to a margin call, pledging company stock as collateral for a loan, and hedging of company stock by Section 16 officers and directors.

 

 

Compensation practices

 

 

active compensation committee review of executive compensation, including comparison of executive compensation to total stockholder return ratio to the ratio for the performance graph peer group (PEER Analysis)

 

 

the initial determination of a position’s salary grade to be at or near the 50th percentile of base salaries paid to similar positions at peer group companies and/or relevant industry companies

 

 

consideration of peer group and/or relevant industry practices to establish appropriate compensation target amounts

 

 

a balanced compensation mix of fixed salary and annual or long-term incentives tied to ourthe company’s financial performance

 

 

use of interpolation for annual and long-term incentive awards to avoid payout cliffs

 

 

negative discretion to adjust any annual or long-term incentive award payment downward

 

 

use of caps on annual incentive awards and stock granted under long-term incentive stock grant awards (200% of target)target for awards granted in 2012)

 

 

discretionary clawbacks on incentive payments in the event of a financial restatement

 

 

use of performance shares, rather than stock options or stock appreciation rights, as equity component of incentive compensation

 

 

use of performance shares with a relative, rather than an absolute, total stockholder return performance goal and mandatory reduction in award if total stockholder return is negative

 

 

use of three-year performance periods to discourage short-term risk-taking


 

 

 

54

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

47




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

substantive incentive goals measured primarily by return on invested capital and earnings per share criteria, which encourage balanced performance and are important to stockholders

 

 

use of financial performance metrics that are readily monitored and reviewed

 

 

regular review of the appropriateness of the companies in the performance graph peer group

 

 

stock ownership requirements for executives participating in the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive Plan and for the board of directors

 

 

mandatory holding periods for 50% of any net after-tax shares earned under long-term incentive awards granted in 2011 and thereafter and

 

 

use of independent consultants in establishing pay targets at least biennially.


 

 

 

48

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

55




 

Proxy Statement

INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

At the first annual meeting of the board after the annual meeting of stockholders, our board of directors elects our executive officers, who serve until their successors are chosen and qualify. A majority of our board of directors may remove any executive officer at any time. Information concerning our executive officers, including their ages, present corporate positions, and business experience, is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Present Corporate Position and Business Experience

Terry D. HildestadDavid L. Goodin

 

6251

 

Mr. Goodin was elected President and Chief Executive Officer.Officer of the company and a director effective January 4, 2013. For more information about Mr. Hildestad,Goodin, see “Election of Directors.”

 

 

 

 

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

5354

 

Mr. Bietz was elected president and chief executive officer of WBI Holdings, Inc. effective March 4, 2006; president effective January 2, 2006; executive vice president and chief operating officer effective September 1, 2002; vice president-administration and chief accounting officer effective November 3, 1999; vice president-administration effective February 1997; and controller effective January 1994.

 

 

 

 

 

William R. Connors

 

5051

 

Mr. Connors was elected vice president–renewable resources of MDU Resources Group, Inc., effective September 1, 2008. Prior to that, he was vice president-business development of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation effective November 2007; vice president-origination, contracts & regulatory of Centennial Energy Resources, LLC, effective January 2007; vice president-origination, contracts & regulatory of Centennial Power, Inc., effective July 2005; and, was first employed as vice president-contracts & regulatory of Centennial Power, Inc., effective July 2004. Prior to that Mr. Connors was of counsel to Miller Nash, LLP, a law firm in Seattle, Washington.

 

 

 

 

 

Mark A. Del Vecchio

 

5253

 

Mr. Del Vecchio was elected vice president–human resources on October 1, 2007. From November 3, 2003 to October 1, 2007, Mr. Del Vecchio was director of executive programs and compensation. From April 1996 to October 31, 2003, Mr. Del Vecchio was vice president and member of The Carter Group, LLC, an executive search and management consulting company.

 

 

 

 

 

David L. Goodin

50

Mr. Goodin was elected president and chief executive officer of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., and Cascade Natural Gas Corporation effective June 6, 2008, and president and chief executive officer of Intermountain Gas Company effective October 1, 2008. Prior to that, he was president of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Great Plains Natural Gas Co. effective March 1, 2008; president of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation effective July 2, 2007; executive vice president-operations and acquisitions of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. effective January 2007; vice president-operations effective January 2000; electric systems manager effective April 1999; electric systems supervisor effective August 1993; division electric superintendent effective February 1989; and division electrical engineer effective May 1983.

John G. Harp

 

5960

 

Mr. Harp was elected chief executive officer of Knife River Corporation effective January 1, 2012, and will continuecontinues to serve as chief executive officer of MDU Construction Services Group, Inc. He was elected president and chief executive officer of Utility Services Inc., which is now MDU Construction Services Group, Inc., effective September 29, 2004. From May 2004 to September 29, 2004, Mr. Harp was vice president of Ledcor Technical Services Inc., a provider of fiber optic cable maintenance services. From April 2001 to May 2004, he was president of JODE CORP., a broadband maintenance company. Mr. Harp sold JODE CORP. to Ledcor Construction in May 2004. Prior to that, he was president of Harp Line Constructors Co. and Harp Engineering, Inc. from July 1998, when they were bought by Utility Services Inc., to April 2001.

 

 

 

 

 

Nicole A. Kivisto

 

3839

 

Ms. Kivisto was elected vice president, controller and chief accounting officer effective February 17, 2010. Prior to that she was controller effective December 1, 2005; a financial analyst IV in the Corporate Planning Department effective May 2003; a financial and investor relations analyst in the Investor Relations Department effective May 2000; and a financial analyst in the Corporate Accounting Department effective July 1995.

 

 

 

 

 

Douglass A. Mahowald

 

6263

 

Mr. Mahowald was elected treasurer and assistant secretary effective February 17, 2010. Prior to that he was the assistant treasurer and assistant secretary effective August 1992; treasury services manager effective November 1982; and budget statistician effective February 1982.

 

 

 

 

 

K. Frank Morehouse

54

Mr. Morehouse was elected president and chief executive officer of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, and Intermountain Gas Company effective January 4, 2013. Prior to that, he was executive vice president and general manager of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation effective April 1, 2009, and Intermountain Gas Company effective October 1, 2008; vice president-operations of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Great Plains Natural Gas Co. effective January 29, 2007; Region Manager for Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. effective October 1, 2004; and Region Manager of Great Plains Natural Gas Co. when it was acquired July 1, 2000.

Cynthia J. Norland

 

5758

 

Ms. Norland was elected vice president–administration effective July 16, 2007. Prior to that she was the assistant vice president–administration effective January 17, 2007; associate general counsel in the Legal Department effective March 6, 2004; and senior attorney in the Legal Department effective June 1, 1995.

 

 

 

 

 

Paul K. Sandness

 

5758

 

Mr. Sandness was elected general counsel and secretary of the company, its divisions and major subsidiaries effective April 6, 2004. He also was elected a director of the company’s principal subsidiaries and was appointed to the Managing Committees of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Great Plains Natural Gas Co. Prior to that he served as a senior attorney effective 1987 and as an assistant secretary of several subsidiary companies.



MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Proxy Statement


49




Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

William E. Schneider

 

6364

 

Mr. Schneider was elected executive vice president–Bakken Development effective January 1, 2012. Prior to that, he was president and chief executive officer of Knife River Corporation effective May 1, 2005; and senior vice president-construction materials effective from September 15, 1999 to April 30, 2005.


56

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

Doran N. Schwartz

 

4243

 

Mr. Schwartz was elected vice president and chief financial officer effective February 17, 2010. Prior to that, he was vice president and chief accounting officer effective March 1, 2006; and assistant vice president-special projects effective September 6, 2005. He was director of membership rewards for American Express, a financial services company, from November 2004 to August 1, 2005; audit manager for Deloitte & Touche, an audit and professional services company, from June 2002 to November 2004; and audit manager/senior for Arthur Andersen, an audit and professional services company, from December 1997 to June 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

John P. Stumpf

 

5253

 

Mr. Stumpf was elected vice president–strategic planning effective December 1, 2006. Mr. Stumpf was vice president–corporate development for Knife River Corporation from July 1, 2002 to November 30, 2006, and director of corporate development of Knife River Corporation from January 14, 2002 to June 30, 2002. Prior to that, he was special projects manager for Knife River Corporation from May 1, 2000 to January 13, 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

J. Kent Wells

 

5556

 

Mr. Wells was elected vice chairman of the company and a director effective January 4, 2013, and continues to serve as president and chief executive officer of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, the position for which he was hired effective May 2, 2011. Prior to that he was senior vice presidentFor more information about Mr. Wells, see “Election of exploration and production for BP America, Inc. from June 2007 until October 2010, when he was named BP America Inc.’s group senior vice president for global deepwater response until March 31, 2011. He also served as general manager of Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations from February 2005 until June 2007; vice-president, Gulf of Mexico shelf, for BP America, Inc. from 2002 to 2005; vice-president, Rockies, for BP America, Inc. from 2000 to 2002; general manager of Crescendo Resources LP from 1997 to 2000; manager, Hugoton, for Amoco Production Company, Inc. from 1993 to 1996; manager, operations, for Amoco Production Company, Inc. in 1993; and resource manager for Amoco Production Company, Inc. in 1988 to 1993.Directors.”

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

The table below sets forth the number of shares of our capital stock that each director and each nominee for director, each named executive officer, and all directors and executive officers as a group owned beneficially as of December 31, 2011.2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares Beneficially

 

 

Owned Include:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Individuals

 

Deferred

 

 

Have Rights

 

Director Fees

 

 

Common Shares

 

to Acquire

 

Shares Held By

 

Held as

 

 

Beneficially

 

Within 60

 

Family

 

Percent

 

Phantom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

Name

 

Owned(1)

 

Days(2)

 

Members(3)

 

of Class

 

Stock(4)

 

 

Common Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)

 

Shares Held By
Family
Members(2)

 

Percent
of Class

 

Deferred
Director Fees
Held as
Phantom
Stock(3)

 

Steven L. Bietz

 

69,392

(4)

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

Thomas Everist

Thomas Everist

 

1,880,123

(5)

 

6,750

 

1.0

 

28,350

 

 

1,885,590

(5)

 

 

 

1.0

 

29,243

 

Karen B. Fagg

Karen B. Fagg

 

30,997

 

 

 

*

 

 

37,481

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

John G. Harp

 

85,719

(6)

 

 

 

*

 

Terry D. Hildestad

Terry D. Hildestad

 

214,073

 

 

 

*

 

 

214,073

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

A. Bart Holaday

A. Bart Holaday

 

35,012

 

 

 

*

 

 

41,200

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

Dennis W. Johnson

Dennis W. Johnson

 

81,019

(7)

 

4,560

 

*

 

 

88,583

(6)

 

4,560

 

*

 

 

 

Thomas C. Knudson

Thomas C. Knudson

 

19,000

 

 

 

*

 

 

24,467

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

Richard H. Lewis

Richard H. Lewis

 

25,700

 

 

 

*

 

16,275

 

 

28,167

 

 

 

*

 

18,185

 

Patricia L. Moss

Patricia L. Moss

 

56,687

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

63,225

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

Harry J. Pearce

Harry J. Pearce

 

212,550

 

 

 

*

 

46,614

 

 

218,017

 

 

 

*

 

48,081

 

William E. Schneider

William E. Schneider

 

116,219

(8)

 

800

 

*

 

 

104,555

(7)

 

800

 

*

 

 

 

Doran N. Schwartz

Doran N. Schwartz

 

18,735

(6)

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

24,763

(4) (8)

 

1,300

 

*

 

 

 

J. Kent Wells

J. Kent Wells

 

(9)

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

27,743

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

John K. Wilson

John K. Wilson

 

82,439

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

90,549

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (23 in number)

All directors and executive officers as a group (23 in number)

 

3,124,888

 

6,750

 

18,006

 

1.7

 

91,239

 

 

3,222,078

 

20,228

 

1.7

 

95,509

 


 

 

*

Less than one percent of the class.

(1)

“Beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or investment power with respect to a security.

(2)

Indicates shares of our stock that executive officers and directors have the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to stock options. These shares are included in the “Common Shares Beneficially Owned” column.

(3)

These shares are included in the “Common Shares Beneficially Owned” column.

(4)

These shares are not included in the “Common Shares Beneficially Owned” column. Directors may defer all or a portion of their cash compensation pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors. Deferred amounts are held as phantom stock with dividend accruals and are paid out in cash over a five-year period after the director leaves the board.

(4)

Includes full shares allocated to the officer’s account in our 401(k) retirement plan.

(5)

Includes 1,820,000 shares of common stock acquired through the sale of Connolly-Pacific to us.

(6)

Includes full shares allocated to the officer’s account in our 401(k) retirement plan.

(7)

Mr. Johnson disclaims all beneficial ownership of the 4,560 shares owned by his wife.

(8)(7)

Mr. Schneider disclaims all beneficial ownership of the 800 shares owned by his wife.

(9)(8)

As of February 22, 2012,The total includes 1,300 shares owned by Mr. Wells owns 25,743 shares of our common stock.Schwartz’s wife.


 

 


50


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

57




 

Proxy Statement

We prohibit our directors and executive officers from hedging their ownership of company common stock. They may not enter into transactions that allow them to benefit from devaluation of our stock or otherwise own stock technically but without the full benefits and risks of such ownership.

Directors, executive officers, and related persons are prohibited from holding our common stock in a margin account, with certain exceptions, or pledging company securities as collateral for a loan. Company common stock may be held in a margin brokerage account only if the stock is explicitly excluded from any margin, pledge, or security provisions of the customer agreement. Company common stock may be held in a cash account, which is a brokerage account that does not allow any extension of credit on securities. “Related person” means an executive officer’s or director’s spouse, minor child, and any person (other than a tenant or domestic employee) sharing the household of a director or executive officer, as well as any entities over which a director or executive officer exercises control.

The table below sets forth information with respect to any person we know to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Address

 

Amount and Nature

 

Percent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Title of Class

 

of Beneficial Owner

 

of Beneficial Ownership

 

of Class

 

 

Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership

 

Percent of
Class

 

Common Stock

 

BlackRock, Inc.
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022

 

11,808,063

(1)

6.25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

New York Life Trust Company

 

 

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202

 

11,315,091

(2)

5.90

%

 

51 Madison Avenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10010

 

9,676,893

(1)

5.13

%

Common Stock

 

State Street Corporation
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111

 

9,760,389

(3)

5.20

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

BlackRock, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355

 

10,319,105

(4)

5.46

%

 

40 East 52nd Street

 

 

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10022

 

10,780,367

(2)

5.71

%

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

100 E. Pratt Street

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baltimore, MD 21202

 

11,783,757

(3)

6.20

%

 

 

 

(1)

In a Schedule 13G/A, Amendment No. 12,3, filed on February 14, 2012, New York Life Trust Company indicates that it holds these shares as directed trustee of our 401(k) plan and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares.

(2)

In a Schedule 13G/A, Amendment No. 2, filed on February 13, 2012,5, 2013, BlackRock, Inc. reports sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares as the parent holding company or control person of BlackRock Capital Management, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co. Ltd., BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Australia Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Fund Managers Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock International Limited, and BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited.

(3)(2)

In a Schedule 13G,13G/A, Amendment No. 1, filed on February 14, 2012,7, 2013, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reports sole voting power with respect to 2,372,9401,724,000 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 11,783,75711,315,091 shares. These securities are owned by individual and institutional investors to which T. Rowe Price serves as investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For purposes of the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, T. Rowe Price is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, T. Rowe Price expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.

(3)

In a Schedule 13G, filed on February 12, 2013, State Street Corporation reports shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares as the parent holding company or control person of State Street Global Advisors France S.A., State Street Bank and Trust Company, SSGA Funds Management, Inc., State Street Global Advisors Limited, State Street Global Advisors Ltd, State Street Global Advisors, Australia Limited, State Street Global Advisors Japan Co., Ltd. and State Street Global Advisors, Asia Limited.

(4)

In a Schedule 13G, filed on February 13, 2013, The Vanguard Group reports sole dispositive power with respect to 10,140,265 shares, shared dispositive power with respect to 178,840 shares and sole voting power with respect to 191,340 shares. These shares include 127,440 shares beneficially owned by Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts, and 115,300 shares beneficially owned by Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.



MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement


51




Proxy Statement

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION DISCLOSURE

The board of directors has adopted a policy for the review of related person transactions. This policy is contained in our corporate governance guidelines, which are posted on our website at www.mdu.com.

The audit committee reviews related person transactions in which we are or will be a participant to determine if they are in the best interests of our stockholders and the company. Financial transactions, arrangements, relationships, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships in which a related person had or will have a material interest and that exceed $120,000 are subject to the committee’s review.

Related persons are directors, director nominees, executive officers, holders of 5% or more of our voting stock, and their immediate family members. Immediate family members are spouses, parents, stepparents, mothers-in-law, fathers-in-law, siblings, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, children, stepchildren, daughters-in-law, sons-in-law, and any person, other than a tenant or domestic employee, who shares the household of a director, director nominee, executive officer, or holder of 5% or more of our voting stock.

After its review, the committee makes a determination or a recommendation to the board and officers of the company with respect to the related person transaction. Upon receipt of the committee’s recommendation, the board of directors or officers, as the case may be, take such action as they deem appropriate in light of their responsibilities under applicable laws and regulations.

The audit committee and the board of directors reviewed two leases between an indirect subsidiary of the company and a Nevada limited liability company, MOJO Montana, LLC (MOJO). John G. Harp, who was president andis chief executive officer of MDU Construction Services Group, Inc. until January 1, 2012, at which time he became the chief executive officer of MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.,and Knife River Corporation, and his brother, Michael D. Harp, are managing members of MOJO. The properties described in these two leases are located in Kalispell and Billings, Montana, and have been leased since 1998. In May 2010, the audit committee determined that renewing these leases was in the company’s best interests after it reviewed 2010 third party appraisals for the properties and considered the consumer price index and our operating companies’ knowledge of local property markets. The audit committee recommended and the board approved three-year leases for these properties that provide for our indirect subsidiary to pay a combined monthly rent of $9,508 to MOJO. The leases expire June 30, 2013.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence
The board of directors has adopted guidelines on director independence that are included in our corporate governance guidelines, which are available for review on our corporate website at http://www.mdu.com/Documents/Governance/CorporateGovernance.pdf. The board of directors has determined that Thomas Everist, Karen B. Fagg, A. Bart Holaday, Dennis W. Johnson, Thomas C. Knudson, Richard H. Lewis, Patricia L. Moss, Harry J. Pearce, and John K. Wilson:

 

 

have no material relationship with us and

 

 

are independent in accordance with our director independence guidelines and the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.


 

 

58

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

In determining director independence for 2011,In determining director independence for 2012, the board of directors considered the following transactions or relationships:

 

Mr. Everist’s ownership of approximately 1.86 million shares in 2010 and approximately 1.87 million shares in 2011 and approximately 1.89 million shares in 2012 of our common stock. In December 2011, we entered into a two-year contract with WebFilings, LLC, which offers a cloud-based solution for meeting SEC reporting requirements. The contract provides for a quarterly subscription fee of approximately $13,000 to use WebFilings’ software and for additional fees to be determined based on the number of users and additional services requested. The additional fees for 2011 were $4,500, for 2012 were $5,000, and we expect them to be approximately $3,100 for 2013. Mr. Everist is a limited partner and owns less than 1% of WebFilings, LLC. The MDU Resources Foundation (Foundation) made charitable contributions to Medcenter One Foundation, which is now known as Sanford Health following a merger effective July 2, 2012, in the amount of $500 in 2011 and $1,250 in 2012. Mr. Everist is a member of the board of directors of the Sanford Health Foundation and his wife, Barbara Everist, is vice chairman of the board of trustees of Sanford Health.

 

 

charitable contributions from the Foundation in the amount of $13,500 in 2010 and $33,625$2,700 in 2011 to the Montana State University – Ms. Fagg serves as a member of the Montana State University’s Engineering Advisory Council

charitable contributionsand $2,625 in the amount of $14,750 in 2010 and $2,700 in 20112012 to the University of North Dakota Foundation – Mr. Holaday serves as the Chairmanchairman of the Boardboard and as a Trusteetrustee for the University of North Dakota Center for Innovation Foundation and also serves as a director for the University of North Dakota Foundation; charitable contributions from the Foundation in the amount of $1,250 in 2010 and $3,750 in 2011 and $27,250 in 2012 to Jamestown College or its foundation – Mr. Holaday serves as a directortrustee for Jamestown CollegeCollege.

 

 

charitable contributions from the Foundation to the City of Dickinson in the amount of $20,000 in 20102011 and in 20112012 – Mr. Johnson is president of the City of Dickinson board of commissionerscommissioners.

52

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement



Proxy Statement


 

 

charitable contributions from the Foundation to Colorado UpLift in the amount of $25,000 in 20102011 and $20,000 in 2011–2012 – Mr. Lewis is a board director and chairman of the Development Board of Colorado UpLift; charitable contributions from the Foundation in the amount of $10,000 in 20102011 and $5,000 in 20112012 to the Alliance for Choice in Education – Mr. Lewis serves on the Colorado Board of Trustees for Alliance.

Director Resignation upon Change of Job Responsibility
Our corporate governance guidelines require a director to tender his or her resignation after a material change in job responsibility. In 2011, two2012, no directors submitted resignations under this requirement. Ms. Fagg submitted her resignation in connection with the announcement of her retirement as vice president of DOWL LLC, d/b/a DOWL HKM, effective December 31, 2011. Ms. Moss submitted her resignation in connection with her retirement from Cascade Bancorp and the Bank of the Cascades effective July 25, 2012. After considering the background, experience on the board, skills and character, and contribution to the company by both of these directors in light of the company’s business and structure, the board determined the resignations should not be accepted.

Code of Conduct
We have a code of conduct and ethics, which we refer to as the Leading With Integrity Guide, which applies to all employees, directors, and officers.

We intend to satisfy our disclosure obligations regarding:

 

 

amendments to, or waivers of, any provision of the code of conduct that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition in Regulation S-K, Item 406(b) and

 

 

waivers of the code of conduct for our directors or executive officers, as required by New York Stock Exchange listing standards by posting such information on our website at http://www.mdu.com/Documents/Governance/IntegrityGuide.pdf.

Board Leadership Structure and Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The board separated the positions of chairman of the board and chief executive officer in 2006 and elected Harry J. Pearce, a non-employee independent director, as our chairman, and Terry D. Hildestad as our president and chief executive officer.chairman. Separating these positions allows our chief executive officer to focus on the full-time job of running our business, while allowing the chairman of the board to lead the board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. The board believes this structure recognizes the time, effort, and energy that the chief executive officer is required to devote to his position in the current business environment, as well as the commitment required to serve as our chairman, particularly as the board’s oversight responsibilities continue to grow and demand more time and attention. The fundamental role of the board of directors is to provide oversight of the management of the company in good faith and in the best interests of the company and its stockholders. Having an independent chairman is a means to ensure the chief executive officer is accountable for managing the company in close alignment with the interests of stockholders. An independent chairman avoids the conflicts of interest that arise when the chairman and chief executive positions are combined and more effectively manages relationships between the board and the chief executive officer. An independent chairman is in a better position to encourage frank and lively discussions and to assure that the company has adequately assessed all appropriate business risks before adopting its final business plans and strategies. WhileIn August 2012, we amended our bylaws and corporate governance guidelines do notto require that our chairman and chief executive officer positions be separate, theindependent. The board continues to believebelieves that having separate positions and having an independent outside director serve as chairman is the appropriate leadership structure for the company and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance.

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

59




Proxy Statement

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including economic risks, environmental and regulatory risks, and others, such as the impact of competition, weather conditions, limitations on our ability to pay dividends, increased pension plan obligations, and cyber attacks or acts of terrorism. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks the company faces, while the board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed.

The board believes that establishing the right “tone at the top” and that full and open communication between management and the board of directors are essential for effective risk management and oversight. Our chairman meets regularly with our president and chief executive officer and other senior officers to discuss strategy and risks facing the company. Senior management attends the quarterly board meetings and is available to address any questions or concerns raised by the board on risk management-related and any other matters. Each quarter, the board of directors receives presentations from senior management on strategic matters involving our operations. The board holds strategic planning sessions with senior management to discuss strategies, key challenges, and risks and opportunities for the company.

While the board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight at our company, our three board committees assist the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas of risk. The audit committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk assessment and management in a general manner and specifically in the areas of financial reporting, internal controls and

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

53




Proxy Statement

compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and, in accordance with New York Stock Exchange requirements, discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and their adequacy and effectiveness. Risk assessment reports are regularly provided by management to the audit committee. This opens the opportunity for discussions about areas where the company may have material risk exposure, steps taken to manage those exposures, and the company’s risk tolerance in relation to company strategy. The audit committee reports regularly to the board of directors on the company’s management of risks in the audit committees’committee’s areas of responsibility. The compensation committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. The nominating and governance committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with board organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors and executive officers, and corporate governance.

Board Meetings and Committees
During 2011,2012, the board of directors held fourseven meetings. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the combined total meetings of the board and the committees on which the director served during 2011.2012. Director attendance at our annual meeting of stockholders is left to the discretion of each director. Three directors attended our 20112012 annual meeting of stockholders.

Harry J. Pearce was elected non-employee chairman of the board on August 17, 2006. Mr. Pearce served as lead director from February 15, 2001 to August 17, 2006. He presides at the executive session of the non-employee directors held in connection with each regularly scheduled quarterly board of directors meeting. The non-employee directors also meet in executive session with the chief executive officer at each regularly scheduled quarterly board of directors meeting. All of our non-employee directors are independent directors.

The board has a standing audit committee, compensation committee, and nominating and governance committee. These committees are composed entirely of independent directors.

The audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees have charters, which are available for review on our website at http://www.mdu.com/Governance/Pages/BoardChartersandCommittees.aspx. Our corporate governance guidelines are available at http://www.mdu.com/Documents/Governance/CorporateGovernance.pdf, and our Leading With Integrity Guide is also on our website at http://www.mdu.com/Documents/Governance/IntegrityGuide.pdf.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The nominating and governance committee met threefour times during 2011.2012. The committee members were Karen B. Fagg, chairman, Richard H. Lewis, A. Bart Holaday, and Patricia L. Moss, who joined the committee effective May 12, 2011.Moss.

The nominating and governance committee provides recommendations to the board with respect to:

 

board organization, membership, and function

 

 

committee structure and membership

 

 

succession planning for our executive management and directors and

 

 

corporate governance guidelines applicable to us.


60

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

The nominating and governance committee assists the board in overseeing the management of risks in the committee’s areas of responsibility.

The committee identifies individuals qualified to become directors and recommends to the board the nominees for director for the next annual meeting of stockholders. The committee also identifies and recommends to the board individuals qualified to become our principal officers and the nominees for membership on each board committee. The committee oversees the evaluation of the board and management.

In identifying nominees for director, the committee consults with board members, our management, consultants, and other individuals likely to possess an understanding of our business and knowledge concerning suitable director candidates.

54

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

Our corporate governance guidelines include our policy on consideration of director candidates recommended to us. We will consider candidates that our stockholders recommend. Stockholders may submit director candidate recommendations to the nominating and governance committee chairman in care of the secretary at MDU Resources Group, Inc., P.O. Box 5650, Bismarck, ND 58506-5650. Please include the following information:

 

 

the candidate’s name, age, business address, residence address, and telephone number

 

 

the candidate’s principal occupation

 

 

the class and number of shares of our stock owned by the candidate

 

 

a description of the candidate’s qualifications to be a director

 

 

whether the candidate would be an independent director and

 

 

any other information you believe is relevant with respect to the recommendation.

These guidelines provide information to stockholders who wish to recommend candidates for director for consideration by the nominating and governance committee. Stockholders who wish to actually nominate persons for election to our board at an annual meeting of stockholders must follow the procedures set forth in section 2.08 of our bylaws. You may obtain a copy of the bylaws by writing to the secretary of MDU Resources Group, Inc. at the address above. Our bylaws are also available on our website at http://www.mdu.com/Documents/Governance/2011-11_Bylaws.pdf.Pages/CorporateGovernanceGuidelines.aspx. See also the section entitled “2013“2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” later in the proxy statement.

There are no differences in the manner by which the committee evaluates director candidates recommended by stockholders and those recommended by other sources.

In evaluating director candidates, the committee considers an individual’s:

 

background, character, and experience, including experience relative to our company’s lines of business

 

 

skills and experience which complement the skills and experience of current board members

 

 

success in the individual’s chosen field of endeavor

 

 

skill in the areas of accounting and financial management, banking, general management, human resources, marketing, operations, public affairs, law, technology, and operations abroad

 

 

background in publicly traded companies

 

 

geographic area of residence

 

 

diversity of business and professional experience, skills, gender, and ethnic background, as appropriate in light of the current composition and needs of the board

 

 

independence, including affiliationsany affiliation or relationshipsrelationship with other groups, organizations, or entities and

 

 

prior and future compliance with applicable law and all applicable corporate governance, code of conduct and ethics, conflict of interest, corporate opportunities, confidentiality, stock ownership and trading policies, and our other policies and guidelines.

As indicated above, when identifying nominees to serve as director, the nominating and governance committee will consider candidates with diverse business and professional experience, skills, gender, and ethnic background, as appropriate, in light of the current composition and needs of the board. The nominating and governance committee assesses the effectiveness of this policy annually in connection with the nomination of directors for election at the annual meeting of stockholders. The composition of the current board reflects diversity in business and professional experience, skills, and gender.

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

61




Proxy Statement

The committee generally will hire an outside firm to perform a background check on potential nominees.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

55




Proxy Statement

Audit Committee
The audit committee is a separately-designated standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The audit committee met eight times during 2011.2012. The audit committee members are Dennis W. Johnson, chairman, A. Bart Holaday, Richard H. Lewis, and John K. Wilson. The board of directors has determined that Messrs. Johnson, Holaday, Lewis, and Wilson are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and Messrs. Johnson, Holaday, Lewis, and Wilson meet the independence standard for audit committee members under our director independence guidelines and the New York Stock Exchange listing standards, including the Securities and Exchange Commission’s audit committee member independence requirements.

The audit committee assists the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities to the stockholders and serves as a communication link among the board, management, the independent auditors, and the internal auditors. The audit committee:

 

 

 

assists the board’s oversight of

 

 

 

o

the integrity of our financial statements and system of internal controls

 

 

 

 

o

our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements

 

 

 

 

o

the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence

 

 

 

 

o

the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors and

 

 

 

 

o

risk management in the audit committee’s areas of responsibility and

 

 

 

arranges for the preparation of and approves the report that Securities and Exchange Commission rules require we include in our annual proxy statement.


 


Audit Committee Report

 

 

 

 

Audit Committee Report


 

In connection with our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, the audit committee has (1) reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management; (2) discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence.

 

 

 

Based on the review and discussions referred to in items (1) through (3) of the above paragraph, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

 

Dennis W. Johnson, Chairman

 

A. Bart Holaday

 

Richard H. Lewis

 

John K. Wilson


 

 

 

6256

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

Statement


CompensationCommittee
The compensation committee metcommitteemet five times during 2011.2012. The compensation committee members are Thomas Everist, chairman, Karen B. Fagg, Thomas C. Knudson, and Patricia L. Moss.

The compensation committee’s responsibilities, as set forthsetforth in its charter, include:

 

 

review andreviewand recommend changes to the board regarding our executive compensation policies for directors and executives

 

 

evaluate theevaluatethe chief executive officer’s performance and, either as a committee or together with other independent directors as directed by the board, determine his or her compensation

 

 

recommend to the board the compensation of our other Section 16 officers and directors

 

 

establish goals, make awards, review performance and determine, or recommend to the board, awards earned under our annual and long-term incentive compensation plans

 

 

review and discuss with management the compensation discussion and analysis and based upon such review and discussion, determine whether to recommend to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our proxy statement and/or our Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

 

arrange for the preparation of and approve the compensation committee report to be included in our proxy statement and/or Annual Report on Form 10-K and

 

 

assist the board in overseeing the management of risk in the committee’s areas of responsibility.

The compensation committee andcommitteeand the board of directors have sole and direct responsibility for determining compensation for our Section 16 officers and directors. The compensation committee makes recommendations to the board regarding compensation of all Section 16 officers, and the board then approves the recommendations. The compensation committee and the board may not delegate their authority. They may, however, use recommendations from outside consultants, the chief executive officer, and the human resources department. The chiefThechief executive officer, the vice president-human resources, and general counsel regularly attend compensation committee meetings. The committee meets in executive session as needed. The committee’s practice has been to retain a compensation consultant every other year to conduct a competitive analysis on executive compensation. The committee did not retainretained a compensation consultant in 20112012 to prepare a competitive assessment for 2012 compensation.2013 compensation for our Section 16 officers.

We discuss ourdiscussour processes and procedures for consideration and determination of compensation of our Section 16 officers in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. We also discuss in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis the role of our executive officers in determining or recommending compensation for our Section 16 officers.

The board of directors determines compensation for our non-employee directors based upon recommendations fromDuring2012, the compensation committee. The committee’s practice has beencommittee retained Towers Watson to retain a compensation consultant every other year to conduct a competitive analysis on director compensation.

During 2011,prepare the vice president-human resources and the human resources department prepared the2013 competitive assessment covering our Section 16 officers. In an engagement letter dated March 23, 2012, the compensation committee asked Towers Watson to prepare separate executive compensation reviews for 2012 compensationthe Section 16 officers and for our executive officers. The vice president-human resources and the human resources department also worked with the chief executive officer. In its review for the Section 16 officers, excluding the chief executive officer, Towers Watson was asked to:

 

 

recommend salary grades,match the Section 16 officer positions to survey data to generate 2013 market estimates for base salaries and annualshort-term and long-term incentive targets for our executive officersincentives

 

 

reviewaddress general trendsin executive compensation

compare base salariesand target short-term and long-term incentives, by position, to market estimates and recommend salary grade changes as appropriate

construct a recommended base2013 salary grades, salary increases, and annualgrade structure

verify the competitiveness of short-term and long-term incentive targets submitted by executive officers for officers reporting to them for reasonablenessassociated with salary grades and alignment with company or business unit objectivesrecommend modifications as appropriate.


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

57




Proxy Statement

In the chief executive officer review, Towers Watson was asked to use survey data and data from the company’s performance graph peer group to:

develop competitive estimatesfor base salary and target short-term and long-term incentives

recommend changes in base salary and incentive targets based on the competitive data and

 

 

review and update annual and long-term incentive programs.address general trendsin chief executive officer compensation.

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, at the request of Mr. Hildestad, the human resources department conducted a competitive assessment in January 2011 to determine the compensation level necessary to recruit a qualified individual to lead Fidelity Exploration & Production Company. Mr. Hildestad, with the assistance of our vice president-human resources, negotiated Mr. Wells’ compensation in connection with his hiring.

The compensation committee has sole authority toauthorityto retain, discharge, and approve fees and other terms and conditions for retention of compensation consultants to assist in consideration of the compensation of the chief executive officer, the other Section 16 officers, and the board of directors. The compensation committee charter requires the committee’s pre-approval of the engagement of the committee’s compensation consultants by the company for any other purpose.

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

63




Proxy Statement

In an engagement letter dated February 28, 2011, and signed by the chairman of the compensation committee, the compensation committee retained Towers Watson to prepare a review of competitive compensation for our non-employee directors’ compensation, including a separate comparison of the non-executive chairman, for review at the committee’s May 2011 meeting.

In its review of board of director compensation, Towers Watson was asked to:

analyze results and develop a competitive director pay reference point using our former and new performance graph peer groups and

identify market trends relative to director compensation, including whether there are any trends to pay equity using a fixed dollar value.

The results of the Towers Watson analysis showed the company’s level of total direct compensation, which is annual board retainer plus equity, was below the medians of both peer groups at the 28th percentile of its current performance graph peer group and at the 23rd percentile of its former performance graph peer group. Additional retainers for the audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committee chairs were well below the medians of both of the performance graph peer groups. In terms of the level of non-executive chairman compensation, the company’s level of total direct compensation was well below the medians compared to the companies in our performance graph peer groups that had a non-executive chairman. The company’s non-executive chairman was at the 31st percentile when compared to companies with a non-executive chairman in the current peer group and at the 17th percentile when compared to the companies with non-executive chairmen in the former peer group. After review and discussion of Towers Watson’s report, the board determined to increase the committee chairmen’s retainers by $5,000 and to change the annual stock grant from a fixed number of shares to a grant of shares equal in value to $110,000. No changes were made to the compensation of the company’s non-executive chairman.

The compensation committee also authorized the company to participate in compensation and employee benefits surveys sponsored by Towers Watson during 2011.in 2012.

The compensation committee requestedand received information from its compensation consultant, Towers Watson, to assist the committee in determining whether Towers Watson’s work raised any conflict of interest. The compensation committee has reviewed Towers Watson’s responses to its request and determined that the work of Towers Watson did not raise any conflict of interest in 2012.

The boardof directors determines compensation for our non-employee directors based upon recommendations from the compensation committee. The compensation committee’s practice has been to retain a compensation consultant every other year to conduct a competitive analysis on director compensation. The compensation committee did not retain an outside consultant for the 2012 compensation review for the board of directors. At its May 2012 meeting, the committee reviewed the analysis of competitive data and recent trends in director compensation, including independent chairman of the board compensation, prepared by the human resources department and the vice president-human resources. The company’s analysis was based on proxy data from our performance graph peer group companies compiled by Equilar and on data from the National Association of Corporate Directors 2011/2012 Director Compensation Report. The committee compared the data to our directors’ compensation and each of its components. After review and discussion of the market data, which indicated that our median director compensation of $165,000 was below the median total direct compensation of$179,596 for large companies in the National Association of Corporate Directors 2011/2012 Director Compensation Report and consistent with the median total direct compensation of $162,002 of the peer companies, the compensation committee recommended, and the board approved, that no changes be made to director compensation for 2012. With respect to non-executive chairman of the board compensation comparison to other directors, the multiple of the median non-executive director total pay for the company was 1.45X as compared to 1.64X under the National Association of Corporate Directors 2011/2012 Director Compensation Report companies and 1.84X for the peer companies. The compensation committee recommended, and the board approved, that no changes be made to the non-executive chairman of the board compensation for 2012.

Stockholder Communications
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to contact the board of directors or an individual director, including our non-employee chairman or non-employee directors as a group, should address a communication in care of the secretary at MDU Resources Group, Inc., P.O. Box 5650, Bismarck, ND 58506-5650. The secretary will forward all communications.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16

Section16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that officers, directors, and holders of more than 10% of our common stock file reports of their trading in our equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 and any amendments to these forms furnished to us during and with respect to 20112012 or written representations that no Forms 5 were required, we believe that all such reports were timely filed.filed, except that one Form 4 for Mr. Lewis reporting one transaction was filed one week late.

CONDUCT OF MEETING;ADJOURNMENT

The chairman of the board has broad responsibility and authority to conduct the annual meeting in an orderly and timely manner. In addition, our bylaws provide that the meeting may be adjourned from time to time by the chairman of the meeting regardless of whether a quorum is present.

58

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


OTHER BUSINESS

Neither the board of directors nor management intends to bring before the meeting any business other than the matters referred to in the notice of annual meeting and this proxy statement. We have not been informed that any other matter will be presented at the meeting by others. However, if any other matter requiring a vote ofmatters are properly brought before the stockholders should arise,annual meeting, or any adjournment(s) thereof, your proxies include discretionary authority for the persons named in the enclosed proxy willto vote or act on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.discretion.

SHAREDSHARED ADDRESS STOCKHOLDERS

In accordance with a notice sent to eligible stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report to stockholders and one proxy statement to that address unless we received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However, if a stockholder of record wishes to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and proxy statement in the future, he or she may contact the office of the treasurer at MDU Resources Group, Inc., P.O. Box 5650, Bismarck, ND 58506-5650, Telephone Number: (701) 530-1000. Eligible stockholders of record who receive multiple copies of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Stockholders who own shares through a bank, broker, or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee.



We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.

64

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

20132014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Director Nominations:Our bylaws provide thatprovidethat director nominations may be made only by (i) the board at any meeting of stockholders or (ii) at an annual meeting by a stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors and who has complied with the procedures established by the bylaws. For a nomination to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder intending to make the nomination must have given timely and proper notice of the nomination in writing to the corporate secretary in accordance with and containing all information and the completed questionnaire provided for in the bylaws. To be timely, such notice must be delivered to or mailed to the corporate secretary and received at our principal executive offices not later than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. For purposes of our annual meeting of stockholders expected to be held April 23, 2013,22, 2014, any stockholder who wishes to submit a nomination must submit the required notice to the corporate secretary on or before January 24, 2013.23, 2014.

Other Meeting Business:Our bylaws also provide thatprovidethat no business may be brought before an annual meeting except (i) as specified in the meeting notice given by or at the direction of the board, (ii) as otherwise properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the board or (iii) properly brought before the meeting by a stockholder entitled to vote who has complied with the procedures established by the bylaws. For business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder (other than nomination of a person for election as a director which is described above) the stockholder must have given timely and proper notice of such business in writing to the corporate secretary, in accordance with, and containing all information provided for in the bylaws and such business must be a proper matter for stockholder action under the General Corporation Law of Delaware. To be timely, such notice must be delivered or mailed to the corporate secretary and received at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. For purposes of our annual meeting expected to be held April 23, 2013,22, 2014, any stockholder who wishes to bring business before the meeting (other than nomination of a person for election as a director which is described above) must submit the required notice to the corporate secretary on or before January 24, 2013.23, 2014.

Discretionary Voting:Rule 14a-4Rule14a-4 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proxy rules allows us to use discretionary voting authority to vote on matters coming before an annual stockholders’ meeting if we do not have notice of the matter at least 45 days before the anniversary date on which we first mailed our proxy materials for the prior year’s annual stockholders’ meeting or the date specified by an advance notice provision in our bylaws. Our bylaws contain an advance notice provision that we have described above. For our annual meeting of stockholders expected to be held on April 23, 2013,22, 2014, stockholders must submit such written notice to the corporate secretary on or before January 24, 2013.23, 2014.

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

59




Proxy Statement

Stockholder Proposals:The requirements we describe above are separate from and in addition to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s requirements that a stockholder must meet to have a stockholder proposal included in our proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. For purposes of our annual meeting of stockholders expected to be held on April 23, 2013,22, 2014, any stockholder who wishes to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials must submit such proposal to the corporate secretary on or before November 9, 2012.13, 2013.

Bylaw Copies:You may obtain aobtaina copy of the full text of the bylaw provisions discussed above by writing to the corporate secretary. Our bylaws are also available on our website at: http://www.mdu.com/Documents/Governance/2011-11_Bylaws.pdf.Pages/CorporateGovernanceGuidelines.aspx.

We will make available to our stockholders to whom we furnish this proxy statementa copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, excluding exhibits, for the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, which is required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may obtain a copy, without charge, upon written or oral request to the Office of the Treasurer of MDU Resources Group, Inc., 1200 West Century Avenue, Mailing Address: P.O. Box5650, Bismarck, ND 58506-5650, Telephone Number: (701) 530-1000. You may also access our Annual Report on Form 10-K through our website at www.mdu.com.www.mdu.com.

 

 

 

By order of the Board of Directors,

 

-s- Paul K. Sandness-s- Paul K. Sandness

 

 

Paul K.PaulK. Sandness

 

Secretary

 

March 9, 2012


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy StatementMarch 13, 2013

65




Proxy Statement

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

 

 

 

 

6660

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Towers Perrin’s (Towers Watson)Watson 2010

 

Auto Club GroupAvanade

 

Chiquita BrandsCH Energy Group

2009 General Industry Executive

Automatic Data Processing

Choice Hotels International

Compensation Database

Avery Dennison

Chrysler

 

Avis Budget Group

 

CHSCH2M Hill

Compensation Database

 

Avista

 

CIGNAChemtura

3M

Avon Products

CIT Group

7-Eleven

 

AXA EquitableGroup

 

CITGO PetroleumChevron

A&P

 

B&W Technical Services Y-12

 

City National BankChevron Phillips Chemical

A.O. Smith

BAE Systems

Cleco

A. T. Cross3M

 

Ball

 

CNAChiquita Brands

AAA of Science7-Eleven

 

Bank of America

 

CobankChoice Hotels International

Abbott LaboratoriesA&P

Bank of Hawaii

CHS

A.H. Belo

Bank of New York Mellon

CIGNA

A.O. Smith

Bank of the West

Cimarex Energy

A. T. Cross

Barnes Group

Cintas

AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah

 

Barrick Gold of North America

 

Coca-Cola EnterprisesCisco Systems

ABC

Battelle Memorial Institute

Colgate-Palmolive

AccentureAAA of Science

 

Baxter International

 

Colorado Springs UtilitiesCIT Group

ACH FoodAbbott Laboratories

 

Bayer AG

 

Columbia SportswearCleco

Advance PublicationsABC

 

Bayer CropScience

 

Comcast Cable CommunicationsCliffs Natural Resources

Advanced Micro DevicesAccenture

Bayer MaterialScience

CMS Energy

ACH Food

 

BB&T

 

ComericaCNA

Advanstar CommunicationsAcuity Brands

BBVA

COACH

AEGON

BD

Cobank

AEI Services

 

Beckman Coulter

 

Commerce InsuranceCoca-Cola

Aegon USAAeropostale

 

Belo

 

CommScopeColgate-Palmolive

AEI ServicesAFLAC

 

Benjamin MooreBemis

 

Compass BancsharesColorado Springs Utilities

AerojetAgilent Technologies

 

Best Buy

 

CompuCom SystemsColumbia Sportswear

AeropostaleAgrium

 

BG US Services

 

ConAgra FoodsComcast

AFLACAIG

 

Big Lots

 

ConnellComerica

Agilent TechnologiesAir Liquide

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Commerce Bancshares

Air Products and Chemicals

 

Biogen Idec

 

ConocoPhillipsCommerce Insurance

AGL ResourcesAlcatel-Lucent

 

Bio-Rad LaboratoriesBJ’s Wholesale Club

 

Consolidated EdisonConAgra Foods

Agrium U.S.Alcoa

Black Hills Power and Light

Connell Limited Partnership

Alcon Laboratories

 

Blockbuster

 

Constellation EnergyConocoPhillips

AIGAlexander & Baldwin

 

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida

 

Consumers EnergyConseco

Air Products and Chemicals

Blue Shield of California

Consumers Union

Alcatel-LucentAllegheny Energy

 

Blyth

 

Continental AirlinesConsolidated Edison

Alcoa

Bob Evans Farms

Continental Automotive Systems

Allegheny EnergyAllergan

 

Boehringer Ingelheim

 

ContinentalConstellation Energy Systems

AllerganAllete

 

Boeing

 

ConvaTecConsumers Union

AlleteAlliant Energy

 

BOK Financial

 

Convergys

Alliance DataContinental Automotive Systems

Booz Allen Hamilton

Covance

Alliant EnergyTechsystems

 

Boston Scientific

 

CovidienConvaTec

Allianz

 

Bovis Lend Lease

 

Cox EnterprisesConvergys

Allstate

 

BP

 

CPS EnergyCooper Industries

Amazon.comAllured Business Media

 

Brady

 

Crown CastleCorning

AmerenAmazon.com

 

Bremer Financial

 

CSRCovance

American Airlines

Bright Business Media

CSX

American Chemical SocietyAmeren

 

Bristol-Myers Squibb

 

CubicCovanta Holdings

American Chemical Society

Broadcom

Covidien

American Crystal Sugar

 

Brown-FormanBurlington Northern Santa Fe

 

Curtiss-WrightCox Enterprises

American Electric Power

 

Bush Brothers

 

CVS CaremarkCPS Energy

American Express

C.H. Robinson Worldwide

Cracker Barrel Old Country Stores

American Family Insurance

 

CA

 

Daiichi SankyoCrown Castle

American Family InsuranceUnited Life

 

Cablevision Systems

 

Daimler Trucks North America

American United Life

CACI International

DanaCrump Group

American Water Works

 

Cadbury North AmericaCabot

 

DannonCSR

AMERIGROUPAmeriprise Financial

Cadbury

CSX

Ameritrade

 

Calgon Carbon

 

DCP MidstreamCUNA Mutual

Ameriprise FinancialAmeron

 

California Independent System Operator

 

Dean FoodsCVS Caremark

AmeritradeAMETEK

 

Callaway Golf

 

Deere & CompanyCytec

AmeronAmgen

 

Calpine

 

Delta AirlinesDaiichi Sankyo

AMETEKAnadarko Petroleum

 

Cameron International

 

DeluxeDana

AmgenAnn Taylor Stores

 

Capital One Financial

 

Denny’sDannon

AmwayAOL

 

Capitol Broadcasting – WRAL

 

DentsplyDarden Restaurants

Anadarko PetroleumAPL

 

Cardinal Health

 

Devon EnergyDay & Zimmermann

APLAppleton Papers

Career Education

DCP Midstream

Applied Materials

CareFusion

Dean Foods

ARAMARK

 

Cargill

 

Diageo North AmericaDel Monte Foods

Apollo GroupArcher Daniels Midland

 

Carlson Companies

 

DIRECTVDell

Applied MaterialsArctic Cat

 

Carmeuse Lime & StoneCarnival

 

Dominion ResourcesDelta Air Lines

ARAMARKAreva

 

Carpenter Technology

 

DonaldsonDeluxe

Areva NPArmstrong World Industries

 

Catalent Pharma Solutions

 

Dow Chemical

Armstrong World Industries

Caterpillar

Dow JonesDenny’s

Arrow Electronics

 

Catholic Healthcare West

 

DPLDentsply

ArvinMeritor

CDI

Dr Pepper Snapple

Arysta LifeScience North AmericaAstraZeneca

 

Cedar Rapids TV – KCRG

 

DukeDevon Energy

Ascend Media

Celestica

DuPont

Associated Banc-CorpAT&T

 

Celgene

 

DynegyDevry

AstraZenecaATC Management

Cemex

Dex One

Atmos Energy

 

CenterPoint Energy

 

E*Trade

AT&T

Century Aluminum

E.ON U.S.

ATC Management

Cephaon

E.W. Scripps

Atmos Energy

CH2M Hill

Eastman Chemical

Atos Origin

Chevron

Eastman KodakDiageo North America

Aurora Healthcare

 

Chicago Mercantile ExchangeCenturyLink

 

EatonDionex

Auto Club Group

Cephalon

Direct Energy

Automatic Data Processing

CF Industries

Disney Publishing Worldwide


 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

A-1




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

eBayDominion Resources

FPL Group

HR Access

Domtar

Franklin Resources

HSBC Holdings

Donaldson

Freddie Mac

Hubbard Broadcasting

Dow Chemical

Freedom Communications

Humana

Dow Corning

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold

Hunt Consolidated

Dow Jones

Future US

Huntington Bancshares

DPL

GAF Materials

Huntsman

DTE Energy

Gannett

Husky Injection Molding Systems

Duke Energy

Gap

Hyatt Hotels

DuPont

GATX

IBM

E.ON U.S.

 

Gavilon

 

Integrys Energy GroupIDACORP

EcolabE.W. Scripps

 

GDF SUEZ Energy North America

 

IntelIDEXX Laboratories

Edison International

Genentech

Intercontinental Hotels

Education ManagementEastman Chemical

 

General Atomics

 

IKON Office Solutions

Eaton

General Dynamics

IMS Health

Ecolab

General Electric

Independence Blue Cross

Edison International Data

General Mills

Infragistics

Education Management

General Motors

ING

Eisai

 

General DynamicsGenworth Financial

Integrys Energy Group

El Paso Corporation

Genzyme

Intel

Electric Power Research Institute

Getty Images

Intercontinental Hotels

Eli Lilly

Gilead Sciences

International Data

EMC

GlaxoSmithKline

 

International Flavors & Fragrances

El Paso CorporationEMCOR Group

 

General Electric

International Game Technology

Electric Power Research Institute

General MillsGMAC Financial Services

 

International Paper

Eli Lilly

General Motors

Invensys Controls

Embarq

GenTek

Invensys Process Systems

Embraer

Genworth Financial

Irvine Company

EMC

Genzyme

Irwin Financial

EMCOR Group

GEO Group

ISO New England

EMI Music

Getty Images

J. Crew

Emulex

Gilead Sciences

J.C. Penney Company

Enbridge Energy

GlaxoSmithKline

J.M. Smucker

Endo PharmaceuticalsEmergency Medical Services

 

Goodrich

 

J.R. SimplotInvensys Controls

EnergenEMI Music

 

Goodyear Tire & Rubber

 

Jack in the BoxION Geophysical

Enbridge Energy

Google

Iron Mountain

Energen

Gorton’s

Irvine Company

Energy Future Holdings

 

GoogleGraco

 

Jacobs EngineeringIrving Oil Commercial G.P

Energy Northwest

Gorton’s

Jarden

Entergy

 

Great-West Life Annuity

 

JetBlueISO New England

EPCOEntergy

 

Greif

 

JM FamilyiSoft

EPCO

Gruma

ISP

Epson

Grupo Ferrovial

ITT – Corporate

Equifax

 

GS1 USGSM Association

 

John HancockJ. Crew

Equity Office Properties

 

GTECH

 

Johns-ManvilleJ.C. Penney Company

ERCOT

 

Guardian Life

 

Johnson & JohnsonJ.M. Smucker

Erie Insurance

 

Guideposts

 

Johnson ControlsJ.R. Simplot

Ernst & Young

 

GXS

 

Kaiser Foundation Health PlanJabil Circuit

ESRIESPN

H&R Block

Jack in the Box

Essilor of America

 

H.B. Fuller

 

Kaman Industrial TechnologiesJacobs Engineering

Evening Post Publishing – KOAA

 

H.J. Heinz

JM Family

Evergreen Packaging

Hanesbrands

 

Kansas City SouthernJohn Hancock

Evergreen PackagingEvonik Degussa

 

Hannaford

 

KB HomeJohnson & Johnson

Exelon

 

Harland Clarke

 

KBRJohnson Controls

ExterranExpress Scripts

 

Harley-Davidson

 

KCTS TelevisionJournal Broadcast Group

ExxonMobilExterran

 

Harman International IndustriesHarris Bank

 

KelloggKaiser Foundation Health Plan

F & W MediaExxonMobil

 

Harris Enterprises

 

Kelly ServicesKalmbach Publishing

Fairchild ControlsFair Isaac

 

Harry Winston

 

Kerry Ingredients & FlavoursKaman Industrial Technologies

Fannie MaeFairchild Controls

 

Hartford Financial Services

 

KeyCorpKao Brands

FANUC Robotics America

Hasbro

KBR

Farmers Group

 

Hawaiian Electric

 

Kimberly-Clark

Farm Progress Companies

Hayes Lemmerz

Kimco Realty

Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh

HBO

Kindred HealthcareKellogg

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

 

HBO

KeyCorp

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

HCA Healthcare

 

Kinross GoldKimberly-Clark

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

 

Health Care ServicesHD Supply

 

KiplingerKinder Morgan

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

 

Health Net

 

KLA-Tencor

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Healthways

KnightKindred Healthcare

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

 

HearstHealthways

 

Koch IndustriesKing Pharmaceuticals

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

 

Hearst-Argyle TelevisionHenkel of America

 

KohlerKinross Gold

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

 

Henkel of America

Kohl’s

Ferderal-Mogul

Henry Ford Health Systems

 

KPMGKLA-Tencor

FerrellgasFerderal-Mogul

 

Herman Miller

 

L.L. BeanKnowles Electronics

Fidelity InvestmentsFerrellgas

 

Hershey

 

L-3 CommunicationsKoch Industries

Fidelity Investments

Hertz

Kohler

Fidelity National Information Services

Hess

Kohl’s

Fifth Third Bancorp

 

HertzHewlett-Packard

 

Lafarge North AmericaKPMG

Fireman’s Fund Insurance

 

HessHighmark Blue Cross Blue Shield

 

Land O’LakesL.L. Bean

First AmericanHorizon National

 

Hexion Specialty ChemicalsHilton Worldwide

 

Leggett and PlattL-3 Communications

First DataSolar

 

Hitachi Data Systems

 

LenovoLafarge North America

First Horizon NationalFirstEnergy

 

HNI

 

Level 3 CommunicationsLance

First SolarFiserv

 

HNTB

 

Lexmark InternationalLand O’Lakes

FirstEnergyFisher Communications

 

Hoffmann-La Roche

 

Liberty MutualLanxess

FiservFlowserve

Home Shopping Network

Laureate Education

Fluor

 

Honeywell

 

Life TechnologiesLear

FluorFord

 

Horizon LinesBlue Cross Blue Shield of New

 

Life TouchLeggett and Platt

FMA CommunicationsForest Laboratories

Jersey

LES

Fortune Brands

 

Hormel Foods

 

Limited

Ford

Hospira

Lincoln Financial

Forest Laboratories

Houghton Mifflin

Lockheed Martin

Fortune Brands

Hovnanian Enterprises

LoewsLevel 3 Communications

Forum Communications – WDAY

 

HSBC North AmericaHospira

 

LOMALevi Strauss

FPLFox Networks Group

 

Hubbard BroadcastingHoughton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing

 

Lorillard Tobacco

Franklin Resources

Humana

Lower Colorado River Authority

Freddie Mac

Hunt Consolidated

M&T Bank

Freedom Communications

Huntington Bancshares

Magellan Midstream Partners

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold

Hyatt Hotels

Marathon Oil

Frontier Airlines

IBM

Marriott International

G&K Services

IDACORP

Marshall & Ilsley

GAF Materials

Idearc Media

Martin Marietta Materials

Gannett

IDEXX Laboratories

Mary Kay

Gap

IKON Office Solutions

Masco

Garland Power & Light

IMS Health

MassachusettsLiberty Mutual

Garmin

ING

Mattel

GATX

Ingersoll-Rand

Matthews International


 

 

 

A-2

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

Life Technologies

New York Times

Praxair

Lincoln Financial

New York University

Premera Blue Cross

Lockheed Martin

Newmont Mining

Principal Financial

Loews

NewPage

PrivateBancorp

LOMA

Nicor

Progress Energy

Lorillard Tobacco

Nielsen Expositions

Progressive Corporation

Lower Colorado River Authority

NIKE

Proliance Energy

LPL Financial

Nissan North America

Protective Life

Lyondell Chemical

Nokia

Providence Health & Services

M&T Bank

Noranda Aluminum

Prudential Financial

MAG Industrial Automation Systems

Norfolk Southern

Public Service Enterprise Group

Magellan Midstream Partners

Northeast Utilities

Puget Energy

Marathon Oil

Northern Power Systems

Pulte Homes

Marriott International

Northrop Grumman

Purdue Pharma

Marsh & McLennan

Northstar Travel Media

QUALCOMM

Marshall & Ilsley

NorthWestern Energy

Quest Diagnostics

Martin Marietta Materials

Northwestern Mutual

Quintiles

Mary Kay

NOVA Chemicals

R.R. Donnelley

Masco

Novartis

Ralcorp Holdings

Massachusetts Mutual

Novartis Consumer Health

Razorfish

MasterCard

Novell

RBC – US

Mattel

Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals

Reader’s Digest

Matthews International

NRG Energy

Realogy

McClatchy

 

NSTAR

Redcats USA

McDermott

NV Energy

Reddy Ice

McDonald’s

NW Natural

Redknee Solutions

McGraw-Hill

NXP Semi-Conductor

Reed Business

McKesson

Nycomed US

Regency Energy Partners LP

MDU Resources

Nypro

Regions Financial

MeadWestvaco

Occidental Chemical

Research in Motion

Mecklenburg County

Occidental Petroleum

Revlon

Media General

Office Depot

RF Micro Devices

Media Tec Publishing

OGE Energy

RGA Reinsurance Group

Medicines Company

Oglethorpe Power

Rio Tinto

MedImmune

Oklahoma Today Magazine

Roche Diagnostics

Medtronic

Omaha Public Power

Rockwell Automation

Merck & Co

Omgeo

Rockwell Collins

Meredith

OneBeacon Insurance

Rodale Press

MetLife

Open Text USA

RRI Energy

Microsoft

Orange Business Services

Ryder System

Midwest Independent

Oshkosh Truck

 

S.C. Johnson

McDermott

Otter Tail

Safety-Kleen Systems

McDonald’sTransmission System Operator

 

Owens Corning

 

SAICSafety-Kleen Systems

McKessonMilacron

 

Owens-Illinois

 

Salt River ProjectSAIC

MDU ResourcesMillennium Inorganic Chemicals

 

Pacific Gas & Electric

 

Sanmina-SCISalt River Project

MeadWestvacoMillipore

 

Pacific Life

 

SanDisk

Mine Safety Appliances

Parametric Technology

Sanofi Pasteur

Medco Health SolutionsMirant

 

Panasonic of North AmericaParker Hannifin

 

Sanofi-Aventis

Media GeneralMizuno USA

 

Papa John’sParsons

 

Sara LeeSantee Cooper

Media Tec PublishingMolson Coors Brewing

 

Parametric TechnologyPearson

 

Sarkes Tarzian – KTVN

MedImmuneMolycorp Minerals

 

Parker HannifinPennWell

 

Sarkes Tarzian – WRCB

MedtronicMoneyGram International

 

ParsonsPenton Media

 

SAS Institute

Meister Media Worldwide

Pearson Education

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions

Merck & CoMonsanto

 

People’s Bank

 

SCA AmericasSaturday Evening Post

MeredithMoody’s

 

Pepco Holdings

 

SCANA

Metavante Technologies

PepsiCo

Schering-Plough

MetLife

Perot Systems

Schlumberger

MetroPCS Communications

PetSmart

Schneider Electric

MGE Energy

Pfizer

School Specialty

Microsoft

Philips Helathcare

Schreiber Foods

Midwest Independent Transmission System

Phillips-Van Heusen

Schurz – KYTV

Operator

Phoenix Companies

Schurz – WDBJ

Millennium Pharmaceuticals

PhRMA

Schwan’s

Millipore

Pinnacle West Captial

Scripps Networks Interactive

Mine Safety Appliances

Pioneer Hi-Bred International

Seagate Technology

Mirant

Pitney Bowes

Sealed Air

Molson Coors Brewing

Pittsburgh Corning

Securian Financial Group

MoneyGram International

PJM Interconnection

Securitas Security Services USASaudi Arabian Oil

Morgan Murphy Stations – WISC

 

PepsiCo

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions

Mosaic

PerkinElmer

Savannah River Remediation

Motorola

Pervasive Software

SCA Americas

Munich Re Group

PetSmart

SCANA

Murphy Oil

Pfizer

Schlumberger

MWH Global

Phillips-Van Heusen

School Specialty

Nash-Finch

Phoenix Companies

Schreiber Foods

Nation

Pinnacle West Capital

Schurz – KYTV

National Geographic Society

Pitney Bowes

Schurz – WDBJ

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Pittsburgh Corning

Schwan’s

National Starch Polymers Group

PJM Interconnection

Scripps Networks Interactive

Nationwide

PlainsCapital

 

Security Benefit GroupSeagate Technology

MosaicNavistar International

 

Plexus

 

Sempra EnergySealed Air

Motorola

PMI Group

Sensata Technologies

MSC Industrial DirectNavy Federal Credit Union

 

PNC Financial Services

 

Shell OilSecurian Financial Group

Munich Reinsurance AmericaNaylor

 

PNM Resources

 

Sherwin-WilliamsSecurity Benefit Group

National Renewable Energy LaboratoryNBC Universal

 

Polaris Industries

 

Shire PharmaceuticalsSempra Energy

NationwideNCCI Holdings

 

Polymer Group

 

SiemensSensata Technologies

Navistar InternationalNestle USA

 

PolyOne

 

Sinclair Broadcast GroupSensient Technologies

Navy Federal Credit UnionNetJets

 

Portland General Electric

 

Sirius XM RadioShell Oil

NBC UniversalNew York Independent System Operator

 

Potash

 

SLMSherwin-Williams

NCCI HoldingsNew York Life

 

PPG Industries

 

Smurfit-Stone Container

NCR

PPL

Sodexo USA

Neoris USA

Praxair

Sonoco Products

Nestle USA

Principal Financial

Sony Corporation of America

New York Life

Progress Energy

South Financial GroupShire Pharmaceuticals

New York Power Authority

 

ProgressivePPL

 

Southern Company Services

New York Times

Providence Health & Services

Southern Union Company

New York University

Prudential Financial

Southwest Airlines

Newmont Mining

Public Service Enterprise Group

Southwest Power Pool

NewPage

Puget Energy

Sovereign Bancorp

Nicor

Pulte Homes

Spectra Energey

NIKE

Purdue Pharma

Sprint Nextel

Nokia

QUALCOMM

SPX

Noranda Aluminum

Quest Diagnostics

Stanford University

Norfolk Southern

Quintiles

Stantec

Northeast Utilities

Qwest Communications

Staples

Northern Trust

R.H. Donnelley

Starbucks

NorthWestern Energy

R.R. Donnelley

Starwood Hotels & Resorts

Northwestern Mutual

Ralcorp Holdings

State Farm Insurance

Novartis

Rayonier

State Street

Novartis Consumer Health

Raytheon

Steelcase

Novell

RBC Dain Rauscher

Sterling Bancshares

Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals

Reader’s Digest

STP Nuclear Operating

NRG Energy

Reed Business Information

String Letter Publishing

NSTAR

Reed Exhibitions

Summit Business Media

NuStar Energy

Regal-Beloit

Sun Life Financial

NV Energy

Regency Energy Partners LP

Sun Microsystems

NW Natural

Regions Financial

Sundt Construction

NXP Semi-Conductor

Reliant Energy

Sunoco

Nycomed US

Research in Motion

SunTrust Banks

Occidental Petroleum

RF Micro Devices

Target

Office Depot

RGA Reinsurance Group of America

Taubman Centers

OGE Energy

Rio Tinto

Taunton Press

Oglethorpe Power

Robb Report

Taylor-Wharton International

Omaha Public Power

Roche Diagnostics

TD Banknorth

Omnova Solutions

Rockwell Automation

TECO Energy

OneBeacon Insurance

Rockwell Collins

TeleTech Holdings

Orange Business Services

Rolls-Royce North America

TellabsSiemens


 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

A-3




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

Temple-InlandSimpson Manufacturing

 

Wells FargoTrinity Industries

 

Garland Power & LightTowers Watson 2010 Energy

Tenet HealthcareSinclair Broadcast Group

 

Wendy’s/Arby’sTronox

Industry Executive

Sirius XM Radio

TRW Automotive

Compensation Database

Skype

T-Systems

SLM

TUI

Smith & Nephew

Tupperware

AEI Services

Smurfit-Stone Container

Twin Cities Public Television – TPT

Allegheny Energy

Snap-on

Tyco Electronics

Allete

Sodexo

U.S. Bancorp

Alliant Energy

Solutia

U.S. Foodservice

Ameren

Solvay America

UIL Holdings

American Electric Power

Sonoco Products

Unifi

Areva

Sony Corporation

Unilever United States

ATC Management

SourceMedia

Union Bank of California

Atmos Energy

Southern Company Services

Union Pacific

Avista

Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative

UniSource Energy

BG US Services

Southern Union Company

Unisys

Black Hills Power and Light

Southwest Power Pool

United Airlines

California Independent System Operator

Spectra Energy

United Parcel Service

Calpine

Spirit AeroSystems

United Rentals

CenterPoint Energy

Sprint Nextel

United States Cellular

CH Energy Group

SPX

United States Steel

Cleco

SRA International

United Technologies

CMS Energy

Stanford University

United Water

Colorado Springs Utilities

Stantec

UnitedHealth

Consolidated Edison

Starbucks

Unitil

Constellation Energy

StarTek

University of Texas –

Covanta Holdings

Starwood Hotels & Resorts

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

CPS Energy

State Farm Insurance

Unum Group

DCP Midstream

State Street

USAA

Direct Energy

Steelcase

USG

Dominion Resources

Sterling Bancshares

Valero Energy

DPL

Stop & Shop

Vectren

DTE Energy

STP Nuclear Operating

Verde Realty

Duke Energy

Stryker

Verizon

E.ON U.S.

Sun Life Financial

Vertex Pharmaceuticals

Edison International

SunTrust

VF

El Paso Corporation

Sunflower Broadcasting

Viacom

Electric Power Research Institute

Sunoco

Village Farms

Enbridge Energy

Sunrise Senior Living

Visa

Energen

SuperMedia

Vision Service Plan

Energy Future Holdings

Swagelok

Vistar

Energy Northwest

Sybron Dental Specialties

Visteon

Entergy

Synacor

Volvo Group North America

EPCO

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited

Vulcan

ERCOT

Targa Resources

Vulcan Materials

Exelon

Target

VWR International

First Solar

Taubman Centers

Walt Disney

FirstEnergy

TD Bank Financial Group

Warnaco

FPL Group

Telefonica O2

Washington Post

 

GDF SUEZ Energy North America

TeradataTellabs

 

Westar EnergyWaste Management

 

Hawaiian Electric

TerexTemple-Inland

 

Western DigitalWatson Pharmaceuticals

 

IDACORP

Terra IndustriesTenet Healthcare

 

Western UnionWatts Water Technologies

 

Integrys Energy Group

TesoroTennessee Valley Authority

 

Westinghouse ElectricWebster Bank

 

ISO New England

TextronTeradata

 

WeyerhaeuserWellcare Health Plans

 

KnightKinder Morgan

Thomas & BettsTerex

 

WhirlpoolWellpoint

LES

Tesoro

Wells Fargo

 

Lower Colorado River Authority

Thomas PublishingTexas Petrochemicals

 

Whole Foods MarketWendy’s/Arby’s Group

 

MDU Resources

Thrivent Financial for LutheransTextron

 

Williams Companies

MGEWestar Energy

TIAA-CREF

Williams-Sonoma

 

Midwest Independent Transmission System

TimeThermo Fisher Scientific

 

Winn-Dixie StoresWestern Digital

 

System Operator

Time WarnerThomas & Betts

 

Wisconsin EnergyWestinghouse Electric

 

Mirant

Time Warner CableThomas Publishing

 

Wm. Wrigley Jr.Weyerhaeuser

 

New York Independent System Operator

TimexThomson Reuters

 

Wolters Kluwer USWhirlpool

 

New York Power Authority

T-Mobile USAThrivent Financial for Lutherans

 

WPPWhole Foods Market

 

Nicor

ToroTIAA-CREF

Wisconsin Energy

Northeast Utilities

Time

Wm. Wrigley Jr.

NorthWestern Energy

Time Warner

Wolters Kluwer

NRG Energy

Time Warner Cable

 

Wray Edwin – KTBS

 

Northeast UtilitiesNSTAR

TransCanada

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals

NorthWestern Energy

TransUnionTimken

 

Wyndham Worldwide

 

NRGNV Energy

TravelersT-Mobile USA

 

Xcel Energy

 

NSTARNW Natural

Tribune

Xerox

NV Energy

TUI TravelToro

 

Yahoo!

 

NW NaturalOGE Energy

TupperwareTotal System Services

 

Young Broadcasting – KFLY

OGE Energy

Twin Cities Public Television – TPT

Young Broadcasting – KRONYankee Publishing

 

Oglethorpe Power

Tyco ElectronicsTransCanada

 

Yum! BrandsYRC Worldwide

 

Omaha Public Power

U.S. BancorpTransUnion

 

Zale

Otter Tail

U.S. Foodservice

Zurich North AmericaYum! Brands

 

Pacific Gas & Electric

UC4 SoftwareTravelers

 

Zale

 

Pepco Holdings

UIL Holdings

Pinnacle West Capital

Unilever United States

Towers Perrin’s (Towers Watson)

PJM Interconnection

Union Bank of California

2009 Energy Industry Executive

PNM Resources

Union Pacific

Compensation Database

Portland General Electric

UniSource Energy

PPL

Unisys

AEI Services

Progress Energy

United Airlines

AGL Resources

Public Service Enterprise Group

United Rentals

Allegheny Energy

Puget Energy

United States Cellular

Allete

Regency Energy Partners LP

United States Enrichment

Alliant Energy

Reliant Energy

United States Steel

Ameren

Salt River Project

United Technologies

American Electric Power

SCANA

United Water

Areva NP

Sempra Energy

UnitedHealth

ATC Management

Southern Company Services

Unitil

Atmos Energy

Southern Union Company

Univar

Avista

Southwest Power Pool

Universal Studios Orlando

BG US Services

Spectra Energy

University of Texas – M.D. Anderson

Black Hills Power and Light

STP Nuclear Operating

  Cancer Center

California Independent System Operator

TECO Energy

Unum Group

Calpine

Tennessee Valley Authority

US Airways

CenterPoint Energy

TransCanada

USAA

Cleco

UIL Holdings

USG

CMS Energy

UniSource Energy

Valero Energy

Colorado Springs Utilities

Unitil

Verizon

Consolidated Edison

Westar Energy

Vertex Pharmaceuticals

Constellation Energy

Westinghouse Electric

VF

CPS Energy

Williams Companies

Viacom

DCP Midstream

Wisconsin Energy

Viad

Dominion Resources

Wolf Creek Nuclear

Virgin Mobile USA

DPL

Xcel Energy

Visa USA

Duke Energy

Visiting Nurse Service

Dynegy

Visteon

E.ON U.S.

Effective Compensation, Inc.’s

Volvo Group North America

Edison International

2009 Oil & Gas Compensation

Vulcan

El Paso Corporation

Survey

Vulcan Materials

Electric Power Research Institute

VWR International

Enbridge Energy

Aera Energy Services Company

W.R. Grace

Energen

Altex Energy Corporation

W.W. Grainger

Energy Future Holdings

ANKOR Energy LLC

Wachovia

Energy Northwest

Antero Resources Corporation

Walt Disney

Entergy

Approach Resources Inc.

Warnaco

EPCO

Aramco Services Company

Waste Management

ERCOT

Aspect Energy, LLC

Watson Pharmaceuticals

Exelon

Atlas Energy Resources L.L.C.F

Webster Bank

FirstEnergy

Berry Petroleum Company

Wellcare Health Plans

FPL Group

Bill Barrett Corporation

Wellpoint


 

 

 

 

A-4

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

Pinnacle West Capital
PJM Interconnection
PNM Resources
Portland General Electric
PPL
Progress Energy
Proliance Holdings
Public Service Enterprise Group
Puget Energy
Regency Energy Partners LP
RRI Energy
Salt River Project
Santee Cooper
SCANA
Sempra Energy
Southern Company Services
Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative
Southern Union Company
Southwest Power Pool
Spectra Energy
STP Nuclear Operating
Targa Resources
Tennessee Valley Authority
TransCanada
UIL Holdings
UniSource Energy
Unitil
Vectren
Westar Energy
Westinghouse Electric
Wisconsin Energy
Wolf Creek Nuclear
Xcel Energy

Effective Compensation, Inc.’s
2010 Oil & Gas
Compensation Survey

ANKOR Energy LLC
Antero Resources
Approach Resources Inc.
Aspect Holdings, LLC
Atinum E&P, Inc.
Atlas Energy Resources L.L.C.F
Berry Petroleum Company
Bill Barrett Corporation
Black Hills Corporation
BOPCO, L.P.
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP
Brigham Exploration Company
Browning Oil Company, Inc.
BTA Oil Producers, LLC
Cabot Oil & ProductionGas Corporation
Cano Petroleum, Inc.
Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc.
Ceja Corporation
Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Cimarex Energy Co.
Comstock Resources
Cohort Energy Company (J-W Operating)
Concho Resources, Inc.
Consol Energy Inc.
Continental Resources, Inc.
Crimson Exploration, Inc.
Denbury Resources, Incorporated
Devon Energy Corporation
Duncan Oil, Inc.
Dynamic Offshore Resources, LLC
Eagle Rock Energy
EnCana Oil & Gas
Energen Resources Corporation
Energy Partners, Ltd.
Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.

 

EOG Resources Inc
EQT Corporation
Equal Energy US Inc. (Altex Energy)
EXCO Resources, Inc.
Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd.
Fidelity Exploration & Production
FIML Natural Resources
Forest Oil Corporation
GMX Resources Inc.
Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana
Great Western Drilling Company
Harvest Natural Resources, Inc.
Henry Resources LLC
HighMount Exploration & Production, LLC
Hilcorp Energy Company
Hillwood International Energy
Holmes Western Oil Corporation
J. M. Huber Corporation
Kinder Morgan CO2 Company L.P.
Lake Ronel Oil Company
Leed Petroleum LLC
Linn Operating, Inc.
Manti Resources
Mariner Energy, Inc.
Maritech Resources, Inc.
McElvain Oil & Gas Properties, Inc.
McMoran Oil and Gas Company
Medco Petroleum Management LLC
Merit Energy Company
Mewbourne Oil Company
Murchison Oil & Gas Inc.
Mustang Fuel Corporation
Nations Petroleum Company Ltd.
Nearburg Producing Company
Newfield Exploration Company
Nexen Petroleum U.S.A., Inc.
NFR Energy LLC
Noble Energy, Inc.
Oasis Petroleum
Oxy Long Beach, Inc. (Thums Long Beach)
Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.
PDC Energy (Petroleum
   Development Corporation)
Penn Virginia Corporation
Petroglyph Energy, Inc.
Petrohawk Energy Corporation
Petro-Hunt, LLC
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
Phoenix Exploration Company
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
Plains Exploration & Production Company

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP

BOPCO, L.P.


QEP Resources, Inc. (Questar
   Market Resources)
Quantum Resources Management, LLC

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP –

BreitBurn Energy

Questar Market Resources Group

Eastern Division

Brigham Exploration Company


Quicksilver Resources Inc.

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP –

Browning Oil Company, Inc.


Range Resources Corporation

Orcutt Facility

Cabot Oil
Read & Gas Corporation

Read and Stevens, Inc.

BreitBurn
Resolute Energy Partners LP – West

Cano Petroleum, Inc.

Corporation
Rex Energy Operating Corp.

Pico Facility

Ceja Corporation


Rosetta Resources, Inc.

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP –

Chaparral Energy, Inc.


Samson

Western Div – California Operations

Chesapeake Energy Corporation


Seneca Resources Corporation

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP –

Cimarex Energy Co.


Sheridan Production Company
Sinclair Oil and GasServices Company

Western Div – Florida Operations

Cohort Energy Company


Southwestern Energy Production Company

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP –

Comstock Resources, Inc.


St. Mary Land & Exploration Company

Western Div – Wyoming Operations

Concho Resources, Inc.


Stone Energy Corporation

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP –

Continental Resources, Inc.


Summit Petroleum LLC
Swift Energy Operating, LLC

Western Division

Core Minerals Operating Co.,Company
Talisman Energy USA Inc.

(Fortuna)
T-C Oil Company

Bridwell Oil Company

Crimson Exploration, Inc.


Tema Oil and Gas Company

Brigham Exploration Company

Dart Oil & Gas

Texas Petroleum Investment Company

Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. –

Denbury Resources Inc.

Thums Long Beach Company

Brookfield Renewable Power

Devon Energy

TOTAL
Total E&P USA, INC.

Bunge Ltd. – BG US Services

Dominion Exploration & Production

Inc.
Triad Energy Corporation

Burnett Oil Company, Inc.

Duncan Oil Properties, Inc./


Tri-Valley Corporation

 

California ISO

Walter Duncan, Inc.

Ultra Petroleum Corp.

Cameron International Corporation

Dynamic Offshore Resources, LLC

Vanco Energy Company

Cameron International Corporation –

Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC


Vantage Energy L.L.C

Aftermarket

Ellora Energy


Venoco, Inc.

Cameron International Corporation –

EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.


Vernon E. Faulconer, Inc.

Centrifugal

Encore Acquisitions Company


Wagner & Brown, Ltd.

Cameron International Corporation –

Energen Resources

Western Production Company

Compression Systems

Energy Partners, Ltd.

Weyerhaeuser Company

Cameron International Corporation –

Eni Operating Co.
Walter Duncan, Inc.


Whiting Petroleum Corporation

Distributed Valves

EOG Resources Inc.


Williams

Cameron International Corporation –

EQT Production Company


Woodside Energy (USA) Inc

Drilling & Production Systems

Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd.


Wynn-Crosby
XTO Energy Inc.

Cameron International Corporation –

Fidelity
Yuma Exploration & Production Company

Yuma Exploration and Production

Drilling Systems

FIML Natural Resources


Company, Inc.

Cameron International Corporation –

Forest Oil Corporation

Engineered Valves

Fortuna Energy, Inc.

Cameron International Corporation –

GMX Resources Inc.



Mercer’s 20092010 Total
Compensation

Flow Control

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation

Survey for
the Energy Sector

Cameron International Corporation –

Great Western Drilling Company

Measurement Division

Harvest NaturalAGL Resources
AGL Resources Inc.

– Sequent
   Energy Management
Abraxas Petroleum Corporation

Cameron International Corporation –

Headington Oil Company, L.P.


Aera Energy, LLC

Petreco Process Systems

Henry Resources LLC

AGL Resources, Inc.

Cameron International Corporation –

Hilcorp Energy Company


Aker Solutions

Process Valves

J. M. Huber Corporation – Energy Sector


Alliance Pipeline Inc.

Cameron International Corporation –

Kinder Morgan CO2 Company, L.P.


Alyeska Pipeline Service Company

Reciprocating

Lake Ronel Oil Company


Ameren Corporation

Cameron International
Ameren Corporation –

Leed Petroleum LLC

Anadarko Petroleum AmerenEnergy
   Fuels & Services
Ameren Corporation

Subsea Systems

Linn
  Ameren Energy Inc.

Resources
Ameren Corporation – AmerienIllinois
Ameren Corporation – AmerenUE
American Transmission Company
Apache Corporation

Cameron International Corporation –

Mariner Energy, Inc.


Arch Coal, Inc.

Surface Systems

McElvain Oil and Gas Properties, Inc.

Aspect Energy, LLC

Cameron International Corporation –

McMoran Oil and Gas Company

Aspect Energy, LLC – Aspect Abundant

Valves & Measurement

Medco Petroleum Management LLC

Shale LP

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

Merit Energy Company

Aspect Energy, LLC – Hungaria

CGGVeritas

Mewbourne Oil Company

Horizon Energy

Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Mustang Fuel Corporation


Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Chesapeake
Atlas Energy, Corporation – CEMI

Nearburg Producing Company

Atlas America, Inc.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

Newfield Exploration Company

Atlas Pipeline Mid-Continent

Chesapeake App

Nexen
BG US Services
BHP Billiton Petroleum U.S.A.(Americas), Inc.


Baker Hughes, Inc.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

NFR Energy LLC


Baker Hughes, Inc. – Baker Atlas

Chesapeake Midstream Partners

Noble Energy, Inc.


Baker Hughes, Inc. – Baker Hughes
Drilling Fluids

Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Baker Hughes, Inc.Compass

Oasis Petroleum LLC

Baker Hughes Inteq
Baker Hughes, Inc. – Baker Oil Tools

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.


Baker Hughes, Inc. – Baker Petrolite

Diamond Y

Penn Virginia Oil & Gas


Baker Hughes, Inc. – Centrilift

Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Baker Hughes, Inc.

Petro-Canada Resources (USA) Inc

Gaffney, Cline &
   Associates
Baker Hughes, Inc. – GeoMechanics
   International
Baker Hughes, Inc. – Hughes Christensen

Great Plains

PETROFLOW Energy, Ltd.

Baker Hughes, Inc. – Inteq

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

Petroglyph Energy, Inc.


Baker Hughes, Inc. – Production Quest

Hodges

Petrohawk Energy Corporation


Basic Energy Services Inc.

Chesapeake
Baytex Energy Corporation –

Petro-Hunt, LLC

BHP Billiton,USA Ltd. – BHP Billiton Petroleum

Midcon

Petroleum Development Corporation

(Americas), Inc.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

PetroQuest Energy LLC


Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP

Nomac

Phoenix
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P.
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. – Eastern
   Division
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. –
   Orcutt Facility
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. –
   West Pico Facility
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. –
   Western Division
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. –
   Western Division, California Operations
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. –
   Western Division, Florida Operations
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. –
   Western Division, Wyoming Operations
Brigham Exploration Company

BP plc – BP North America Exploration

Chief Oil & Gas, LLC

Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.

& Production

CHS, Inc. – Energy
Brookfield Renewable Power


 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

A-5




Proxy Statement


Cimarex Energy Company

Explorer Pipeline Company

Oceaneering International, Inc.

Cinco Natural Resources Corporation

Exterran Holdings, Inc.

Oceaneering International, Inc. – Americas

Citation Oil & Gas Corporation

Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd.

Oceaneering International, Inc. – Multiflex

CITGO Petroleum Corporation

Forest Oil Corporation

Oceaneering International, Inc. –

Cleco Corporation

Fortuna Energy, Inc.

Oceaneering Intervention Engineering

Concho Resources, Inc. –

FX Energy, Inc.

OGE Energy Corp

COG Operating, LLC

FX Energy, Inc – FX Drilling Company, Inc.

Oglethorpe Power Corporation

Colonial Pipeline Company

Genesis Energy, LLC

ONEOK, Inc.

Conectiv Energy

Global Industries, Ltd.

ONEOK, Inc. – Kansas Gas Service Division

Constellation Energy Partners, LLC

Great River Energy

ONEOK, Inc. – Oklahoma Natural

Core Laboratories N.V.

Halliburton Company

Gas Division

CPS Energy

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

ONEOK, Inc. – ONEOK Energy Services

DCP Midstream, LLC

Hess Corporation – Exploration & Production

ONEOK, Inc. – ONEOK Partners

Det Norske Veritas AS – Det Norske Veritas

HighMount Exploration & Production, LLC

ONEOK, Inc. – Texas Gas Service Divison

(USA), Inc

Hilcorp Energy Company

PacifiCorp

Devon Energy Corporation

Hilcorp Energy Company – Harvest Pipeline

Parallel Petroleum Corporation

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.

Company

Parker Drilling Company

Dominion Resources, Inc.

Holly Corporation

Pason Systems USA Corporation

Dominion Resources, Inc. –

Holly Corporation – Holly Asphalt Company

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

Dominion Energy

Holly Corporation – Holly Logistic Services

Petro-Canada USA, Inc.

Dominion Resources, Inc. –

Holly Corporation – Holly Refining and

Petroleum Development Corporation

Dominion Generation

Marketing Woods Cross

Pioneer Natural Resources Company

Dominion Resources, Inc. – Dominion

Holly Corporation –

PJM Interconnection

Virginia Power

Navajo Refining Company

Plains All American Pipeline LP

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.

Hunt Consolidated – Hunt Oil Company

Plains Exploration & Production Company

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc. – Field Operations

Jacksonville Electric Authority

Precision Drilling Oilfield Services

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc. –

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Corporation

North America Operations

Lario Oil & Gas Company

Pride International, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc. – Product Services

Legacy Reserves LP

ProLiance Energy, LLC

DTE Energy Company

Linn Energy, LLC

Puget Sound Energy

DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations

Maersk, Inc. – Moller Supply Services

Questar Corporation

Edison Mission Energy

Magellan Midstream Holdings LP

Questar Corporation – Questar

Edison Mission Energy –

Magellan Midstream Holdings LP –

Market Resources

Edison Mission M&T

Transportation

Quicksilver Resources, Inc.

Edison Mission Energy –

Magellan Midstream Holdings LP –

R. Lacy, Inc. – R. Lacy Services, Ltd.

Edison Mission O&M

Transportation and Terminals

RAM Energy Resources, Inc.

Edison Mission Energy –

MarkWest Energy Partners LP

Range Resources Corporation

EME Homer City Generation

MarkWest Energy Partners LP –

Regency Gas Services

Edison Mission Energy –

Gulf Coast Business Unit

Resolute Natural Resources Company

Midwest Generation EME

MarkWest Energy Partners LP –

RKI Exploration & Production, LLC

Edison Mission Energy –

Northeast Business Unit

Rosewood Resources, Inc.

Midwest Generation, LLC

MarkWest Energy Partners LP –

Rosewood Resources, Inc. –

El Paso Corporation

Southwest Business Unit

Rosewood Services Company

El Paso Corporation – Exploration

McMoRan Exploration Company

Rowan Companies, Inc.

& Production

MCX Exploration (USA), Ltd.

SAIC, Inc.

El Paso Corporation – Pipeline Group

MDU Resources Group, Inc.

SCANA Corporation

EnCana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. –

SCANA Corporation – Carolina Gas

Energy Future Holdings Corporation

WBI Holdings, Inc.

Transmission Corporation (CGTC)

Energy Future Holdings Corporation –

Medco Petroleum Management

SCANA Corporation – PSNC Energy

Luminant

Mestena Operating, Ltd.

SCANA Corporation – SCE&G (South Carolina

Energy Future Holdings Corporation –

Mirant Corporation

Electric and Gas Company)

Luminant Energy Company, LLC

MitEnergy Upstream, LLC

SCANA Corporation – SEMI (SCANA

Energy Future Holdings Corporation –

Murphy Oil Corporation

Energy Marketing, Inc.)

Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC

NATCO Group, Inc.

Schlumberger Limited – Schlumberger

Energy Future Holdings Corporation –

Nexen, Inc. – Nexen Petroleum USA, Inc.

Oilfield Services

TXU Energy Retail Company, LLC

Nippon Oil Exploration USA, Ltd.

Seneca Resources Corporation

Enerplus Resources Fund – Enerplus

NiSource, Inc.

Smith International, Inc.

Resources (USA) Corporation

NiSource, Inc. – Bay State Gas Company

Smith International, Inc. – MI Swaco

EnerVest Management Partners, Ltd.

NiSource, Inc. – Columbia Gas of Kentucky

Southern Company

Eni SpA – Eni US Operating Company, Inc.

NiSource, Inc. – Columbia Gas of Ohio

Southern Company – Alabama

ENSCO International, Inc.

NiSource, Inc. – Columbia Gas of

Power Company

ENSCO International, Inc. –

Pennsylvania

Southern Company – Georgia Power

Deepwater Business Unit

NiSource, Inc. – Columbia Gas of Virginia

Southern Company – Gulf Power Company

ENSCO International, Inc. –

NiSource, Inc. – Energy USA

Southern Union Company

North & South America Business Unit

NiSource, Inc. – NIE

Southern Union Company – Missouri

Entegra Power Services, LLC

NiSource, Inc. – NiSource Energy Tech Inc

Gas Energy

EOG Resources, Inc.

NiSource, Inc. – NiSource Gas Trans

Southern Union Company – New

E. ON AG – E. ON U.S.

& Storage

England Gas

EXCO Resources, Inc.

NiSource, Inc. – Transmission Corp

Southern Union Company – Panhandle

EXCO Resources, Inc. – EXCO Appalachia

Noble Corporation

Energy

EXCO Resources, Inc. – EXCO East TX/LA

Noble Corporation – Noble Drilling Services,

Southern Union Company – Southern

EXCO Resources, Inc. – EXCO Mid-Continent

Inc.

Union Gas Services

EXCO Resources, Inc. – EXCO Midstream

Noble Energy, Inc.

Southwest Gas Corporation

EXCO Resources, Inc. –

Occidental Petroleum Corporation –

Southwestern Energy Company

EXCO Permian/Rockies

Thums Long Beach Company

Sprague Energy Corporation


A-6

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


StatoilHydro

Aker Solutions

The Arizona Republic

Tellus Operating Group, LLC

Alaska Air Group, Inc.

Arkansas Best Corporation

Tesco Corporation

Albemarle Corporation

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

The Williams Companies, Inc.

Alcoa, Inc.

Arrow Electronics, Inc.

The Williams Companies, Inc. – E&P

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

ArvinMeritor, Inc.

The Williams Companies, Inc. – Midstream

Alfa Laval, Inc.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.

The Williams Companies, Inc. – Williams Gas

Allegheny County Sanitary Authority

ASCAP

Pipeline (WGP)

Allegheny Energy, Inc.

Ascent Media Group

TransCanada

Allegheny Technologies Incorporated

Ashland, Inc.

TransCanada – Gas Transmission Northwest

Allergan, Inc.

Asset Marketing Service, Inc.

(GTN)

Allete

Assurant Health

TransCanada – Northern Border Pipeline

Alliance Data Systems Corporation

Assurant, Inc.

TransCanada – US Pipeline Central

Alliance Residential Company

Asurion Corporation

Transocean, Inc.

Alliant Energy Corporation

AT&T, Inc.

Ultra Petroleum Corporation

The Allstate Corporation

Atmos Energy Corporation

Unit Corporation

Alpha Innotech Corporation

Aurora Healthcare

Unit Corporation – Superior Pipeline

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

The Auto Club Group

Company

ALSAC St. Jude

Autodesk, Inc.

Unit Corporation – Unit Drilling Company

Altria Group, Inc.

Autoliv North America, Inc.

Unit Corporation – Unit Petroleum Company

Altru Health System

Automobile Club of Southern California

Venoco, Inc.

Amazon.com, Inc.

AutoNation, Inc.

Verado Energy, Inc.

Amcore Bank

AutoZone, Inc.

Washington Gas Light Company

Ameren Corporation

Aveda Corporation

Weatherford International, Ltd.

American Airlines

Avery Dennison Corporation

Weatherford International, Ltd. – US Region

American Axle & Manufacturing

Avis Budget Group

Western Production Company

Holdings, Inc.

Avista Corporation

Xcel Energy, Inc.

American Cancer Society, Inc.

Avon Products, Inc.

XTO Energy, Inc.

American Commercial Lines, Inc.

Axsys

American Dehydrated Foods, Inc.

B Braun Medical, Inc.

American Eagle Outfitters

Babcock & Wilcox Company

Watson Wyatt’s (Towers Watson)

American Electric Power Company, Inc.

Babson College

2009/2010 Top Management

American Enterprise

Baker Hughes Incorporated

Compensation Survey

American Express Company

Baldor Electric Company

American Family Insurance

Ball Corporation

3M Company

American Financial Group

Bank of America Corporation

A. O. Smith Corporation

American Greetings Corporation

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

A. Schulman, Inc.

American Red Cross

Baptist Health

AAA

American Water

Baptist Health System

ABB, Inc.

Americas Styrenics

Barloworld Handling

Abbott Laboratories

AMERIGROUP Corporation

Barnes & Noble, Inc.

Abercrombie & Fitch Company

AmeriPride Services, Inc.

Basler Electric Company

ABM Industries, Inc.

Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

Baxa Corporation

Accor North America

AmerisourceBergen Corporation

Baxter International, Inc.

Activision Blizzard, Inc.

Ameristar Casinos

Baylor College of Medicine

The Actors Fund of America

Ames True Temper

Baylor Health Care System

Actuant Corporation

AMETEK, Inc.

BB&T Corporation

Acuity

AMETEK, Inc./Advanced Measurement

BE Aerospace, Inc.

Acuity Brands, Inc.

Technology, Inc.

Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.

ACUMED LLC

Amgen, Inc.

BearingPoint, Inc.

Adams Resources & Energy, Inc.

Amkor Technology, Inc.

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Administaff, Inc.

Amphenol Corporation

Bechtel Systems & Infrastructure, Inc.

Adobe Systems Incorporated

AMR Corporation

Beckman Coulter, Inc.

ADTRAN Incorporated

Amtrak

Becton, Dickinson and Company

Advance Auto Parts

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Behr America, Inc.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Analog Devices, Inc.

Belden, Inc.

Adventist Health System

Anchor Bank North America

Belk, Inc.

AECOM Technology Corporation

Andersen Corporation

Bemis Company, Inc.

Aegon USA

The Andersons, Inc.

Bemis Manufacturing Company

Aeropostale, Inc.

ANH Refractories Company

Benchmark Electronics, Inc.

The AES Corporation

Anixter International, Inc.

Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.

Aetna, Inc.

AnnTaylor Stores Corporation

Berwick Offray LLC

Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.

The Antioch Company

Best Buy Co., Inc.

Affinia Group, Inc.

Aon Corporation

Big Lots, Inc.

Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union

APAC Customer Services

Biodynamic Research Corporation

AFLAC Incorporated

Apache Corporation

Biogen Idec, Inc.

AGCO Corporation

Apollo Group

Biomet

AgFirst

Apple, Inc.

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Applied Materials, Inc.

BJ Services Company

AGL Resources, Inc.

AptarGroup, Inc.

BJ’s Wholesale Club

AgriBank, FCB

ARAMARK Corporation

The Black & Decker Corporation

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

Arch Coal, Inc.

BlackRock, Inc.

Airlines Reporting Corporation

Archstone

Blockbuster, Inc.

AirTran Holdings, Inc.

Areva NP, Inc.

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Nebraska

AK Steel Holding Corporation

ARINC, Inc.

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

A-7



Proxy Statement


Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Tennessee

Celanese Corporation

Constellation Energy Group, Inc.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana

Celgene Corporation

Continental Airlines, Inc.

Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc.

Cell Therapeutics, Inc.

Convenience Food Systems, Inc.

Blue Cross of Northeastern Pennsylvania

CEMEX, Inc.

Convergys Corporation

BlueLinx Holdings, Inc.

Centene Corporation

Con-way, Inc.

BMW Manufacturing Corporation

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

Cooper Standard Automotive

Board of Governors of the Federal

Century Aluminum Company

Cooper Tire & Rubber Company

Reserve System

Century Tel, Inc.

Core Laboratories

Bob Evans Farms

Cenveo, Inc.

Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc.

The Boeing Company

Cephalon, Inc.

Corn Products International, Inc.

Boise Cascade Holdings LLC

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Cornell University

Boise, Inc.

The Charles Schwab Corporation

Corning Incorporated

The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.

Chemtreat, Inc.

Correctional Medical Services

Borders Group, Inc.

Chenega Corporation

Corrections Corporation of America

BorgWarner, Inc.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Bosch Packaging Services

Chevron Corporation

Country Insurance & Financial

Boston Scientific Corporation

Chicago Transit Authority

The Country Vintner

Boy Scouts of America

Chico’s FAS, Inc.

Covance, Inc.

Boyd Gaming Corporate

Children’s Healthcare Atlanta

Coventry Health Care, Inc.

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Children’s Home Society

Cox Enterprises, Inc.

Bradley Corporation

Chiquita Brands International, Inc.

Cox Target Media Valpak

Brady Corporation

Choice Hotels International

CPS Energy

Briggs & Stratton Corporation

CHS, Inc.

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

Brightpoint, Inc.

The Chubb Corporation

Crane Company

The Brink’s Company

Chumash Employee Resource Center

Cree, Inc.

Bristol Myers Squibb Company

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Croda, Inc.

Broadcom Corporation

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

Crosstex Energy, Inc.

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

CIGNA Corporation

Crown Castle International Corporation

Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

Cimarex Energy Company

Crown Cork & Seal

Brown Shoe Company, Inc.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation

CSX Corporation

Brownells, Inc.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

Cummins, Inc.

Brunswick Corporation

CIT Group, Inc.

CUNA Mutual Group

Bryant University

Citationshares

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

BSSI

Citigroup, Inc.

CVR Energy, Inc.

Buckeye GP Holdings LP

City of Austin

CVS Caremark

Bucyrus International, Inc.

City of Charlotte

Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

Buffets, Inc.

City of Columbus

Cytec Industries, Inc.

Building Materials Holding Corporation

City of Garland

D & E Communications, Inc.

Burger King Holdings, Inc.

City of Houston

D.R. Horton, Inc.

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation

City of Philadelphia

Daimler Financial Services

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Clarian Health Partners

Dakota Electric Association

C.R. Bard, Inc.

Cleco Corporation

Dallas County

Cabela’s Incorporated

Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc.

Dal-Tile, Inc.

Cablevision Systems Corporation

The Clorox Company

Dana Holding Corporation

Cabot Corporation

ClubCorp, Inc.

Danaher Corporation

CACI International, Inc.

CME Group, Inc.

Data Center, Inc.

Caelum Research Corporation

CMS Energy Corporation

DaVita, Inc.

Calibre Systems

CNL Financial Group

Dean Foods

California Casualty Management Company

Coca-Cola Bottling Company Consolidated

Deckers Outdoor Corporation

California Institute of Technology

The Coca-Cola Company

The Decurion Corporation

California Water Service Company

Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.

Deere & Company

Calpine Corporation

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Dekalb Regional Healthcare Systems

Calumet Specialty Products Partners LP

Colgate-Palmolive Company

Del Monte Fresh Produce Company

Cameron International Corporation

Collective Brands, Inc.

Delorme Publishing

Camoplast, Inc.

The Colman Group, Inc.

Delphi Corporation

Campbell Soup Company

Colonial Bank

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Canyon Ranch

Colorado Springs Utilities

Denso International America

Capital One Financial Corporation

Colsa Corporation

Denso Manufacturing Michigan, Inc.

Career Education Corporation

Columbia Sportswear Company

DENTSPLY International, Inc.

Career Service Authority City and County

Columbus Foods LLC

DePaul University

of Denver

Comcast Corporation

Devon Energy Corporation

CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield

Comerica Incorporated

DeVry University

Carle Clinic Association

Commercial Metals Company

DFW International Airport

Carlisle Companies, Inc.

CommScope, Inc.

Dick’s Sporting Goods

Carlson Companies, Inc.

Community Health Network

Dickstein Shapiro LLP

CarMax

Community Health Systems

Diebold Incorporated

Carpenter Technology Corporation

The Community Preservation Corporation

Dillard’s, Inc.

Carter

Compass Group, North America Division

Direct Financial Solutions, Inc.

Casino Arizona

Complete Production Services, Inc.

The DIRECTV Group, Inc.

Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.

Computer Sciences Corporation

Discover Financial Services

Caterpillar, Inc.

Computer Task Group

Discovery Communications, Inc.

CB Richards Ellis

ConocoPhillips

DISH Network Corporation

CBS Corporation

Conseco, Inc.

Doherty Employer Services

CC Media Holdings, Inc.

CONSOL Energy, Inc.

Dole Food Company, Inc.

CDM

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Dollar General Corporation


A-8

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

Genuine Parts Company

Donaldson Company, Inc.

Farmland Foods, Inc.

Genworth Financial, Inc.

Dover Corporation

Fastenal Company

Genzyme Corporation

The Dow Chemical Company

FCI USA, Inc.

Georg Fischer Signet LLC

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta

Georgia Gulf Corporation

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Georgia Institute of Technology

DSC Logistics

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Georgia System Operations Corporation

DST Systems, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Gerdau Ameristeel

DTE Energy

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Duane Reade Holdings, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Global Partners LP

Duke Energy Corporation

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Godiva, Inc.

Duke Realty Corporation

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Gold Eagle Company

Duke University & Health System

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Goodrich Corporation

DuPont

FedEx Express

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Dynegy, Inc.

FedEx Ground

Google, Inc.

DynMcDermott

FedEx Office

Government Employees Health

E J Brooks Company

Fender Musical Instruments

Association, Inc.

E*TRADE Financial Corporation

Ferguson Enterprises

Graco, Inc.

The E.W. Scripps Company

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

Graham Packaging

Eagle Rock Energy Partners LP

FerrellGas, Inc.

Grande Cheese Company

Early Warning Services

Ferro Corporation

Grange Mutual Insurance Companies

Eastman Chemical Company

Fidelity National Financial, Inc.

Granite Construction, Inc.

Eastman Kodak Company

Fidelity National Information Services

Graybar Electric Company, Inc.

Eaton Corporation

Fifth Third Bancorp

Great Plains Energy Incorporated

eBay

The First American Corporation

Greatwide Truckload Management

Ecolab, Inc.

First American Corporation

Greif, Inc.

Edison International

First Bank

Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Edison Mission Energy

First Citizens Bank

Group 1 Automotive, Inc.

Education Management Corporation

First Data Corporation

GuideStone Financial Resources

Edward Jones & Company

First Horizon National Corporation

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation

Edwards Lifesciences

First Interstate BancSystem

H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center &

EG&G – Defense Materials

First Place Bank

Research Institute

EG&G Services

First Priority

Halliburton Company

El Paso Corporation

First Solar, Inc.

Hanesbrands, Inc.

Element K

FirstEnergy Corporation

Hannaford Bros. Company

Eli Lilly & Company

Fiserv, Inc.

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.

Elizabeth Arden, Inc.

Fleetwood Group

Hapag-Lloyd (America), Inc.

EMC Corporation

Flexcon Company, Inc.

Harley Davidson Motor Company

EMCOR Group, Inc.

Flexible Steel Lacing Company

Harman International Industries, Inc.

Emerson Climate Technologies/Copeland

Florida’s Blood Centers, Inc.

Harrah’s Entertainment

Emerson Electric

Flowers Foods, Inc.

Harris County Hospital District

Enbridge Energy Partners LP

Flowserve Corporation

Harsco Corporation

Energizer Holdings, Inc.

Fluor Corporation

Hartford Financial Services

Energy Future Holdings Corporation

FMC Corporation

Harvard Vanguard Medical Association

Energy Transfer Equity LP

FMC Technologies, Inc.

Harvey Industries

Ensco International Incorporated

Foot Locker, Inc.

Hasbro, Inc.

Entergy Corporation

Ford Motor Company

Hastings Mutual Insurance Company

Enterprise GP Holdings LP

Forth Worth Independent School District

Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.

Entertainment Publications

Fortune Brands

Haynes International, Inc.

EOG Resources, Inc.

Foseco Metallurgical, Inc.

Hazelden Foundation

EON US LLC

Fox Chase Cancer Center

HCA, Inc.

Equifax, Inc.

FPL Group, Inc.

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.

Equity Residential

Franklin Resources, Inc.

HD Supply

Erie Insurance Group

Franklin W Olin College Engineering

Health Management Associates, Inc.

ESCO Corporation

Freeman Companies

Health Net

ESCO Technologies

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc.

Health Partners

The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

HealthNow New York

Esterline Technologies Corporation

Fremont Group

HealthSouth Corporation

Etnyre International, Ltd.

Froedtert & Community Health

HealthSpring, Inc.

Europ Assistance USA

Frontier Communications Corporation

HealthTrans

Evraz Oregon Steel Mills

Frontier Oil Corporation

H-E-B

Exel, Inc.

Furniture Brands International, Inc.

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

Exelon Corporation

G&K Services

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

Exempla Health Care, Inc.

G. Loomis, Inc.

Hendrick Medical Center

Exide Technologies

Gannett Co., Inc.

Hendrickson International

Expedia, Inc.

The Gap, Inc.

Henry Ford Health System

Expeditors International of Washington

Gardner Denver, Inc.

Henry Schein, Inc.

Experian

Garmin International

Herman Miller, Inc.

Express Scripts, Inc.

Gaylord Entertainment

The Hershey Company

Extendicare Health Services

General Cable Corporation

The Hertz Corporation

Exterran Holdings, Inc.

General Dynamics Corporation

Hess Corporation

Exxon Mobil Corporation

General Dynamics Information Technology

Hewitt Associates, Inc.

FAIR Plan Insurance Placement Facility

General Growth Properties, Inc.

Hewlett-Packard Company

of Pennsylvania

General Motors Corporation

Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

A-9




 

Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 

 

 

Highlights for Children, Inc.Buckeye Partners, L.P.

 

ITT Industries Advanced Engineering

Level 3 Communications, Inc.

Highmark, Inc.

& Sciences

Levi Strauss & Company

HighMount Exploration & Production LLC

ITT Systems Division

Lexmark International, Inc.

Hill Phoenix

J J Keller & Associates, Inc.

LG Electronics USA, Inc.

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.

J R Simplot Company

Liberty Global, Inc.

Hilti, Inc.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

Liberty Media Corporation (Interactive)

Hilton Hotels Corporation (Promus Hotels)

J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

LifeMasters Supported SelfCare, Inc.

Hines Interests

Jabil

LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.

Hitachi

Jack in the Box, Inc.

Lighthouse Computer Services

HNI Corporation

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

Limited Brands

HNTB Corporation

Jacobs Technology, Inc.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.

Holden Industries, Inc.

Jarden Consumer Solutions

Lincoln National Corporation

Holly Corporation

Jarden Corporation

Lithia Motors, Inc.

The Home Depot, Inc.

Jefferson Science Associates

Little Lady Foods

Home Shopping Network

Jefferson Wells International

Liz Claiborne, Inc.

HoneywellENSCO International, Inc.

 

Jet Blue AirwaysJ-W Operating Company –

Burnett Oil Co., Inc.

 

LKQ CorporationENSCO International, Inc. –

J-W Measurement Company

Hormel FoodsCCS Midstream Service, LLC

Deepwater Business Unit

J-W Operating Company –

CEDA International Inc.

ENSCO International, Inc. – North & South

J-W Power Company

CGGVeritas

America Business Unit

J-W Operating Company –

CHS Inc. – Energy

EOG Resources, Inc.

J-W Wireline & Excell

CITGO Petroleum Corporation

 

JM Family Enterprises

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Hospira,EXCO Resources, Inc.

 

Jo-Ann Stores,Kinder Morgan, Inc.

CPS Energy

 

Lockton Companies

Host Hotels & Resorts,EXCO Resources, Inc. – EXCO Appalachia

 

John Crane, Inc.

Loews CorporationLario Oil & Gas Company

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

Hub Group, Inc.

Johns Hopkins MedicalCalfrac Well Services

Lower Colorado River Authority

Hubbard Feeds, Inc.

Johnson & Johnson

Lozier Corporation

Hubbell Incorporated

Johnson Controls, Inc.

LSG Sky Chefs

Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.

Johnson Financial Group

LSI Corporation

Humana, Inc.

JohnsonDiversey, Inc.

Lubrizol Corporation

Hunter Douglas, Inc.

Jones Apparel Group, Inc.

Luck Stone Corporation

Hunter Industries

Jones Lang LaSalle

Luther Midelfort-Mayo Health System

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Joy Global, Inc.

Lutron Electronics

Huntsman Corporation

 

JPMorgan Chase & Co.EXCO Resources, Inc. – EXCO East TX/LA

 

Luxottica RetailLegacy Reserves, LP

Huron Consulting GroupCalifornia ISO

 

Judicial Council of CaliforniaEXCO Resources, Inc. – EXCO Midstream

 

M&T Bank CorporationLinn Energy, LLC

Hutchinson Technology, Inc.

Juniper Networks, Inc.

Macy’s, Inc.

Hyatt Hotels Corporation

Kalsec, Inc.

Maersk, Inc.

Hyundai Motor America

Kansas City Southern

Magellan Health Services

IAC/InterActiveCorp

Kansas Farm Bureau

Mahr Federal, Inc.

Iasis Healthcare Corporation

KAR Holdings, Inc.

Malco Products, Inc.

IBA USA, Inc.

KB Home

Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Icahn Enterprises LP

KBR, Inc.

Mannington Mills, Inc.

IDT Corporation

Keihin Indiana Precision Technology

Manpower International, Inc.

Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

Kellogg Company

Manpower, Inc.

Imation Corporation

Kelly Services, Inc.

ManTech International Corporation

Imerys

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation

Marathon Oil Corporation

IMS Health, Inc.

Key Energy Services, Inc.

Maricopa County Office of Management

Indianapolis Power & Light Company

KeyCorp

& Budget

Inergy Holdings LP

Keystone Automotive Industries

Maricopa Integrated Health System

Information Management Service

Keystone Foods Corporation

The Mark Travel Corporation

Ingersoll Rand

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Markel Corporation

Ingles Markets, Incorporated

Kindred Healthcare, Inc.

Market Planning Solutions, Inc.

Ingram Industries, Inc.

Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

Marriott International, Inc.

Ingram Micro, Inc.

Kingston Technology

Mars North America

Inmar, Inc.

KLA-Tencor Corporation

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

Inolex Chemical Company

Knight, Inc.

Marshall & Ilsley Corporation

INOVA Health Systems

Kohl’s Corporation

Marshfield Clinic

In-Sink-Erator

Kraft Foods, Inc.

MARTA

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations

The Kroger Company

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Integrys Energy Group, Inc.

KrugerCameron International

 

Mary Kay,EXCO Resources, Inc.

Intel Corporation – EXCO

 

Kyocera America, Inc.M-I SWACO

Cameron International – Aftermarket

 

Masco Corporation

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.Permian/Rockies

 

L L Bean, Inc.MCX Exploration (USA), Ltd.

Cameron International – Centrifugal

 

MasseyEdison Mission Energy Company

International Assets Holding Corporation

L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.

MasterCard Incorporated

International Business Machines Corporation

Lab Volt Systems

Mattel, Inc.

International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

Maui Jim, Inc.

International Game Technology

The Laclede Group, Inc.

Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

International Paper Company

Lake Federal Bank

Mayo Clinic

Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

Lam Research Corporation

The McClatchy Company

Intertape Polymer Group

Lancaster General Hospital

McCormick & Company, Incorporated

Intuit, Inc.

Land O’Lakes, Inc.

McDonald’s Corporation

Invacare Corporation

Landstar System, Inc.

MCG Health, Inc.

Invensys Controls

Lansing Board of Water & Light

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

Las Vegas Sands Corporation

McKesson Medical-Surgical

The Irvine Company

La-Z-Boy Chair Company

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Isuzu Motors America, Inc.

Leap Wireless International, Inc.

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.

Ithaca CollegeCameron International –

 

LearEdison Mission Energy –

MDU Resources Group, Inc. –

Compression Systems

EME Homer City Generation

WBI Holdings, Inc.

Cameron International –

Edison Mission Energy –

Magellan Midstream Holdings, LP

Distributor Valves Division

Edison Mission O&M

Magellan Midstream Holdings, LP –

Cameron International – Drilling Systems

Edison Mission Energy –

Pipeline/Terminal Division

Cameron International –

Energy Mission Marketing & Trading

Magellan Midstream Holdings, LP –

Drilling and Production Systems

Edison Mission Energy –

Transportation

Cameron International –

Midwest Generation EME

MarkWest Energy Partners LP

Engineered Valves Divison

Edison Mission Energy –

MarkWest Energy Partners LP –

Cameron International – Flow Control

Midwest Generation, LLC

Gulf Coast Business Unit

Cameron International –

El Paso Corporation

 

MeadWestvacoMarkWest Energy Partners LP –

Measurement Division

El Paso Corporation –

Liberty Business Unit

Cameron International –

Exploration & Production

MarkWest Energy Partners LP –

Petreco Process Systems

El Paso Corporation –

Northeast Business Unit

Cameron International –

Pipeline Group

MarkWest Energy Partners LP –

Process Valves Division

EnerVest, Ltd.

Southwest Business Unit

Cameron International – Reciprocating

Energen Corporation

Medco Petroleum Management

Cameron International – Subsea Systems

Energen Corporation – Energen Resources

Mestena Operating, Ltd.

Cameron International – Surface Systems

Corporation

Mirant Corporation

ItochuCameron International – Valves &

Energy Future Holdings Corporation

Mitsui E&P USA LLC

Measurement

Energy Future Holdings Corporation –

Modec International Inc.

CenterPoint Energy

Luminant

Murphy Oil Corporation

Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Energy Future Holdings Corporation –

New York Power Authority

Chesapeake Energy Corporation – CEMI

TXU Energy

New York Power Authority –

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

Enerplus Resources Fund – Enerplus

Blenheim-Gilboa Power Project

Chesapeake Midstream Partners

Resources (USA) Corporation

New York Power Authority –

Chesapeake Energy Corporation – Compass

Eni US Operating Company, Inc.

 

LeggettClark Energy Center

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

Entegra Power Services, LLC

New York Power Authority –

Diamond Y

Equal Energy Ltd. – Altex Energy Corporation

Niagara Power Project

Chesapeake Energy Corporation –

Explorer Pipeline Company

New York Power Authority –

Great Plains

Exterran

Richard M. Flynn Power Plant

Chesapeake Energy Corporation – Hodges

Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd.

New York Power Authority –

Chesapeake Energy Corporation – Midcon

Forest Oil Corporation

St. Lawrence/FDR Power Project

Chesapeake Energy Corporation – Nomac

GE Oil & Platt,Gas Operations LLC –

Newfield Exploration Company

Cimarex Energy Co.

PII North America, Inc.

 

Medco Health Solutions,Nexen Petroleum USA, Inc.

Itron,Cinco Natural Resources Corporation

Genesis Energy, LLC

NiSource Inc.

Citation Oil & Gas Corp.

Global Industries

NiSource Inc. – Bay State Gas Company

Cleco Corporation

Great River Energy

NiSource Inc. – Columbia Gas of Kentucky

Colonial Pipeline Company

Halliburton Company

NiSource Inc. – Columbia Gas of Ohio

Constellation Energy Partners LLC

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

 

Lender Processing Services,NiSource Inc. – Columbia Gas of

Copano Energy

Hercules Offshore, Inc.

 

Media General, Inc.Pennsylvania

ITTCrosstex Energy Services

Hess Corporation – Exploration & Production

NiSource Inc. – Columbia Gas of Virginia

DCP Midstream, LLC

HighMount Exploration & Production LLC

NiSource Inc. – NiSource Energy

DPL Inc.

Hilcorp Energy Company

Technologies

DTE Energy

Hilcorp Energy Company –

NiSource Inc. – NiSource Gas

Davis Petroleum Corp.

Harvest Pipeline Company

Transmission & Storage

Det Norske Veritas USA

Holly Corporation

 

LennarNiSource Inc. – Northern Indiana

Devon Energy

Holly Corporation – Asphalt Company

Fuel & Light

Dominion Resources, Inc.

Holly Corporation – Logistic Services

NiSource Inc. – Northern Indiana Public

Dominion Resources, Inc. –

Holly Corporation – Navajo Refining

Service Company

Dominion Energy

Company

NiSource Inc. – Transmission Corporation

Dominion Resources, Inc. –

Holly Corporation – Refining and Marketing

Nippon Oil Exploration USA Ltd.

Dominion Generation

Woods Cross

Noble Corporation

Dominion Resources, Inc. –

Holly Refining and Marketing Tulsa LLC

Noble Corporation – Noble Drilling

Dominion Virginia Power

Hunt Consolidated – Hunt Oil Company

Services, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group Inc.

Husky Energy Inc.

Noble Energy, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group Inc. –

ION Geophysical Corporation

 

Meeting Consultants,OGE Energy Corporation

Dresser-Rand New Equipment

J-W Operating Company

ONEOK, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc. –

J-W Operating Company –

ONEOK, Inc. – Kansas Gas Service Division

Dresser-Rand Product Services

Cohort Energy Company

ONEOK, Inc. – ONEOK Energy

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc. –NAO

J-W Operating Company –

Services Company

DynMcDermott Petroleum

J-W Gathering Company

ONEOK, Inc. – ONEOK Partners

Operations Company

 

 

Lennox International, Inc.

 

MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.


 

 

 

A-10A-6

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 

 

 

Mercantile Commerce BankONEOK, Inc. – Oklahoma Natural

 

NCI BuildingSuperior Energy Services, Inc. LLC

Albemarle Corporation

Gas Division

Superior Natural Gas Corporation

Alcoa, Inc.

ONEOK, Inc. – Texas Gas Services Division

TAQA New World Inc.

Alfa Laval, Inc.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation –

TAQA North USA

Allegheny County Sanitary Authority

Thums Long Beach Company

TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company

Allegheny Energy, Inc.

Oceaneering International, Inc.

Talisman Energy Inc. US

Allegheny Technologies, Inc.

Oceaneering International, Inc. – Americas

Tecpetrol Corporation

Allegiance Health

Oceaneering International, Inc. – Inspection

Tellus Operating Group, LLC

Allergan, Inc.

Oceaneering International, Inc. – Multiflex

Tesco Corporation

Allete, Inc.

Oceaneering International, Inc. – OIE

The Williams Companies, Inc.

Alliance Data Systems Corporation

PD Holdings Company

ThermaSource, Inc.

Alliance Defense Fund

PJM Interconnection

ThermaSource, Inc. –

Alliance Residential LLC

PSNC Energy

ThermsSource Cementing

Alliant Energy Corporation

Parallel Petroleum LLC

TransCanada Corporation

Allstate Corporation

Parker Drilling Company

TransCanada Corporation –

Ally Financial, Inc.

Pason Systems USA Corp.

US Pipeline Central

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

Transocean, Inc.

ALSAC St. Jude

Petroleum Development Corporation

Unit Corporation

Amazon.com, Inc.

Pioneer Drilling Company

Unit Corporation –

Ambac Financial Group

Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.

Superior Pipeline Company, LLC

Ambius

Plains Exploration & Production Company

Unit Corporation – Unit Drilling Company

Ameren Corporation

Pride International

Unit Corporation – Unit Petroleum Company

American Cancer Society, Inc.

Puget Sound Energy

Venoco, Inc.

American Commercial Lines, Inc.

Questar Corporation

Verado Energy, Inc.

American Dehydrated Foods, Inc.

Questar Corporation – QEP Resources

WGL Holdings, Inc. – Washington Gas

American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.

Quicksilver Resources Inc.

XTO Energy, Inc.

American Electric Power Company

R. Lacy, Inc. – R. Lacy Services, Ltd.

Xcel Energy Inc.

American Express Company

RAM Energy Resources, Inc.

American Family Insurance

RKI Exploration & Production, LLC

Towers Watson 2010/2011

American Greetings Corporation

Range Resources Corp.

Top Management

American International Group, Inc.

Regency Energy Partners LP

Compensation Survey

American National Insurance

Repsol Services Company

American Tire Distributors Holdings,

Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC

American Tower Corporation

Rosewood Resources, Inc.

3M Company

American University

Rosewood Resources, Inc. – Advanced

84 Lumber Company

American Water

Drilling Technologies

A. O. Smith Corporation

AMERIGROUP Corporation

Rowan Companies, Inc.

AAA

AmeriPride Services, Inc.

SCANA Corporation

AAR Corporation

Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

SCANA Corporation – Carolina Gas

Aaron’s, Inc.

AmerisourceBergen Corporation

Transmission Corporation

Abbott Laboratories

Ameristar Casinos

SCANA Corporation – SC Electric & Gas

Abercrombie & Fitch

Ames True Temper

SandRidge Energy, Inc.

ABM Industries, Inc.

AMETEK, Inc.

Schlumberger Limited

Accident Fund Insurance Company of

AMETEK, Inc./Advanced Measurement

Science Applications International

America

Technologies

Corporation (SAIC)

Accor North America

Amgen, Inc.

Seawell Americas, Inc.

Acme Industries

Amica Mutual Insurance Company

SemGroup Corporation

The Actors Fund of America

Amkor Technology, Inc.

SemGroup Corporation – SemCrude

Acuity

Amphenol Corporation

SemGroup Corporation – SemGas

Acuity Brands, Inc.

AMR Corporation

SemGroup Corporation – SemStream

ACUMED LLC

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Seneca Resources Corporation

Administaff, Inc.

Analog Devices

Seneca Resources Corporation – Bakersfield

Adobe Systems, Inc.

 

Packaging Corporation of AmericaAnchor Bank NA

Mercer UniversitySeneca Resources Corporation – Williamsville

 

NCMICADTRAN Incorporated

Andersen Corporation

Smith International

Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

Andersons, Inc.

SourceGas LLC

Advanced Micro Devices

Anixter International, Inc.

Southern Company

AECOM Technology Corporation

Annaly Capital Management

Southern Company –

Aegon USA

AnnTaylor Stores Corporation

Alabama Power Company

Aeronix, Inc.

AOC LLC

Southern Company – Georgia Power

Aeropostale, Inc.

Aon Corporation

Southern Company – Gulf Power Company

AES Corporation

Apache Corporation

Southern Company –

Aetna, Inc.

Apollo Group

Mississippi Power Company

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

Apple, Inc.

Southern Union Company

AFLAC Incorporated

Applied Materials, Inc.

Southern Union Company –

AFP, Inc.

AptarGroup, Inc.

Missouri Gas Energy

AGCO Corporation

ARAMARK Corporation

Southern Union Company –

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Arch Coal, Inc.

New England Gas

Agilysys, Inc.

Archstone

Southern Union Company –

AGL Resources, Inc.

Armed Forces Insurance

Panhandle Energy

AgriBank, FCB

Armstrong World Industries

Southern Union Company –

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Southern Union Gas Services

AirTran Holdings, Inc.

ArvinMeritor, Inc.

Southwestern Energy Company

Aker Solutions

Asahi Kasei Plastics NA, Inc.

Sprague Energy Corp.

AKSteel Holding Corporation

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.

Stantec Inc.

Alaska Air Group, Inc.

 

Pactiv Corporation

Merck & Co., Inc.

NCR Corporation

Pall Corporation

Mercury General Corporation

Nebraska Public Power District

The Pampered Chef

Merit Medical Systems

NetApp, Inc.

Panduit Corporation

MeritCare Health System

New Hanover Regional Medical Center

Panera LLC

Merrill Corporation

New Jersey Resources Corporation

The Pantry, Inc.

Metals USA, Inc.

New York Hotel Trades Council

Papa John’s International

Metavante

The New York Times Company

Patterson Companies, Inc.

The Methodist Health Care Corporation

Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

MetroPCS Communications, Inc.

Newfield Exploration Company

Paychex

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Newmont Mining Corporation

PBS

Metropolitan Transit Authority

NewPage Holding Corporation

PC Connection, Inc.

Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.

Nicor Gas

Peabody Energy Corporation

MFS Investment Management

Nicor, Inc.

Penn National Gaming, Inc.

MGIC Investment Corporation

NII Holdings, Inc.

Penn State Hershey Medical Center

Miami Children’s Hospital

NiSource, Inc.

Penske AutomotiveAscent Media Group Inc.

Michael Baker Corporation

Nissan North America

Pentair, Inc.

Michael Foods, Inc.

Nissin Foods (USA) Co., Inc.

The Pep Boys – Manny, Moe & Jack

Michaels Stores, Inc.

NJM Insurance Group

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

Micron Technology, Inc.

Noble Energy, Inc.

The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.

MidAmerican Energy Company

Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.

PepsiAmericas, Inc.

Midwest Research Institute

Nordson Corporation

PepsiCo, Inc.

Mike Albert Leasing, Inc.

Nordstrom

Perini Corporation

Millennium Inorganic Chemicals

Nordstrom, Inc.

PerkinElmer, Inc.

MillerCoors

Norfolk Southern Corporation

Perot System

Minco Products, Inc.

North American Hoganas

Perrigo Company

Mine Safety Appliances Company

North Texas Tollway Authority

PetSmart, Inc.

Miniature Precision Components, Inc.

Northeast Utilities System

Pfizer, Inc.

Minntech Corporation

Northern Trust Corporation

PG&E Corporation

Mirant Corporation

Northrop Grumman Corporation

PGT Industries

Missouri Department of Conservation

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

Phacil, Inc.

Missouri Department of Transportation

Norton Health Care

Pharmavite LLC

Mitsubishi International Corporation

NRUCFC

PharMerica Corporation

Mitsui & Company USA, Inc.

NSK Corporation

PHH Arval

MMS Consultants, Inc.

NSTAR

PHH Corporation

Mohawk Industries

NTK Holdings, Inc.

PHI, Inc.

Mohegan Sun Casino

Nucor Corporation

Philip Morris International, Inc.

Molex, Inc.

NuStar Energy LP

Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation

Molina Healthcare, Inc.

NV Energy, Inc.

The Phoenix Companies, Inc.

Molson Coors Brewing Company

NVIDIA Corporation

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.

Moneris Solutions Corporation

NVR, Inc.

Pinnacle West Capital Corporation

Monsanto Company

NYSE Euronext

Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc.

Moody’s Corporation

O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.

Pioneer Natural Resources

Moog, Inc.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Pitney Bowes

Morgan Stanley

Oceaneering International

Plains All American Pipeline LP

Motorola, Inc.

Office Depot, Inc.

Plains Exploration & Production Company

MPS Group, Inc.

OfficeMax

The Planet Internet Services

MSC Industrial Direct

OGE Energy Corporation

Plexus Corporation

MTA Long Island Bus

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Plymouth Tube

MTD Products, Inc.

Ohio State University

PM Company

MTS System Corporation

Ohio State University Medical Center

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

Mueller Industries, Inc.

Oil States International, Inc.

PNM Resources, Inc.

Mueller Water Products, Inc.

Oil-Dri Corporation of America

Polaris Industries, Inc.

Murphy Oil Corporation

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative

PolyOne Corporation

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company

Old Republic International Corporation

Pool Corporation

Mutual of Omaha

Olin Corporation

Popular, Inc.

Mylan, Inc.

OM Group, Inc.

Port of Portland

NACCO Industries, Inc.

Omnicare, Inc.

Portland General Electric Company

Nalco Company

Omnicom Group, Inc.

PPG Industries, Inc.

NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

ON Semiconductor Corporation

PPL Corporation

Nash-Finch Company

Oncology Nursing Society

Praxair, Inc.

National Academies

Oncor Electric Delivery

Preformed Line Products Company

National Fuel Gas Company

ONEOK, Inc.

Premera Blue Cross

National Futures Association

Orbital Science Corporation

Premier, Inc.

National Interstate Insurance Company

Oregon State Lottery

Price Chopper/Golub Corporation

National Radio Astronomy Observatory

Oriental Trading Company

priceline.com Incorporated

National Safety Council

OSG Tap & Die, Inc.

Pride International, Inc.

National Tobacco Company

Oshkosh Corporation

Prince William Health System

National-Oilwell Varco, Inc.

Owens & Minor, Inc.

Principal Financial Group, Inc.

Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc.

Owens Corning

Pro Staff

Navistar International Corporation

Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Probuild Holdings, Inc.

Navy Exchange Service Command

Oxford Industries

Progress Energy, Inc.

NBTY, Inc.

PACCAR, Inc.

The Progressive Corporation

NCCI Holdings, Inc.

Pacer International, Inc.

Project Management Institute


 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

A-11A-7




 

Proxy Statement

 


 

 

 

 

 

ProLogisASCO – Valve

 

Safeway,Boeing Company

ConnectiCare Capital LLC

Ash Grove Cement Company

Boise Cascade Holdings LLC

Conocophillips

Ashland, Inc.

 

Southern Union CompanyBoise, Inc.

Consol Energy, Inc.

Protective LifeAsset Marketing Service, Inc.

Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Assurant, Inc.

Borders Group, Inc.

Constellation Energy

Asurion Corporation

 

SafiloBorg Warner

Continental Airlines, Inc.

AT&T, Inc.

Bosch Packaging Services

Continental Data Graphics

Atlas Energy, Inc.

Bosch Rexroth Corporation

Convergys Corporation

Atmos Energy Corporation

Boston Scientific Corporation

Con-Way

Aurora Healthcare

Boy Scouts of America

Cook Communications Ministries

The Auto Club Group

Boyd Gaming Corporate

Cooper Tire & Rubber Company

Autodesk, Inc.

Bradley Corporation

Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc.

Autoliv, Inc.

Brady Corporation

CooperVision, Inc.

Automobile Club of Southern California

Bridgepoint Education

Core Mark Holding Company, Inc.

AutoNation, Inc.

Briggs & Stratton Corporation

Corinthian Colleges

AutoZone, Inc.

Brightpoint, Inc.

Corn Products International, Inc.

Avery Dennison Corporation

Brinks Company

Cornell University

Avis Budget Group

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

Corning, Inc.

Avista Corporation

Broadcom Corporation

Correctional Medical Services

Avon Products, Inc.

Broadlane, Inc.

Corrections Corporation of America

Axsys

Broadridge Financial Solutions

Costco Wholesale Corporation

B Braun Medical, Inc.

Brocade Communications Systems

Country Insurance & Financial

B/E Aerospace, Inc.

Brookdale Senior Living

Country of Spotsylvania

Babson College

Brown Shoe Company, Inc.

Covance, Inc.

Baker Hughes, Inc.

Brownells, Inc.

Covanta Holding Corporation

Baldor Electric Company

Brown-Forman Corporation

Coventry Health Care, Inc.

Ball Corporation

Brunswick Corporation

CPS Energy

Bank of America Corporation

Bryant University

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

BSSI

Crane Company

Baptist Health

Bucyrus International, Inc.

Crosstex Energy, Inc.

Barilla America, Inc.

Buffets, Inc.

Crown Castle International Corporation

Barloworld Handling

Burger King Holdings, Inc.

CSX Corporation

Basler Electric Company

C H Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

CTS Corporation

Baxter International, Inc.

C.R. Bard, Inc.

Cultural Institute Retirement System

Baylor College of Medicine

Cabelas, Inc.

Cummins, Inc.

Baylor Health Care System

Cablevision Systems Corporation

CUNA Mutual Group

BB&T Corporation

Cabot Corporation

Curtiss Wright Corporation

Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.

Caci International, Inc.

CVREnergy, Inc.

Bechtel Systems & Infrastructure, Inc.

Caelum Research Corporation

CVS Caremark

Beckman Coulter, Inc.

California Casualty Management Company

Cytec Industries, Inc.

Becton Dickinson & Company

California Dental Association

D R Horton, Inc.

Belk, Inc.

Calpine Corporation

Daimler Financial Services

Bemis Company, Inc.

Calumet Specialty Products Partners LP

Dallas County

Bemis Manufacturing Company

Cameron International Corporation

Dal-Tile, Inc.

Benchmark Electronics, Inc.

Campbell Soup Company

Dana Holding Corporation

The Bergquist Company

Career Education Corporation

Danaher Corporation

Berkshire Hathaway

Carhartt, Inc.

Data Center, Inc.

Berry Plastics Corporation

CaridianBCT, Inc.

DaVita, Inc.

Berwick Offray LLC

Carlisle Cos, Inc.

Dean Foods Company

Best Buy Company, Inc.

Carlson Companies, Inc.

The Decurion Corporation

Big Lots, Inc.

CarMax

Deere & Company

Bimbo Bakeries USA

 

Southwest AirlinesCarpenter Technology Corporation

Dekalb Regional Healthcare Systems

Biodynamic Research Corporation

Carter

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Biogen Idec, Inc.

Carter’s, Inc.

Delta Dental Plan of Michigan

Biomet

Catalyst Health Solutions

Deluxe Corporation

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

Caterpillar, Inc.

Denny’s, Inc.

BJ Services Company

CB Richard Ellis

Denso International America

BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc.

CBS Corporation

DENTSPLY International, Inc.

Black Hills Corporation

CC Media Holdings, Inc.

DePaul University

Blackrock, Inc.

CDM

Devon Energy Corporation

Blackstone Group LP

CEC Entertainment, Inc.

Dex One Corporation

Blockbuster, Inc.

CEI

DFW International Airport

Blue Cross Northeastern Pennsylvania

Celanese Corporation

Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.

Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc.

Celgard, Inc.

Dickstein Shapiro LLP

BlueCross BlueShield of Arizona

Celgene Corporation

Diebold, Inc.

BlueCross BlueShield of Delaware

CEMEX, Inc.

Dillards, Inc.

BlueCross BlueShield of Louisiana

Centene Corporation

DIRECTV

BlueCross BlueShield of Nebraska

Comcast Corporation

Discover Financial Services, Inc.

BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina

Comerica, Inc.

Discovery Communications, Inc.

BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee

Commercial Metals

DISH Network

Bluelinx Holdings, Inc.

CommScope, Inc.

Diversey, Inc.

BMW Manufacturing Corporation

Community Coffee Company LLC

Doherty Employer Services

Board of Governors of the

Community Health Systems, Inc.

Dole Food Company, Inc.

Federal Reserve System

The Community Preservation Corporation

Dollar General Corporation

The Body Shop

Computer Task Group

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group

A-8

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Gilbarco, Inc.

Donaldson Company, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Dover Corporation

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Glatfelter Company

PrudentialDow Chemical

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

The Gleason Works

DPL, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Global Partners LP

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

GOJO Industries, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Gold Eagle Company

DST Systems, Inc.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

DTE Energy

FedEx Express

Goodman Manufacturing

Duane Reade Holdings, Inc.

FedEx Ground

Goodrich Corporation

Duke Energy Corporation

FedEx Office

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Duke Realty Corporation

Fender Musical Instruments

Google, Inc.

Duke University & Health System

Ferguson Enterprises

Graco, Inc.

Dun & Bradstreet Corporation

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

Graham Packaging Company, Inc.

DuPont

FerrellGas, Inc.

Grande Cheese Company

Dupont Fabros Technology

Ferro Corporation

Grange Mutual Insurance Company

Dyn McDermott

Fiberweb

Granite Construction, Inc.

Dynegy, Inc.

Fidelity National Financial

Graphic Packaging Holding Company

E TRADE Financial Corporation

Fidelity National Information Services

Graybar Electric Company, Inc.

Early Warning Services

Fifth Third Bancorp

Great American Insurance/Great

Eastman Chemical Company

The First American Corporation

American Financial

Eastman Kodak Company

First Bank

Great Plains Energy, Inc.

Eaton Corporation

First Citizens Bank

Greenheck Fan Corporation

eBay, Inc.

First Horizon National Corporation

Greif, Inc.

Echostar Corporation

First Solar, Inc.

Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Ecolab, Inc.

FirstEnergy Corporation

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company

Edison Mission Energy

Fiserv, Inc.

Group 1 Automotive, Inc.

Edward Jones & Company

Fleetwood Group

Grow Financial Federal Credit Union

Edwards Lifesciences

Flexcon Company, Inc.

Growmark, Inc.

Einstein Noah Restaurant Group

Flexible Steel Lacing Company

GTECH Corporation

El Paso Corporation

Florida Power & Light Company

GuideStone Financial Resources

Electrolux Homecare of North America

Flowers Foods, Inc.

Habitat for Humanity International

Eli Lilly & Company

Flowserve Corporation

Halliburton Company

Elizabeth Arden, Inc.

Fluor Corporation

Hancock Holdings Company

EMC Corporation

FMC Corporation

Hanesbrands, Inc.

EMCOR Group, Inc.

FMC Technologies, Inc.

Hannaford Bros. Company

Emerson Climate Technologies, Inc.

Follett Corporation

Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.

Emerson Electric

Foot Locker, Inc.

Hapag-Lloyd (America), Inc.

Enbridge Energy Partners LP

Ford Motor Company

Harley Davidson Motor Company

Energizer Holdings, Inc.

Fortune Brands

Harman International Industries

Energy Enterprise Solutions LLC

Fossil, Inc.

Harrahs Entertainment, Inc.

Energy Future Holdings

Foster Poultry Farms

Harris County Hospital District

Energy Transfer Equity LP

Foundation for California

Harsco Corporation

EnergySolutions, Inc.

Community Colleges

Hartford Financial Services

Enpro Industries (Fairbanks Morse Engine)

Franklin Resources, Inc.

Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates

Entergy Corporation

Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Harvey Industries

Enterprise GP Holdings LP

Freeman Dallas Corporate Office

Hasbro, Inc.

EOG Resources, Inc.

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc.

Hastings Mutual Insurance Company

EON US LLC

Fremont Group

Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.

Equifax, Inc.

Friendly Ice Cream Corporation

Haynes & Boone LLP

Equity Residential

Froedtert & Community Health

Hayward Industries, Inc.

Erickson Retirement Communities

Frontier Communications Corporation

Hazelden Foundation

Erie Insurance Group

Frontier Oil Corporation

HCA, Inc.

ESCO Corporation

Funeral Directors Life Insurance Company

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.

ESCO Technologies

G&K Services

HD Supply, Inc.

Esterline Technologies Corporation

Gallagher Arthur J & Company

HDR, Inc.

Etnyre International, Ltd.

Gannett Company

Health Care Service Corporation

Evraz, Inc.

Gap, Inc.

Health Management Association

Exel, Inc.

Gardner Denver, Inc.

Health Net

Exelon Corporation

Gas Technology Institute

Health Partners

Exempla Health Care, Inc.

Gaylord Entertainment

Health Plus of Michigan

Exide Technologies

General Cable Corporation

HealthNow New York

Expedia, Inc.

General Dynamics Corporation

HealthSouth Corporation

Express Scripts, Inc.

General Dynamics Information Technology

HealthSpring, Inc.

Exterran Holdings, Inc.

General Electric Company

Heartland Food Corporation

Extra Space Storage

General Nutrition, Inc.

Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.

Exxon Mobil Corporation

Genesis Energy

Heat Transfer Research, Inc.

FAIR Plan Insurance Placement

Gentiva Health Services

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

Facility of Pennsylvania

Genuine Parts Company

Hendrick Medical Center

Fairfield Manufacturing

Genworth Financial, Inc.

 

Sage SoftwareHendrickson International

Family Dollar Stores

 

Southwest GasGenzyme Corporation

Henry Ford Health System

Fannie Mae

Georg Fischer Signet LLC

Hercules Offshore

Farmland Foods, Inc.

Georgia Gulf Corporation

Herman Miller, Inc.

Fastenal Company

Georgia Institute of Technology

Hershey Company

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Gerdau Ameristeel

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

A-9




Proxy Statement


Hess Corporation

ITT Corporation

Legal & General America

Hewitt Associates, Inc.

ITT Industries – AES

Leggett & Platt, Inc.

Hewlett-Packard Company

J J Keller & Associates, Inc.

Lender Processing Services

Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.

J R Simplot Company

Lennar Corporation

High Industries, Inc.

J&J Worldwide Services

Lennox International, Inc.

Highmark, Inc.

J.C. Penney Company

Level 3 Communications, Inc.

Hill Phoenix

Jabil Circuit, Inc.

Levi Strauss & Company

Hilti, Inc.

Jack In The Box, Inc.

Lexmark International, Inc.

Hitachi America, Ltd.

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

Liberty Global, Inc.

HNI Corporation

Jacobs Technology, Inc.

Liberty Media Corporation

HNTB Corporation

James Hardie Building Products

Lieberman Research Worldwide

Holden Industries, Inc.

Jarden Corporation

Life Technologies Corporation

Holly Corporation

JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

Lifepoint Hospitals, Inc.

Hologic, Inc.

Jet Blue Airways

Limited Brands

Home Depot, Inc.

JM Family Enterprises

Lincare Holdings, Inc.

Home Shopping Network

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.

Honeywell International, Inc.

John Crane, Inc.

Lincoln National Corporation

Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Lithia Motors, Inc.

Hormel Foods Corporation

Johns Hopkins University

Littelfuse, Inc.

Hospira, Inc.

Johnson & Johnson

Little Lady Foods

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Johnson Controls, Inc.

Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

Hostess Brands

Johnson Financial Group

Liz Claiborne

Hot Topic, Inc.

Jones Apparel Group, Inc.

LKQ Corporation

Hubbell, Inc.

Jones Financial Companies LLLP

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.

Jones Lang LaSalle

Loews Corporation

Hu-Friedy Manufacturing Company, Inc.

Jostens, Inc.

Lorillard, Inc.

Humana, Inc.

Joy Global, Inc.

Los Angeles Unified School District

Hunter Industries

JPMorgan Chase & Company

Louisiana Pacific

Huntington Bancshares

Judicial Council of California

Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

Huntsman Corporation

Juniper Networks, Inc.

Lower Colorado River Authority

Huron Consulting Group

K Hovnanian Companies LLC

Lozier Corporation

Hutchinson Technology Incorporated

Kalsec, Inc.

LPL Investment Holdings, Inc.

Hyatt Hotels Corporation

Kansas Farm Bureau

LSG Sky Chefs

Hyundai Motor Manufacturing of Alabama

KAR Auction Services, Inc.

LSI Corporation

IAC/Interactivecorp

Katun Corporation

Lubrizol Corporation

Icahn Enterprises LP

KB Home

Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH

IDEX Corporation

KBR, Inc.

Luther Midelfort-Mayo Health System

IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.

Keihin North America

Lutron Electronics

IDT Corporation

Kellogg Company

Luxottica Retail

IKON Office Solutions

Kelly Services, Inc.

M & F Worldwide Corporation

Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

Kettering University

M & T Bank Corporation

Imation Corporation

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation

Macy’s, Inc.

IMS Health, Inc.

Keycorp

Magellan Health Services

Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance

Keystone Automotive Industries

Magna Seating Systems Engineering

Inergy Holdings LP

Keystone Foods Corporation

Malco Products, Inc.

Information Management Service

KI, Inc.

Malt-O-Meal

Ingersoll Rand

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Manitowoc Company

Ingles Markets, Inc.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

MANN+HUMMEL USA, Inc.

Ingram Industries, Inc.

Kinder Morgan Energy

Manpower International, Inc.

Ingram Micro, Inc.

Kindred Healthcare

Manpower, Inc.

Insight Enterprises, Inc.

Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

ManTech International

In-Sink-Erator

King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

MAPFRE USA, Corporation

Institute for Defense Analyses

Kingston Technology

Marathon Oil Corporation

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations

Klein Tools

Maricopa County Office of

Insurance Auto Auctions

Kohler Company

Management & Budget

Integrys Energy Group, Inc.

Kohls Corporation

Maricopa Integrated Health System

Intel Corporation

Komatsu America Corporation

Maritz, Inc.

Interbake Foods, Inc.

Kraft Foods, Inc.

Markel Corporation

InterMetro Industries Corporation

L. L. Bean, Inc.

Market Planning Solutions, Inc.

International Assets Holding Company

L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.

Marriott International, Inc.

International Business Machines Corporation

L-3 Communications, Global Security &

Mars North America

International Dairy Queen, Inc.

Engineering Solutions

Marsh & McLennan Companies

International Flavors & Fragrances

La Macchia Enterprises

Marshall & Ilsley Corporation

International Game Technology

Lab Volt Systems

Marshfield Clinic

International Paper Company

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

MARTA

Interpublic Group of Companies

Laclede Group, Inc.

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Intertape Polymer Group

Lake Federal Bank

Mary Kay, Inc.

Intuit, Inc.

Lake Forest Academy

Maryland Department of Transportation

Invacare Corporation

Lake Region Medical

Masco Corporation

Invensys Controls

Lance, Inc.

Massey Energy Company

Iron Mountain Canada Corporation

Landstar System, Inc.

MasTec, Inc.

The Irvine Company

Lantech.com

Master Halco

Ithaca College

Las Vegas Sands Corporation

Mattel, Inc.

Itochu International, Inc.

Leap Wireless International, Inc.

Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

Itron, Inc.

Lear Corporation

Mayo Clinic


A-10

MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement


McAfee, Inc.

Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc.

Packaging Corporation of America

McCormick & Company, Inc.

Navistar International Corporation

Pactiv Corporation

McDonald’s Corporation

Navy Exchange Service Command

Pall Corporation

MCG Health, Inc.

NBTY, Inc.

The Pampered Chef

McGraw-Hill Companies

NCCI Holdings, Inc.

Panduit Corporation

McKesson Medical-Surgical

NCR Corporation

Pantry, Inc.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. (WBI Holdings)

Nebraska Public Power District

Papa John’s International

MeadWestvaco Corporation

Neiman Marcus

Parsons Child & Family Center

Mecklenburg County

Netflix, Inc.

Patterson Companies, Inc.

Medco Health Solutions, Inc.

New Jersey Resources Corporation

PC Connection, Inc.

Media General, Inc.

New York Times Company

Peabody Energy Corporation

Medline Industries

Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.

Pearson Education

Men’s Wearhouse, Inc.

Newmont Mining Corporation

Penn National Gaming, Inc.

Mercer University

NewPage Corporation

Penn State Hershey Medical Center

Merck & Company

Nicor Gas

Penske Automotive Group, Inc.

Mercury General Corporation

Nicor, Inc.

Pentair, Inc.

Merit Medical Systems

The Nielsen Company

Pep Boys–Manny Moe & Jack

MeritCare Health System

NII Holdings, Inc.

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

Merrill Corporation

NiSource Corporate Services

Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.

The Methodist Hospital

Nissin Foods (USA) Company, Inc.

PepsiCo, Inc.

MetroPCS Communications, Inc.

NJM Insurance Group

Perkinelmer, Inc.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Noble Energy, Inc.

Petsmart, Inc.

Metropolitan Transit Authority

The Nordam Group

Pfizer, Inc.

Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.

Nordson Corporation

PG&E Corporation

MFS Investment Management

Nordstrom

Pharmavite LLC

MGIC Investment Corporation

Nordstrom, Inc.

Pharmerica Corporation

MGM Mirage

Norfolk Southern Corporation

PHH Arval

Miami Children’s Hospital

North Carolina State Employees’ Credit Union

PHH Corporation

Miami Dade Community College

North Texas Tollway Authority

PHI, Inc.

Michael Baker Corporation

Northeast Utilities

Philip Morris International, Inc.

Michael Foods, Inc.

Northern Trust Corporation

Phillips – Van Heusen Corporation

Michaels Stores, Inc.

Northrop Grumman Corporation

Phoenix Companies, Inc.

Micron Technology, Inc.

Northwestern Mutual

Picerne Military Housing

Midwest Research Institute

NovaMed Corporation

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.

Mike Albert Leasing, Inc.

NRG Energy, Inc.

Pier 1 Imports

Millennium Inorganic Chemicals

NRUCFC

Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation

Mine Safety Appliances Company

Nstar

Pinnacle Airlines

Minnesota Management & Budget

Nucor Corporation

Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC

Mirant Corporation

NuStar Energy LP

Pinnacle West Capital Corporation

Mission Foods

NV Energy, Inc.

Pinnacol Assurance

Missouri Department of Conservation

NVIDIA Corporation

Pioneer Natural Resources Company

Missouri Department of Transportation

NVR, Inc.

Pitney Bowes, Inc.

Mitsubishi International Corporation

NYSE Euronext

Plains All American Pipeline LP

Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing

O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.

Plexus Corporation

MMS Consultants, Inc.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

PM Company

Mohawk Industries

Oceaneering International

PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

Mohegan Sun Casino

Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA, Inc.

PNM Resources, Inc.

Molex, Inc.

Office Depot, Inc.

Polaris Industries, Inc.

Molina Health Care, Inc.

OfficeMax

Polymer Technologies

Molson Coors Brewing Company

OGE Energy Corporation

Polyone Corporation

Momentive Performance Materials, Inc.

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Popular, Inc.

Monsanto Company

Ohio State University

Port Authority of Allegheny County

Moody’s Corporation

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Port of Portland

Moog, Inc.

Ohio University

Portland General Electric Company

Morgan Stanley

OHL

Poudre Valley Health Systems

Motorola, Inc.

Oil States International, Inc.

PPG Industries, Inc.

MTA Long Island Bus

Oil-Dri Corporation of America

PPL Corporation

MTD Products, Inc.

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative

Praxair, Inc.

MTS System Corporation

Old Republic Companies

Preformed Line Products Company

Mueller Industries, Inc.

Omnicare, Inc.

Premera Blue Cross

Murphy Oil Corporation

Omnicom Group

Priceline.com, Inc.

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company

Omnova Solutions, Inc.

Pride International, Inc.

Mutual of Omaha

ON Semiconductor Corporation

Prince William Health System

Mylan, Inc.

ONEOK, Inc.

Principal Financial Group, Inc.

NACCO Industries, Inc.

The Oppenheimer Group

Probuild Holdings, Inc.

Nalco Holding Company

Orange County Government

Progress Energy, Inc.

NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

Orbital Science Corporation

Progressive Corporation

Nash Finch Company

Oregon State Lottery

Project Management Institute

National Academies

Oshkosh Corporation

Property Casualty Insurers Association

National Fuel Gas Company

Owens & Minor, Inc.

of America

National Futures Association

Owens Corning

Protective Life Corporation

National Interstate Insurance Company

Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Prudential Financial, Inc.

National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

Oxford Industries

Psion Teklogix, Inc.

National Safety Council

PACCAR, Inc.

Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.

National Tobacco Company

Pacer International, Inc.

Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.


MDU Resources Group, Inc. Proxy Statement

A-11




Proxy Statement


Public Storage

 

SAIC, Inc.

 

Southwestern EnergySonoco Products Company

Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.

Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers

Sovereign Bank

Public Storage

Saks Incorporated

Space Telescope Science Institute

Public Utility District #1 of Chelan County

 

Sakura Finetek USA,Saks, Inc.

 

Sparrow Health SystemSource Interlink Companies, Inc.

Publix Super Markets, Inc.

 

Salk InstituteSakura Finetek USA, Inc.

 

Spectra Energy CorporationSouth Jersey Gas Company

Puget Energy, Inc.

 

Sally Beauty CompanySalk Institute

 

Spectrum Brands,Southco, Inc.

Pulte Homes,Pultegroup, Inc.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

Southeastern Freight Lines

QSC Audio Products, Inc.

 

Salt River Project

 

Spectrum Health – DowntownSouthern Company

QBE Regional InsuranceQTI Human Resources

 

Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation

 

Spherion CorporationSouthern Poverty Law Center

Qdoba Restaurant CorporationQualcomm, Inc.

 

San Antonio Water System

 

Springs Global US, Inc.Southern Union Company

QTI Human ResourcesQuality Bicycle Products

 

San Manuel Band of Mission Indians

 

Springs Window Fashions DivisionSouthwest Airlines

Qualcomm,Quanta Services, Inc.

 

Sanderson Farms, Inc.

 

Sprint NextelSouthwest Gas Corporation

Quality Bicycle ProductsQuest Diagnostics Incorporated

 

SanDiskSandisk Corporation

 

SPX Corporation

Quanta Services, Inc.

Sandoz, Inc.

SRA International, Inc.

Quest Diagnostics, Inc.

Sanmina-SCI Corporation

St. Cloud HospitalSouthwestern Energy Company

Questar Corporation

 

Sargent Fletcher, Inc.Sanmina-Sci Corporation

 

St. Jude Medical, Inc.Space Dynamics Lab

Quiksilver, Inc.

 

SAS Institute, Inc.

 

St. Louis County GovernmentSpace Telescope Science Institute

Quorum Health ResourcesQwest Communications International, Inc.

 

Sauer-Danfoss, Inc.

 

St. Mary’s at AmsterdamSpectra Energy Corporation

Qwest Communications International, Inc.R L I Insurance Company

 

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC

 

Stamats Communications, Inc.

R H Donnelly

SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services

Stampin’ Up!

R L I Insurance Company

SCANA Corporation

StanCorp Financial Group,Spectrum Brands, Inc.

R L Polk & Company

 

ScanSource,Save Mart

Spectrum Group International, Inc.

Radio One

SCANA Corporation

Spectrum Health – Downtown

Radioshack Corporation

Scansource, Inc.

 

Standard Aero LimitedSprint Nextel Corporation

RackspaceRalcorp Holdings, Inc.

SCF Arizona

SPX Corporation

The Raymond Corporation

 

Schaumburg Township District Library

 

Standard Motor Products, Inc.St. Cloud Hospital

Radian Group,Raymond James Financial

Schein Henry, Inc.

 

Schering-Plough Corporation

Standard Pacific HomesSt. John Health System

Radio OneRaytheon Company

 

Schneider Electric

 

The Stanley WorksSt. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

Radio ShackREA Magnet Wire Company, Inc.

Schneider National, Inc.

St. Jude Medical, Inc.

Realogy Corporation

 

Schnitzer Steel Industries Inc.

 

Staples, Inc.St. Louis County Government

Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.

Schreiber Foods, Inc.

Starbucks Corporation

The Raymond CorporationRecology

 

Schwan Food Company

 

Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.St. Luke’s Episcopal Health System

Raymond James Financial, Inc.

Scottrade, Inc.

State Corporation Commission

RaytheonRed Wing Shoe Company

 

Scientific Research Corporation

St. Mary’s at Amsterdam

Redcats USA

The Scooter Store

St. Vincent Hospital

Regal Entertainment Group

Scott & White Hospital

Stampin’ Up!

Regal-Beloit

Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

 

State Employee Credit UnionStancorp Financial Group, Inc.

Reading Hospital & Medical CenterThe Regence Group

Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc.

Standard Motor Products, Inc.

Regency Centers Corporation

 

Seaboard Corporation

 

State of MinnesotaStanley Black & Decker, Inc.

RealogyRegions Financial Corporation

Seacoast National Bank

Staples, Inc.

Reinsurance Group of America

Seacor Holdings, Inc.

Starbucks Corporation

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company

 

Sealed Air Corporation

 

State Personnel AdministrationStarwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide

Regal Entertainment GroupRemington Arms Company, Inc.

 

Sealy, Inc.

 

State Street Corporation Commission

Regal-BeloitRenaissance Learning, Inc.

Seaman Corporation

 

State of Oregon

Renown Health

Sears Holdings Corporation

State Personnel Administration

Rent-A-Center, Inc.

Seco Tools, Inc.

State Street Corporation

Republic Services, Inc.

Select Medical Holdings Corporation

 

Stater Bros. Holdings, Inc.

The Regence GroupRes-Care, Inc.

 

Seco Tools,Selective Insurance Group, Inc.

 

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

Regency Centers Corporation

Securitas Security Services USA

Steelcase,Rexel, Inc.

Regions Financial Corporation

Securus Technologies, Inc.

Stepan Company

Reliance Steel & Aluminum

Self Regional Healthcare

Stericycle, Inc.

Reliant Energy

 

SEMCO Energy

 

Sterilite CorporationSteel Technologies-Corporate

Remington Arms Company,Reynolds American, Inc.

SemGroup Corporation

Steelcase, Inc.

Rice University

 

Sempra Energy

 

STERISStepan Company

Remy International, Inc.

Senco Products, Inc.

Sterling Bank

Renaissance Learning,RiceTec, Inc.

 

Sentara Healthcare

 

Stinger Ghaffarian TechnologiesSterilite Corporation

Rent-A-Center, Inc.Rich Products Corporation

 

Sentry Group

 

Stonyfield Farm, Inc.STERIS

Republic Services,Richco

Sentry Insurance

Sterling Bank

Ricoh Electronics, Inc.

 

Serco, Inc.

 

Storck USA LPStewart & Stevenson

Rewards NetworkRite – Hite Holding Corporation

 

Service Corporation International

 

Structural Associates, Inc.Stewart Information Services

Rexel, Inc.Robert Bosch LLC

 

The ServiceMaster Company

 

Stryker CorporationStonyfield Farm, Inc.

Reynolds American, Inc.Robert Bosch Tool Corporation

 

Seventh Generation

Stryker Corporation

Robert Half International, Inc.

SFN Group, Inc.

 

Subuaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc.

RiceTec, Inc.Roche Diagnostics

 

Shands HealthCare

 

Sulzer Pumps US, Inc.

Rich Products CorporationRock-Tenn Company

 

Sharp Electronics Corporation

 

Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.

RichcoRockwell Automation

 

The Shaw Group, Inc.

 

Sundt CompaniesSun Microsystems, Inc.

Ricoh Electronics,Rockwell Collins, Inc.

 

Sherwin-Williams Company

 

SunGard Data Systems, Inc.Suncoast Schools Federal Credit Union

Rite-Hite CorporationRockwood Holdings, Inc.

 

Sigma Aldrich

 

Sungard Data Systems, Inc.

Rollins, Inc.

Sigma-Aldrich Corporation

Sunoco, Inc.

Rite Aid CorporationRoper Industries

 

Silgan Holdings, Inc.

 

Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.

Robert Half International,Roper Industries, Inc.

Simmons Bedding Company

Sunstar Americas

Ross Stores, Inc.

 

Simon Property Group, Inc.

 

SunTrustSuntrust Banks, Inc.

Roche Diagnostics

Simpson Housing LLLP

Superior Energy Services,Rowan Companies, Inc.

Rock-Tenn Company

 

Sirius Computer Solutions, Ltd.XM Radio, Inc.

 

SUPERVALU,Supermedia, Inc.

Rockwell AutomationRoyal Bank of Canada

Sitel

SuperValue

Royal Caribbean Cruise Line

 

SJE-Rhombus

SureWest Communications Company

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

SkyWest, Inc.

 

Susser Holdings Corporation

Rockwood Holdings,RR Donnelley & Sons Company

Skywest, Inc.

Sutter Health

RRI Energy

 

SLM Corporation

 

Swiss Reinsurance

RSC Equipment Rental

Smead Manufacturing Company

Sykes Enterprises

Rollins, Inc.

Smith International, Inc.

SYNNEX Corporation

Roper IndustriesRSM McGladrey

 

SMSC Gaming Enterprise

 

SynovateSymetra Financial Corporation

Roper Industries, Inc.Ruddick Corporation

 

Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation

 

SYNNEX Corporation

Ryder System, Inc.

Snap-On, Inc.

Synovate

The Ryland Group

Snyder’s of Hanover

Synovus Financial Corporation

Ross Stores, Inc.S&C Electric Company

 

Snap-on IncorporatedSolae LLC

 

Synthes

Roundy’s,Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.

Sole Technology, Inc.

SYSCO Corporation

Safeway, Inc.

 

Solo Cup Company

 

SYSCO CorporationSystemax, Inc.

Rowan Companies, Inc.Safilo USA

 

Solutia, Inc.

 

Systemax, Inc.

RR Donnelley & Sons Company

Somerset Medical Center

T. Rowe Price Group Inc.

RSC Holdings, Inc.SAGE Publications

 

Sonic Automotive, Inc.

 

Targa Resources Inc.

Ruddick Corporation

Sonoco Products Company

Target Corporation

Rutgers University

South Jersey Gas Company

Tastefully Simple

Ryder System, Inc.

Southeastern Freight Lines

The Taubman Company

The Ryland Group, Inc.

The Southern Company

Taylor Corporation

S&C Electric Company

Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance

TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation

SAC Federal Credit Union

Southern Poverty Law Center

TDS Telecom CorporationPartners LP


 

 

 

A-12

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement


 

 

 

 

 

Target Corporation

Unilife Corporation

Virgin Media, Inc.

Tastefully Simple

Union Pacific Corporation

Visa, Inc.

The Taubman Company

Unisys Corporation

Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.

Taylor Corporation

United HealthCare Group

Visiting Nurse Association of the Inland

TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation

United Natural Foods, Inc.

Counties

TDS Telecom Corporation

United Parcel Service, Inc.

Visiting Nurse Service of New York

Team Health Holdings, Inc.

United Refining Company

Visteon Corporation

Tech Data Corporation

 

Universal Health Services,United Rentals, Inc.

 

Wake County GovernmentVolvo Group North America

TECO Energy, Inc.

United States Steel Corporation

Vornado Realty Trust

Tecolote Research, Inc.

United Stationers, Inc.

Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.

TelAlaska, Inc.

United Technologies Corporation

Vulcan Materials Company

Tele-Consultants, Inc.

United Way for Southeastern Michigan

W C Bradley Company

Teledyne Technologies, Inc.

Unitrin, Inc.

W R Grace & Company

Teleflex

Universal American Corporation

W.R. Berkley Corporation

Telephone & Data Systems, Inc.

Universal Forest Prods, Inc.

W.W. Grainger, Inc.

Tellabs Operations, Inc.

Universal Health Services

Wackenhut Services, Inc.

Temple-Inland, Inc.

 

Universal Orlando

 

Waldrop, Inc.Wake County Government

Tecolote Research,Tenaris, Inc.

University Health System

Walgreen Company

Tele-Consultants, Inc.

University of Akron

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Teledyne Technologies Incorporated

 

University of Alabama at Birmingham

 

The Walt DisneyWalgreen Company

TeleflexTenet Healthcare Corporation

 

University of California at BerkeleyArkansas for Medical Science

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Tenneco, Inc.

 

The Warnaco Group, Inc.

Telephone & Data Systems, Inc.

University of Chicago

 

Warner Music Group CorporationWalt Disney Company

TeletechTeradata Corporation

 

University of Georgia

 

The Washington Post CompanyWalter Energy

Tellabs,Terex Corporation

University of Houston

Warnaco Group, Inc.

Terra Industries, Inc.

 

University of Kansas Hospital

 

Washington University in St. LouisWarner Music Group Corporation

Temple-Inland, Inc.Tescom Corporation

 

University of Louisville

 

Waste Management, Inc.Washington Post

Tenet HealthcareTesoro Corporation

University of Maryland Medical Center

Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

Tetra Tech, Inc.

University of Miami

Washington University in St. Louis

Texas County & District Retirement System

 

University of Michigan

 

Watson Pharmaceuticals,Waste Industries, Inc.

Tenneco,Texas Industries, Inc.

 

University of Minnesota

 

Wayne Memorial HospitalWaste Management, Inc.

Teradata CorporationTexas Instruments, Inc.

 

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Weir Slurry GroupWatsco, Inc.

Terex CorporationTexas Mutual Insurance Company

 

University of Notre Dame

 

Weis Markets,Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Tesoro CorporationTextron, Inc.

University of Pennsylvania

Wawa, Inc.

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

 

University of Rochester

 

Wayne Memorial Hospital

Thomas & Betts Corporation

University of South Florida

Wellcare Health Plans

Texas County & District Retirement SystemTI Group Automotive Systems LLC

 

University of St. Thomas

 

Wellmark BlueCross BlueShield

Texas Industries, Inc.Tiffany & Co.

 

University of Texas at Austin

 

WellPoint,Wellpoint, Inc.

Texas Instruments IncorporatedThe Timberland Company

 

University of Texas Southwestern Medical

Wells Fargo & Company

Textron, Inc.

Health Science Center

Wells’ Dairy, Inc.

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

University of Virginia

 

Wendy’s/Arby’s Group, Inc.

Thomas & Betts CorporationTime Warner Cable

The University of Texas M.D. Anderson

Werner Company

Time Warner, Inc.

Cancer Center

Werner Enterprises, Inc.

TIMET

University of Texas Southwestern

WESCO International, Inc.

Timken Company

Medical Center

West Penn Allegheny Health System

TJX Companies, Inc.

 

University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation

 

Werner CompanyWest Pharmaceutical Services

Thomas Jefferson University HospitalToll Brothers, Inc.

 

University Physicians, Inc.

 

Werner Enterprises,West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.

Thomson, Inc.

Univision Communications, Inc.

WESCO International, Inc.

Thor Industries, Inc.Torchmark Corporation

 

Unum Group

 

West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanyWestar Energy, Inc.

Tiffany &The Toro Company

 

UPS

 

West Penn Allegheny Health SystemWestern Refining, Inc.

Time Warner CableToys R Us, Inc.

 

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

 

West Virginia University HospitalsWestern Southern Financial Group

Time Warner, Inc.Tractor Supply Company

 

URS Corporation

 

Westar Energy, Inc.Western Textile Companies

TIMETTravelcenters of America LLC

 

US Airways Group, Inc.

 

Western Refining, Inc.Union Company

The Timken CompanyTravelers Companies, Inc.

US Bancorp

Westfield Group

Travis County

 

US Foodservices

 

Western Southern Financial GroupWestlake Chemical Corporation

TJX Companies,Treasure Island Resort & Casino

US Oncology Holdings, Inc.

 

US Steel Corporation

Western Textile CompaniesWeston Solutions, Inc.

Toll Brothers,Tremco, Inc.

 

USAA

 

Western UnionWeyerhaeuser Company

Torchmark CorporationTribune Company

USEC, Inc.

WGL Holdings, Inc.

Tri-Met

 

USG Corporation

 

Westlake Chemical CorporationWheaton Franciscan Healthcare

The Toro Company

Utah Retirement Systems

Weston Solutions, Inc.

Total Mechanical, Inc.Trinity Health

 

Utah Transit Authority

 

Weyerhaeuser CompanyWheels, Inc.

Toys “R” Us, Inc.Trinity Industries

 

Utica National Insurance

 

WGL Holdings, Inc.Whirlpool Corporation

Tractor Supply Company

V S ETriple-S Management Corporation

Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare

TransUnion

 

Vail Resorts Inc.Management Company

 

Whirlpool CorporationWhole Foods Market, Inc.

Travel Guard – AIGTriwest Healthcare Alliance

 

Valassis Communications, Inc.

 

Whole Foods Market, Inc.Wilbur Smith Associates

TravelCenters of America LLCTruckPro, Inc.

 

Valero Energy Corporation

 

The Wilder Foundation

The Travelers Companies,True Value Company

Valhi, Inc.

 

VALHI,Williams Companies, Inc.

William Rainey Harper College

Travis CountyTRW Automotive Holdings Corporation

 

Valmont Industries, Inc.

 

Williams Companies,Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

Treasure Island Resort & CasinoTSYS

 

Van Andel Institute

 

Williams-SonomaWilmer Hale

Tredegar Industries, Inc.Tufts Health Plan

 

Vangent, Inc.

 

Wilmer HaleWilsonart International

Tribune CompanyTupperware Corporation

 

Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

 

Windstream Communications

Tri-MetTurner Broadcasting System, Inc.

 

Vectren Corporation

 

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

Trinity Consultants, Inc.Tutor Perini Corporation

 

Venetian Resort-Hotel-Casino

 

Winpak Portion Packaging, Ltd.

Trinity Industries, Inc.Tyco Electronics

 

Ventura Foods LLC

 

Wisconsin Energy Corporation

Triwest Healthcare AllianceTyson Foods, Inc.

 

Venturedyne, Ltd.

 

WMSWisconsin Physicians Service

True Value CompanyUAL Corporation

 

Verde Realty

 

World Fuel ServicesInsurance Corporation

TRW Automotive Holdings CorporationUDR

 

Verizon Communications, Inc.

 

Wolverine World Vision InternationalWide, Inc.

TSYS

Verso PaperUGI Corporation

 

World Vision United States

Tufts Health PlanVermeer Manufacturing Company

 

Vesuvius USA

Worley ParsonsWorld Fuel Services Corporation

Tupperware CorporationUMB Bank NA

 

VF Corporation

 

The Wornick CompanyWorld Vision International

Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.UMDNJ-University of Medicine & Dentistry

 

Via Christi Regional Medical Center

 

Worthington Industries

Tyco ElectronicsUnderwriters Laboratories, Inc.

 

Viacom, Inc.

 

Wyle Laboratories

Tyson Foods,Unified Grocers, Inc.

Viad Corporation

Wyndham Worldwide Corporation

U.S. Bancorp

 

Viant Health Payment Solutions

 

Wynn Resorts, LimitedWyndham Worldwide Corporation

UAL Corporation

Viasystems Group, Inc.

Xcel Energy, Inc.

UGI CorporationUnified Personnel System

 

Viejas Enterprise

 

Xerox Corporation

UMB Bank NA

Virgin Media, Inc.

XTO Energy, Inc.

UMDNJ-University of Medicine & Dentistry

Visa, Inc.

Yahoo!, Inc.

Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.

Vishay Intertechnology

Yale University

Unified Grocers, Inc.

Visteon Corporation

Yamaha Motor Corporation USA

Union Pacific Corporation

Volt Information Sciences, Inc.

Yankee Candle Company

Unisys Corporation

Volvo Group North America

YKK Corporation of America

United HealthCare Group

Vornado Realty Trust

YRC Worldwide, Inc.

United Natural Foods, Inc.

Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.

YSI

United Refining Company

Vulcan Materials Company

Yum! Brands, Inc.

United Rentals, Inc.

VWR International

Zale Corporation

United Stationers, Inc.

W C Bradley Company

Zappos.com

United Technologies Corporation

W R Grace & Company

Zebra Technologies Corporation

UnitedHealth Group, Inc.

W W Grainger, Inc.

Zimmer Holdings, Inc.

Unitrin, Inc.

W.R. Berkley Corporation

Zions Bancorporation

Universal American Corporation

WABCO Holdings, Inc.

Zurich North America

Universal Forest Products, Inc.

Wackenhut Services, Inc.

Wynn Resorts, Ltd.


 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

A-13




 

Proxy Statement


 

Xcel Energy, Inc.

Xerox Corporation

Yahoo, Inc.

Yamaha Corporation of America

Yankee Candle Company

YKK Corporation of America

YSI

Yum Brands, Inc.

Zale Corporation

Zeon Chemicals LP

Zimmer, Inc.

Zions Bancorporation

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)


 

 

 

 

A-14

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




 

Proxy Statement


 

EXHIBITEXHIBIT B

 

Companies Surveyed using Equilar, Inc.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. – President & Chief Executive Officer

Competitive Analysis Measuring Long-Term Incentiveto Determine Base Salary, Target Annual Cash Compensation,
and Target Total Direct Compensation


Compensation and Supplemental Income Security Plan Benefits

 

AGL Resources Inc.

Allegheny
Alliant Energy Inc.

Amer. Water Works Co., Inc.

Armstrong World Ind., Inc.

Corp.
Ameren Corp.
ARC Resources Ltd.
Atmos Energy Corp.

BJ Services
Avista Corp.
Berry Petroleum Co.

Bucyrus International Inc.

Cameron International
Black Hills Corp.

Centex Corp.


Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.


Cimarex Energy Co.
CMS Energy Corp.

CVR Energy
Comfort Systems USA Inc.

Delek US Holdings,
Compass Minerals International Inc.


Complete Production Services, Inc.
Comstock Resources Inc.
DCP Midstream Partners, LP
Denbury Resources Inc.
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.

Dynegy
DPL Inc.


El Paso Corp.


EMCOR Group, Inc.
Energen Corp.
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.


Enerplus Corp.
Ensco plc
EOG Resources, Inc.

FMC Technologies
EQT Corp.
Foster Wheeler AG
Granite Construction Inc.

Global
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Integrys Energy Group, Inc.
Key Energy Services Inc.
Laclede Group, Inc.
Layne Christenson Co.
MarkWest Energy Partners, LP

Hawaiian Electric Ind.,L.P.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Holly Corp.

Lennar Corp.

McDermott International
MasTec, Inc.

Mirant Corp.


Nabors Industries Ltd.


National Fuel Gas Co.
New Jersey Resources Corp.


Newfield Exploration Co.
Nexen Inc.


Nicor Inc.


NiSource Inc.
Noble Corp.


Noble Energy Inc.

Northeast Utilities

Nustar Energy L.P.


Northwest Natural Gas Co.
NorthWestern Corp.
NV Energy Inc.

NVR
Oceaneering International Inc.

Oil States
Patterson UTI Energy Inc.
Pengrowth Energy Corp.
Penn West Petroleum Ltd.
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
Petrohawk Energy Corp.
Piedmont Natural Gas Co. Inc.
Pike Electric Corp.
Pioneer Natural Resources Co.
Plains Exploration & Production Co.
Precision Drilling Corp.
Pride International Inc.

Owens Corning

Patriot CoalQEP Resources, Inc.
Quanta Services, Inc.
Questar Corp.

Pinnacle West Capital
Range Resources Corp.

Puget
Regency Energy Partners LP
Rowan Companies Inc.

Pulte Homes
RPC Inc.

RPM International Inc.


SCANA Corp.
SM Energy Co.
Southern Union Co.


Southwest Gas Corp.
Southwestern Energy Co.


Spectra Energy Corp.

Sunoco Logistics
Sterling Construction Co. Inc.
Superior Energy Services Inc.
Swift Energy Co.
Talisman Energy Inc.
Targa Resources Partners L.P.

TecoLP
Texas Industries Inc.
TransCanada Corp.
UGI Corp.
USEC Inc.
Vectren Corp.
Vulcan Materials Co.
Westar Energy Inc.

Transalta Corp.

Tutor Perini Corp.

UGI Corp.

USG Corp.

Valspar Corp.

Watsco Inc.


WGL Holdings, Inc.
Whiting Petroleum Corp.
Willbros Group, Inc.
Wisconsin Energy Corp.

Companies Surveyed using
Equilar, Inc.
MDU Resources Group, Inc. –
Vice President & Chief
Financial Officer
Competitive Analysis to
Determine Base Salary,
Target Annual Cash
Compensation, and Target Total
Direct Compensation

Alliant Energy Corp.
Ameren Corp.
ARC Resources Ltd.
Atmos Energy Corp.
Avista Corp.
Berry Petroleum Co.
BJ Services Co.
Black Hills Corp.
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.
Cimarex Energy Co.
CMS Energy Corp.
Comfort Systems USA Inc.
Compass Minerals International Inc.
Complete Production Services, Inc.
Comstock Resources Inc.
Denbury Resources Inc.
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
DPL Inc.

EMCOR Group, Inc.
Enerplus Corp.
Ensco plc
EOG Resources, Inc.
EQT Corp.
Foster Wheeler AG
Granite Construction Inc.
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Integrys Energy Group, Inc.
Key Energy Services Inc.
Layne Christenson Co.
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
MasTec, Inc.
Nabors Industries Ltd.
National Fuel Gas Co.
Newfield Exploration Co.
Nexen Inc.
NiSource Inc.
Noble Corp.
Noble Energy Inc.
Northwest Natural Gas Co.
NorthWestern Corp.
NV Energy Inc.
Oceaneering International Inc.
Patterson UTI Energy Inc.
Pengrowth Energy Corp.
Penn West Petroleum Ltd.
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
Petrohawk Energy Corp.
Pike Electric Corp.
Pioneer Natural Resources Co.
Plains Exploration & Production Co.
Precision Drilling Corp
Pride International Inc.
QEP Resources, Inc.
Quanta Services, Inc.
Questar Corp.
Range Resources Corp.
Regency Energy Partners LP
Rowan Companies Inc.
RPC Inc.
SCANA Corp.
SM Energy Co.
Southern Union Co.
Southwest Gas Corp.
Southwestern Energy Co.
Sterling Construction Co. Inc.
Superior Energy Services Inc.
Swift Energy Co.
Talisman Energy Inc.
Texas Industries Inc.
UGI Corp.
USEC Inc.
Vectren Corp.
Vulcan Materials Co.
Westar Energy Inc.
Whiting Petroleum Corp.
Willbros Group, Inc.
Wisconsin Energy Corp.


 

 

 

 

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

B-1




Proxy Statement

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

B-2

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement




Proxy Statement

EXHIBIT C

Companies Surveyed using Equilar, Inc. –

Fidelity Exploration & Production Company – Chief Executive Officer

Competitive Analysis Measuring Base Salary, Target Annual Cash

Compensation, and Target Total Direct Compensation

ATP Oil & Gas Corp

Atwood Oceanics Inc

Berry Petroleum Co

Bill Barrett Corp

Clayton Williams Energy Inc

CNX Gas Corp

Comstock Resources Inc

Concho Resources Inc

Continental Resources Inc

Eagle Rock Energy Partners L P

Encore Acquisition Co

Energy XXI (Bermuda) Ltd

Exco Resources Inc

Forest Oil Corp

Geokinetics Inc

Global Geophysical Services Inc

Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.

Hercules Offshore, Inc.

Ion Geophysical Corp

Linn Energy, LLC

Markwest Energy Partners L P

McMoran Exploration Co

Parker Drilling Co

Patterson Uti Energy Inc

Penn Virginia Corp

Pioneer Drilling Co

Quicksilver Resources Inc

Rosetta Resources Inc

Sandridge Energy Inc

St Mary Land & Exploration Co

Stone Energy Corp

Swift Energy Co

Ultra Petroleum Corp

Unit Corp
Venoco, Inc.

W&T Offshore Inc.


MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement

C-1




 

Proxy Statement


 

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)Companies Surveyed using Equilar, Inc.

Exploration and Production Segment – President & Chief Executive Officer

Competitive Analysis to Determine Base Salary, Target Annual Cash Compensation,
and Target Total Direct Compensation

Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd.

ATP Oil & Gas Corp.

Atwood Oceanics Inc.

Berry Petroleum Co.

Bill Barrett

BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P.

Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.

Comstock Resources Inc

Continental Resources Inc.

Eagle Rock Energy Partners L.P.

Energy XXI (Bermuda) Ltd.

EQT Corp.

EXCO Resources Inc.

Geokinetics Inc.

Global Geophysical Services Inc.

Gran Tierra Energy Inc.

Hercules Offshore, Inc.

Ion Geophysical

Linn Energy, LLC

Parker Drilling Co.

Penn Virginia Corp.

Petroleum Development Corp.

Pioneer Drilling Co.

Rosetta Resources Inc.

SM Energy Co.

Stone Energy Corp.

Swift Energy Co.

Vantage Drilling Co.

Venoco, Inc.

W&T Offshore Inc.

Whiting Petroleum Corp.

Companies Surveyed using Equilar, Inc.

Pipeline and Energy Services Segment – President & Chief Executive Officer

Competitive Analysis to Determine Base Salary, Target Annual Cash Compensation,

and Target Total Direct Compensation

Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.

Basic Energy Services, Inc.

Cal Dive International, Inc.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation

Copano Energy, L.L.C.

Core Laboratories Inc.

Delta Natural Gas Company, Inc.

Dune Energy, Inc.

Global Industries, Ltd.

National Fuel Gas Co.

Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

Northwest Natural Gas Co.

Questar Corp.

RGC Resources, Inc.

South Jersey Industries, Inc.

Southern Union Co.

Western Gas Partners, LP


 

 

 

C-2B-2

MDU Resources Group, Inc.Proxy Statement



(This page has been left blank intentionally.)


(This page has been left blank intentionally.)


 

MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.

 

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

23, 2013
11:00 a.m. Central Daylight Saving Time



909 Airport Road


Bismarck, ND

 

 

 

 

 

1200 West Century Avenue

proxy

Mailing Address:


P.O. Box 5650

Bismarck, ND 58506-5650


(701) 530-1000

 proxy

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 24, 2012.23, 2013.

This proxy will also be used to provide voting instructions to New York Life Trust Company, as Trustee of the MDU Resources Group, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan, for any shares of Company common stock held in the plan.

The undersigned hereby appoints Harry J. Pearce and Paul K. Sandness and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote all Common Stock of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 11:00 a.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, April 24, 2012,23, 2013, at 909 Airport Road, Bismarck, ND, and at any adjournment(s) thereof, upon all subjects that may properly come before the meeting, including the matters described in the Proxy Statement furnished herewith, subject to any directions indicated on the reverse side.Your vote is important! Ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting.Either (1) submit your proxy by touch-tone telephone, (2) submit your proxy by Internet, or (3) mark, date, sign, and return this proxy card in the envelope provided (no postage is necessary if mailed in the United States).If no directions are given, the proxies will vote in accordance with the Directors’ recommendation on all matters listed on this proxy, and at their discretion on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

 

See reverse for voting instructions.

 


Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64945
St. Paul, MN 55164-0945
 

  
Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64945
St. Paul, MN 55164-0945

COMPANY #

 

 Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
   
 
Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named
proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if
you
marked, signed, and returned your proxy card.
   
 :  INTERNET – www.eproxy.com/mdu

Use the Internet to vote your proxy until 12:00 p.m.
(CDT) on Monday, April 23, 2012.22, 2013.
   
 (TELEPHONE – 1-800-560-1965

Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until
12:00 p.m. (CDT) on Monday, April 23, 2012.22, 2013.
   
 *MAIL – Mark, sign, and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided, or return it to
MDU Resources Group, Inc., c/o Shareowner Services,
P.O. Box 64873, St. Paul, MN 55164-0873.

 

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not mail your Proxy Card.

     

Please detach here     

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR” all nominees and “FOR” Items 2 and 3.

         
1.Election of directors: Election of Directors:    
 FORAGAINSTABSTAIN FORAGAINSTABSTAIN  FORAGAINSTABSTAIN  FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
      
01.Thomas Everist 06.Thomas C. Knudson Thomas Everistoo 06.Thomas C. Knudsonoo
     
02.Karen B. Fagg 07.Richard H. Lewis Karen B. Faggoo 07.Patricia L. Mossoo
     
03.Terry D. Hildestad 08.Patricia L. Moss David L. Goodinoo 08.Harry J. Pearceoo
     
04.A. Bart Holaday 09.Harry J. Pearce A. Bart Holadayoo 09.J. Kent Wellso
     
05.Dennis W. Johnson 10.John K. Wilson Dennis W. Johnsonoo 10.John K. Wilsonoo

 

2.Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the company’s independent auditors for 2012.2013.oForoAgainstoAbstain
        
3.Advisory vote to approveApproval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the company’s named executive officers.oForoAgainstoAbstain

 

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTEDFOR ALL NOMINEES ANDFOR ITEMS 2 AND 3.

Address Change? Mark box, sign, and indicate changes below:oDate  

  
 

Signature(s) in Box

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on Proxy. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy.